Hello Hugo,
Hugo Lefeuvre kirjoitti 19.7.2019 klo 21.21:
> I had a look at the changes, everything fine. Manual smoke tests fine as
> well. I'm pretty sure there are still bugs in there, pysolfc breaks very
> easily (that's the main reason why I kept delaying this update for such a
> long time).
El vie., 19 de jul. de 2019 a la(s) 16:20, Andrej Shadura (
andrew.shad...@collabora.co.uk) escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On 19/07/2019 16:15, eamanu15 . wrote:
> > Hello Andrej,
> >
> > I am updating to 36d6229 sha git version. I want to upload to
> experimental
> >
> > The error is because is compiled
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:05:12PM +0200, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> * Package name: python-jellyfish
> Version : 0.6.1-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> [ Ondřej Nový ]
> * d/control: Set Vcs-* to salsa.debian.org
>
> [ Jelmer Vernooij ]
> * Remove unnecessary
Hi,
On 19/07/2019 16:15, eamanu15 . wrote:
> Hello Andrej,
>
> I am updating to 36d6229 sha git version. I want to upload to experimental
>
> The error is because is compiled with Werror and fail
> for a warning:
>
> ../src/libcamera/process.cpp:74:13: error: ignoring return value of
>
Hello Andrej,
I am updating to 36d6229 sha git version. I want to upload to experimental
The error is because is compiled with Werror and fail
for a warning:
../src/libcamera/process.cpp:74:13: error: ignoring return value of
‘ssize_t write(int, const void*, size_t)’, declared with attribute
Hi Juhani,
I had a look at the changes, everything fine. Manual smoke tests fine as
well. I'm pretty sure there are still bugs in there, pysolfc breaks very
easily (that's the main reason why I kept delaying this update for such a
long time).
Anyways, we can't delay this forever, so I went along
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2019 20:00:01 +0200
with message-id <20190719180001.gb28...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#932371: Subject: RFS: xsnow/1:2.0.8-1 [ITA] -- snow on
desktop
has caused the Debian Bug report #932371,
regarding Subject: RFS: xsnow/1:2.0.8-1 [ITA] -- snow on desktop
Hi Juhani,
Thanks for working on this. I'll review your changes and upload asap.
cheers,
Hugo
--
Hugo Lefeuvre (hle)|www.owl.eu.com
RSA4096_ 360B 03B3 BF27 4F4D 7A3F D5E8 14AA 1EB8 A247 3DFD
ed25519_ 37B2 6D38 0B25 B8A2 6B9F 3A65 A36F 5357 5F2D DC4C
signature.asc
Alright, thanks!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 4:44 PM Sven Hartge wrote:
>
> Nico Schlömer wrote:
>
> > From the gmsh repro-build, I'm getting
> > ```
> > /builds/science-team/gmsh/debian/output: found 38 matching files
> > ERROR: Uploading artifacts to coordinator... too large archive
> > id=227001
On 19/07/2019 12:10, eamanu15 . wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build an updated packaging.
>
> But it is falling:
I’m not sure what error you’re seeing but I have built and uploaded it
to NEW last week or so.
--
Cheers,
Andrej
Hello,
I am trying to build an updated packaging.
But it is falling:
[29/150] c++ -Isrc/libcamera/4ab8042@@camera@sha -Isrc/libcamera
-I../src/libcamera -Iinclude -I../include -I../src/libcamera/include
-fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Werror -std=c++11
Nico Schlömer wrote:
> From the gmsh repro-build, I'm getting
> ```
> /builds/science-team/gmsh/debian/output: found 38 matching files
> ERROR: Uploading artifacts to coordinator... too large archive
> id=227001 responseStatus=413 Request Entity Too Large status=413
> Request Entity Too Large
>From the gmsh repro-build, I'm getting
```
/builds/science-team/gmsh/debian/output: found 38 matching files
ERROR: Uploading artifacts to coordinator... too large archive
id=227001 responseStatus=413 Request Entity Too Large status=413
Request Entity Too Large token=XzzUdm1f
FATAL: too large
```
I fixed the spelling errors lintian complains about upstream:
https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance/commit/c30406b2b6f0e9c23b7
Paride
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Please review my packaging branch for irqbalance/1.6.0-1 at:
https://salsa.debian.org/paride-guest/irqbalance
In the beginning I thought this was going to be an easy one, it turned
out not to be the case. This means that even the review won't be
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-jellyfish"
* Package name: python-jellyfish
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : James Turk
* URL : https://github.com/jamesturk/jellyfish
* License
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ah, I get it now! Because `${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}` is used in the
.install-files, they have to be treated with a special tool, dh-exec, that
takes the variables from debian/rules.
Thanks everyone!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: FlowCrypt
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 03:53:55AM -0400, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> >> debian/rules has
> >> ```
> >> DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
> >> ```
> >> so I thought (on respective machines), {DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH} equals
> >> x86_64-linux-gnu. Not the case?
> > No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>> debian/rules has
>> ```
>> DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
>> ```
>> so I thought (on respective machines), {DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH} equals
>> x86_64-linux-gnu. Not the case?
> No substitutions is done on
19 matches
Mail list logo
