Re: Time delay between RFS messages
Hello Boris, On 18.10.2011 13:13, Boris Pek wrote: So how long I should wait to sent repeated message in these cases? (Since last message or since first message in that thread) I am sorry to hear you can't find a sponsor. There is definitively room for improvements left and we're discussing possibilities to improve the situation. The latest plan is to track sponsor requests as bugs instead. Regarding your question, there is no strict rule. Typically people seem to ping every few weeks again. Just don't flood the list with your request and nobody will mind you doing a re-post. If you file a RFS for another time, please make sure your mail reader files a correct follow-up header to point people to previous discussions on your package (if any). Moreover, you may want to consider to ask relevant teams or individuals aside of formal requests to this list. Possibly a developer maintaining packages similar to yours might be interested to sponsor you. Also, certain types of packages are being maintained in teams. In such cases you should consider joining that team. Typically package sponsoring is handled privately in packaging teams. I didn't use RFS before and I didn't find this info in the FAQ. Which FAQ do you mean? I admit, there is room for improvement left on mentors.d.n. But I think this question can be added somewhere in documentation. Yes, my pending change on mentors.d.n will outline the role of sponsors and emphasize communication channels between sponsors and people looking for team. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e9f6230.5000...@toell.net
Re: Notes about mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Boris, On 10.10.2011 12:31, Boris Pek wrote: 1) Successfully uploaded packages are not deleted from mentors.debian.net as it was earlier. There is no even such option in account settings. So people should remove own packages manually. Not all need current functional for package reviewing... There is a setting. If you are logged in, you can remove a package by clicking on the Delete package link. 2) There is no any marker that a package was uploaded to the Debian in package details page. Such packages are being removed (again) in future. The code is already there [1]. 3) Some time ago it was very interesting field with counter in package details page. That counter was showing the number of downloads by potential sponsors. There is no such useful counter now. Was it something wrong with its algorithm? I didn't assume anyone would miss it. Apparently people do, so it may come back in future. Or, if you want, send me a patch enabling it. Unless I am mistaken we have some code tracking it already. PS: debexpo-devel mailing list looks like realy dead: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debexpo-devel/ http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debexpo-devel/2011-September/09.html Yes. My apologies. We might decide soon what to do with the mailing list to avoid any confusion. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=blob;f=debexpo/cronjobs/removeolduploads.py;h=e710b2b05f31f3ba72bd3221d1be9ef4828bcb5b;hb=refs/heads/devel - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOlGGYAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtLLUP/A+zued+tjePD6RhHjzE8SEv aF1bl9diDpDNkzSsvIwHHdyshIFNlwQQiXFfRERHWBmcjbDRHN/VFUIFlHXm3ki8 XGmzsBRHYiuvcYNxtnJ+DUpeCGnpATYNd4GMXbo4p9G4lLmEabQ4JDa3MeQgCTpA K7icqf2p84TCah/YhLl+2zq0skS0tGysmw1O1myEG12/k1oaIuks7O3/dz56goij vpGnZ9Y88pc/+fCNj73rUDByhoT+iO2t1/9NshCLCMzjXyFEuqvGZ76ztBhdq33s ftwYetA2rUy0E7hx79PdSzyTCoHD91Xp+DjpAhvn8jSMmR2RMH6P+tAyYjPNhfGS ktQWHrvY0MrFuqzvIeLTavWtLqzPKHBWFwITZ2sGAMcbeiknWQzIfPpKXtPY0SMO B+yBnCH599aCJWFx27lL+53p3T1YO3kb7k20U0qpCiEzlf8ryn8UET2R/wyGNaia w3SiydLqsbQ1P5o+RGJEL9M0JblSbUiQM0nGuBLcTLgOMBOQbCRPKn60f9BqEelc UQwc12ZGj7EB2VXzoY5Qq7H8cJb31DocWixbwJgUmWcmZ/tx0e7W6TdG2wNINfz1 7qVlWpsqXqrj4vTaPMUc3f/jf861wZww72NaQaxWI05jRhA5vHchO1JGUrEYwYDT /n8eeAdFc+HuyUOFLBA/ =uaXZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e946199.3010...@toell.net
Re: dput failure to mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Paul, On 10.10.2011 09:26, Paul Elliott wrote: Because of previous difficulty dput'ing swe-standard-data with http I decided to upload it with ftp. Here is the console output: As you can see in succeeds. you should have gotten this email: 01:10:08,161 ERROR [debexpo.importer.3192] Rejected: You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports oldstable-backports-sloppy stable-security testing-security stable-proposed-updates testing-proposed-updates sid wheezy squeeze lenny squeeze-backports lenny-backports lenny-security lenny-backports-sloppy lenny-volatile squeeze-security squeeze-updates wheezy-security - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOksCUAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtNXQQALwPryCPkim1pAiT2EJMdZSm ZFETG5AjBvOz5fugzGOtv+/FQ0XDplIlCD90/Uc63BWdOqBNzj5g36237npklXmF iVV3uUcCEoSu93+0WWLRccWP4nVnUIq6Dm4h05t6gz8PPABq3DO/Pj7WoS3ghc1y esDM8jAVdtnL9k8FNjkqXIRlFXotpC0QOgXHxxYkYolVaBx5aKUAkksM1dD78ZPy e9oaMl+x9j6Q0waL+DpDmcLpx0xiY2KvHmMa2cd8WdnGBxbdJStKve1Z4uqqN8Sy WRkQ27UJFzuR3bV4bTVrVrI+6Jt0vzcWfR5jEifRH69n79yq9ahXzZspPWP6ZwxS Dlhy/63KnB6Epg7juXhxbcAmQoLUwv6IzBsHpusK+Fy3UKjaOK8LS0My9AKr4TX3 SBQA5kQPk8j2RT5injsiKd53/EZ+HNQZgvhozGliL7nQNR7sLcXtWyocLZAI9PtO eQ/QzZUBomK56IJM7eyXKREbCHJrI7HhKMRZA2x+Z9x1QPzB3sRbPh988UuwZK3y mYHiC7udHNned83Ch+I1p+8573exKEmw3EhqxEL/+HBHRrDTFtwTgHV+GUl7UFr1 Lkqm6O3awt4UQRS168S5AAxwxEGQ/ajI7avZVGYgGd1EolqGVhKglqF10of/YllF Gln2WQFMd/3EVwbe3TSG =CL7Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e92c095.5000...@toell.net
Re: needs a sponsor column in m.d.n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 10.10.2011 10:22, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: I meant that in the webpage (http://mentors.debian.org) shows only the packages that needs a sponsor. But http://mentors.debian.net/packages/index shows them all. Do you want to get rid of the flag or just don't display it where it is implied the package needs a sponsor (e.g. on the start page)? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOksE0AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtYLAP/2m7xxAj8aeMXQdII7mh3lnd gutS/gtTmzDVXSTduObZfi4vWw64Ch31D88Lbfjyg6VkUiSwoAUiqRSUBYGiUhX3 FqF+meolav0B0y9EaXUg9dPnuYwkd7Av0D06SE2fVWPk9H+HgauNdKU1oAL+96f+ /SKzj08j3QlKSureE6VbWd/3lZ1vTxXnR5eayIxUZRcyLaCGp5/sRaWM4Btsk/Ic zLJ3tSU8b29fD+2LYspgT3jRZXhFSzg/UVItNvV74n4AKX2rnc/GUMSDzbQkV1jr zkvOMR8Xa1R8SfsbrtctIEIC55vpntobeiYwXSGLEW+7WDOJMpHqGr7VR1WKNswY XvR8lV62ElUctxR8MNHtGSn/SYX6zDGYPstBlZourK1ekOfDlFzznOWf1gaE6Aeg nx9jMDC6HZtptc4DFTOiKP91AgMkldG+1j/A/VPHltWl0VPW4UXZPF4nv3yOyBZ2 hX2fQym/ysgU49s+VNnRap3vHyn+fZcYy1YtSbnrCJDzAckXtUZf0ZyPjj8Sl2eD LZG+3Np8PuJlSoeYX+GUj40/uOYxW6bkCxT/hoM1x6TqyYdGB1vbAY6VfktxojUd oLD5J2QCwKTaQE8+rCXBQj9sKNwG3+Na5A+52Gli+GE1+of7uvdsn75s2s8HmLA8 YQ0imFSZRXeJiI+3v+h7 =cjjD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e92c134.9030...@toell.net
