Bug#905455: marked as done (RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2)

2018-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Aug 2018 22:20:24 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #905455, regarding RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 05-08-2018 16:14, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:54:23PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all' I'm sorry but

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:54:23PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > > > Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: > > > > > > > > > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie > > > > > export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE > > > > Why? > > > Becauso of 'blhc --all' > > I'm sorry but

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:23:33PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: > > > > > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie > > > export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE > > Why? > > > > Becauso of 'blhc --all' Actually, I think using blhc with

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 05-08-2018 15:47, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:23:33PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all' I'm sorry but

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:23:33PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: > > > > > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie > > > export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE > > Why? > > > > Becauso of 'blhc --all' I'm sorry but that's not a valid

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 05-08-2018 15:27, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Herbert, thanks for your review. Am Sonntag, den 05.08.2018, 15:02 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: Hi, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Herbert, thanks for your review. Am Sonntag, den 05.08.2018, 15:02 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: > Hi, > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 05-08-2018 15:10, Andrey Rahmatullin escreveu: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:02:39PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? Becauso of 'blhc --all'

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:02:39PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Sorry, but can you please add to debian/rules: > > export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE -pie > export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -fPIE Why? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode" Package name: dmidecode Version : 3.1-2 Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org URL

Re: Help to build libsmithwaterman with gcc-8 needed

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Well, your Makefile.am doesn't say you need to build the lib before the > > binary. > > Strange. I have never seen such kind of specification and I assumed > that this is automatically the case. No, it cannot know that in -lfoo

Re: Help to build libsmithwaterman with gcc-8 needed

2018-08-05 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsmithwaterman >> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >> Well, your Makefile.am doesn't say you need to build the lib before the >> binary. > > Strange. I have never seen such kind of specification and I

Re: Help to build libsmithwaterman with gcc-8 needed

2018-08-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrey, On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:00:28PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:31:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for > > libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different > >

Bug#905375: marked as done (RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1)

2018-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Aug 2018 15:49:42 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #905375, regarding RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1

2018-08-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em 04-08-2018 19:21, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Herbert, Am Samstag, den 04.08.2018, 09:05 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: Hi, > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 > thanks

Bug#905349: marked as done (RFS: kcm-fcitx/0.5.5-2 [RC])

2018-08-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Aug 2018 12:39:26 +0200 with message-id <20180805103926.6ftaecp7te4oa...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#905349: RFS: kcm-fcitx/0.5.5-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #905349, regarding RFS: kcm-fcitx/0.5.5-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#905489: RFS: ipmitool/1.8.18-6

2018-08-05 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmitool" Package name: ipmitool Version : 1.8.18-6 Upstream Author : Alexander Amelkin URL :

Re: Help to build libsmithwaterman with gcc-8 needed

2018-08-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:31:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for > libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different > reason now. Any idea why this might happen: > > ... > make all-am > make[2]: Entering