Bug#901134: marked as done (RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP])

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:28:25 +0800
with message-id 

and subject line Android modules are built as in-tree modules since kernel 
4.17.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #901134,
regarding RFS: anbox-modules/0.0~git20180608-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
901134: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901134
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Lamb 

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anbox-modules"

 * Package name: anbox-modules
   Version : 0.0~git20180608-1
   Upstream Author : Simon Fels 
 * URL : https://github.com/anbox/anbox-modules/
 * License : GPL-2
   Section : kernel

  It builds those binary packages:

anbox-modules-dkms - Android kernel driver (binder, ashmem) in DKMS format

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/anbox-modules


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/anbox-modules/anbox-modules_0.0~git20180608-1.dsc

Regards,
Shengjing Zhu


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Android modules are built as in-tree modules since kernel 4.17.3
Please see  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=901492
Hence, I'm closing these two bugs.

-- 
Best regards,
Shengjing Zhu--- End Message ---


Bug#902967: RFS: ddnet/11.2.1-1

2018-07-03 Thread Yangfl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddnet"

 * Package name: ddnet
   Version : 11.2.1-1
   Upstream Author : Dennis Felsing
 * URL : http://ddnet.tw/
 * License : zlib (code), CC-BY-SA 3.0 (data)
   Section : games

It builds those binary packages:

  ddnet - Teeworlds modification with a unique cooperative gameplay
 ddnet-data - Data for DDNet
 ddnet-server - Server for DDNet
 ddnet-tools - Tools for DDNet

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/ddnet


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/ddnet/ddnet_11.2.1-2.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release


Regards,
 Yangfl



Bug#902494: marked as done (RFS: libplist/2.0.0-4 [QA])

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:33:02 +0200
with message-id <20180703233302.dcjuh4hlzlcmh...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#902494: RFS: libplist/2.0.0-4 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #902494,
regarding RFS: libplist/2.0.0-4 [QA]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: sunwea...@debian.org

Dear Mike and mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for package "libplist" as a QA upload.

Besides, I am looking for a DD to help creating a git repository under Salsa's
Debian group and grant me (hosiet-guest) a Master role so that I could push
the changes onto the git repo.

 * Package name: libplist
   Version : 2.0.0-4
   Upstream Author : Nikias Bassen  and others
 * URL : https://github.com/libimobiledevice/libplist/
 * License : LGPL-2.1+
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

 libplist++-dev - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists
 libplist++3v5 - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists
 libplist-dev - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists
 libplist-doc - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists - docs
 libplist-utils - Apple property list converter
 libplist3  - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists
 python-plist - Library for handling Apple binary and XML property lists

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libplist


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libplist/libplist_2.0.0-4.dsc

  Git packaging repository (proposed, not exist yet):

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libplist.git

  Git packaging repository (temporary, will be removed after upload):

https://salsa.debian.org/hosiet-guest/libplist.git

  Changes since the last upload:

 libplist (2.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4.
   * Bump debhelper compat to v11.
   * debian/control:
 - Drop unnecessary build dependency dh-autoreconf.
 - Drop -dbg package to achieve -dbgsym migration.
 + Mark Multi-Arch information according to M-A Hints:
   + libplist-doc: M-A: foreign
   + libplist++-dev: M-A: same
   + libplist-dev: M-A: same
   + python-plist: M-A: same
 + Update Vcs fields with git repo under Salsa Debian group.
 + Use Breaks + Replaces instead of Conflicts + Replaces
   for package replacement.
   * debian/compat: Update accordingly.
   * debian/copyright: Update information accordingly.
   * debian/patches: Refresh patches.
   * debian/pycompat: Removed. (lintian tag "debian-pycompat-is-obsolete")
   * debian/rules:
 + Enable full hardening.
 + Use "dh_missing --fail-missing".
 + Update dh_strip invocation for dbgsym migration.
 + Force non-parallel build to circumvent failure in tests.
   * d/p/0003-bplist-Prevent-store-to-misaligned-address-when-writ.patch:
 Backport upstream patch.

Side note: I'm not sure why I often encounter with random test failures
caused by parallel build (parallel tests) while others basically cannot
reproduce. Might be a problem on my side or some flaws in upstream build
system. Anyway, forcing --no-parallel solves FTBFS.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:03:03PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Besides, I am looking for a DD to help creating a git repository under Salsa's
> Debian group and grant me (hosiet-guest) a Master role so that I could push
> the changes onto the git repo.