Re: Did mistake in signaturing, and can't fix this by dcut.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello again, On 08.10.2011 22:05, Tal Hadad wrote: The maintainer send me this: gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found in case I was unclear: You can not upload to ftp-master.debian.org. You are not allowed to upload to ftp-master.debian.org. You need to find a sponsor which uploads a package on your behalf. To do so, upload your package to mentors.debian.net NOT ftp-master.debian.org. (I possibly have understood some parts wrong in your explanation. I'm sorry.) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOkK9VAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtV3MP/RGanyi4SkuT/HCIGp0N7pj3 9r0lvJV8NXH4jriWH3Cb6QCV+/4oVQgaIg6w2SX4mdOjhEnjWyVfVdBdxXEJgoUW vysBGCg/9nY8QOr62KrKDcLDlm5ZZFEpKIMKAeWvnzZ0aKpMnvSuVDsUjtrE+DE4 kNxp+bKWq5x337iudF4r310VW7/A+WZrsaO2TGbyXs0xntGitJMgtKOICVa7OoFv MMbT7b+JrxpgmvX0cHOud7eZ5ljNhMar6Ua8UCSuTLlynqMgF6MTFZmhcGGUZqRN +c1TKsVOGreXBMurYDDxC09A3wguvVzeewzgTyJFE0DOmMKWep2C9uj9KYFuXs/2 gB3Pv1TeOKf3yL5aB4rEbp2h2YXMsT4vQKcGo3zdIrjysY7lXccPteFePWHb5imY HcwrkHI6NICVju39JszNGLKFsUNDYYlGOMv3M6LXCYPSpDTKF6YtMCtQxfqlUbpj gHFTfAt972marbpQnSWYKoxXWDPJL1KcL5fiTfNGSbY1BBCNG+BU0Z8heLdFWnAs P4Tk6966GvppHRumcaukDnPPXA2y5s7Dx1aI7u3knzHPXD6s9t4br87PB9C7wXZV VU77VtjVLgkWtTTR6fGtSWCCW7a3vgzAf7MaAW9olcAanyD0V4u4SfU0c0jqGIdK 9sBlMj+BxEyr8QNJ9njq =nIOx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e90af56.6000...@toell.net
Re: Did mistake in signaturing, and can't fix this by dcut.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 08.10.2011 22:21, Tal Hadad wrote: Sorry for being misunderstood, but read carefully- I said I get this error using DPUT, and it SHOULD recognize and allow me. I uploaded changes file, so this is why I'm wondering. I'm sorry but you don't seem to be a Debian Developer, and only Debian Developers are allowed to upload to ftp-master. This is not a problem of dput which will happily upload whatever you feed into it. What makes you think you should be allowed to upload packages to Debian? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOkLG8AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtNqsP/jtWqvEnU3qoCUtnXMCdqWZO R1M0v9Q+dl0+iBNcnTsdDAWryMoi/GRT/mjOTzbJzzWnPjb6l/iUSNej60ddH+6g DmSEf3wlVQNsJ27q8Ljh1DAniX/Q+ALY7aHnOiVv8RrnpKAplmYLX2aVYdP2cDUf pUivxD1iACI6S13ZoxLkMjqmH4vgA5wKm+OqjhVrace5eKu60drO0M6N/+XzlW0Y lE3p+5S3CrdAEdz9zyGKhecfclKBUHNsjs0JVcn5v+jqWH46yYgNePt8i8pk2Aub pT8fBP8sha02c57Yrm4KyGOzx4B8hJd4GiukcnRL/080W91vlI1KcpxHhuSsEJgM aQtUmPrtFmPsyfoGFWXTtA8C+xCdKnwsfZYo9rwG09hXtKQtSYukBOMeSBKhu0fz neI0NVPnXbA99s0o15Hy/BuIbq1roeFMDNOVy3ynF56I+UiuTVa61y3TLJRdSVPn B//L2VXhO+S0P/fBRfTgTzn9k5aL1Ma8j1NtZw/2Ffy+C8lCx+KJ/QvR0/ahBTWf +AIYlr6WCVeCS2Pz+RRZplzaDPcpakieu4Zl0flmCAEUMxt3NFNxJPaAYpRIBsCZ 2UmF9ciTkKixdbsY9fkZQ64CsRtBWfWciOvwUpHelICmg3ZeP+0AQT/RjkGLOFtZ qcEyEfy8vBwKR4qphvp6 =LsAn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e90b1bc.5020...@toell.net
Re: Did mistake in signaturing, and can't fix this by dcut.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Tal, On 07.10.2011 10:08, Tal Hadad wrote: The maintainer, whom the failure mail was send to, have suggest me to remove the package and try again. Still 0.1.29 is there so I can't. Then I've found out that I can use dcut. I've created a signed reset.commands file: .. FTP Master queue daemon sent me this: gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found (Exit status 2) /reset.commands has bad PGP/GnuPG signature! I'm sorry if I can't help you appropriately but your question confused me a bit. I try to paraphrase what you tried, please tell me where I'm wrong: You are neither a Debian Developer nor a Debian Maintainer, hence a sponsor of you uploaded xnoise 0.1.29. For some reasons I don't quite understood that turned out to be the wrong package which was not supposed to be uploaded to Debian. Hence, you now decided to dcut (cancel) that upload, but the ftp-master refuses your signature because it didn't find your public key? Given I was right with my summary, you can't dcut uploads made to Debian. ftp-master only accepts signatures from Debian Developers (not sure about Debian Maintainers who try to dcut their own package with DMUA set). The key you uploaded to mentors.debian.net is not related here, that key is only used _there_ to verify your uploads, it has no relevance for the ftp-master. If you: a) uploaded xnoise to ftp-master yourself but you are not a Debian Developer or Debian Maintainer with DMUA set (don't worry if you don't understand, I can see the package is NEW - so it does not matter anyway) just wait. Your upload will automatically be removed as you can't upload directly to Debian anyway b) You seem not to have uploaded a changes file, hence ftp-master considers your upload incomplete. Just wait, it will remove both of your uploads automatically anyway c) had a sponsor which uploaded xnoise for you, only your sponsor can use dcut, or at least he needs to sign your commands file. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOjsXdAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtMKwP/1FI0nFgiDWa7L1XzepzoNj+ JbCaXNmF/5g+X+Q8yGKBzDeDVVUzy7/5sCS9Yp+CKaExdN7Qex3UabA+pRja6/RG E2mBf6MpkaYPcihzIC7F6tsy/56GzVia0gbUJZqgJMDVpN86lE+I99pXvB3kqDG2 1Wsg62vlOdTX0rGE5jL7By2jGpVOL+pxZ+dFqjMTBxTPJgZFbHXx16VUQHpwy99K K2hEf8SmNgpDsJmRrWEQgOHqMqYf0/S1hjmf1iFtCnZDfLJtUTd1vHaxP3kWJImc 6OueSuteD8r0IsldO+6+R3KY7L3YLvxlgeQQ4v/y8QN8Jfu/MOHmSrSIb+OnhCK2 r3KrJhdXAwsM77ekrPoXyu1EC0TR7vlBa7e+lINlBr/hhSEiswkrpENwJhPu8re/ GNFOBXXzOwVptSBsLaqS0BIYXPa2rbeS2o9qZUOuk6kKULsLiGd7G9nEkvehp/IC nXd68BFyjFohN4S0oBTHj/Ut3AJHiuLmH7R4q/IsjeaJ0xM75lrZAE+RZVx6UhvP R5RJtHJg68027TWktMrkFLoJ62PqNnBk3ct9Drh3q1jT9dBiMkv5VAZ5n9nZpe0m MiiCYoacYX1iHfzqtrtNCDkbNM0IoRQxee0ITiWsJH1YcMqqLbDJ588KZPUMTSjm eHrS5nzEeaHCBykOxdt3 =YLXt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8ec5de.7020...@toell.net
Re: RFS: leechcraft (closes ITP bug)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Boris, On 03.10.2011 20:38, Boris Pek wrote: It builds those binary packages: leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft [] None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing what leechcraft is. Thank you for interest. Of cause I can describe in more detail. I guess, what Bernhard wanted to imply is, that you should improve the understandability of your short package descriptions in a way you don't need to know already what Leechcraft is about. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOigpnAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtpHEP/iH+FsIMW0nhPktjgrJWK5vl EhA1mUGaQb+4myg37P/NmJpZP2aX30GmEQsPTV/dzpkGZ54Xle3Pe92gaDAhWuFy vAn4e8hze9f/XBfK08QWcsh1Ktd33fYb6nfXYZSo+lTTZJxN3ms1Sxzw64Tb7V28 QnEYOT8Lc0ST+AguYqZ5FEsfGyiOQ1h5DAnywhUTXUd1/ky6qO0+KXhnP2Sepip6 djlHKNWegDPqB5d92iRFtSacqOYI1HGnyvJs6OeUK9GU92kzjowSQopS2AjdvqT1 M47jhQL8G8mdSAJECo6UyegQ1NvVxVONyHbAC3coNz0iRf9hIods5bLhmXo5/vGR x/OCty0/bn7p5SSPDBs6v7XY2E/M9kDbYe45FoNtVLKjbF3sR9w4AgaRf20oD5fv aleWHDAIxPBpiL5Pp6iBBEP2zdj6Gu503mcPvThP4JPOeii0exSJ04QFCOj7t+jt jjcYsB/+owU1AGPeSqQNaEIj+O/TU4plFNFzFW2YoOuGftpN8EYUoJkrxg6AMoVH KYaVvNb4o3a2w8OuLwYnEpmJgG30h9KKAlLkHo4hF99/jwzsMpqal+J3ntUFhDtj 84y3po821ELu6drxrJESY13QqPFELvS33oKxlhK2TYGP68cODPXn8aN1Cu7Qp3Q4 ox/l1sAlKpAy8KB/P2+Z =J7qW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e8a0a6...@toell.net
