Bug#882642: RFS: quickcal/1.0 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quickcal" * Package name: quickcal Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : * URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/quickcal/ * License : GPL Section

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 24 novembre 2017 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni >  : > For 8 packages, you can file the bug directly. As for severity, people > may not agree with the interpretation of the policy: CC0 is equivalent

Re: How to find Multi-Arch path(s)

Hi! On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 13:59:40 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> So, how can I canonically (ideally from C) retrieve a sorted list of > >> supported multi arch paths at runtime? Or is

Bug#882568: marked as done (RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:27:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #882568, regarding RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 24 novembre 2017 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni  : >> Any MBF should be discussed first on debian-devel@ first. For me, >> this seems a small violation and it would be preferable to stick with >> severity normal to not appear too agressive. > > Only 8 source

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:21:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 24 novembre 2017 17:48 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni >  : > > > - include the whole CC0 license in debian/copyright > > (this is already uploaded to mentors.d.n); > > - open a bug against base-files

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

❦ 24 novembre 2017 17:48 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni  : >> In d/copyright: you need to include the complete CC0 license. > > OK; I did so based on what other packages were doing, according to > codesearch.d.n [0]. If that's an acceptable solution, I will > - include

FEP Automotive injection Mold-- one of your mold suppliers' choice in the future

Hello Sir, I'm Lily from FEP Mold. How's it going today? Fine very well, i hope. if not, i also would like become your loyal listener. As the head of the mold market, Have you ever concerned your molds' price and quality? or want to find the better

Bug#882568: RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:14:51AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > In d/changelog: you forgot to include the ITP bug number. Thanks for the catch; it seems I had included the ITP number in git (present on my laptop and alioth) but forgot to rebuild before dput... > In d/copyright: you need to

Re: How to find Multi-Arch path(s)

Hi Guillem, thanks for the quick answer. Guillem Jover writes: > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> /usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/iraf > > It that was to be used, then it should be DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH, the > _TARGET_ variants are for canadian

Re: How to find Multi-Arch path(s)

Hi! On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I want to package a software, "iraf" (with extensions) that uses some > system dependent binaries internally. Some of the extensions will be > available in 32 bit only, so this is a good use case for > Multi-Arch. That means, that

How to find Multi-Arch path(s)

Hi, I want to package a software, "iraf" (with extensions) that uses some system dependent binaries internally. Some of the extensions will be available in 32 bit only, so this is a good use case for Multi-Arch. That means, that the binaries will go to /usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/iraf At

Bug#882392: RFS: dmg2img/1.6.7-1 [ITA]

Hi Denys, On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:08:05AM +, Denys Berkovskyy wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmg2img" Excellent, thanks for taking care of this! > Changes since the last upload: > * New upstream version 1.6.6 (Closes: #778827) > * New upstream version 1.6.7 > *