Done.  I even copied in your repo this time, for a change.

>  * Package name: libplist
>Version : 2.0.0-4

>  libplist (2.0.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* QA upload.
>* Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
>* Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4.
>* Bump debhelper compat to v11.
>* debian/control:
>  - Drop unnecessary build dependency dh-autoreconf.
>  - Drop -dbg package to achieve -dbgsym migration.
>  + Mark Multi-Arch information according to M-A Hints:
>+ libplist-doc: M-A: foreign
>+ libplist++-dev: M-A: same
>+ libplist-dev: M-A: same
>  

Bug#902486: marked as done (RFS: node-macaddress/0.2.9-1)

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 00:57:15 +0200
with message-id <20180703225715.6percm7wn45za...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#902486: RFS: node-macaddress/0.2.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #902486,
regarding RFS: node-macaddress/0.2.9-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902486: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902486
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: sunwea...@debian.org pkg-javascript-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org


Hi Mike, Debian JavaScript Team and mentors,


I am looking for a sponsor for team-maintained package "node-macaddress".

* Package name: node-macaddress
  Version : 0.2.9-1
  Upstream Author : Julian Fleischer
* URL : https://github.com/scravy/node-macaddress
* License : Expat
  Section : javascript


  It builds those binary packages:

node-macaddress - Get MAC addresses of host network interfaces in Node.js

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-macaddress


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-macaddress/node-macaddress_0.2.9-1.dsc


  Git packaging repository:

https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-macaddress.git


  Changes since the last upload:

 node-macaddress (0.2.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release.
 + Fix a vulnerability to arbitrary code execution attack.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no changes needed).
   * d/rules: Use "dh_missing --fail-missing".
   * d/copyright: Refresh copyright information.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 01:38:54PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> * Package name: node-macaddress
>   Version : 0.2.9-1

>  node-macaddress (0.2.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* New upstream release.
>  + Fix a vulnerability to arbitrary code execution attack.
>* Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4 (no changes needed).
>* d/rules: Use "dh_missing --fail-missing".
>* d/copyright: Refresh copyright information.

✓

-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---


Bug#902894: marked as done (RFS: fcitx-qt5/1.2.3-1)

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 00:39:37 +0200
with message-id <20180703223937.idmmcz7dtkly2...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#902894: RFS: fcitx-qt5/1.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #902894,
regarding RFS: fcitx-qt5/1.2.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902894: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org a...@debian.org
sunwea...@debian.org s...@debian.org

Dear Aron, Mike, debian-input-method members and mentors,

As part of bug fixes and package rebuild in Input Method Team, I prepared a
team upload for package "fcitx-qt5" and am currently looking for a sponsor for
this package.

Levels of rebuild (and bugfix):

Level 1:
  * libmarisa0 (done), libopencc2 (done)

Level 2:
  * libbkc2 (done), libkkc-data (done), librime1 (done)

Level 3:
  * brise (done), fcitx (done)

Level 4:
  * fcitx-qt5, goldendict, ibus-libzhuyin, fcitx-kkc, ibus-kkc, ibus-rime
  ^ we are here

Level 5:
  * fcitx-rime

 * Package name: fcitx-qt5
   Version : 1.2.3-1
   Upstream Author : Weng Xuetian 
 * URL : https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-qt5
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : libs


  It builds those binary packages:
 fcitx-frontend-qt5 - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - Qt5 IM Module frontend
 fcitx5-module-quickphrase-editor - Flexible Input Method Framework -
Quick Phrase editor module
 libfcitx-qt5-1 - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - D-Bus client libraries for Qt5
 libfcitx-qt5-data - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - data files for Qt5
integration
 libfcitx-qt5-dev - Free Chinese Input Toy of X - Devel files for libfcitx-qt5

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/fcitx-qt5


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx-qt5/fcitx-qt5_1.2.3-1.dsc


  Git packaging repository:

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fcitx-qt5

  Changes since the last rebuild:

 fcitx-qt5 (1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream release.
 + Fix FTBFS with Qt 5.11.
   * Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
   * debian/control: Update YunQiang Su's email address with @debian.org one.
   * Drop backported patches.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:12:25PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>  * Package name: fcitx-qt5
>Version : 1.2.3-1

>  fcitx-qt5 (1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Team upload.
>* New upstream release.
>  + Fix FTBFS with Qt 5.11.
>* Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
>* debian/control: Update YunQiang Su's email address with @debian.org one.
>* Drop backported patches.