Re: RFS: snes9x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Michael, On 03.10.2011 00:51, Michael Moorman wrote: Is the non-commercial use clause what makes it non-free according to the DFSG? quoting from the license (highlighting by me): Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute Snes9x in both binary and source form, for non-commercial purposes, is hereby granted without fee, providing that this license information and copyright notice appear with all copies and any derived work. That's a clear contradiction to our Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) where I quote §6 (No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor) [1]. So yes, this restriction makes your package non-free. Everything else reads ok to me and would qualify as free software. [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOiO7PAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtDGIQANUINd+/4Z0gdMnCGoQPT88q GuGYT9bCS5KlYJvfcoR8qQO5iHpME9AYNNydzwvXb67P10bw2Te8Y97OXIlpvsY4 +E7UTfi55hjIYYbCsXsXtiOdttvJ0NJTJ5fejnomb9257ueDtQHnTaOIzTNsxuoA 17R0En4sJ4S7J3VUml0IvWU15DFOY3BqQoo3Y7EOqIe/UPNNnI0oQhvI+yxRDHo8 hjWjzhj0j1O3c3Xn8Lym7WsACusx5KRO6yZYydN/QgQkHwpnIP6HnJuLIcWfjsKa p28wP72MYMIzgXyBOVHSlbPrt81/erZkp1K4zQCOcxCVSt3Gc+AQ+903vrx452tw kgRuXgsj59CgbunRmVPAyhE/cUUo6fUl2rNQQG7GenGHlNEZ1ZrfjhjWmHSFNHZL gUDNGqE+IRkJO1UASwN6gCr2vqtlUs5zpl61ArX0edgnuefUTIZlorKgjP+eBeHx SeqQTiTM8GICDSP/AFvAVdKc7YfGIrpZd4e/UhS63htHMJTR6/qfH228fyvl0YKX 2LrpvXK9RXkN9Sf+d34fU2ipWfjZBxz563CB8MRzzLcOM7/WC0qGfD+ZO1Off18f WecpF8/xbTXOru3hOzY3lh1w59fVcJkiXszCpC/vzGAQczvjIMiNTGkuTFi5Nrhk udsfyqfwbm/gRpIO4wNr =E8LI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e88eecf.9070...@toell.net
New software revision on mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I just deployed a software revision of Debexpo, the software running mentors.debian.net. The visible changes are low and mostly related to the completely rewritten introduction for new maintainers [1]. However the code base got support for more features coming up soon I will announce once again when they are ready. Having that said, this new software revision also merged a lot of (invisible) bug fixes into the live site. In particular: * Debian revision uploads without full source (e.g. mypackage_1.0-2) are now correctly imported if the orig.tar.gz was found on official Debian mirrors * Native packages are correctly imported (this does not mean you should be uploading native packages unless you know what you are doing) * Allowed distributions to be uploaded are now: oldstable', 'stable', 'unstable', 'experimental', 'stable-backports', 'oldstable-backports', 'oldstable-backports-sloppy', 'stable-security', 'testing-security', 'stable-proposed-updates', 'testing-proposed-updates', 'sid', 'wheezy', 'squeeze', 'lenny', 'squeeze-backports', 'lenny-backports', 'lenny-security', 'lenny-backports-sloppy', 'lenny-volatile', 'squeeze-security', 'squeeze-updates', 'wheezy-security'. Something for everyone of you. I hope. * While we're at it: When rejecting incomplete uploads (because of a missing orig.tar.gz for example), Debexpo gives now an improved error reason pointing the uploader to the most likely problem * There should be no HTML display issues anymore, e.g. on error pages Finally, a random poll: Are you bored from announcements like this, I make on this mailing list regarding Debexpo software updates and bugs since that's not /entirely/ on-topic here and you would hence prefer to use our own mailing list for that purpose? Or would you say: it's ok, we use mentors.d.n anyway, just go on? [1] http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOheCpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNto74P/39cRvNG/z2MzAEI/W+drvbn Yhmib+xOi26kQd1JOf0MoCEkLnPRi55avf3JZhvEw/OoNSuH1vWdKL+EnRkAQo7K wE36/ucApLNFcV3FIAe7wdggiADmMbtzRL8/j3k2wy27ZNs2H7tX8o+XfH4bF/ma 298evXRvyu5UnzYFFlNsVqXSKH6vNZMCUJn4gAvUUGzYmmzFsf0jO2Y0AlBNsSkq 15wTxZFWtakBQmdW/hcTCzABtoTDnlalob2lIkoOF9tJAqpIPp0WIdacDHY2Mur1 50M6bVpn2psvl0MC7NPQ2ahEB0spTQYz9AZkFgEswOrKXxgf5gFJ6WA7RSrLKBXz 6LPyOzcihxjv8p+feLzMVROS9Y7w2N3av8A7a+rl6w7dk3h1yG/kkuGMnGKVGmM5 kvi96SUNbyMQHdBgyFE1Z49k4Tc3EDQcJju1XTkSECQgQO2LZDq1isl1/xZ9RYQ0 PB+3Uy3mDnJ+7Mb8hJ2BTpM4qyJR+/DbTpzlNms32Xwe1fRf0BT6wHFqSJwjsYpr fi75utFa9TzZzZb9TgkwYZjYXesLUkS0NUnpXmo1VkG7yuyg89Ov90X0AR78yp4A 2JgD0P2G2FKSF4OzkhG8dcOO1yXr5mDzvmGSe/tH7k1b+cxcjOGNM7MVDf6l27CL y1/dpOA49IKZKTBBv89A =FgJF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e85e0a9.5030...@toell.net
Re: reportbug: support for mentors.debian.org pseudo package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Michael, On 30.09.2011 21:57, Michael Gilbert wrote: Then let's get mentors officialized to tear down this barrier! This is not something I or you or anyone else could push forward right now here. This is something which needs consensus among Debian Developers and a DPL accepting that. And, finally some DDs who would need to be delegated there. Feel free to open a thread on debian-devel and/or get our beloved DPL's opinion on that matter. Eventually you should find two developers first which would agree with you pushing things forward here. In my opinion a term like contributors would be much more empowering. It would better convey the fact that this is as a place for new contributors to work together, learn, evolve, and grow within the project. We are all contributors. Those who need the mentors.debian.net and those who don't. There is still room for improvements left. I agree, I chose this approach since it's possible to implement right now; although it's certainly fragile (certain changes to the mentors pages will break the scraping algorithms). A soap based interface would be wonderful! In fact, I noticed there is already a SOAP interface. Apparently nobody used it since 2+ years though, so it may be working or not, but it seems ok, generally speaking: import SOAPpy server = SOAPpy.SOAPProxy(http://mentors.debian.net/soap.wsdl;) server.config.dumpSOAPIn = 1 server.package(name='lighttpd',version='1.4.29-1') *** Incoming SOAP ** SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance; xmlns:SOAP-ENV=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/; SOAP-ENV:Body packageResponse packageResult type=tns:stringArray string xsi:type=xs:stringlighttpd/string string xsi:type=xs:stringArno Töll lt;deb...@toell.netgt;/string string xsi:type=xs:stringlighttpd - fast webserver with minimal memory footprint ... /string string xsi:type=xs:string0/string string xsi:type=xs:string1.4.29-1/string string xsi:type=xs:stringhttpd/string string xsi:type=xs:stringunstable/string string xsi:type=xs:stringmain/string string xsi:type=xs:stringoptional/string string xsi:type=xs:string629638/string string xsi:type=xs:string2011-09-30 15:13:18.862216/string /packageResult /packageResponse /SOAP-ENV:Body /SOAP-ENV:Envelope ... - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOhjRAAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtqd8QAIUANc+XSBsgJpQBeGXnxsKW pB8zpnX1m5YJmGFjoB5zd0mYDtVlvk7ArCOKg+35d7IPAByeJt+wfgP8rUfyVTae yUMOQnFKZUIiSj8rlsZ1PZzt9vUoEBjujQWaqgrX/SQgKu4JqXEU796QcZJwq0MY 4jVdBkUD5wgBmi3hFJmGm4OsNdNnLFAU3Pozi4AyFLcOiBDP7OiBl/vDBi1NLwWu agccko95gFsFX25/gLCDAbSMCuxIo7xnpDxHRkA3Sx+as7/aK4VwSr2ALoMd42fL dw7rFi0icP4yQavW8TSCONNm2F+Q9oxZ5o5KrGB4EkKSbZvo3bI+ZxmRUWf4PiS6 Yv2bcqnb7KAHXa5pR+P4JcDo6TTS5Wg6/IciU4WkRP9VgMy9WefzTlPGiZeDfaZR PlCGxTawppQBLGUlf7kfpRV5nFQET0WCQ/B5KW401L3D3COHoEDCoIIAuqgURRVp NYFG61/2G49cvFBPcdqd3XtVwZbyS5yqgX7+Q2iUP4Q7GBJBGOTG3PZKOYAreQak sDRkRTOiKXfGEGhhCEFma4j+t/bBonOCvmJnsIPMm2QkNDKTXblZlJFMUwpUX3ii 4rydHOuWcBRDpTkrfjmKMioELEbn0bJz4tCj9C2nFjsSXnKZ1prEqyacWGzK+Puk PH6zQj67ibj4CuTk9HSH =Ag5w -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e863440.4020...@toell.net
