Bug#949783: RFS: milter-greylist/4.6.2-1 [QA] -- Greylist milter for sendmail

2020-01-24 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "milter-greylist"

 * Package name: milter-greylist
   Version : 4.6.2-1
   Upstream Author : Emmanuel Dreyfus 
 * URL : http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/
 * License : BSD
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/milter-greylist
   Section : mail

It builds those binary packages:

  milter-greylist - Greylist milter for sendmail

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/milter-greylist

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/milter-greylist/milter-greylist_4.6.2-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * QA upload.
   * Update to v4.6.2 (Closes: #881154)
   * Add dependency on lsb-base.
   * Disable init.d script using dh_installinit.
 - Ref. Debian Policy Manual section 9.3.3.1
   * Use proper home with adduser.
   * Orphan the package (See: #889305)
   * Update compat level to 12.
   * Remove dependency on autotools-dev and quilt.
   * Update Standards-Version to 4.4.1
 - Change priority to optional.
   * Add dependency on init-system-helpers.
   * Add predends on misc.
   * Maintainer script should not use recursive chown.
   * Add commented patch file in series.
   * Add vcs link to salsa.


-- 
Regards
Sudip



Looking for sponsor (was RFS: dwarves-dfsg 1.16-1)

2020-01-24 Thread Domenico Andreoli
Hi again,

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:57:17PM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I'm looking for a sponsor for this package:

I'm still looking for the sponsor... :)

Thanks,
Domenico

> 
> * Package name: dwarves-dfsg
>   Version : 1.16-1
>   Upstream Author : Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 
> * URL : http://acmel.wordpress.com
> * License : GPLv2
>   Section : utils
> 
> It builds these binary packages:
> 
> dwarves   - set of advanced DWARF utilities
> dwarves-dbgsym- debug symbols for dwarves
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
> URL:
> 
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/dwarves-dfsg
> 
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
> dget -x 
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwarves-dfsg/dwarves-dfsg_1.16-1.dsc
> 
> More information can be obtained from 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
> dwarves-dfsg (1.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * New upstream release (changes since 1.15):
> - Preserve and encode exported functions as BTF_KIND_FUNC
> - Add support for BTF_KIND_FUNC
> - Account inline type __aligned__ member types for spacing
> - Fix alignment of class members that are structs/enums/unions
> - Fixup handling classes with no members, solving a NULL deref
> - Avoid infinite loop trying to determine type with static data
>   member of its own type.
> - type->type == 0 is void, fix --compile for that
> - Print DW_TAG_subroutine_type as well
> - Fix ptr_table__add_with_id() handling of pt->nr_entries, covering
>   how BTF variables IDs are encoded
> - Allow passing the format path specifier, to use with BTF
> - Fixup issues pointed out by various coverity reports
> 
>  -- Domenico Andreoli   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 18:02:11 +0100
> 
> Kind regards,
> Domenico

-- 
rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE  FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA  356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#947270: RFS: libfilezilla/0.19.3-1 -- build high-performing platform-independent programs (development

2020-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
 Hello Phil,


>Hi Adrien,
>
>I can use git that is not an issue, but I won't. gbp is a joke - look at
>fedora and pagure. I will put out RFS(s), which I have done, you merge
>them based on submission or not as I do not care. I have put time in and
>submitted updates. You explain to the community how submitters get
>treated. I am done with you lot and DM/DD power.

sorry if you felt bad for this...I admit I'm having not much time nowadays to 
keep up with RFS, and for newcomers the process is somewhat slower...I feel sad 
for your gbp sentence, I like instead it really a lot, next time (if you want 
of course),you can do something easy such as:git clone repocd repouscangbp 
import-orig --pristine-tar ../tarball.tar.gzdo your modifications and commitgbp 
dchfix changelogsend an email requesting sponsorhip without even having to do 
the RFS.
I don't think it is more difficult than your current workflow, but it makes 
easier to review single changes, and to know why you did and what (if 
commitmessages are self explanatory).
I have to say, at the end your work has gone into the archive, so the time was 
not lost at all, and I thank you for the nice contribution you did.
I only had to revert a Break relationship you had erroneously bumped, and 
everything else was nice on the first shot, something not easy to be seenon a 
first RFS bug.
Please let me know if you want to contribute more on Debian, I'm pretty sure 
you have the required skills to do it in the proper way, even if it might bea 
little bit more difficult than the Fedora approach (and trust me, it used to be 
even more difficult, now with salsa we at least have one common place forgit 
repositories)
Gianfranco