Hi Andrey,
Thanks for the info, didn't know artemis have same binary file name. You
are right, it may not be a good idea to have /usr/bin/art. I believe
this python library is most useful as depend for other packages rather
than just creating text art at the terminal. I have excluded
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please exclude the generated file src/kildclient.gresource.c from the source
package.
You can use debian/copyright's Files-Excluded field.
When you are done, untag moreinfo.
This ships a file named /usr/bin/art. I'm not sure if it's a good idea by
itself, but also the artemis package also ships a file with this name
(which I'm also not sure is a good idea) and so you should follow the
first paragraph of
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#binaries
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: kd8...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-art":
* Package name : python-art
Version : 6.1-1
Upstream contact : Sepand Haghighi
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pointback":
* Package name : pointback
Version : 0.2-5
Upstream contact : Markus Triska
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "js2-mode":
* Package name : js2-mode
Version : 0.0~git20230628.79bc78d-1
Upstream contact : Dmitry Gutov
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
* Package name : go-mode.el
Version : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef
*
Your message dated Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:04:03 -0400
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1054385: Acknowledgement (RFS: art/6.1-1 [ITP] --
ASCII art)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054385,
regarding RFS: art/6.1-1 [ITP] -- ASCII art
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:31:19 +0200
with message-id <3b6215a8-58bf-4463-8e8f-f6bf2ad81...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: fheroes2/1.0.9+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Free remake of Heroes
of Might and Magic II game engine
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017680,
regarding RFS:
Am 23.10.23 um 12:05 schrieb Norwid Behrnd:
What is wrong with just adding mdl as a new binary package in the existing
source package?
By the conventions of the Ruby team,[1] the name `ruby-mdl` conveys the idea
the binary provides only a library. For them, the binary however provides an
> What is wrong with just adding mdl as a new binary package in the existing
> source package?
By the conventions of the Ruby team,[1] the name `ruby-mdl` conveys the idea
the binary provides only a library. For them, the binary however provides an
application conventionally named without the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libheif":
* Package name : libheif
Version : 1.17.1-1
Upstream contact : struktur AG
* URL : http://www.libheif.org
* License : BOOST-1.0,
Am 23.10.23 um 11:23 schrieb Norwid Behrnd:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:34:22 +0200
Bastian Germann wrote:
So, where is that mdl package that ruby-mdl depends on with the new version?
Following an advice by Antonio Terceiro,[1] the intention is dummy / transition
package ruby-mdl
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:34:22 +0200
Bastian Germann wrote:
> So, where is that mdl package that ruby-mdl depends on with the new version?
Following an advice by Antonio Terceiro,[1] the intention is dummy / transition
package ruby-mdl
https://mentors.debian.net/package/ruby-mdl/
So, where is that mdl package that ruby-mdl depends on with the new version?
15 matches
Mail list logo