Re: reportbug: support for mentors.debian.org pseudo package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Michael, (sorry, wrote you and the bug instead of d-mentors before) On 29.09.2011 06:32, Michael Gilbert wrote: I've written a patch to tentatively support a mentors.debian.org pseudo package (in order to better track and support the incredible volume of sponsorship requests and such). I appreciate your efforts and I like the idea of reportbug integration. I won't comment about the patch itself, I am not maintaining the reportbug package, so I can't judge. However please note, mentors.debian.NET is not an official Debian project. The .net indicates a subtle difference. While some people, including Don, agreed in eventually having a debian-mentors pseudo package that would be associated with the debian-mentors mailing list, not with mentors.debian.net (i.e. Debexpo, the sofware running there). Hence I don't think any tight mentors.d.n integration of reportbug would be appropriate for the time being. Also I am not particularly convinced on the way you do it (content scraping). If you want, I will gratefully merge a SOAP interface into Debexpo you could query though. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOhEcnAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt85gP+gOJpcTvQNscV2/GiLsg4B/0 bs80wDhK9LF4YiLywFMjiporJb3HcB7tq+vYcy/2Nckkg9WRjgkWpl4ckd4VeI13 DS6stTb8SYlfskH0mefDDj4o/U9LDtjsYOJ1XJRUt0jYP0yzPtPVHnzidRY1TKDO Fl/e3XI+iprOaztm5oieHJlrzR4HYfUJg9oR2kiPtaE77dy4NVASwExw8rBQQIrA s0EPeExjiKQijI4H1PHbyk+7BB2YPnxL5JEqgYtStJgJBVb0+FYLTYxoLZycST4Q lsszWBljTd/omFIx+zwvvRoyxtSYxh1t2Jto7jsKnettE1zk4DOohN+55/1gs1Ca AYXaV7jNR8dHE/p+GnZJffy7nQHNN/YhqI6gV8lFaMIF2Qm1eHmlc5DCCt2lnP9V qHwMWdb88S3iy81XWXMSrrfjwS3hMBI5OukZtpkxP5fYbP8w0xDU1oWTEQaXDXP6 k1vEU4DKM3KBwl+F3miPyTaUT9lGP/WgFD/j2xDDSlF85SZxLRRUbSRQWNf2ojmd osgZVDU6q8teDpD9C1Y+TQGBV+eWzDTKmbXIsLGJaE144Q2V5sqmF07wc3R2CfbP jH0jgzaASTMNf/u90n4OZKCWP6rpTyfNHNT8fIB8W0g7XT1VCg/Xr2WRmlF1XVou DR6hbhORB2MeL8Hs0Brg =PdF4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e844727.20...@toell.net
Re: Attempt to dput fails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25.09.2011 09:58, Paul Elliott wrote: It may be because this is a data package and therefore large. The file it apparently chokes on, swe-standard-data_1-1_all.deb, is 34M in size. That should not be a problem. Eventually it is for our fragile setup right now, which is proxying requests to the real server because we still couldn't move the DNS pointer. Besides pabs is probably right: Our HTTP proxy might time for such large uploads. I'm afraid, I can't do much here as the DNS pointer is beyond my control. I would like to try method = ftp but that asks for a password and neither or anonymous works! Use this configuration for FTP uploads: [mentors-ftp] fqdn = mentors.debian.net login = anonymous progress_indicator = 2 passive_ftp = 1 incoming = / method = ftp allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 Note, this goes through a proxy as well ... - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOfzFjAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtMo8P/27+R8BSE/zuKc+diIkLmRXh TxEGafy6dQAtqmsbJPYyoklyY6ybyqnpRrrKrILo8l3w0uJDcAEtDrX4ysYtVbgb 7ucCHUwRSWJC+yDek/swS4oUPw0qHsnxRnUx2sTtpkCWlCF4z2rmGgy376cSNren de++ACSq2t/YZ5JqV8wTZJEYRY77MsI7HwVxO7ybBygYWJJ4IIaZkpcRll5CHoDD 4btArioxoE8azi8szemiBNZsZSBaJXtaaOtfbJc6fCawSBJhgYKN+fzN1w61Eo2g /mpWf8qcomsHlJPoKgWgRFdkOPF0ydrxLIpF6QmUcT5IP7UObLLMcJqq77IMj37a 8LfSPa+DpLfqRaFTfB461ozKLkxSZV1wMWhx9Awp6S4UW3e0WvNL7MdMfD+xiRVk oD/El7RePfCnZbYCGqtQukHOa5EIx872hSW/09EZzj4X5PHy93Im1EBpERxqS5Wz V5iziP78yBh933KWPWdXdvR/dhcfgkEFenEuOzD6qdnFhFchnK5KYS4f3uyhsWCI oD3QEf4ot4U468riTXis9rR4ZWsO2FCdI9TCdsXaXhyOIPsPaUZuwWivpa8XpJur 8+wbxpiBFQFl6tulHUl1qUCw58HEuV5SA1hoVTczQiWCNIhgFFpNAP1TH6EEGBbl IEqu9Nghtp/Y+PJ53gTs =Q2xf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7f3163.8070...@toell.net
Re: Attempt to dput fails.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 25.09.2011 15:56, Paul Elliott wrote: I think the my account page should show how to setup .dput.cf for ftp as well. It took me a while to guess how this should look to make ftp work. There is a commit pending which does exactly that. It will be shown on http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers soon. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOfzb7AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt+CwP/3OKt1SYcNKzSmMrNm7Xr2rS BSRjfj3uFX1v1PQA7B+4yEQKSEjYFVysOv3HpYqyCc1ZNtxo6+2DmbTjk7yIiZWI p+z7620xrfgghgdVoiC4Z7fcjdQjmjDJaHOGLgGLW6TwnyPkhFSNBUGYB10P5Cwj VmyOltqhz0AFABou8cpx/bWIyxCS4VrqEVwhzK5hNtYjhXijjgyfEnLzATVzhrLe Hay1aZHaX2PE0NJ5QyueOoude0388OsjKjl/JWaObANTw+dV/EhpKXBx0ctIHJKW VK9tylwAXtFtLtCebQPYSGGgRy1oeSLfvzXpcK9VcY/p1TeilwY359J1S6kegMKf LGpy1hSx0slMVj7op33GAnP9nSh1ZVHoHM4DnnV6HtOeWEGN+2Dh5FJDVog6xIVO 8pgjvSpDZv45cUy0nfFYCujzyxa6Fk9z13zEVvX4OVxdR/Sz4uBDvEqzB50DJ7Vx UGt2ifTjK+TeIAV/WFlaguZge6ZjBJcLCSkmrhZPyFSge5lyk8DUKXqavwNWDw3q TkLklK2rjoDD7eJ4T4SCm56l25se5PbTHTp4pPyhbdIaYwD09k/XthUO8VpySCHD CUJWPxybjHxe5Saht700LlIpUz7j49F9CaBuaFi1VNwFzcHIqJsIrQIZSOSCAp7t 4pfRZmZz8vtDDUb0ZKaF =aCTQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7f36fc.7080...@toell.net
Re: E helper-templates-in-copyright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.09.2011 13:56, Julien Valroff wrote:
Upstream Author(s):
^
Yes, that's the problem. Lintian checks the following patterns:
if (m,\fill in (?:http/)?ftp site\,o or
m,\Must follow here\,o or
m,\Put the license of the package here,o or
m,\put author[\'\(]s\)? name and email here\,o or
m,\Copyright \(C\) Name OfAuthor\,o or
m,Upstream Author\(s\),o or
m,\years\,o or
m,\special license\,o or
m,\Put the license of the package here indented by 1 space\,o or
m,\This follows the format of Description: lines in control file\,o or
m,\Including paragraphs\,o or
m,\likewise for another author\,o) {
tag 'helper-templates-in-copyright';
}
Its not exactly obvious, the Author(s) shall be replaced though, I admit.
Moreover you eventually want to use DEP-5 instead, please see [1]. DEP-5
is required for many sponsored maintainers from their sponsors, but no
global Debian requirement.
