Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Emmanuel, Sorry, you still have to fix a few things before the package is ready for upload. We're almost there; don't give up! On Tuesday, August 21 2018, eamanu wrote: > No problem. However, the "License:" still doesn't reflect the license >> of the software. According to LICENSE: >> >>

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

Hello Sergio, No problem. However, the "License:" still doesn't reflect the license > of the software. According to LICENSE: > > We provide this software under a slightly modified version of the > Apache Software License. The only changes to the document were the > replacement of

Bug#906877: RFS: yuma123/2.11-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yuma123" * Package name    : yuma123   Version : 2.11-1   Upstream Author : Vladimir Vassilev * URL :https://sourceforge.net/projects/yuma123 * License : BSD  

Bug#884697: marked as done (RFS: logrotate/3.14.0-1 ITA)

Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2018 17:49:32 +0200 with message-id <20180821154932.4sfzxi3pcc7pl...@fatal.se> and subject line Re: logrotate package has caused the Debian Bug report #884697, regarding RFS: logrotate/3.14.0-1 ITA to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#884697: logrotate package

Hello Andreas, > There doesn't seem to be any (signed) debian/3.14.0-1 tag in the > logrotate repository at > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logrotate/tags > > Please push one, or if you'd rather finish up the changes in master > and release them then please push a (signed) debian/3.14.0-2 tag.

Bug#884697: logrotate package

Hello Christian, On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 11:05:49AM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: [...] > > Please tell me if you want me to go ahead with further testing and > > uploading of the package, or if you already have someone else in mind > > for this task. > > Yes, I'd like to go ahead. [...]

Need help with atac (kmer): running atac worked in stable, but fails in testing/unstable

Hi, I was writing an autopkgtest for kmer [1] and faced a SEGFAULT error while testing one of kmer's binaries — atac in testing/unstable [2]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/kmer [2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kmer/ Notably, that building and testing atac in stable were successful.

Bug#905906: RFS: hinawa-utils/0.0.99-1 [ITP]

Hi, On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 22:10:28 +0900 Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hinawa-utils" With quick look, > Description: Python 3 module to handle Audio and Music units on > IEEE1394 bus via libhinawa API with a help of PyGObject. Short description is not