Hello Adam,
Congratulations to Buster release! Now it's time for my trip in Debian
again. Will you kind to sponsor 'simhash' anymore and upload it to
salsa.debian.org/debian/?.
Thanks,
laoks
Hi,
2019年7月15日(月) 7:30 Roman Ondráček :
>
> Dear Mr Matsui,
>
> I am not sure if you received my answer on your comment on the site
> mentors.debian.net because I replied you via comment on the site
> mentors.debian.net.
>
> It should be fixed in the latest upload where I uploaded the forgotten
>
Dear Mr Matsui,
I am not sure if you received my answer on your comment on the site
mentors.debian.net because I replied you via comment on the site
mentors.debian.net.
It should be fixed in the latest upload where I uploaded the forgotten
source tarball.
Yours sincerely,
Roman Ondráček
Dne
Hi Nico,
On 7/14/19 10:35 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm trying to update gmsh [1], but the tests on salsa report
> ```
> gbp:error: upstream/4.4.0+ds1 is not a valid treeish
> ```
This is because there is no tag named `upstream/4.4.0+ds1` in that repo.
Maybe you forgot to push
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to update gmsh [1], but the tests on salsa report
```
gbp:error: upstream/4.4.0+ds1 is not a valid treeish
```
See [2]. I have no idea why this comes up.
Any hints?
Cheers,
Nico
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gmsh
[2]
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:41:17 +0200
with message-id <20190714154117.gd12...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#931989: RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #931989,
regarding RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-1 -- Organize your desktop with panels,
notes and photos
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload new release of texinfo-doc-nonfree to Debian. My
first upload was rejected, b/c I made a source-only upload and forgot to
set the "XS-Autobuild: yes" in debian/control.
Next try was w/ that field and last try w/o that field but binary upload
(as that package just
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>Package name: uriparser
>Version : 0.9.3-1
> * New upstream release.
> - Refresh symbols file.
> - Rewrite build process.
> * Migrate to debhelper 12:
> - Change debian/compat to 12.
> -
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2019 15:54:21 +0200
with message-id <20190714135421.gb12...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#932025: RFS: mwc/2.0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #932025,
regarding RFS: mwc/2.0.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 09:54:40AM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> > If a remote has a branch this doesn't mean your repo has the same branch.
> Is this intended as agreement with my "rename upstream/master with git
> branch -u" proposal? Or is it a suggestion to delete Salsa/master and
>
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
If a remote has a branch this doesn't mean your repo has the same branch.
Is this intended as agreement with my "rename upstream/master with git
branch -u" proposal? Or is it a suggestion to delete Salsa/master and
force-push upstream/master over it (i.e. rewrite
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mwc"
Package name: mwc
Version : 2.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Michael Till Beck
URL :
12 matches
Mail list logo