[1] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOfcaBAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtazIQAJKiRsSSxX0+7VrmM0aCRNrv
djsLiAM9SHRBfLcA6GAxDRyylhEfb7s3xvHZjI02IYaiXFyL9BkKy45CJydsjJM6
oKu8xE9pbMK8d2vSo9RQOZdkU/nMRrrUimAIiAeXsk/jSEId0x3v/h8HBvjHhPF9
PL2NEf/T1Y+SQdpKcboRWPUBxUpfSuk9xCN5cfZXVtjv9xyJRA2YTMTRErpQ207w
DOKYCt6iIdkvHt+bIo8zCebkkAbIGsEkTSekZCmH1+NBQgCqj7+C/Ynzhi4kh+6t
SeTWuHWcvQgDonAeugBHMQo3iY+aGtaztUhNq0ycta1q3c2XUmG0Mxei1Nlf9YUW
Y/GVfqL3+T64pAVtWD5ND7MX25RDUoYWcX5QaA8/PYxyuaIprTSOwleF58OWG0ML
pjUaM2dlpudcPNa147Q+BEFVvoBhRMTMpR4fd2WltWtTknLIhIHPSpNhZIm+uCWf
5r4CdJuZYDQH7uf0Wtgn+YFN3w338YymtG8kx35awe1thP9dvTObhyWBe+swO4Dk
AGxn7U0OOSZCTTFIqbOp7ngEj8loUGcVwOgYvBNQVO/l+m+DsKbmGeN9AbdWIGHQ
rMlDubXTovZVTS7tPabOOucKrPgzTV6CnnHSVeWNjpgvfouZRZxU2tHe2f3le1iN
gZ/jKSJN71FWV08Ycdf9
=t+b+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7dc682.6090...@toell.net
Re: I can not register.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 24.09.2011 21:29, Paul Elliott wrote: Help I need to register to send my package so people can find fault with it! Could you forward me your registration mail? Please don't post the full URL publicly though as it contains your double-opt-in activation string. (Would you trust me, if I claim it is ok to forward me the mail though?) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOfkE/AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNty/IQAMtllhXoHMxsnS/S5QJEUY57 4iEShwovIRqwifkCtZ0IFcwEqQWIAwPKj2tjHej8nrw4nVSCIHdGoGQy4n29zhuE BoPuh3DdzUchoJBN+qtaLHOj3RtfIuXxK7s1puK7z3BHsm/4XbywDvTSZoqA67cz jNdHa89AhPbS4Vr8t8Vp8lgaJs65aDbtnCjCy+Xdi1vC65zn+V9XsReJi9F1wIpH C+NfiVo9+U6vmzgDkwDZHTcdt7Rg0iMpjzqkXXAxU5/jeZWK98tDoY8aimgST4t2 RDXxIWa3SPuj85aDeS6dVYVhpoi9gKlNNhGmg6z6eRibGNAS5Ywrkcu3RDNQ5Ew2 PycFVQAD6EhLqZRnK574B6jyHCnJrOgIfaRtb9R+TClVk/hMxoLEklFfexxaCk1a Dt8q3oLRR738BI3zlAYJjQAqLMkAHob0cZzzpShNgsLahBUWYDD7QXYl8o8/QwjW vt9ymkIAx/EezTdrdPlhPQJkszCszAPH0wDDXxCMUL79VjmaWG9zaTo9soYZOwIc uw1CFhi7K02Ac4R+Gzvk6UapUjgNdS4VHiIwUrTiND9vy+gVtqnxdouJb5D9F3iq 8loNPes5MfYSAQ3psG4Jd2gf8oGWBnopwo2avYFEpCP4eKbU3f6cc8T3i+jfNWpC ctbyo9VNmFbie/4H02Mo =7XnV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7e4140@toell.net
Re: mentors.debian.net moved to new hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tony, On 22.09.2011 15:51, Tony Houghton wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:08:33 +0200 Does it include the new version of debexpo that was soon to be deployed? In particular I'm waiting for a bugfix to allow uploading to experimental. No, not yet - sorry. I intend to deploy that very soon, unfortunately I still got no acknowledge from Asheesh, as the patch you are referring to is embedded in a major change and can't easily cherry-picked. As soon as we did, I will write a separate announcement. Sorry for the hassle. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOe0CMAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtMwYQAMb+cl8jjR4/dz2aiznBlboe BCYlixiUn3Rm4Xz4Jd6I06Qabbi/YgNFSVrXB9h6EW6bI1l6U/PNI71SjKzCLV/W U1LM1I0OYbQ8pbutiezUPwu4CYLjAnoYs3Th2oFU5tVm321XZxXpxo6kGM+ICaOg FcAmQS00SOF2XyKS+ltIeSbyLpjmQ74+tBJCc/4/GUW90NPiU88POrcsz4IvQKP0 I6sbPb18KB5Jl3uGMFfrfgvr/9FLFFYnamn7ZXkD0yFnyyjP7/vk1ZirumndAi3n m/JAPOY+fS+1GWc1fKZnezXCUbruo+h0sWDakStaFs/3XrSGqxVI2+sUYQDAcQMh 7UPDHugN6z3TxAEC5C6AEqSn4Zp5udsrYdBJoBivrO0FJkJt4JVFWD1P3Pw01hdB bMM8Qo8jEvZum24gwvZ/zToSqIme0yZUWiAf4zL8r6dhRFbl+K99ls89PxFEGsPn zwuw6WUjBWBzXu4fetJ7OAwOM+UvLmnYKFthuDktBc6MDMJNQiGrylc+shjHxArG xMiFRmVn0oEndLoz5bXt4+SstsO/t7C4BxpNeS7Ey+cUSa/sAMtydeZxD4eCQ/Eg mMA9IYs1nUnagDTyidV39LH6JvAgbMvFZopb5jTgkQHUqQuAGzUP5t4/15RIpFnM 4SIAzRR/zXqMTju2J5nN =Iig7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7b408c@toell.net
Re: mentors.debian.net time in sync?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeroen, On 21.09.2011 11:22, Jeroen Nijhof wrote: Hi Arno, E: libpam-tacplus: tar-errors-from-data ./lib/security/pam_tacplus.so: time stamp 2011-09-21 08:46:23 is 6411.189313009 s in the future Don't worry, that's Lintian, not a reject. Your package is perfectly reachable to everyone else. Regarding the Lintian error itself, you eventually didn't configure your local time accordingly. Our server runs with a time zone configured to be UTC and tar is supposed to cope with time zones. Yet we had your problem occasionally, but we never found the particular reason, so we expected the packages to /really/ have configured their clocks that way. If you have any other evidence, please let me know. (replied public, as I guess you just hit the wrong button in your MUA) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOea91AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtPuMQAMQi5P2GU3N9NR/XI1drHrwu 3iJiwIVSM/ZIIGGIhGYezxB23j6+V+XWkxsRjAmY1Ob4FSvxLmiDy2el5BSRUIbv Mexcz5F1MRtsjs67IO8Q136E6XfOx1TAk7XkTMBd4ym5NsQac53jRVvW85GSDtta eGPhgJLDBy960rPHFsCIpqwO4XmCC0EKRkLEU7tjaSVflIVzCxOhsE2/DV/i6Cjj VOMWKsZVMjmTJ3ClfkcPhWgMYWVoZyz/ycSrDtCAw2EhSee7d1O64V+DfT03zsgW Z3UKF8cQz25ftrsMjyhZxvuZbC+/FqS64p9yAQOWbnIDhyFEWWJbFFq2RmTTU97q HJI1vlKdjpyJ3YQtNdm5+aSczszbtmwChJxB3QQIetpY9AaJfDUHulXhZiwsv9p4 a08ND0y8wv3REJuhY3svSvA326qgKNsqnznWR+3/Ykibd1Mw335O7h1MoJUNGaEN Gt+8UZtnjv0o547SpG9wJgSUYzaTgTtChDUvlv32RaM72Ab58/5NGmJvqJh4qMCg R5N/DlZNCPje4U0DCWxYjXITgY6phYeq3ELa3MCSuvwTEwuG9I0pKTOXxmaSyDXC q3aY8MKTrji+gk4XsDtpQHY2e9iUlZXbNdckjQbpggiGaGgzBsziz9RjdFbzZSkS mD0vFZxBNeOz7XVIZ/72 =b7jt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e79af76.60...@toell.net
Re: mentors.debian.net time in sync?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21.09.2011 11:39, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Same message for me: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnupg-pkcs11-scd I correct myself: Our clock is /supposed/ to run with UTC as local time. Now it really is (again). If both of you care enough, you can re-upload your packages to get a fresh Lintian run. Thanks for reporting. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOebY7AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNteuUP/0zNIwq/pxFzvXDR/GrWg9+7 Yk/BH9Ijwi8THp5YO9ShQ/lxmlmuqt2eNB5r0i4FqMH2d6t8eRYY6GB1L2cpIfJd gODzyNAnrHEOyrozRI6Gnzx84GWfgHdLpehbwTcM6gg4o1n7QahDd/5oONCrWR6c Mzu6DL1V6otpqTP/iiE+Ib4XMgvl2/6TKX1zZBp+s2xnc9Yu5uwha4QDfj1k5+GW KNlU+v5UpW7+joDscmdxej7rm0egREHaIHX3bc/T/ugHZie+bLBgVkHN1DpF4SDu O0rU7yd+up1Q6Oo8N30Gqp8Er5gENnD4WmcSb4GdD6Sv9X5c+S4nOPsoos0NXgYx TFyDp41pISRVz5SIQ4DE1UYsI3Wx2yTAZ1oa+4ZfpOFV1xjQSHgexU9aWJ6LXWxw Ar74UhPAW13ikBPTth0WzJ7iXrtOs8Ha07luan5ueXPpER19bJHibsUbLAK7SNyh BiOjVDNK+HJ66JRD0Tv2mhe1hQYKxjiOyVlXcKKe2CSyw4b05Q2FPHOWb5EaviwJ 42hpnvv2ZRh04nGcf8ZYYz+0ZPgrjjrHit7DGM5fxmAUsJHZMRFxSzVb85xftEA6 qIRPCDSt5mYPHEqqMmVVN+CYJhFzrNaoYVb3vQJm77Fh2haBQ5LPQQwzi+rpLdux 6P3WzwKdb7s9KB11P4QR =oOUU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e79b63b.3000...@toell.net