✓

-- 
// If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately
// cease using counterfeit alphabets.  Instead, contact the nearest temple
// of Amon, whose priests will provide you with scribal services for all
// your writing needs, for Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory prices.--- End Message ---


Bug#902737: marked as done (RFS: sunpinyin/3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1 [RC])

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jul 2018 00:23:38 +0200
with message-id <20180703222336.buc5ibvmgs54j...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#902737: RFS: sunpinyin/3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #902737,
regarding RFS: sunpinyin/3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902737: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902737
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: guoli...@debian.org debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org 
sunwea...@debian.org

Dear Mike, Liang, debian-input-method members and mentors,

As part of bug fixes and package rebuild in Debian Input Method Team, I
prepared a team upload for package "sunpinyin" and I'm currently looking for
a sponsor for this package.

Besides, I am looking for a DD to help to create a git repository under Debian
group on Salsa platform and grant me (hosiet-guest) write access so that I
could push and maintain changes there.


Levels of rebuild (and bugfix):

Level 1:
  * sunpinyin (libsunpinyin), fcitx (separate RFS #902675)
   ^ we are here

Level 2:
  * xsunpinyin, fcitx-sunpinyin, ibus-sunpinyin, ucimf-sunpinyin


 * Package name: sunpinyin
   Version : 3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1
   Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc and other Sunpinyin Developers
 * URL : https://github.com/sunpinyin/sunpinyin/
 * License : LGPL-2.1 or CDDL
   Section : libs

  It builds those binary packages:

 libsunpinyin-dev - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN (development)
 libsunpinyin3v5 - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN (runtime)
 python-sunpinyin - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN (Python binding)
 sunpinyin-utils - Simplified Chinese Input Method from SUN (utilities)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/sunpinyin


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sunpinyin/sunpinyin_3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1.dsc


  Git packaging repository (proposed, not exist yet):

https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sunpinyin

  Git packaging repository (temporary, will be removed after upload):

https://salsa.debian.org/hosiet-guest/sunpinyin

  Changes since the last upload:

 sunpinyin (3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream snapshot 20180629.
 + Added support for riscv64 architecture. (Closes: #898019)
 + Made the build reproducible. (Closes: #860201)
 + Various fixes.
   * debian: Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
   * debian/control:
 + Update Maintainer field with debian-input-method mailing list address.
   (Closes: #899693)
 + Bump debhelper compat to v11.
 + Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.4.
 + Update homepage information. (Closes: #860202)
 + Drop unnecessary build dependency quilt.
 + Drop old -dbg package in favor of automatic -dbgsym package.
 + Migrate git packaging repo onto Salsa platform.
 + Update Uploaders list and use @debian.org mail address.
   * debian/copyright:
 + Explicitly write wrapper files in Files-Excluded field.
 + Refresh information.
   * debian/changelog:
 + Remove trailing spaces.
   * debian/patches/backport: Backport all latter commits from trunk.
   * debian/rules:
 + Use "dh_missing --fail-missing".
 + Add full hardening.
 + Update dh_strip for automatic debug package migration.
   * debian/watch: Refine and reintroduce watch file.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 09:42:29AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Besides, I am looking for a DD to help to create a git repository under Debian
> group on Salsa platform and grant me (hosiet-guest) write access so that I
> could push and maintain changes there.

Done, temp repository not pushed.

>  * Package name: sunpinyin
>Version : 3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1

>  sunpinyin (3.0.0~rc1+ds1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Team upload.
>* New upstream snapshot 20180629.
>  + Added support for riscv64 architecture. (Closes: #898019)
>  + Made the build reproducible. (Closes: #860201)
>  + Various fixes.
>* debian: Apply "wrap-and-sort -abst".
>* debian/control:
>  + Update Maintainer field with debian-input-method mailing list address.
>(Closes: #899693)
>  + Bump 

Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:00:34PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> Hello Dimitry,
>
> Thanks for you email. I Will make the changes that you recommend.
>
> I have a cuestion for you. When I update to the version 1.40, Do I merge
> all the changelog entries, including 1.35-1 upload, isn't?

Yes, it is better to merge these entries and keep one entry per actual
upload to archive.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-03 Thread eamanu15
Hello Dimitry,

Thanks for you email. I Will make the changes that you recommend.

I have a cuestion for you. When I update to the version 1.40, Do I merge
all the changelog entries, including 1.35-1 upload, isn't?

