Bug#870125:

[Lumin]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses"

 * Package name: lua-moses
   Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-1
   Upstream Author : Yonaba
 * URL :http://yonaba.github.io/Moses/
 * License : MIT
   Section : interpreters

  It builds those binary packages:

lua-moses  - Utility library for functional programming in Lua

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/lua-moses


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lua-moses/lua-moses_1.6.1+git20170613-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from

http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-1/buildlog

Note, this new packages FIXES an RC bug of another pacakge,
because that package added this package as a new dependency.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870029

  Changes since the last upload:

lua-moses (1.6.1+git20170613-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release. (Closes: #870124)

Bug#864737: marked as done (RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP])

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 30 Jul 2017 04:20:10 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #864737,
regarding RFS: cid/9.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
864737: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864737
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cid"

* Package name: cid
  Version : 9.0-1
  Upstream Author : Eduardo Moraes 
* URL : https://c-i-d.sourceforge.io
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

cid   -  Simple tool to insert and manage Linux stations in an AD domain
cid-base  -  Base files for cid and cid-gtk packages
cid-gtk   -  Graphical tool to insert and manage Linux stations in an AD domain

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/cid


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cid/cid_9.0-1.dsc


Regards,
 Eduardo Moraes
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package cid has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#868544: Debian Bug #868544: RFS (dtksettings) Rejected

[Boyuan Yang]

X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org felixonm...@archlinux.org

在 2017年7月29日星期六 CST 下午6:08:37，Gianfranco Costamagna 写道：
> Seems to have been rejected
> 
> G.

Ack. The package is rejected since pkg-deepin does not exist (yet) on Alioth.

Here is the plan:

* Poke Alioth admins on IRC #alioth and DebConf (with the help of debconf 
attendees) and see when will pkg-deepin be set up.

* Before that, temporarily set packages as self-maintained.

Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#870100: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 29 Jul 2017 22:54:39 +0200
with message-id <20170729205439.jjlhj4w25ldzn...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#870100: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #870100,
regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
870100: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870100
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.2.1-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.2.1-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
  * debian/postinst: removed fallback to init.d script for new standards
version

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 09:28:50PM +0200, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> * Package name: hoteldruid
>   Version : 2.2.1-1

> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   * New upstream release.
>   * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
>   * debian/postinst: removed fallback to init.d script for new standards
> version

I have no means to test the package, but /debian/ changes look obvious and
good.

Uploaded.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ What Would Jesus Do, MUD/MMORPG edition:
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ • multiplay with an admin char to benefit your mortal
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ • abuse item cloning bugs (the five fishes + two breads affair)
⠈⠳⣄ • use glitches to walk on water--- End Message ---

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

[Federico Brega]

On the git server you can find a new commit with all the changes requested.

2017-07-29 19:34 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> * The package now depends on python3
> Which package?
It's both a build dependency and a runtime dependency of "cyclograph"
the main binary package. The cyclograph-qt5 and cyclograph-gtk3 binary
packages depend on cyclograph, so they all depend on python3.
Please take a look at the new changelog and see if this is now clear.
> * The package now uses dh-python in combination with python3-setuptools
> "in combination"?
My understanding is that pybuild, provided by the dh-python package,
needs the setuptools for python3, but, since it cannot know if python2
or python3 is used, the correct B-D has to be manually added.
Please take a look at the new changelog and see if this is now clear.
> * Added cyclograph-qt5 ui
> Not clear that cyclograph-qt5 is a new subpackage.
Ok, last entry in the changelog was about the removal of
cyclograph-qt4, but I can understand that a longer description in the
changelog is more useful.
> * Debhelper compat version updated to 10
> It's "compat level", see debhelper(7).
Sorry for that. I confused the Debhelper version, with the compatibility level.
> * Updated Standards to 4.0.0
> It's "Standards-Version", and it's customary to add "(no change needed)"
> if an upgrade to the new version didn't require anything (I assume you've
> read the upgrade checklist?).
I read the checklist[1] and I didn't find anything to be done.
"(no change needed)" added.
> * Updated gtk to webkit2 version 4.0
> Not clear what is "gtk" here.
This is the "cyclograph-gtk3".
> * Added vcs field to debian/control
> It's not a "vcs" field but Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser.
Modified
> You also didn't mention the switch to pybuild.
Added

 [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt
--
Federico

Bug#870100: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.1-1

[Marco M. F. De Santis]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.2.1-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.2.1-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
  * debian/postinst: removed fallback to init.d script for new standards
version

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 08:08:52PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > And there are other changes (about python for example) that are not listed
> > in the changelog.
> I listed all the changes done to files in the "debian" folder. The
> other changes are
> all made by upstream and, in my understanding, are out of scope from the 
> debian
> changelog.

