Hi,
El vie., 15 de feb. de 2019 a la(s) 10:32, Andrey Rahmatullin (
w...@debian.org) escribió:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:15:39AM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> > How could I package it to include *tar.gz.asc on .changes file?
> Use dpkg >= 1.18.5.
>
I am using dpkg = 1.19.4
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
>
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:39:06 +0100
with message-id <20190215163906.qgdug7dknkmwq...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#922411: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #922411,
regarding RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc"
* Package name: moc
Version : 1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-3
Upstream Author : Damian Pietras
* URL : https://moc.daper.net/
* License : GPL2+
Section
On 2/15/19 10:34 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2019-02-15 Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> I working on a Debian revison for libgphoto2 and
>> have this Lintian about pkg-config.
>
>> pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library
>
>> The libgphoto2_port/libgphoto2_port.pc.in file has:
>
>> Libs: -L${
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:15:39AM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> How could I package it to include *tar.gz.asc on .changes file?
Use dpkg >= 1.18.5.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:12:45 +0100
with message-id <20190215131245.rqofetw7br5mf...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#922114: RFS: worklog/2.0-1 -- Keep Track of Time
worked on Projects
has caused the Debian Bug report #922114,
regarding RFS: worklog/2.0-1 -- Keep Track of Time
Hello everybody,
I am trying to adopt hollywood
But when I upload to m.d.n I have the next problem:
*gpgv: Signature made Fri 15 Feb 2019 10:01:57 AM UTCgpgv:
using RSA key 13796755BBC72BB8ABE2AEB5FA9DEC5DE11C63F1gpgv: Can't check
signature: No public keydpkg-source: warning: failed to verif
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:07:43 +0100
with message-id <20190215130743.2h4r3thas2ve7...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921936: RFS: grim/1.1+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #921936,
regarding RFS: grim/1.1+ds-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 14:03:07 +0100
with message-id <20190215130307.cj2zszttxyzee...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#921922: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #921922,
regarding RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2994-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
On 2019-02-15 Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I working on a Debian revison for libgphoto2 and
> have this Lintian about pkg-config.
> pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library
> The libgphoto2_port/libgphoto2_port.pc.in file has:
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lgphoto2 -lm
[...]
Hello,
Looks like a false po
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:15:02AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I working on a Debian revison for libgphoto2 and
> have this Lintian about pkg-config.
>
> pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library
>
> The libgphoto2_port/libgphoto2_port.pc.in file has:
>
> Libs: -L${libdir} -lgphoto2 -lm
>
Hi,
I working on a Debian revison for libgphoto2 and
have this Lintian about pkg-config.
pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library
The libgphoto2_port/libgphoto2_port.pc.in file has:
Libs: -L${libdir} -lgphoto2 -lm
The libgphoto2.pc.in[0] file has this content since
version 2.4.6, 7 year ag
12 matches
Mail list logo