Bug#989486: RFS: python-click-log/0.3.2-1 -- Logging integration for Click - Python 3.x

2021-06-04 Thread Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-click-log": * Package name: python-click-log Version : 0.3.2-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL :

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-06-04 Thread Jon Gough
On 5/6/21 8:36 am, Sven Hartge wrote: The Wanderer wrote: I genuinely do not see what insisting on uninstalling plugins at the same time as the main program, for all user accounts, provides as a benefit. The only maybe benefit I've seen suggested is cleaning up to free disk space, and that

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-06-04 Thread Jon Gough
On 5/6/21 7:59 am, The Wanderer wrote: On 2021-06-04 at 17:43, Jon Gough wrote: On 9/5/21 5:40 pm, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 04:41:13PM +1000, Jon Gough wrote: I now know what path I need to follow, i.e. have a plugin manager that uses the platform installation

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-06-04 Thread Sven Hartge
The Wanderer wrote: > I genuinely do not see what insisting on uninstalling plugins at the > same time as the main program, for all user accounts, provides as a > benefit. The only maybe benefit I've seen suggested is cleaning up to > free disk space, and that seems to me to be so obviously

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-06-04 Thread The Wanderer
On 2021-06-04 at 17:43, Jon Gough wrote: > On 9/5/21 5:40 pm, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > >> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 04:41:13PM +1000, Jon Gough wrote: >>> I now know what path I need to follow, i.e. have a plugin manager >>> that uses the platform installation process so that the uninstall >>>

Re: Location for user installed plugin libraries and icons

2021-06-04 Thread Jon Gough
On 9/5/21 5:40 pm, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 04:41:13PM +1000, Jon Gough wrote: My conclusion is that application plugin mangers should make use of the platform installation process for installing and uninstalling plugins as it "the platform installation process"

Bug#977380: RFS: fonts-sono/0.93-1 [ITP] -- soft monospace variable font

2021-06-04 Thread Tobias Frost
I've just sponsored an upload of gftools; it is now in NEWS. Unfortunatly, with that package in a local repository, the font still FTBFs: INFO:ufo2ft.postProcessor:Renaming glyphs to final production names Post processing VFs HOTFIX: './fonts/variable/Sono[wght].ttf': Font lacked a digital

Bug#981794: marked as done (RFS: gftools/0.5.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Google Fonts Tools)

2021-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:59:14 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#981794: RFS: gftools/0.5.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Google Fonts Tools has caused the Debian Bug report #981794, regarding RFS: gftools/0.5.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Google Fonts Tools to be marked as done. This means

Bug#989458: RFS: dte/1.10-1 -- small and easy to use console text editor

2021-06-04 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dte": * Package name: dte Version : 1.10-1 Upstream Author : Craig Barnes * URL : https://craigbarnes.gitlab.io/dte/ * License : GPL-2 * Vcs