Re: mentors.debian.net time in sync?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21.09.2011 12:10, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: PS I can't delete my previous uploaded package: it gives me an internal error 500, in details: That's a known (and fixed) bug, supposed to be deployed soon. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOebhGAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt86wP/2dFIywZAiANXV9Go8ZMXomW uJrb5dy+VG8FwwJvtaJQ2qiRP3my1JCFY2OOSJ+tbbgP4/kNAbhutjvYFQyZxr3A synygsvHpI7odYCtqvLauyPfQUrphYfhuKRLFq7WOw0gEHRGYcIgEEx/NwUNTx/w aZpkbvuvI2FbESAVBfX+qG8h5aDJLiYCKYXe3P2exjQGJiWnXMGSLAX59wToHTWQ I/yMBpchA4rRzFlWEPf/kD6gdLgvyuyX/13fSvDVZVwyXhAlpVfi1jO/eXxXyaYI qHPyxJpo7Mbm2D34+jMyqrgGiZSve1WBri3eYUCKNFnFqCtWFRP7DkGQdf5GZ9lz yT5cLP5Wcz9UJkqwWc9ThgqjFq6zjsznQYt+8hfGobUMJvXyEBPKUgPo+C8afPJf 3v/TYmPGluRYeAUJpX1HsO6zJav9rMueyz1RXpmzdeK72N8EYDuaj5hexxI3PajP kEM6mqTY2X1sNCZUG8ycHBtS9HiKV3bpwCZAgoRg+x5FA3leUujQvu2zqTCqUSZc AwSEkwQOGBv0gbUGxMUR7GIohDXfOExC6z5DVZhiPrhKDoOfwguh+uo5N/banO2F 4yGBIhh+MQzNGxPmbiKuBsPaL9h7GsLHO1PZbe0JrT8OjPZ6aEp5vwg4wUU2CAyk Ae4A8bdvmbgi9s1Glo5z =oLvL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e79b846.6010...@toell.net
Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, aside from my comments below I fully agree to both of your mails. On 21.09.2011 14:33, Gergely Nagy wrote: but I am a bit unhappy about having comment possibilities on both mentors.d.n and the mailing list with information not forwarded. Whatever happens, the end result should be that comments would be visible on all commonly used places: on this list, and on mentors.d.n (possibly including the BTS, my personal preference). that's pretty much the reason why I am picky to get people to comment in this thread. I am aware of this problem and I am exploring possibilities to solve it. On whatever solution we may agree (or not), Debexpo will need to follow. That said, I don't want to find a solution in Debexpo the mailing list has to follow, but the other way around. I am not sure what the original intention of the author regarding the comment function was - I didn't implement it. Its clear its not really usable as is. On the other hand I know from several people they like the web comment function, opposing us old, grumpy MUA die-hards and consider it a worthwhile addition. Hence my idea was and is to merge the web review part of Expo with our current or future review solution. So, people using either solution would be aware of comments from the other world. - Comments are sent to the BTS. Tags are used as follows: - moreinfo: Open questions or changes are required before an upload. - confirmed: Somebody did review the package and thinks it is okay. (Not needed when the package is directly uploaded.) - pending (closing the bug): Somebody will (did) upload the package (no further changes required). I like this. We would probably need in addition: - - wontfix: Somebody claims the package is not distributable by Debian and/or does not belong to Debian. The last point is hard to judge, but developers should be brave enough to use it by making clear its a vote on the package, not a personal level. If a developer disagrees he can still retag and taking over ownership of the bug. This is to not have many bugs more or less forever in the BTS being tagged moreinfo. A wontfix bug would be closed automatically after a while, say 8 weeks or so. - mentors.d.n automatically closes RFS bugs for uploaded packages or packages that were removed from there. It may also automatically close inactive bugs. Apart from closing inactive bugs automatically, I believe this is a good idea. [..] I think it's worth having that RFS bug still open, and pinging it once in a while only adds noise. Closing it, and opening a new one (or reopening the same) would only be noise, in my opinion. As Ansgar says (in his next reply) we should avoid carrying old cruft forever with us. The inactivity period may be very long, though. I wouldn't close it based on the date it was filed, but based on the last activity. That would be conform to your idea I think. sponsoring process involves fixing a few issues, the bug can even be closed with the changelog). Quoting myself from IRC for a wider audience: That's semantically wrong, as its not the maintainer, but the sponsor to fix the bug. It should be closed by mentors.d.n or/and and by an explicit -done from the sponsor. Instead of mentors.d.n automatically doing the mail (which would be a dumbed-down web interface to the BTS), it would in my opinion, be better if it had the appropriate mailto: links instead, and provide a read-only interface to the comments only. While I personally wouldn't mind, I know people who disagree here. I tried to honor their opinion a bit above. Being subscribed to both -bugs-dist and -devel-changes among other high volume lists, I wouldn't mind the extra noise to be honest. Probably wouldn't even notice the difference in volume. Frankly, I don't see anything wrong even if we would draw attraction to sponsor requests by that way as a side effect. Mentoring needs more attraction among developers. I truly doubt the amount of sponsor requests is /that/ notable, though. Its about two fresh requests per day (citation needed). - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOee4hAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtTKYQALTqQz1ttKTBuDWO6Ktg/E6l 6lSeZauZnyYj5jqC3j5eF27j72wwSd6/817zYcmulJqzjTBUEe+Lexqd46n3vX1H xM0CE1yIkE5cCJtuSun0+7uHsHrnA9Z0GmI+3D6nsxx1j8BUlpdh1HiHpsg3SJ8S lpJOeNDjcdYq2QROHEbNTs7vvgPSsMCtWXmFoPBsjeVsiTlXqXKiaAO4hzQizBD8 XrQbz3NHnCTspqLFqXBoP2DPHbi9P20Pv0aohOIqGPOtk3uwJ2pWUqJF/S/yU0zP KVVS0pkdDH82vkavj+gl89//HyrbA++bpquek8hULzn46UR7BpTLO+He5eSoJlFF tJkIgBLZR6JHsQmISVCIvcQ+FvJB+k5cRZsITwtLy8sDeDaSa0qrbhj8Rg3Np/I3 ymVCHaWMgiG0GNuSfrCFUqlQbbFjBGkE2PiDHJ2ZB1W8JVfFAvmgnBxpBaHTer6k M64tkbapHepZYLHIcCi2r54wb/t+gK7QGtHanU2lxInJobhuqhTBpDzEzy1eglXN 76U+wYHq+2bodqzx9w
mentors.debian.net moved to new hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, our (not so) old host running http://mentors.debian.net was replaced right before by shiny new hardware. For you, as user you shouldn't hopefully notice the switch. The new hardware is much more powerful and has plenty of disk space. Hence all problems with exhausted disk space and time-outing servers should not occur anymore. If you find any problem with the new setup, please let us know. Please note, in particular the DNS update is pending and not complete yet. However we set-up a proxy routing your uploads to the new server. HTTP uploads work as before, as do FTP uploads, except that FTP uploads are processed in a more timely manner now. Also we improved security of the anonymous FTP[sic!]. For you, this means you can't overwrite anonymous uploads anymore until they have been processed by mentors and have been moved out from the incoming directory. Hardware and bandwidth is generously donated by Wavecon GmbH www.wavecon.de. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOem5xAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtZ1AP/i5ArxmhRvVOLqid/6ThHz6Q tskMF/n3yhpW3BCASv4oD+THZ4dlfRZTi9hE+hbnwMWndaj+jsT+oJKQvG+p2max szx/0+ab31gyjErVZ3VMaRSqQOIx6bOaKqC4Xjn55M8jJUQMg7Tixkdc+JpH/pPQ A5ogF0Yn9xLFFR6w73AWWPiKc7aKeHvTMvFqHJ/u8gz1m9KZPNzx0s3JVxRpJ2hm NTZcBeA+IMsXkYPjVnV2koVoQF5agiERmTlbXC1p1MEfFYzrC0mGJfCNy/7NU1h9 jyVCCvl31b0MrYH5SHFyFIsrSMaQFGU/j+0A7wZTu6fN98N/pRR37Ol4rOXpDr02 B3Nb4dVGBgRH5jzEkNeAfJFW9V8d+bfihWlgORCM9xmMc9G1tx9cb5xBz5miGFR9 g+8puM8WrEbbMJFs6Iog8XLw8Y+MgiFZr9p6Wh87sXjUOk/ozRFGPbJPe4GcIwCP 2qfWyWdAFjtdv8CDTbJGVn8AyO68lBJY8J9aY+8Jbs/+Yf57GqyIIin54Bdcxfxj zkCAUv53sdZtrSH45h20tXcJpEwufYPD2equhXOsNLptJrJc8Tpjv4I6qAcsEDcc SLe4QxsJ0uT+O6ph02+MbDhcDkegMfjsKYdPC+nGS+TKj1RYPAfHSop1mAL+/seb X7fVuvUhfB3XuOk6B+oR =+dXy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7a6e71.3010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: sigit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18.09.2011 00:46, Jakub Wilk wrote: I can't download your source package: I (on behalf of the Debexpo team) am to blame here. At least partially. Rasmus did not upload the full source (please always use -sa for dpkg-buildpackage when uploading -1+ uploads to Mentors). We used to reject such uploads, but due to a bug in our plugin infrastructure we accepted the package nonetheless, as we could find the orig.tar.gz on Debian mirrors. However we failed to glue all together correctly. This is fixed in [1] and will be deployed next week (I think), together with some more fixes. