Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Am 28. Februar 2018 05:53:31 MEZ schrieb Yangfl : >2018-02-28 2:30 GMT+08:00 Tobias Frost : >> Homework: >> - please manually remove the package from mentors. (as it has to pass >NEW) > >IIRC the package will be auto-removed, isn't it? After being accepted,

Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

2018-02-28 2:30 GMT+08:00 Tobias Frost : > Homework: > - please manually remove the package from mentors. (as it has to pass NEW) IIRC the package will be auto-removed, isn't it? > Future uploads: > - please add a dep3 header to the patch. > - there are tons of depereciation

Bug#889515: Review of persepolis

Dear Julien, Thanks for reviewing my package. It was really helpful. I fixed some of the mentioned issues and uploaded a new package to mentors.debian.net. There are still the following issues which I cannot fix: no-upstream-changelog - Because there isn't any upstream changelog.

Bug#890878: RFS: company-irony

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:43:51PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Feb 26 2018, Alberto Luaces wrote: > > > I have refreshed those fields. I have not still refreshed the > > changelog date in order to wait for more potential changes. > > Thanks for fixing this. > > I'm not in

Re: Package EOL checklist

Thanks all for your help and advises. That's perfect! I'll have a look into it. :) Joseph

Bug#890681: marked as done (RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:02:10 -0500 with message-id

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Does it have revdeps or not? If it does, you can't just remove it. If it > doesn't, I'd say don't maintain libs which no one needs. There is one reverse dependency: $ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -s unstable -Rn libmrss ...

Bug#890814: marked as done (RFS: anosql/0.2.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:21:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: anosql/0.2.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #890814, regarding RFS: anosql/0.2.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:20:49 -0800, Joseph Herlant wrote: > 5. Once there is no more package depending on yours (probably after a > few months), ask the ftp masters to remove the package from testing > and unstable via a mail to their list. "From unstable" (it will be removed automatically from

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:47:04AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Please update the Vcs fields and I'll sponsor the update. > > Also, it would be good for you to add a redirect at > https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/AliothRewriter I've updated the Vcs URLs, added a merge request for AliothRewriter,

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:20:49AM -0800, Joseph Herlant wrote: > > Yes, this needs to be done. > > > Thanks for your answer. > So is the list I was putting in my initial mail correct for this use case? > > 3. Open bugs on all depending packages (including those who use it as > build

Re: Package EOL checklist

> Yes, this needs to be done. Thanks for your answer. So is the list I was putting in my initial mail correct for this use case? 3. Open bugs on all depending packages (including those who use it as build dependencies) to have them switch to something else. 4. Open a bug for your package

Bug#873094: marked as done (RFS: granite/0.5+ds-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 19:30:19 +0100 with message-id <20180227183018.gd29...@coldtobi.de> and subject line Re: Bug#873094: RFS: granite/0.4.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #873094, regarding RFS: granite/0.5+ds-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi, just to avoid a dead-lock: you're still working on the package, nothing to review atm? Just let us know (and remove the moreinfo tag as sign) when ready for the next round of review. (I'd like to avoid reviewing when not everything has been implemented) -- tobi On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at

Bug#890803: marked as done (RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.6-1 -- Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:46:37 +0100 with message-id <1519753597.5023.0.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.6-1 -- Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator has caused the Debian Bug report #890803, regarding RFS: pokemmo-installer/1.4.6-1 --

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:32:52AM -0800, Joseph Herlant wrote: > * libmrss has received no upstream commit over the last 10 years and > the author confirmed that he won't touch it anymore. I'm fine > continuing to maintain the packaging part it's a very easy one! :) I > was just wondering if

Re: Package EOL checklist

Hi guys, Thanks for your answers. > A project stopping development is not a reason to delete the package from > the distro. Hence no docs. My bad, I thought it was a best practice after a few years without maintenance to do that. Sorry :\ > The first step when asking questions should always be

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Hello Ansgar >This means building the package will give different results depending >on dietlibc-dev installed or not? That shouldn't happen... > >Please check via some other means that a build using dietlibc has been >requested; don't do different things just because a package happens to >be

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Jason Crain wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:27:54AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Oops, It looks like I have to be an Owner. > > I don't have the option to set you to Owner. Looks like Master is the > highest I can set the permission

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:27:54AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Oops, It looks like I have to be an Owner. I don't have the option to set you to Owner. Looks like Master is the highest I can set the permission to.

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:20:19AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Jason Crain wrote: > > I would like it to use the Debian namespace but I can't move it myself. > > Is there a way to transfer it? > > Sure. Could you make me (jbicha) a

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Jason Crain wrote: >> I would like it to use the Debian namespace but I can't move it myself. >> Is there a way to transfer it? > > Sure. Could you make me

Bug#891643: RFS: inkscape-open-symbols/1.2.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "inkscape-open-symbols". Download with dget: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inkscape-open-symbols/inkscape-open-symbols_1.2.1-2.dsc Or

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Jason Crain wrote: > I would like it to use the Debian namespace but I can't move it myself. > Is there a way to transfer it? Sure. Could you make me (jbicha) a Master on the project and I can transfer it? Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#890681: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.8-1 -- GObject-based wrapper around the Exiv2 library

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:07:05PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > I see you updated your VCS from > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/gexiv2.git > to > https://salsa.debian.org/jcrain-guest/gexiv2 > > Do you want this project to use the Debian namespace instead? >

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:58 +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > Anyhow, if you want to enable, you can do something like this, to > make > > me and you happy, and then easily revert when new bugs are opened > > > HAVE_DIETLIBC=no > ifeq ($(shell dpkg -s dietlibc-dev | grep -o

Bug#891005: RFS: gdbm/1.14.1-5

Hello. > Anyhow, if you want to enable, you can do something like this, to make > me and you happy, and then easily revert when new bugs are opened HAVE_DIETLIBC=no ifeq ($(shell dpkg -s dietlibc-dev | grep -o installed), installed) DIET_LIBDIR := $(shell diet

Bug#891478: marked as done (RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-3)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:28:05 +0200 with message-id <20180227102805.GA27988@localhost> and subject line Re: Bug#891478: RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #891478, regarding RFS: gnustep-back/0.26.2-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#891132: marked as done (RFS: python-meshio/1.11.7-1)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:45:27 +0100 with message-id <20180227094527.ad4qssrl2szho...@villemot.name> and subject line Re: RFS: python-meshio/1.11.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #891132, regarding RFS: python-meshio/1.11.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Re: Package EOL checklist

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Did I miss a step? The first step when asking questions should always be to include details so that we know what we are talking about. > I have a package that is not maintained by upstream anymore and I was trying > to find some sort of