Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread eamanu15 .
El lun., 15 de ene. de 2018 a la(s) 14:38, Paul R. Tagliamonte < paul...@gmail.com> escribió: > Cool. Like I said, I'd try `sbuild -A` -- did that work? > > Paul > Thanks Paul! It work for me! > > > > On Jan 15, 2018 12:34 PM, "eamanu15 ." wrote: > > Hi Paul > > El lun., 15 de ene. de 2018 a l

Bug#887403: RFS: budgie-extras/0.4.0-1

2018-01-15 Thread foss.freedom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-extras" * Package name: budgie-extras Version : 0.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Ubuntu Budgie Developers * URL : https://github.com/ubuntubudgie/budgie-ext

Bug#887362: RFS: flameshot/0.5.0+git20180114-1 [ITP]

2018-01-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:03:56PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > * Package name: flameshot > flameshot - Powerful yet simple-to-use screenshot software While I already uploaded the package to NEW, there's one nitpick I want to report as a wishlist after the package is available. So, in ca

Bug#887369: RFS: libreoffice-style-papirus/20170228-1 [ITP]

2018-01-15 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:02:14PM +0800, Yangfl wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libreoffice-style-papirus" > > * Package name: libreoffice-style-papirus >Upstream Author : Papirus Development Team > * URL : > https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/papi

Bug#887362: marked as done (RFS: flameshot/0.5.0+git20180114-1 [ITP])

2018-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jan 2018 23:12:30 +0100 with message-id <20180115221230.7jhxpwkakjt6a...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#887362: RFS: flameshot/0.5.0+git20180114-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #887362, regarding RFS: flameshot/0.5.0+git20180114-1 [ITP] to be marked as done

Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Le 15 janv. 2018 17:34, "eamanu15 ." a écrit : Hi Paul El lun., 15 de ene. de 2018 a la(s) 12:52, Paul R. Tagliamonte < paul...@gmail.com> escribió: > How are you running sbuild? You need to tell it if you want it to build an > arch:all package with a flag. -A iirc? > I Just run *sbuild *(as i

Re: package review: ddupdate.

2018-01-15 Thread Alec Leamas
On 15/01/18 19:13, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:46:22PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: >> So: Have anyone time to check my package ddupdate[1] for errors or >> mistakes? > The RFS is 1 day old. It's too early to ask. OK. So, what's an appropriate time to wait before asking?

Re: package review: ddupdate.

2018-01-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:46:22PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > Following the checklist for new packages on debian mentors FAQ [2] I'm > approaching the review point: "Ask on the debian-mentors mailing list > for people to check your packaging..." > > So: Have anyone time to check my package ddupda

Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
Cool. Like I said, I'd try `sbuild -A` -- did that work? Paul On Jan 15, 2018 12:34 PM, "eamanu15 ." wrote: Hi Paul El lun., 15 de ene. de 2018 a la(s) 12:52, Paul R. Tagliamonte < paul...@gmail.com> escribió: > How are you running sbuild? You need to tell it if you want it to build an > a

package review: ddupdate.

2018-01-15 Thread Alec Leamas
Dear mentors, Following the checklist for new packages on debian mentors FAQ [2] I'm approaching the review point: "Ask on the debian-mentors mailing list for people to check your packaging..." So: Have anyone time to check my package ddupdate[1] for errors or mistakes? ddupdate is a small pytho

Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread eamanu15 .
Hi Paul El lun., 15 de ene. de 2018 a la(s) 12:52, Paul R. Tagliamonte < paul...@gmail.com> escribió: > How are you running sbuild? You need to tell it if you want it to build an > arch:all package with a flag. -A iirc? > I Just run *sbuild *(as indicated on https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild) from

Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
How are you running sbuild? You need to tell it if you want it to build an arch:all package with a flag. -A iirc? Paul On Jan 15, 2018 10:49 AM, "eamanu15 ." wrote: Dear Mentors, I start to use sbuild to package. So, I use this tutorial for sbuild setup: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild When I

E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread eamanu15 .
Dear Mentors, I start to use sbuild to package. So, I use this tutorial for sbuild setup: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild When I run sbuild, I have the next error: *E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list or does not match any arch wildcards: all -- skipping* I don't find a solution for the problem on int

Re: E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list

2018-01-15 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:10:19PM +, eamanu15 . wrote: > Dear Mentors, Original post was to d-boot@l.d.o. ( now in BCC ) > > I start to use sbuild to package. So, I use this tutorial for sbuild setup: > https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild > > When I run sbuild, I have the next error: *E: dsc

Bug#887369: RFS: libreoffice-style-papirus/20170228-1 [ITP]

2018-01-15 Thread Yangfl
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libreoffice-style-papirus" * Package name: libreoffice-style-papirus Version : 20170228-1 Upstream Author : Papirus Development Team * URL : https://github.co

Bug#887362: RFS: flameshot/0.5.0+git20180114-1 [ITP]

2018-01-15 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: sz...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flameshot". * Package name: flameshot Version : 0.5.0+git20180114-1 Upstream Author : lupoDharkael * URL : https://github.com/

Re: ITA: pygithub/1.35-1

2018-01-15 Thread eamanu15 .
Hello everybody, Paul, Geert and Ghislain thanks for yours feedback. I am working now with sbuild and I will packaging and will send it again to mentors.debian. I am using this tutorial for sbuild setup: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild But I have this error: *E: dsc: amd64 not in arch list or doe

Bug#887356: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.3-1

2018-01-15 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-admin" * Package name: nautilus-admin Version : 1.1.3-1 Upstream Author : Bruno Nova * URL : https://github.com/brunonova/nautilus-admin * Licens