* The package now depends on python3
Which package?
* The package now uses dh-python in combination with python3-setuptools
"in combination"? 
* Added cyclograph-qt5 ui
Not clear that cyclograph-qt5 is a new subpackage.
* Debhelper compat version updated to 10
It's "compat level", see debhelper(7).
* Updated Standards to 4.0.0
It's "Standards-Version", and it's customary to add "(no change needed)"
if an upgrade to the new version didn't require anything (I assume you've
read the upgrade checklist?).
* Updated gtk to webkit2 version 4.0
Not clear what is "gtk" here.
* Added vcs field to debian/control
It's not a "vcs" field but Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser.

You also didn't mention the switch to pybuild.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#868544: closing 868544

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Seems to have been rejected

G.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#867009: RFS: fzf/0.16.8-2 [ITP]

[Tom Fitzhenry]

Hi Andrey,

Thank you for the feedback.

> The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1.

The latest revision is revision 1.[0]

> Please update to the current Standards-Version.

The latest revision uses Standards-Version 4.0.0, though mentors.debian.net
does not recognise 4.0.0, which I have raised as a bug.[1]

> Please use the priority optional.
Done. The latest revision now has priority optional.

> The .dsc file is wrong: "dpkg-source: error: file
./fzf_0.16.8.orig.tar.gz has size 128895 instead of expected 128889"

I cannot reproduce this. I recall my first release had some problems
relating to how I used pristine-tar, which I fixed, which might have fixed
this size mismatch.

Additionally, I need to update to latest upstream: 0.16.10.

Regards,
Tom Fitzhenry

0. https://mentors.debian.net/package/fzf
1.
https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail=315789_id=100127=413115


On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 at 22:02 Andrey Rahmatullin  wrote:

> The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1.
> Please update to the current Standards-Version.
> Please use the priority optional.
> The .dsc file is wrong: "dpkg-source: error: file ./fzf_0.16.8.orig.tar.gz
> has size 128895 instead of expected 128889".
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
>

Bug#866123: RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1-1 [ITP]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
You don't need DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS and /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk.
The upstream build system ignores CPPFLAGS.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#867009: RFS: fzf/0.16.8-2 [ITP]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

The initial upload should have the debian revision of -1.
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please use the priority optional.
The .dsc file is wrong: "dpkg-source: error: file ./fzf_0.16.8.orig.tar.gz
has size 128895 instead of expected 128889".

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#864944: RFS: zimg/2.5.1-1 [ITP]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch to the debhelper compat level 10.
${shlibs:Depends} for libzimg-examples does nothing and there is a warning
about that in the build log.
Files: src/* doc/* test/* m4/* * should be replaced with just Files: *.
*.la files should not be installed.
You should disable compression for the example files.
test/extra/* should be covered in d/copyright.
The package seems to contain tests but they are not run during the build
process.
Consider providing a symbols file for the lib.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

[Andreas Moog]

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 07:44:59AM -0400, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Andreas Moog wrote:
> 
> > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> 
> I suggest mailing the bug instead, since debian-mentors is subscribed
> to all RFS bugs but RFS bug submitters might be only subscribed to
> their RFS bugs.

Good point, thanks. I bounced my last 2 mails to the bugs they are about.

-- 
PGP-encrypted mails preferred
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#858155: RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

Also, usually the License blocks are put after the Files blocks in
d/copyright.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#858155: RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

[Andrey Rahmatullin]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !

The project license is GPL-2 while debian/copyright says GPL-2+.
Please update to the current Standards-Version.
Please switch tot he debhelper compat level 10.
Otherwise the package seems good.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

[Paul Wise]

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Andreas Moog wrote:

> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org

I suggest mailing the bug instead, since debian-mentors is subscribed
to all RFS bugs but RFS bug submitters might be only subscribed to
their RFS bugs.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Bug#867145: RFS: fancon/0.11.13

[Andreas Moog]

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 05:35:15PM +1000, Hayden Briese wrote:

I'm not a DD, so can't sponsor your package. Here are some comments:

> * Package name: fancon
>   Version : 0.11.13
>   Upstream Author : Hayden Briese (haydenbri...@gmail.com)
> * URL : https://github.com/hbriese/fancon
> * License : Apache Version 2.0
>   Section : utils

1. The package you created is a native package. This generally is only useful 
for software that are specifically targeted for Debian. In this case non-native 
would be the better choice. (See [1] for an explanation of native/non-native)

2. The files README and README.source still contain default text, either remove 
the files or fill them with useful information.

3. debian/fancon-docs.docs: This file is named wrong. Either name it just 
"docs" or "fancon.docs". The part before the ".docs" is the package name it 
applies to and you don't build a package named fancon-docs. (See "man 
dh_installdocs"). Also, the contents are wrong, the man-page has more
information about that as well.

4. debian/manpage.1: That doesn't look useful at all.

5. debian/copyright: the files under the cmake-directory have different 
copyright information, you need to record that as well.

6. debian/rules: Are all the overrides really needed? Then you should document 
why they are there and delete the non-used comments.