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=commit;h=a6057e92165ba8869a44223eff444dbf34ed0040 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOdgkTAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtLnkP/1GlgWakU2m087t2D5mNJA9N A7A9Q2IsJSqtDKM1p8hzC6pwgQDjyCBBYcLxuUikHt4UPPB6M/qIwlPJBI/34J7Q A4RHjA5FfAedNhwuHrecZz0sSVFAkpTxD5r+pPA/VdJ0yteQptzCsPFZel+jYFyY DECrJz5mIMxyXHaOok2HxlT6D1+lWez/3SP8OUV4dZ/wpZ1RTt6e1pHksIBMJSNV ShSAi2E5ogoc31qyUTVyhzrxoYbaFjq78x0UaoQhNpu3+XdDfkkD/IVjAsjstZur 1toiBSs+er6jyrshM8jbddkLXMJa8CLHThVKTPgGKqXiIA+1/1tyI6ttMRiV3EGj 8KL86aBu0IR5Mig4g8NC7+5djts8mxwCjUn4qjUeyhzysiz0DFHbyek/oGOfadMw jqgQCOZwxjyNvtczDhHcUgC+Rc2ZFdp0u0+AJdSqQrOMnuZxRibC28caVw+sDHmQ JFBN+xRVmjTiD1td6B4My0nPCWtz/2XBD8YxPZc5TE24wwmFZzbR6oLvQKjdpiVB VQ4Fj3UxuKGYObnT9GzXgYy0sycwuJuUhheEB4nd2gse6Bbkf9eta7QyxY1ys5eg 89tE4OkiV9l78NBCpU2v5IiJwJCRKJ5z+lEmQ6VeZOMimxXp5IQ0YMnm2yqwoggi jHcy8x/gdQpB/fsJ64y6 =a3ND -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e760914.6070...@toell.net
Re: How to startx inside a pbuilder-managed chroot?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 18.09.2011 00:24, Paul Wise wrote: Apparently Xen does support that for GPUs though. yes it does, but don't expect too much from it. Passing through video cards is a complicated, error-prone operation. For some video cards (notably Nvidia's) this is known not to work at all in some cases. If I didn't scare you off yet, have a look to [1] and [2]. Finally please note, passing through a PCI devices implies to hide it from your host system. This means, you have /no/ video card output at all from your host system, unless you have a spare video card. This turns your testing system into a headless one. [1] http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPCIpassthrough [2] http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/XenVGAPassthrough - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOdR9+AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt1CEP/jCUdA+7wztL28QlxdjQ4bxN RjNF7bpYQk2aLQNSys66Juj2HRn3YWrekIMVypzs3tI/Nt9+kXbT7pkcx/P75R/q 0FqEnhlC93ZHQVUiEBkueiuMLWuAXH1kDnr9hfUgB2qrS3XcVTP/e9Mo/YWvGBEV Ocs5Kr7+nbIQui1/LhCxHax8+bwhgIn0Hb0bFlLKCleIDHCoUk4ermKUB5/mrGgh qtS2XoopI0F10CuOXO54qqiHF0AGg0DERww4SXTqmnJu1ytHPIgCG+1qJybjXIOw GmpFFPMm7x03tGIHCHKaPXbgRN/+s4Cv0wlHZVWb8NQErZd0QchvjBTZTJmdCxfX 3EzgC3gL7GNQDcQKHRYQNlkxvao4L32LAkW4lW5X0wHzdJZJ1WLo+OC03iQkZ2ev 06CgiyR8d8/iPLydFzDiRS4bcLYNOGhG4hpQcu1dRA1wf+F01T9eJ6Gdi+UDm9gi OH4QvvdCGPAvWEQ6U1KrSorGp3r6s0ZU6ePljSj4YC0EWjYd9xYlMItmjoCeH9oY ylOu1xyD4EZbf2wBPNVyVKDAI5KhRrncyae0Ct9OO345ZJrsDBowYMe6dlk2e7ms ysm0sClVXjRG9MT+SMnHOkOlcxz+BZrxGnTutO3XOBWpS4/hdtt3WRJ+YjHUknsr dtbqCHa6ukbZhDnHvjQ5 =3vvz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e751f7f.6050...@toell.net
Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project on Alioth: No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=commitdiff;h=4347537533b2e917542369df48ff8bc0989589d3 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOch2sAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtsicQAIR06MJ3Xz92UBBc2H3Plw73 Z/4mgi3hQ5rWc5H3FLoW5hvB5Zpdz48ILUBbi35Kur7BlTQCWuIJFxQ0D6DRBA+p PEn+gI0wb2LOmyxBdfSf+ZMSifZk4T/V9l4e5+WUR8O2jg+OQ3C1SNzWyf4l/ZGm Q6MkxhVpStOsiFfPH0GSPMitIUm5cagvOKDNV2qM4jkf/0zc6LwhWnxgM77uQ+Sy LkejJ9EoIQvu9eB5XIsaeAFLeRbMQ1oqy+p1JkRe6eQz8XX6kWF0QcT9+jisuKNa EcSfqbHeRjPXVJDdLM7dhv79ATg/R0I+cZY53TdwFXhdhGssdvG/FiKATHHNB5Au Qg88cd/vyN5CfiIxmr2vPbRsuAGNcxfR8qRyVY4o23yyQBeCOzYotriKaZ/cd3ra Q268i6uwaoeSkQ9FIV5MPHostgMxlEuTgjFxx0+wMR+N4ycGYBiylHXlBV2HZJrd rP/OGV0iFS8mvjk205myDtq8rvxZ97Kio1msT5L3L1qwqLuVLONgiK3nEWIb5U6N p470Jxx2qit3dQOC4q+m0KmpR9nWNU5Bd1UROvu6C+L3jpKACMURDva7RtgLwYVz 0hfb1cHli0dCIb+ptTDtKVvOOr+aoF8HuNB8QKlxdmgq/jh8nesuoNSok3bSnc80 VTr8fKkdLNpsGCneN/MP =MLYd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e721dac.90...@toell.net
Re: RFS: instead-game-cat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sam, On 13.09.2011 10:20, Sam Protsenko wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package instead-game-cat. Would you be interested to join the games team [1] for both of your requests? I believe there you could find some people interested in your package with uploading capabilities. As a start I'd ask you to send your requests to their mailing list [2] [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Team [2] http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-games - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObxNgAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt+ioQALjpUSWsv0/RF1rWuye85VXL XXVhaiiWliznMzH3MXKbF7fgBLVIbT/OloDdDeN3FQiEUbBIDHcdi1r2ibfCtMGW 1zDKRG+CdXV32JsahT+ha57o4JcRwf3AumZr14PEoN30C4JqhBFIi8l8Gf2Pm4YK KdmD15OwhOZek8H1OMVm2D/GAacBILtxUKWgB9fZSnIGjbnjjqW2rVzHZTbgSIfv XS1ubFT2MCI+lYpgh+2uNYXMeq4+vhQSBlVwQbctFIOAYgf9y98/HhjOeqO0Ul9D XatuCbTz86Rt3U1GIaFeLGOEHvR8D7UbcXDLV5waejExFqv/KBrg8LriuPMt/5j1 mmbj1s9uKg+m9mQJNuaBqN8FQLHH8lKhbf7ghtypmO4ONGrnkWEei4rleYfCEP9T 1orxmNBZ5s2+M0LU2xSYNMWjYgcrtxaplh+0lMp/qctj1VNGnsLAHmFQOoofDHUK lOnQn10IyAY0RQKOVXVPEvMavmevaWMRXQ6ddljlLRg+Py82sseqVpVad3NKSkvQ 0fI8rwnmwtQTF7g9f7FkQOCfRIjsSzQha9oCvFOWzWc42YieC9onaqoLjdcdFFKA 8iNEQ6mr+plcWpMTuNI47Df5CP+kMiZ66uk8eifUjxF/z+qvDL9P5QoTkGuoefRr s8/DUrtY6lPdDy5Yyccj =N2SW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6f1360.90...@toell.net
Re: Report from the debconf11 sponsoring/mentors BoF.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Serafeim, (keeping your CCs:) On 11.09.2011 23:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: I understand that there's two sides in this effort: debexpo plugins that produce additional info about certain package features, and a repository of sponsors' interests/preferences/requirements. Do I understand correctly that you implement both things within debexpo? Are DDs expected to enter their preferences via the debexpo web ui? Yes. Debexpo runs certain plugins on incoming packages. Among those several QA plugins, which for example run Lintian, or check bugs being closed by the upload. Have a look to any given package on mentors.d.n to get the idea. On the other hand there are concepts and ideas to extend the mentors platform by social network functionalities to bring together packages with sponsors. Aside of the mentioned metrics, I am referring in particular to Lucas' idea here [1][2]. As far as I know there are currently no concrete plans to work on that though. Regarding the sponsor metrics: Yes, I do expect Debian developer to file their preferences via Debexpo web UI. The third key concept of the mentoring process is the package review itself. That's the part which is currently done by email on the debian-mentors mailing list. As we mentioned in the report you are all invited