Bug#899429: RFS: ddnet/11.1.8-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddnet" * Package name: ddnet Version : 11.1.8-1 Upstream Author : Dennis Felsing * URL : http://ddnet.tw/ * License : zlib (code), CC-BY-SA 3.0 (data) Section : games It builds those binary packages: ddnet - Teeworlds modification with a unique cooperative gameplay ddnet-data - Data for DDNet ddnet-server - Server for DDNet ddnet-tools - Tools for DDNet To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/ddnet Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * Temporarily bundle icon font since it uses Unicode private area Regards, Yangfl
Bug#898655: marked as done (RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC])
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 22:19:01 +0200 with message-id <20180523201901.uewmlunpolu2f...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898655: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #898655, regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 898655: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898655 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch" * Package name: speedcrunch Version : 0.12.0-4 Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others * URL : http://speedcrunch.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : math It builds those binary packages: speedcrunch - High precision calculator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/speedcrunch Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/speedcrunch/speedcrunch_0.12.0-4.dsc Changes since the last upload: * d/control: - update VCS-* urls - bump Standards-Version - use python3-sphinx instead of python-sphinx * d/compat: bump debhelper compat version to 10 * d/patches, d/rules: build the HTML manual in a separate step - Rebuilding the HTML manual during the build has proven fragile. Instead, the manual is now built in a separate step and the application build is pointed at the result of that build. - Closes: #897531 --- In addition to some housekeeping, a change in... CMake? Qt? -- caused an FTBFS. Instead of working around it, we changed the build process so that building the HTML manual is now a separate step. This should be more robust, but it makes d/rules a bit more complicated. I'm not sure I used the dh_auto_* targets in the best possible fashion there. Upstream bug: https://bitbucket.org/heldercorreia/speedcrunch/issues/830/build-with-drebuild_manual-fails-on-debian Regards, Felix --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:51:33PM +0200, Felix Krull wrote: > * Package name: speedcrunch > Version : 0.12.0-4 > Changes since the last upload: > > * d/control: > - update VCS-* urls > - bump Standards-Version > - use python3-sphinx instead of python-sphinx > * d/compat: bump debhelper compat version to 10 > * d/patches, d/rules: build the HTML manual in a separate step > - Rebuilding the HTML manual during the build has proven fragile. > Instead, > the manual is now built in a separate step and the application build > is > pointed at the result of that build. > - Closes: #897531 > In addition to some housekeeping, a change in... CMake? Qt? -- caused an > FTBFS. Instead of working around it, we changed the build process so that > building the HTML manual is now a separate step. This should be more > robust, but it makes d/rules a bit more complicated. I'm not sure I used > the dh_auto_* targets in the best possible fashion there. While it is vital that things are built from source, it doesn't matter how you do it. Building stuff during configure rather than compile is a bit strange, but there's no non-philosophical reason to avoid doing so. Thus... it's ok. Uploaded. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: ⠈⠳⣄ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall--- End Message ---
Bug#899188: marked as done (RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1)
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:34:03 +0200 with message-id <20180523193403.6jtqxfgoyojvl...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#899188: RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #899188, regarding RFS: urlwatch/2.11-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 899188: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: p...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch" * Package name: urlwatch Version : 2.11-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ * License : BSD-3-clause Section : web It builds those binary packages: urlwatch - tool for monitoring webpages for updates To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/urlwatch Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/urlwatch/ urlwatch_2.11-1.dsc More information about urlwatch can be obtained from https://github.com/thp/urlwatch. Changes since the last upload: urlwatch (2.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Updated patches to new upstream sources * Removed trailing spaces * Removed X-Python3-Version per Lintian rule ancient-python-version-field * Updated Standards-Version to 4.1.4 Regards, Maxime Werlen --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Maxime Werlen wrote: > * Package name: urlwatch >Version : 2.11-1 > urlwatch (2.11-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release > * Updated patches to new upstream sources > * Removed trailing spaces > * Removed X-Python3-Version per Lintian rule ancient-python-version-field > * Updated Standards-Version to 4.1.4 ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: ⠈⠳⣄ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall--- End Message ---
Bug#898975: marked as done (RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2)
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:27:52 +0200 with message-id <20180523192752.sdamjtbdwoaoi...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898975: RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #898975, regarding RFS: lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 898975: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898975 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: ti...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-moses": * Package name: lua-moses Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-2 Upstream Author : * URL : * License : MIT Section : interpreters The package can be obtained here: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/lua-moses which has passed all the tests of debomatic-amd64: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/lua-moses/1.6.1+git20170613-2/buildlog Changes since the last upload: lua-moses (1.6.1+git20170613-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Packaging repo was moved to Science Team (Salsa). + Update Vcs-* fields accordingly. * Maintainer is now Science Team. Move myself to Uploaders. + Move myself to Uploaders. * Install guide docs. + Register the docs in doc-base. * Add support for lua 5.3 + Also lua5.3 tests in autopkgtest control file. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no changes). * Mark the package as Multi-Arch: foreign because it contains no arch-dep file. signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 05:45:49AM +, Lumin wrote: > * Package name: lua-moses >Version : 1.6.1+git20170613-2 > Changes since the last upload: > > lua-moses (1.6.1+git20170613-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Packaging repo was moved to Science Team (Salsa). > + Update Vcs-* fields accordingly. > * Maintainer is now Science Team. Move myself to Uploaders. > + Move myself to Uploaders. > * Install guide docs. > + Register the docs in doc-base. > * Add support for lua 5.3 > + Also lua5.3 tests in autopkgtest control file. > * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no changes). > * Mark the package as Multi-Arch: foreign because it contains no > arch-dep file. ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: ⠈⠳⣄ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall--- End Message ---
Bug#897964: marked as done (RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1)
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 21:21:15 +0200 with message-id <20180523192115.crbcvappgdx2r...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#897964: RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #897964, regarding RFS: uriparser/0.8.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 897964: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=897964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uriparser" Package name: uriparser Version : 0.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Sebastian Pipping URL : https://github.com/uriparser/uriparser License : BSD-3-clause, LGPL-2.1+, GPL-3+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: liburiparser-dev - development files for uriparser liburiparser-doc - documentation files for uriparser liburiparser1 - URI parsing library compliant with RFC 3986 To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/uriparser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uriparser/uriparser_0.8.5-1.dsc or from git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/uriparser.git?h=release%2Fdebian%2F0.8.5-1 Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #893316). - Refresh symbols file. - Refresh debian/copyright. - Rewrite debian/upstream/metadata. * Remove trailing whitespaces: - debian/changelog - debian/control - debian/rules * Migrate to debhelper 11: - Change debian/compat to 11. - Bump minimum debhelper version in debian/control to >= 11. - Remove dh-autoreconf from Build-Depends. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4 (No changes needed). * Change to my new email address: - debian/control - debian/copyright * New README.source to explain the branching model used. * debian/rules: - Switch to $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION). Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst - -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype:joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEY+AHX8jUOrs1qzDuCfifPIyh0l0FAlrtbuoACgkQCfifPIyh 0l0/cxAA1Oe6PA3W4p/YuftMYYxjuCurHWrJOU4iK/351G2L1DSY6mCOdhqdBp8a gFHX+jzIPv10SNnY+Z34/DZUCMhr+ocd4jT678h0ECuclz9OLaKu6Hk3elh+mRUH Mhnk1e94jPhFhFdZwZ1Kv2HyklhNONIqvDNu/8vgrC7ZJhXvT/x1DaPVAI1jov5B r9pWQqEjkBLLbli9Jp0btO6oW7pEOgIGGxnxo1FLqcWTNTciGrPWviPpzk95OO8y l16xfNR+Sur88tcR3PYrrF9rUzrupUCt/j4ZUG8jN+lCzsgej5NcYtb8GgttIU29 NGxZd/jVp1n2m5MRaj3WMEV1PA6FiTN+q3DQ3YT2kgmwVK6Qwq8Lqfrh3IW8gzGe z+KnkwOo9k8BqdD4w9ak/lgIUi+pKnJf6xQKH3OddpBJJRcEphf1o00/+TZEiAtY TeaAqKSh6+ix4lBb6wG+VFqq+aHvIUK9v8o64Y63q9VTo9cfR9g72IVRtH2kYUCy y+AiGA94LlI+NcyiIqBpme9bZ95HynsfkEMyFTNUVqYrkLdXRIbp+e/Qlmd7V+0E BMxS7+xF+eYyTWo37rhX6I7edZRrk1lS0yMML1w60QfP+f49rM7Zj/8KzSuCcmRm kKHNX+bHCaL3bUZX5MKLjE3SR2C3ABIjrteO3ujark4S2becDUQ= =5qDG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: >Package name: uriparser >Version : 0.8.5-1 > Changes since the last upload: > > * New upstream release (Closes: #893316). > - Refresh symbols file. > - Refresh debian/copyright. > - Rewrite debian/upstream/metadata. > * Remove trailing whitespaces: > - debian/changelog > - debian/control > - debian/rules > * Migrate to debhelper 11: > - Change debian/compat to 11. > - Bump minimum debhelper version in debian/control to >= 11. > - Remove dh-autoreconf from Build-Depends. > * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4 (No changes needed). > * Change to my new email address: > - debian/control > - debian/copyright > * New README.source to explain the branching model used. > * debian/rules: > - Switch to $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION). Uploaded. I assume the symbols that have been removed were never supposed to be public, and t
Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]
Hello, I have updated odp & odp-dpdk packages on mentors.d.n. 2018-05-06 3:56 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : > I will make my next upload use alternatives, thank you. This upload uses alternatives to select ODP library to be used. >> * move all the executables to /usr/bin. Their name starts with odp_, so >> I don't expect them to pollute the public name space. Putting these >> test programs in a private directory just makes it hard to find and >> use them. > > This looks logical to me. I will move some (usefull) programs to /usr/bin > and will drop the rest of them. I have moved several executables to /usr/bin and removed the rest of them. This upload does not have manpages for those binaries, I will fix that in the next upload. >>> > 11. Why is dh_auto_test overrode to empty? >>> >>> We had issues with make check before, they interacted strangely with >>> build environment, that is why it is disabled for now. I plan to >>> reenable it later. >> >> How strange is it? And what happend during the test? >> >> As per policy, network access during the build is not availble. If this >> is the cause of test problem, we can omit the test part. However, we >> should still write the tests in the override_dh_auto_test target, if our >> user want to test it somehow. > > Some of the validation scripts are trying to create/remove network > interfaces. > >> override_dh_auto_test: >> -test_binary >> >> This should be ok. > > Ack This is not fixed yet. Also will be fixed in the next upload. Could you please review alternatives system, so that I can be sure that I've used them correctly? -- With best wishes Dmitry
Bug#867731: marked as done (RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 16:30:07 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #867731, regarding RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 867731: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867731 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smart-mode-line". Smart-mode-line has a really nice right-indentation and display truncated path function with substitutions (eg: ~/.emacs.d -> :ED:), and many other neat features. Package name: smart-mode-line Version : 2.10.1-1 Upstream Author : Artur Malabarba URL : https://github.com/Malabarba/smart-mode-line License : GPL-2+ Section : lisp It builds these binary packages: elpa-smart-mode-line - Powerful and beautiful mode-line for Emacs elpa-smart-mode-line-powerline-theme - Smart-mode-line theme that mimics the powerline appearance To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/smart-mode-line Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smart-mode-line/smart-mode-line_2.10.1-1.dsc Alternatively, clone from here: git clone git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/smart-mode-line.git Thank you, Nicholas -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package smart-mode-line version 2.11.0-1 is in NEW now, and the package at mentors is not newer (2018-05-22) than the package in NEW (2018-05-22), so there is currently no package to sponsor. https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/smart-mode-line_2.11.0-1.html https://mentors.debian.net/package/smart-mode-line Please remove the package from mentors or mark it "needs sponsor = no". If for some reason you need to replace the package in NEW, then you can upload an updated package to mentors and feel free to reopen this RFS 867731 or open a new RFS.--- End Message ---
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Problem with lintian error symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision
Hi Andreas, On 05/23/2018 12:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a symbols file for libseqlib version 1.1.1+dfsg since I > suspected an ABI change by upstream. A test build with this symbols > file went fine without lintian errors. I upgraded to libseqlib version > 1.1.2 which in fact had an ABI change[2]. I have upgraded the symbols > file accordingly[3]. When I build this package I get: > > E: libseqlib1: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on > symbol > _ZN12aho_corasick10basic_trieIcE10parse_textENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE@Base > and 433 others > I wonder whether I'm missing something but this smeels like a wrong > lintian warning to me since the Debian revision "-1" was stripped from > the diff. To be sure to not create noise for lintian in BTS I'd like > to have a second pair of eyeballs on this symbols file. I guess you also need to bump the library version in the first line of symbols file: s/libseqlib.so.0/libseqlib.so.1/ Best regards, Alex
Bug#898551: marked as done (RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1)
Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2018 12:08:39 +0200 with message-id <20180523100839.rd54aauw3qp6o...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#898551: RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #898551, regarding RFS: libsml/0.1.1+git20180125-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 898551: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898551 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsml" * Package name: libsml Version : 0.1.1+git20180125-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsml-dev - Header files for libSML libsml1- Library for the Smart Messaging Language (SML) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsml Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libsml/libsml_0.1.1+git20180125-1.dsc Or from salsa: git clone https://salsa.debian.org/amoog-guest/libsml.git Changes since the last upload: libsml (0.1.1+git20180125-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release * Update VCS-Uri to salsa * Install pkg-config file to multiarch directory * Use dh-compat level 11 * Declare compliance with Policy 4.1.4 * Update copyright years * Use uscan and Files-Excluded instead of get-orig-source * Add gitlab CI -- Andreas Moog Sun, 13 May 2018 10:27:20 +0200 Regards, Andreas Moog -- PGP-encrypted mails preferred PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624 signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 03:20:39PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: > * Package name: libsml > Version : 0.1.1+git20180125-1 > libsml (0.1.1+git20180125-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream release > * Update VCS-Uri to salsa > * Install pkg-config file to multiarch directory > * Use dh-compat level 11 > * Declare compliance with Policy 4.1.4 > * Update copyright years > * Use uscan and Files-Excluded instead of get-orig-source > * Add gitlab CI ✓ -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ .globl _start↵.data↵rc: .ascii "/etc/init.d/rcS\0"↵.text↵_start ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ mov $57,%rax↵syscall↵cmp $0,%rax↵jne child↵parent:↵mov $61,%rax ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ mov $-1,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall↵jmp parent↵child: ⠈⠳⣄ mov $59,%rax↵mov $rc,%rdi↵xor %rsi,%rsi↵xor %rdx,%rdx↵syscall--- End Message ---
Problem with lintian error symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision
Hi, I've created a symbols file for libseqlib version 1.1.1+dfsg since I suspected an ABI change by upstream. A test build with this symbols file went fine without lintian errors. I upgraded to libseqlib version 1.1.2 which in fact had an ABI change[2]. I have upgraded the symbols file accordingly[3]. When I build this package I get: E: libseqlib1: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol _ZN12aho_corasick10basic_trieIcE10parse_textENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE@Base and 433 others N: N:Debian revisions should be stripped from versions in symbols files. Not N:doing so leads to dependencies unsatisfiable by backports (1.0-1~bpo << N:1.0-1 while 1.0-1~bpo >= 1.0). If the Debian revision can't be stripped N:because the symbol really appeared between two specific Debian N:revisions, you should postfix the version with a single "~" (example: N:1.0-3~ if the symbol appeared in 1.0-3). N: N:This problem normally means that the symbols were added automatically by N:dpkg-gensymbols. dpkg-gensymbols uses the full version number for the N:dependency associated to any new symbol that it detects. The maintainer N:must update the debian/.symbols file by adding the new symbols N:with the corresponding upstream version. N: N:Severity: important, Certainty: certain N: N:Check: shared-libs, Type: binary, udeb N: I wonder whether I'm missing something but this smeels like a wrong lintian warning to me since the Debian revision "-1" was stripped from the diff. To be sure to not create noise for lintian in BTS I'd like to have a second pair of eyeballs on this symbols file. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libseqlib/blob/23e6ae31d0155b6b5011aabdc3944b695ed79986/debian/libseqlib0.symbols [2] https://github.com/walaj/SeqLib/issues/24 [3] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libseqlib/commit/b8991175a61613622bf9776a296967740db74057 -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#867731: RFS: smart-mode-line/2.11.0-1 [ITP]
tags 867731 + pending thanks Nicholas, > If you have time, would you please sponsor this one too? Done. > […] FYI, there is really no need for lengthy explanations, descriptions of the changes and your history with the package here. Indeed, please redirect that effort — if any — into putting documentation into the package itself (changelog?); the comments on this RFS are essentially ephemeral and thus seems a misdirection of well-intentioned effort. Linking directly to the .dsc would be helpful from my point of view, however. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-