Bug#902037: marked as done (RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-11)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2018 22:28:29 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #902037,
regarding RFS: dmalloc/5.5.2-11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
902037: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902037
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmalloc"

 * Package name: dmalloc
   Version : 5.5.2-11
   Upstream Author : Gray Watson 
 * URL : http://dmalloc.com/
 * License : CC-BY-SA-3.0 or Dmalloc
   Section : devel

  It builds these binary packages:

libdmalloc-dev - debug memory allocation library (development files and doc)
libdmalloc5 - debug memory allocation library

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/dmalloc


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmalloc/dmalloc_5.5.2-11.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Remove obsolete debian/dmalloc-dev.info control file.
  * Remove trailing white space from debian/changelog.
  * debian/control:
- Remove unnecessary Testsuite header.
- Update Vcs-* headers to salsa.debian.org.
- Update B-D on debhelper (>= 11).
- Indicate compliance with Debian Policy 4.1.4.
- Mark libdmalloc-dev package as Multi-Arch: same.
  * Bump DH build compat level to 11.
  * debian/source/lintian-overrides:
- Suppress debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri.
- Rename debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature to
  debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature.
  * debian/rules:
- Allow tests to be disabled by setting nocheck in
  DEB_BUILD(_MAINT)?_OPTIONS.
- Simplify LFS build rules.
- Remove unnecessary inclusion of /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk.
- Add missing -fPIE and -pie flags as suggested by blhc.
- Install dmalloc binary in multiarch library path.
- Use dh_link to simplify creation of library symlinks.
  * debian/patches:
- Remove duplicate word from patch description of
  17-autoreconf-2.69.patch.
  * Add machine-readable upstream metadata.
  * Update debian/copyright.
  * Re-implement reproducible-pdfs autopkgtest using poppler-utils,
since pdftk is no longer available.
  * Add debian/gbp.conf.


  Regards,
   Carlos Maddela
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package dmalloc has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#910018: marked as done (RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2018 22:28:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #910018,
regarding RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
910018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid"

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.2.4-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.2.4-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
  * debian/control: added suggest on sensible-utils for
hoteldruid-launcher previously included in debianutils

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package hoteldruid has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#910245: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.10+ds.1-1

[Tobias Winchen]

Dear Herbert,

I executed cowbuilder 2x in a fresh virtual machine and could not reproduce 
this problem. Please let me know if I can do anything else.

Bests,


Tobi





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#910538: RFS: vitetris/0.57.2-1 [ITP]

[Pierre-Elliott Bécue]

Le lundi 08 octobre 2018 à 19:10:55+0200, Baptiste BEAUPLAT a écrit :
> Hello Pierre-Elliott,
> 
> Taking into account your suggestions, I re-uploaded the vitetris package
> with the following fixes:
> 
> * Rework package description
> * Remove extra licence file from package
> 
> Url:
> 
> Package on mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vitetris
> Pool on
> mentors:https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vitetris/vitetris_0.57.2-1.dsc
> Git: https://salsa.debian.org/lyknode-guest/vitetris
> 
> Best regards,

Hi,

Uploaded. Thanks for your contribution.

Cheers!

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#910538: RFS: vitetris/0.57.2-1 [ITP]

[Baptiste BEAUPLAT]

Hello Pierre-Elliott,

Taking into account your suggestions, I re-uploaded the vitetris package
with the following fixes:

* Rework package description
* Remove extra licence file from package

Url:

Package on mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/vitetris
Pool on
mentors:https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vitetris/vitetris_0.57.2-1.dsc
Git: https://salsa.debian.org/lyknode-guest/vitetris

Best regards,

-- 
Baptiste BEAUPLAT - lyknode




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#910608: RFS: libtheft/0.4.5-1 ITP #910296

[Richard Ipsum]

Package: sponsorship-requests
 Severity: wishlist

 Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtheft"

* Package name: libtheft
  Version : 0.4.5-1
  Upstream Author : Scott Vokes 
* URL : https://github.com/silentbicycle/theft
* License : ISC
  Section : libs

 It builds those binary packages:

   libtheft-dev - property-based testing for C

 To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

 https://mentors.debian.net/package/libtheft


 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libt/libtheft/libtheft_0.4.5-1.dsc

 More information about libtheft can be obtained from 
https://github.com/silentbicycle/theft
 and https://yakking.branchable.com/posts/property-testing-in-c/.

 Changes since the last upload:

 libtheft (0.4.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial release (Closes: #910296)

 -- Richard Ipsum   Thu, 04 Oct 2018 18:07:05 +0100

 Regards,
  Richard Ipsum

Bug#898951: marked as done (RFS: ibus-kmfl/1.0.8-1 [ITP] -- Please help me for upstream)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2018 16:25:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: ibus-kmfl/1.0.8-1 [ITP] -- Please help me for 
upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #898951,
regarding RFS: ibus-kmfl/1.0.8-1 [ITP] -- Please help me for upstream
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
898951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer, Mentor and Developer

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ibus-kmfl"

 please improve for my package and allow to upload upstream.
 i am follow DFSG and SC, now i am waiting 4 software package.
 when i become DD or DM, i will more support at mentor :'(

 * Package name: ibus-kmfl
   Version : 1.0.8-1
   Upstream Author : kokoye2007 
 * URL : https://kmfl.sf.net
 * License : gpl2
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

ibus-kmfl  - ibus kmfl for linux its windows keyman

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/ibus-kmfl


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ibus-kmfl/ibus-kmfl_1.0.8-1.dsc


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers bionic-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'bionic-updates'), (500, 'bionic-security'), (500, 
'bionic-proposed'), (500, 'bionic')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-21-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package ibus-kmfl has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---

Bug#910604: RFS: theme-d/1.1.7-1

[Tommi Höynälänmaa]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "theme-d"

    Package name    : theme-d
    Version : 1.1.7-1
    Upstream Author : Tommi Höynälänmaa
    URL : http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/
    License : GPL-3, LGPL-3, and GFDL-1.3
    Section : lisp

  It builds those binary packages:

    libthemedsupport - Theme-D support library
    th-scheme-utilities - TH Scheme Utilities library
    theme-d - Programming language extending Scheme with static typing
    theme-d-doc - Documentation for programming language Theme-D
    theme-d-rte - Theme-D runtime environment

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


    https://mentors.debian.net/package/theme-d


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/theme-d/theme-d_1.1.7-1.dsc


  More information about Theme-D can be obtained from 
http://www.iki.fi/tohoyn/theme-d/.


  Changes since the last upload: -

  Regards,

    Tommi Höynälänmaa

Bug#910018: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1

[Marco M. F. De Santis]

Il 07/10/18 13:46, Adam Borowski ha scritto:

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:

* Package name: hoteldruid
   Version : 2.2.4-1



Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release.
   * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
   * debian/control: added suggest on sensible-utils for
 hoteldruid-launcher previously included in debianutils


I'm pretty sure "hoteldruid-launcher" has never been included in either
sensible-utils nor debianutils.  Care to clarify?

Besides, both packages are >= priority:important, thus a stronger dependency
has no downsides (as hoteldruid is not something that cares about cutting
every little bit of bloat from a container it runs in).


Hello Adam, it's "hoteldruid-launcher" that checks if "sensible-browser" 
is present and eventually launches it, otherwise checks other browsers 
that may be available. Probably I had to add a comma in the changelog 
before "previously included in debianutils" as it's sensible-utils that 
used to be included in debianutils, so lintian complained that 
hoteldruid had to add a new dependency on "sensible-utils".


Best regards,
Marco