Bug#894071: RFS: gemmlowp/0~20180308-gf59a96b-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gemmlowp" * Package name: gemmlowp Version : 0~20180308-gf59a96b-1 Upstream Author : google * URL : https://github.com/google/gemmlowp * License

Bug#894048: marked as done (RFS: urlwatch/2.9-1)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:58:22 +0200 with message-id <20180325195822.j42wsahbbfboo...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#894048: RFS: urlwatch/2.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #894048, regarding RFS: urlwatch/2.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#893503: marked as done (RFS: mailfilter/0.8.6-3 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:51:25 +0200 with message-id <20180325195125.ez6ihndkpunao...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#893503: RFS: mailfilter/0.8.6-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #893503, regarding RFS: mailfilter/0.8.6-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#892627: marked as done (RFS: flameshot/0.5.1-3~bpo9+1)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:38:21 +0200 with message-id <20180325193821.7f66y45zszttn...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#892627: RFS: flameshot/0.5.1-3~bpo9+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #892627, regarding RFS: flameshot/0.5.1-3~bpo9+1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#894048: RFS: urlwatch/2.9-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" * Package name: urlwatch Version : 2.9-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ * License

Bug#894024: marked as done (RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-1)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 21:12:22 +0200 with message-id <20180325191222.42tbmmuh4pcwo...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#894024: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #894024, regarding RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#894023: marked as done (RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-3 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:37:21 +0200 with message-id <20180325183721.nu63mwgtgndpm...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#894023: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #894023, regarding RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-3 [RC] to be marked as done. This

Bug#894021: marked as done (RFS: cenon.app/4.0.6+ds1-2 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:27:01 +0200 with message-id <20180325182701.typjaomydwsax...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#894021: RFS: cenon.app/4.0.6+ds1-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #894021, regarding RFS: cenon.app/4.0.6+ds1-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#893979: marked as done (RFS: pikopixel.app/1.0-b9a-2)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:16:16 +0200 with message-id <20180325181616.n3b37ynadljsa...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#893979: RFS: pikopixel.app/1.0-b9a-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #893979, regarding RFS: pikopixel.app/1.0-b9a-2 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#884697: Progress

> PS: I just saw that you prefixed your branches with cgzones... > That means that I can just do the fixes without stepping on your toes.. > So I've now imported all previous versions into the repository under the > non-prefixed naming scheme. Thanks for importing the history and applying my

Bug#893503: RFS: mailfilter/0.8.6-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #893503 Any one here to sponsor my package? It is announced that mailfilter 0.8.6-2 will be removed from testing. 0.8.8-3 fixes the caused RC-bug, though. Thanks Elimar -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT

Bug#893349: RFS: deepin-screen-recorder/2.7.3-1 [ITP]

On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 12:07:49 +0100 Geert Stappers wrote: > It says > Source Code Location: > https://github.com/manateelazycat/deepin-screen-recorder > The link is outdated and is hosted by one of Deepin's employee. For official mirror please view

Bug#894024: RFS: highwayhash/0~20180209-g14dedec-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash" * Package name: highwayhash Version : 0~20180209-g14dedec-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of

Bug#884697: Progress

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 02:33:54PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > However, it is missing the packaging history (it should have been imported > using git-build-package's import-dscs --debsnap) > Do you mind to recreate it (I can also do it, just let me know) PS: I just saw that you prefixed your

Bug#894023: RFS: lynkeos.app/2.10+dfsg1-3 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "lynkeos.app". * Package name: lynkeos.app Version : 2.10+dfsg1-3 Upstream Author : Jean-Etienne Lamiaud * URL : http://lynkeos.sf.net * License :

Bug#884697: Progress

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:24:44PM +0100, Christian Göttsche wrote: > There is now a salsa project for logrotate: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logrotate > > I also pushed my current packaging progress of version 3.14.0 to the > branch cgzones_master. Thanks! However, it is missing the

Bug#893986: RFS: spi-tools/0.8.1-1 [ITP]

Hi, On Sun, 25 Mar 2018 09:28:33 +0200 Geert Stappers wrote: ... > | $ dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spi-tools/spi-tools_0.8.1-1.dsc > ... > | spi-tools_0.8.1-1.dsc: > | dscverify: spi-tools_0.8.1-1.dsc failed signature check: > | gpg: WARNING:

Bug#894021: RFS: cenon.app/4.0.6+ds1-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cenon.app". * Package name: cenon.app Version : 4.0.6+ds1-2 Upstream Author : Cenon GmbH * URL : http://cenon.info * License : CenPL Section

Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 08:06:13PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Hi, > > uploaded the package. I've to make up my mind about the kind of linux > > specific > > arch all packaging stuff. > > > > Sven > > Thank

Bug#893377: RFS: taptempo/1.2.1-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 +moreinfo Hi François, Several questions about your package: 1. Why is the package on mentors newer than that on github repo? Could you please keep the packaging repo up-to-date? https://github.com/moleculext/taptempo 2. Where is your public key? no

Bug#886827: RFS: youtube-dl-gui/0.4-1 [ITP]

Hi Félix, I'm sure youtube-dl is working when invoked from command line for downloading an youtube video. However youtube-dl-gui doesn't work with the same URL. I got this from youtube-dl-gui's log, and it seems to be the reason why youtube-dlg doesn't work for me: [Sun Mar 25 07:35:30 2018]

Bug#893986: RFS: spi-tools/0.8.1-1 [ITP]

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 10:48:58PM +, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spi-tools" > > * Package name: spi-tools > * URL : https://github.com/cpb-/spi-tools > * License : GPLv2 > > It builds those binary packages: > > spi-tools