Bug#874619: RFS: node-acorn-object-spread/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2017-09-07 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-acorn-object-spread" * Package name: node-acorn-object-spread Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Darío Javier Cravero * URL :

Autopkgtest for goocanvas

2017-09-07 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi Mentors, Now that lintian reminds me every time, I feel guilty and I am trying to provide an autopkgtest for goocanvas-2.0. The problem is that my lack of C foo is letting me down. So far (cribbed from other examples on debian codesearch), I have the following skeleton of a smoke test:

Bug#873105: find-file-in-project/5.4.3-1 [ITP]

2017-09-07 Thread Diane Trout
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 09:55 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Diane, > > Welcome to the pkg-emacsen team! :-) Thank you :) > > If sponsoring from git, please use commit b58d0e6 > If sponsoring from mentors, here is the updated link: >

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2017-09-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package libopagent-dev: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends} I: oprofile source: duplicate-short-description libopagent1 libopagent-dev W: oprofile-jit: package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger W: libopagent-dev:

Bug#873105: find-file-in-project/5.4.3-1 [ITP]

2017-09-07 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Diane, Welcome to the pkg-emacsen team! :-) On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:16:03PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > I apparently downloaded from mentors a while ago and had an older > version of your package. > > The package I just built ran its expected tests correctly. > > Also I joined the

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > Anyways, seems like the detect for libxml2 is flawed. Why? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Fabian Klötzl
On 07.09.2017 12:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > Uhmm, yes, I missed this. Adding Build-Depends libxml2-dev helped ... > > Thanks for helping me reading It is always the little things. ☺ Anyways, seems like the detect for libxml2 is flawed. Might be worth opening an issue upstream. Fabian

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:32:59PM +0200, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > On 07.09.2017 12:06, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Uhmm, yes, I missed this. Adding Build-Depends libxml2-dev helped ... > > > > Thanks for helping me reading > > It is always the little things. ☺ > > Anyways, seems like the

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:00:44AM +0200, Fabian Klötzl wrote: > Note that GRAPHML_NAMESPACE_URI is only defined if > > #if HAVE_LIBXML == 1 > > see src/foreign-graphml.c:37. Maybe hoisting it out of that block might > help? Uhmm, yes, I missed this. Adding Build-Depends libxml2-dev helped ...

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Actually, this is the error without the patch: foreign-graphml.c: In function 'igraph_write_graph_graphml': foreign-graphml.c:1408:46: error: expected ')' before 'GRAPHML_NAMESPACE_URI' ret=fprintf(outstream, "\n"); ^ -- WBR, wRAR

Re: Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
You say "not encapsulated in any conditional statement" but that's wrong, it's encapsulated in #if HAVE_LIBXML == 1. Of course this code shouldn't work even without the patch. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Gcc-7 help needed to upgrade r-cran-igraph

2017-09-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi I intended to upgrade r-cran-igraph[1] to the latest upstream version but I stumbled upon a strange issue where a #define statement seems to be ignored by the C prepocessor. At first I assumed that some printf format statement would be the cause which I tried to fix in a patch[2] but it seems

Bug#861394: marked as done (RFS: wcc/0.0.1-1 [ITP] -- a collection of compilation tools to perform binary black magic on the GNU/Linux and other)

2017-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:45:30 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#861394: RFS: wcc/20170424-1 [ITP] -- a collection of compilation tools to perform binary black magic on the GNU/Linux and other has caused the Debian Bug