Bug#915524: Acknowledgement (RFS: filemanager-actions/3.4-1 [ITP])

2019-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 1:07 AM Carlos Maddela wrote: > The reason I put it in the -dev package was that this documentation was> more > related to the API and not so much in end user's interests. Other > packages that have it this way are libnautilus-extension-dev and > network-manager-dev. Those

Bug#915524: Acknowledgement (RFS: filemanager-actions/3.4-1 [ITP])

2019-02-08 Thread Carlos Maddela
On 9/2/19 1:14 am, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > 2. Why do you have gtk-doc stuff in your -dev package instead of in > your -doc package? > Hi, The reason I put it in the -dev package was that this documentation was more related to the API and not so much in end user's interests. Other packages t

Bug#914833: marked as done (RFS: python-pyxs/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python XenStore client implementation)

2019-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Feb 2019 02:06:00 +0100 with message-id <20190209010600.4wio5ypajrk3hcyq@bogus> and subject line Re: Bug#914833: RFS: python-pyxs/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python XenStore client implementation has caused the Debian Bug report #914833, regarding RFS: python-pyxs/0.4.1-1 [ITP]

Bug#914833: RFS: python-pyxs/0.4.1-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python XenStore client implementation

2019-02-08 Thread Benjamin Hof
Hey nicoo, Awesome, thank you for taking the time! I agree with your edits and have pushed the updated changelog. Kind regards, Benjamin

Bug#921647: marked as done (RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-1)

2019-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:55:08 +0100 with message-id <20190208185508.moik3iypds4oz...@toy.home.lxtec.de> and subject line Re: Bug#921647: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #921647, regarding RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Re: Building a shared library with no SONAME

2019-02-08 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 12:26:24PM -0500, Nicolas Mora wrote: > Le 2019-02-06 11:59, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit : > > It's a bad idea to package shared libraries that don't keep stable ABI. > > > [...] > > > Please don't just add a random SONAME. Library versions with different > > ABIs must have

Bug#915524: Acknowledgement (RFS: filemanager-actions/3.4-1 [ITP])

2019-02-08 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Hi, I apologize for the late review. Reviewing your package has been on my todo list for several weeks. I think it will be appropriate for us to ask for an exception to ensure it gets into the Buster release even though it will be a bit late from the freeze deadline. I imported your git repo to

Bug#910004: RFS: apache-opennlp/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- machine learning based toolkit for the processing of natural language text

2019-02-08 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2019-02-08 04:08, Mo Zhou wrote: > Is this package useful enough without these components? I would say so. opennlp-tools is the core toolkit of the OpenNLP, while opennlp-brat-annotator and opennlp-morfologik-addon are merely add-ons to other software packages. Furthermore, language parsing a