Hi,
Please note that the issues raised have been mostly dealt with. There is a
man page, the descriptions in the control file have been changed, the
copyright has been updated, and now usr/bin/brightness-controller calls an
interpreter.
Thanks,
Archisman
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 12:35 AM Archisman
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 2:36 PM Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> The package used to be in debian before but has been orphaned.
When reintroducing packages, there are some extra steps to perform in
addition to the ones done when adding new packages:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen
Hi I am trying to create a debian package and submit it before the
Buster Feb 12 soft freeze.
The package used to be in debian before but has been orphaned. The package is
python-fltk
I am in the process of learning how to build the package. I found a
previous xenial ubuntu package here
https:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "austin"
* Package name: austin
Version : 0.6.1-beta-1
Upstream Author : Gabriele N. Tornetta
* URL : https://github.com/P403n1x87/austin
* License : GPLv
Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2019 22:29:38 +0100
with message-id <20190202212938.bvlplqzeqdsng...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#920990: RFS: rawdog/2.23-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #920990,
regarding RFS: rawdog/2.23-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2019 21:18:04 +0100
with message-id <20190202201804.xavp44c5ylvuf...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921141: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.6-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #921141,
regarding RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.6-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2019 21:17:37 +0100
with message-id <20190202201737.z7fxjolztn26m...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921140: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #921140,
regarding RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 02 Feb 2019 12:40:40 -0500
with message-id <87bm3u142v@curie.anarc.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#921130: RFS: php-elisp/1.21.0-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #921130,
regarding RFS: php-elisp/1.21.0-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:14 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ffcvt is now in NEW: . . .
Thanks for your kind explanation Mattia, after which I found that
email in my trash bin, :-(
Thanks again everyone!
On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> Would such such upload problem affected my ffcvt package as well? --
> as Pirate has done the upload for me, but so far I haven't received
> any response for it yet either.
ffcvt is now in NEW:
mattia@coccia ~ % xzgrep ffcvt /srv/ftp-mast
On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > I uploaded a new version 0.7.5-2 of package theme-d-gnome about five hours
> > > ago but so far I haven't received any response.
> >
> > I think the importer was stuck somewhere, at least the log stopped a
> > couple of days ago sudden
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:24 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 04:26:49PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> > I uploaded a new version 0.7.5-2 of package theme-d-gnome about five hours
> > ago but so far I haven't received any response.
>
> I think the importer was stuck somewhe
Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2019 13:22:42 +
with message-id <20190202132242.f3lycaztye4yv...@master.debian.org>
and subject line no longer at mentors
has caused the Debian Bug report #920218,
regarding RFS: webcamoid/8.5.0+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Hi Mo Zhou,
thanks a lot for the interest in my RFS. At first glance the FTBFS issue
seems to be related to #920020. I will investigate it further.
Best wishes,
Andrius
[#920020] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920020
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, 10:30 Mo Zhou control: tags -1 +morein
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Andrius,
Thank you for the effort on apache-opennlp packaging. However it failed
to build (I cannot help you diagnose the failure because I know nothing
about Java):
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/apache-opennlp/1.9.0-1/buildlog
BTW, 1.9.1
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi Michael,
As much as I'd appreciate your effort trying to create a package for
Debian, but I have to say the packaging is unacceptable.
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openliberty/openliberty_18.0.0.4.dsc
The present packaging might be fine to third
16 matches
Mail list logo