Thanks
Regards

Arias Emmanuel
eamanu.com


El mar., 3 de jul. de 2018 17:17, Dmitry Shachnev 
escribió:

> Control: merge 898416 898811 900368
>
> Hi Emmanuel!
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:35:25PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygithub"
>
> Note that I am merging your three RFS bugs. If you want to ping, just reply
> to the existing bug, not file a new one.
>
> Here are my comments about your changes.
>
> - It would be nice if you based the repository on the existing Git
>   repository [1], rather than starting from scratch.
>
>   Also for new team repositories as this one, it is better to use Gbp-Pq
>   workflow as described in the team wiki [2].
>
> - Please merge the last three changelog entries, as 1.35-1 upload did not
>   happen.
>
> - When building in the current sid, I get Lintian warnings about three
> files
>   shipped in /usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/.
>
>   That probably happens because of output of 2to3 is slightly different in
>   Python 3.6 and 3.7 (e.g. files.items() vs. iter(files.items())), and
>   dh_python3 does not remove the file if it does not match.
>
>   I would recommend removing debian/python3-github/usr/lib/python3.*
> manually
>   in debian/rules. Keeping debian-python@ in Cc in case someone has a
> better
>   idea.
>
> - A new stable 1.40 release has been released on June 26th [3].
>   Can you update from alpha to the stable version?
>
>   Also please add uversionmangle to debian/watch (like here [4]), to make
> it
>   treat 1.40 as a higher version than 1.40aN.
>
> [1]:
> https://alioth-archive.debian.org/git/users/kaction-guest/pygithub.git.tar.xz
> [2]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
> [3]: https://pypi.org/project/PyGithub/1.40/
> [4]: https://pypi.debian.net/PyGithub/watch
>
> --
> Dmitry Shachnev
>


Bug#900368: RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

2018-07-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: merge 898416 898811 900368

Hi Emmanuel!

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:35:25PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygithub"

Note that I am merging your three RFS bugs. If you want to ping, just reply
to the existing bug, not file a new one.

Here are my comments about your changes.

- It would be nice if you based the repository on the existing Git
  repository [1], rather than starting from scratch.

  Also for new team repositories as this one, it is better to use Gbp-Pq
  workflow as described in the team wiki [2].

- Please merge the last three changelog entries, as 1.35-1 upload did not
  happen.

- When building in the current sid, I get Lintian warnings about three files
  shipped in /usr/lib/python3.7/dist-packages/.

  That probably happens because of output of 2to3 is slightly different in
  Python 3.6 and 3.7 (e.g. files.items() vs. iter(files.items())), and
  dh_python3 does not remove the file if it does not match.

  I would recommend removing debian/python3-github/usr/lib/python3.* manually
  in debian/rules. Keeping debian-python@ in Cc in case someone has a better
  idea.

- A new stable 1.40 release has been released on June 26th [3].
  Can you update from alpha to the stable version?

  Also please add uversionmangle to debian/watch (like here [4]), to make it
  treat 1.40 as a higher version than 1.40aN.

[1]: 
https://alioth-archive.debian.org/git/users/kaction-guest/pygithub.git.tar.xz
[2]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackagingPQ
[3]: https://pypi.org/project/PyGithub/1.40/
[4]: https://pypi.debian.net/PyGithub/watch

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#902949: RFS: elpy/1.22.0-1

2018-07-03 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Chris,

I have CCed you because you've sponsored past releases of Elpy.  To
add to the changelog, I realised that it would ease long-term
maintenance to make 0001-Disable-failing-tests.patch more granular—at
a minimum, a patch for a test known to always fail on buildd, and a
patch that tests interoperation with a package that Debian does not
provide.

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpy"

Package name: elpy
Version : 1.22.0-1
Upstream Author : Jorgen Schaefer 
URL : https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy
License : GPL-3+
Section : devel

It builds this binary package:

  elpa-elpy  - Emacs Python Development Environment

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/elpy

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/elpy/elpy_1.22.0-1.dsc

Or clone with git:

  git clone https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/elpy.git

More information about elpy can be obtained from 
https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy

Changes since the last upload:

elpy (1.22.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  [ Nicholas D Steeves ]
  * New upstream version.
  * Add 0002-Disable-tests-for-black-code-formatter.patch
- Debian does not yet provide a package for Black, "the uncompromising
  Python code formatter" (https://github.com/ambv/black).
- Disable these tests until there is something to test.
  * Rename 0001-Disable-failing-tests.patch to
-> 0001-Disable-test-shell-send-region-or-buffer.patch