7. debian/control: 
   a) Carefully look at the Build-Depends again, some of the packages you 
  specified are already in build-essential so no need to specify them
  again.
   b) The current Standards version is 4.0.0
   c) Consider running "wrap-and-sort" from devscripts to make the 
  Depends/Build-Depends more readable

8. The package doesn't build:
In file included from /<>/src/Controller.hpp:4:0,
 from /<>/src/main.hpp:4,
 from /<>/src/main.cpp:1:
/<>/src/Devices.hpp:18:15: error: 'fancon::FanNV' has not been 
declared using fancon::FanNV;
/<>/src/Devices.hpp:21:15: error: 'fancon::SensorNV' has not been 
declared using fancon::SensorNV;

(Full buildlog at https://warperbbs.de/buildlogs/fancon.build)

Cheers,
  Andreas

[1] 
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F

-- 
PGP-encrypted mails preferred
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#870042: RFS: gsettings-qt/0.1+16.04.20170729-1 [ITP]

[Pino Toscano]

Hi,

I'm not uploading it myself, but there are various things that ought to
be fixed:

a) qtchooser is not needed in Build-Depends, it's an "implementation
   detail"

b) we don't use a "qtdeclarative5-" prefix for QML modules, but
   "qml-module-"

c) seen while building:
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package libgsettings-qt-dev: unknown 
substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}

d) lines like "usr/lib/*/lib*.so*" are way too generic, and they will
   silently adapt to breaking changes like library renaming, or even
   SONAME bump; a way better option is:
   - libfoo1.install: "usr/lib/*/libfoo.so.1" + "usr/lib/*/libfoo.so.1.*"
   - libfoo-dev.install: "usr/lib/*/libfoo.so"

e) the descriptions could be improved:
   - short descriptions don't start with an uppercase letter
   - longer description could say something more...

f) there is no watch file, so upstream does not do releases at all?
   in this case, you need to specify in changelog that you did a new
   upstream snapshot

g) the QML example in the -dev package? that does not seem to logic to
   me, since you would install the QML package to run it, not the -dev
   (which is needed for using the C++ library)

h) all the "Pre-Depends" fields in control should not be needed anymore
   at this point

i) "Format" in copyright should be https now

j) the symbols file needs "Build-Depends-Package:"; also you added an
   entry as mangled (line 35), while the rest of the file is with
   unmangled symbols (and no old commented entries, please)

k) the tests don't seem to be run at all?

l) the package with the QML module could be "Multi-Arch: same", and
   most probably the -dev package too (but needs to be checked)

m) strictly speaking, there is no need to have this under the qt-kde
   umbrella, since you already put it under collab-maint, and the
   prospected users are other packages in the pkg-deepin team;
   collab-maint with you as single maintainer, or pkg-deepin, would
   be better choices IMHO

n) considering (f) above, the patches, and the logs of the upstream
   repository (especially that few names are not Canonical employees
   anymore), I have some doubt whether this software is still
   maintained/fixed/worked on at all, and thus that it would be
   unmaintained code in Debian right from the first upload

That should be enough notes for now; as general recommendation, please
check the build logs, and fix the lintian issues when possible (info
tags included).

-- 
Pino Toscano

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#870042: RFS: gsettings-qt/0.1+16.04.20170729-1 [ITP]

[Boyuan Yang]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: czc...@debian.org debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gsettings-qt".

 * Package name: gsettings-qt
   Version : 0.1+16.04.20170729-1
   Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
 * URL : https://launchpad.net/gsettings-qt
 * License : LGPL-3
   Section : libs


  It builds those binary packages:

 libgsettings-qt-dev - Library to access GSettings from Qt - devel
 libgsettings-qt1 - Library to access GSettings from Qt
 qtdeclarative5-gsettings1.0 - QML Bindings for GSettings

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gsettings-qt

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gsettings-qt/
gsettings-qt_0.1+16.04.20170729-1.dsc

  Alternatively, one can view build status on deb-o-matic amd64:
dget -x http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/debomatic/unstable/pool/
gsettings-qt_0.1+16.04.20170729-1/gsettings-qt_0.1+16.04.20170729-1.dsc

  Git packaging repository can be found on Alioth:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/gsettings-qt.git

  Changes since last upload:

 gsettings-qt (0.1+16.04.20170729-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial Release in Debian. (Closes: #870031)
   * Fix FTBFS problem due to incorrect link path. (LP: #1706682)

Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Bug#869198: RFS: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir/0.0~git20170330.0.e180dbd-1 [ITP]

[Andreas Moog]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:19:20PM +0200, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:

I'm not a DD so can't sponsor your package. Here is a comment:

>  * Package name: golang-github-shibukawa-configdir

Your watch-file seems to be not working:

$ uscan --report
uscan warn: unrecognised option \\
uscan warn: Filename pattern missing version delimiters () without 
filenamemangle in debian/watch, skipping:  
uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?(RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha)[.]?(\d*)$/\$1~\$2\$3/ 
\\
uscan warn: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line
  https://github.com/shibukawa/configdir/tags .*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz

And since on that github-page there aren't any releases, a watchfile doesn't 
seem to be needed and could just be removed?

Cheers,
  Andreas

-- 
PGP-encrypted mails preferred
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature