On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, 4:48 am Paul Wise, wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:11 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, that does not work. Because I suspect rather an
> > organizational, than a technical problem suspect, I don't post extensive
> > logs. What am I missing? Do I need to be DD
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:11 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Unfortunately, that does not work. Because I suspect rather an
> organizational, than a technical problem suspect, I don't post extensive
> logs. What am I missing? Do I need to be DD to login into porter boxes
> or should it be possible as
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 25.04.19 15:31, Mo Zhou wrote:
>
> Hi Mo,
Hello List,
> > I'm sure a "DM with guest account" can access the porter boxes because
> > I've ever done so. You have to wait for some time because the machines
> > need to sync LDAP
Hi Sébastien,
Thanks for taking the time to review the package.
On 4/17/19 2:55 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
— The autopkgtest does not work. I get:
autopkgtest [14:48:10]: test cuba: [---
make: *** No rule to make target 'check'. Stop.
autopkgtest [14:48:11]: test cuba:
On 25.04.19 15:31, Mo Zhou wrote:
Hi Mo,
> I'm sure a "DM with guest account" can access the porter boxes because
> I've ever done so. You have to wait for some time because the machines
> need to sync LDAP information.
>
So, what means "some time"? My LDAP Account was created / changed
finally
Hi Alex,
On 2019-04-25 15:51, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> have you found a solution?
> I managed to craft the following d/watch:
[snip]
Thanks, I have already managed to put together something very similar,
which also works fine.
Best,
Andrius
--
Andrius Merkys
Vilnius University Institute of
Hi Hilmar,
I'm sure a "DM with guest account" can access the porter boxes because
I've ever done so. You have to wait for some time because the machines
need to sync LDAP information.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:11:24PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since a few days ago I am "Debian
On 4/24/19 11:01 AM, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to package unversioned source. AFAIK, it should be possible to
> have timestamp of the last tarball change in lieu of upstream version. I
> am wondering if it would be possible to write uscan rules to extract the
> timestamp and
Hi all,
since a few days ago I am "Debian Maintainer, with guest account". Now
I'm trying to log in into a porter box to investigate build failures.
On [1] is written, I should do this on the "New Members site". If I open
from here page [2] I get the info "As a Debian Maintainer, with guest
Hello,
I have updated the dependencies and made them specific to Debian Stretch.
I have also tested the same using pbuilder.
Can you please check again?
With best regards,
Gaurav Mishra
-Original Message-
From: Adam Borowski
Sent: 15 April 2019 13:00
To: Mishra, Gaurav (IOT DS AA DTS
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scdoc"
* Package name : scdoc
Version : 1.9.4-2
Upstream Author : Drew DeVault
* Url : https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/scdoc
* Licenses : MIT
Hi Paul,
On 2019-04-25 04:09, Paul Wise wrote:
> uscan now supports arbitrary mangling of the page HTML using the
> pagemangle option. This combined with the downloadurlmangle option
> could easily accommodate this website.
Thanks for the directions. I will check this out.
> I think that would
Hi Ben,
On 2019-04-25 03:59, Ben Finney wrote:
> So, for an upstream source tarball with timestamp “2013-03-12T12:16”,
> mangle that to the version string “0+2013.03.12.12.16” (and hence the
> first Debian release of that upstream source has the Debian package
> version string
13 matches
Mail list logo