 -- Nicholas D Steeves   Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:39:24 -0400

elpy (1.21.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium


Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves


Re: Explicit Autoconf disables

2018-07-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 03 Jul 2018, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> When building packages in clean chroots many configure checks are
> expected to fail not finding their dependencies.  This is fine.  Until
> somebody tries to build the package in a not so clean chroot, where the
> additional packages present satisfy some of these checks enabling extra
> features.  Or even breaking the build by exposing bugs (see #874600 for
> an example).
> 
> Is adding all possible --disable-whatever options to the configure call
> a good practice?  It clutters debian/rules, isn't easy to do
> exhaustively in an obviously correct way, but protects against some
> changes in the build environment.  I'm interested in hearing your takes
> on the issue.

You could disable them in configure, yes.  But often this is addressed
as build-conflicts, instead.  Especially when you're not going to
*really* test if the end result with the undesired dependencies
installed but the feature disabled in configure.

Which one is best depends really on how easy you want to make for people
to selectively enable these features on local rebuilds.

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh



Explicit Autoconf disables

2018-07-03 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Dear Mentors,

When building packages in clean chroots many configure checks are
expected to fail not finding their dependencies.  This is fine.  Until
somebody tries to build the package in a not so clean chroot, where the
additional packages present satisfy some of these checks enabling extra
features.  Or even breaking the build by exposing bugs (see #874600 for
an example).

Is adding all possible --disable-whatever options to the configure call
a good practice?  It clutters debian/rules, isn't easy to do
exhaustively in an obviously correct way, but protects against some
changes in the build environment.  I'm interested in hearing your takes
on the issue.
-- 
Thanks,
Feri



Bug#902425: marked as done (RFS: gammaray/2.9.0-2.1 [NMU])

2018-07-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:19:43 +0200
with message-id <0dd8f79b-4113-2e85-9555-14f7e3728...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: gammaray/2.9.0-2.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #902425,
regarding RFS: gammaray/2.9.0-2.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gammaray"

 * Package name: gammaray
   Version : 2.9.0-2.1
   Upstream Author : Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
 * URL : http://www.kdab.com/gammaray
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

gammaray   - Tool for examining the internals of Qt application
 gammaray-dev - GammaRay plugin development files
 gammaray-plugin-bluetooth - QtBluetooth type support for GammaRay
 gammaray-plugin-kjobtracker - KJob tracker plugin for GammaRay
 gammaray-plugin-positioning - Qt5Positioning type support for GammaRay
 gammaray-plugin-quickinspector - GammaRay plugin for inspecting QtQuick2 
applications
 gammaray-plugin-waylandinspector - Wayland compositor inspector plugin for 
GammaRay

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/gammaray


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gammaray/gammaray_2.9.0-2.1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  gammaray (2.9.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Non-maintainer upload.
- Rebuild with Qt 5.10 (Closes: #902098).
  * d/gammaray.install: Remove the 2nd line about *gammaray_3dinspector*
because they don't get compiled.

-- 
Yanhao Mo


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:35:17 + Yanhao Mo  wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
>   Dear mentors,
> 
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gammaray"
> 
>  * Package name: gammaray
>Version : 2.9.0-2.1
>Upstream Author : Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
>  * URL : http://www.kdab.com/gammaray
>  * License : GPL-2+
>Section : devel
> 
>   It builds those binary packages:
> 
> gammaray   - Tool for examining the internals of Qt application
>  gammaray-dev - GammaRay plugin development files
>  gammaray-plugin-bluetooth - QtBluetooth type support for GammaRay
>  gammaray-plugin-kjobtracker - KJob tracker plugin for GammaRay
>  gammaray-plugin-positioning - Qt5Positioning type support for GammaRay
>  gammaray-plugin-quickinspector - GammaRay plugin for inspecting QtQuick2 
> applications
>  gammaray-plugin-waylandinspector - Wayland compositor inspector plugin for 
> GammaRay
> 
>   To access further information about this package, please visit the 
> following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/gammaray
> 
> 
>   Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
> dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gammaray/gammaray_2.9.0-2.1.dsc
> 
>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   gammaray (2.9.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
> - Rebuild with Qt 5.10 (Closes: #902098).
>   * d/gammaray.install: Remove the 2nd line about *gammaray_3dinspector*
> because they don't get compiled.
> 

on my way, thanks!

G.

> -- 
> Yanhao Mo--- End Message ---