to join the current discussion going on there, how to improve the situation by moving the discussion part to the BTS (or not). My idea instead was to maintain DDs' preferences via an ikiwiki instance (using something structured like yaml), and make the wiki data accessible to debexpo via a REST interface. At the end of the day, it's up to whoever will do the work, but it's wise to remember that geeks prefer their favourite text editor than a web browser. I am not particularly thrilled by that idea. If you want to implement that, feel free to do, but I don't see any real benefit here. Really, I think I don't expect too much from a Debian Developer if I want him/her to register once in Expo and fill out a form if there is some general interest to sponsor packages. That's about two minutes of work if you have no free text to add. Also you should take into account, that human editable semi-structured data is error prone and lacks validation. Anyhow, thanks for stepping up, and whatever your approach, please share any code you have with Janos and see whether/how you could work together. Its all in our Git repository [3]. As usual I appreciate any contribution and we certainly need more help and good ideas. [1] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=313252group_id=100127atid=413115 [2] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=313253group_id=100127atid=413115 [3] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObiKbAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtEb4P/jVwf0LNKPxDniFVyrJnAgZl syIEieOaprZ3W/j16IjCWes+FwyWQ2MxeVcZDP7XgETAo9N/WDNbeZA6hTMt7u9H UnAl3kavSwHIDUfviRSiXhntiRxf1JA/ZLYDk7dcgQRvGkiWDm6l3eopAPFraXMA Id4xVZjcX6cyozaADYZG525JWvJhj5NhhwwnIgrbWB+mU1u2+rd5LV2H+h2GBuhY l7Bv9NvZmpMlDHfeIVGqvLb6i5nr5L899D5TNgCfcu/wwsDyikXOmh2hewPk8hog RHoi8u8Sr1eD3/WYZtQ8tSwgQPwQd0MVgH0B4BOLVHatnf6QzjLpDlPgoRujUu7Y zpOKpp3CfLGv5qUYrue6t38SSXBohz4wtvp1xT1npTbtp5KsuoVyTxbmojXpBTAy PuMmIwb2yhFVKOP0SHBWAoLU4lEa/vgDt/NuDwuBJaZvgSvd/6c0yx9EF7xdmX+P KD5g3Hi1yjmRC9APoLJzwQtMe6bsKto13GOWegI0vMZdspyVjRfW41ZmFdfhx4E+ UDnVvZsSZH/wVsEXFL4MedimhHADZ5bWxU8BwD3o9AmGc34T6dPE5T4f6UTi5m4I iW/6W2UZyEX7a7TGgV09F3AZVwmJoP209H7MlII/mGVgYEOiqbZGUmyxRJ0raAcm vDIjw8caJAUp/9Um+g+S =HVHf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6e229c.5010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dfu-programmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rodolphe, (CC: the WNPP bug and the involved people) On 12.09.2011 17:09, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package dfu-programmer. As I forgot to send my ITA after the current maintainer orphaned the package, Uwe Hermann has sent his ITA (#637949). I've see with him and he's agree to let me maintain dfu-programmer. Should I sent a new ITA before or the bug will be closed with the upload ? Please don't file any duplicates. If Uwe is indeed ok to let you taking over the WNPP bug, please set yourself as owner and go on. Your package should close the WNPP bug upon upload. Besides I'm curious to know what you changed since 1312498880.27663.18.camel@chicard, since you file a new request to sponsor your package. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObiXxAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtHY8QAIIRE9DxxIWzU14Z5cwfXufH Jrq/l6GLh9MhsAdUUGVBXCU0nTEgsLcgujfNBdrZq/w2vRStBVg2koVNRe9hWnos xSsIHjVBh4kFrP6Jx5uS0cRBz6pjP+BClEKRN7Eoxt0HBFJMjgpfoTecQpdQg9qo c3eWTT8ZkaW/ntFB3FDUvtwtStmT1rd+WNk7oQbDgJ9TaVS7UJ9gM5UAZsZReXhV RP0F1qvbLrW6UnRskvRiP3yc9ztqb51rMTsK14Vwob1KH6zxgttplyy39GZxzrbX XZD/irgPmllAX2hr30hdl32qL6HPIr7DFT6Y6tMRRLgNYdQVmP8xp8awMikBRsaa hiRXMNmmm5WCheBiJRhfHO3NU8ET61VvcUp24vUFJYkLSc8JC5GdVniw5nz/0uzb 9i/2CeqFpBrURZPepQY28A/C10NGNr7jO8v3yicWJ/+sPIxIHsRoV6M6kOHeijTz dxhu1HJ/7vLiYznW5FxXnKl/D9RPJXfQy5bJXyfqU04NGbOCoh2WncMVVpvlD6V4 52T88feTDjwMQ/b94eIg77m3I4/q7KLCuFwfTO8NCo0I5zKwIKPfzKUk+3C6Ft3b tRoSV07HXSyHMJ5IuWbzGmdO4WxNqKcGMj82W/3R8OyG2NUi0vpMrjgTHXorWjAG BlYH3/bpj6nA0QbpkeEx =DNNg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6e25f1.8010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dfu-programmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rodolphe, On 12.09.2011 18:13, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote: I've just changed Vcs-* from alioth to gitorious (as I didn't receive any response from collab-maint admin yet). one of the less cool features of Alioth is, you won't get any confirmation mail once someone approved (or rejected) your request to join a project. I don't know your user name, but check whether you are listed as developer for collab-maint in https://alioth.debian.org/users/yourusername-guest/. If not, please poke its admins again. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObjHoAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtbk4QALohpV7lIRwoAkW4ZmZesME8 xlxsU7GRLVGJT9tGpeoTOVZJj62UNTO/2sEqIier21b2CUGrSBXOJvjTlE2V2rXQ b63fcBI9kP0zuNvgL6fRAOjIUEe510IVMX6TOkiL/NRvSkdoSdJKexbPmeO8pgpu /5ph8J/mEY1vuYlJWQn2vlH0RRbBSUFGW8vvNIw99qem7Xv+5Caz2EPbt8EUNu3d R3KboI3s3ypzfw3ghXgUv4IQO+jEz69+229D86EduW5bOpepe+J/+yCP9r0ZxEGO m9+mYx0PhB74xmO2rPSiiF0mRC3Uii/BxV1EBDIA/nOQxp+b2HbQvWq7v7CSXA/O 598yThMb/rVzahuyH4Gm9lcEe0dKEwQZtjmZAzc1M0Z228AkMT/k1OvmrZdWpK4i 81PgsQRUCZOzMvXtuy5qWOYa28mDVnt67x/akQ223wbifK+TipjkraARXXKBybHl zPrgtOM+7J7I8RZnZb9XtEyw7puVPFn2M+t9RMaGdT9Tl+JGj+Ti9cIl+IXBtynF GUqaC4iq3ze965f47ybxZqQDLFBW7875O83sGLSuxye+CTMhk6HO9v2Fl1YkXLEG kS/XPbuFrSo7PpzDWEfLp0x5f59qA/qBd37T4vB4oknn3RY8kJKibV9c0nR4WS/w f901u1P95kTjK+Vj5nHq =3irU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6e31e9.7060...@toell.net
Re: problem with dput debexpo packet upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ansgar, On 10.09.2011 19:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: That sounds like a bug in debexpo concerning native packages. As your package likely should not be native anyway, you can work around it by making it non-native. yes you are right. Native packages produced a false positive reject, while checking the upload for a orig.tar.gz. As native packages don't have a orig.tar.gz they erroneously triggered that error. Debexpo should not reject native packages, although there is very likely no reason why anyone would like to upload such a package to mentors. Hence I fixed that problem and I will deploy it live soon. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObKitAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtBrUQAIgNoxgVWyWPkCENCuunV57+ aIvJ4RVdQQ2MSPHTszBeJN+9xf3MZLCXdTZ8lwQTq3HVjIzbo9Z1nVIWDCTnFqrw 6KrGK45xz/H1fzj0tlFvRgaW+8/meVZYGftdbPfo3u7IujfRClcjmYPauogJue34 4MpXlXHgrtxtkjmI7mihQRhZWZPR4MxD/ErhuEprNRT1/tJ5wIPYaemQ426zrSUF mmZ3RDo9W3bSam/tZ8YX57551pF11v4tZGmPgpynrMLODJ0/jWbq5/h6XrEQqSt+ lL1LSFd3mrLwXCBZaK0rhaMvrTszY45VxPRugkGFIEtnGdbe5JyptAq5c61SIjnc X4DlDy5VO5QKOYsDbVmu89vNJLWwFP5XW52wJCFzCcR9XJ2To4pvKegFbFPpattW 5o2wcusYA1LqpVmGHWaBkZrnFmMI3u0xHJz2blwmRVYuYmpbVi4LSL6rpWUEW/js quUf7rfCh2QLXBib+jK4ABjMJ6m3lKKn9TPfqdcJJTK6SE7lbcOdtQ3X4160O9+m n2uBQgPPiRDnLQorFsb6PsXmRhWZSekEcLZmHeGNSxKD9YBAR+Z29MRNq3FKT4I7 YZi+vo+wg5W/S6ie8bSNwTACdoDC1BL8xmT1tG+s1rGKiM5mmU8uxIuBldprok3v hxIgDGaKWrf3EilhfmSM =lrvE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e6ca8ad.1090...@toell.net
Re: Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tim, On 08.09.2011 18:22, Tim Gokcen wrote: I'm trying to do an NMU of package mdadm, but my upload is failing on one of the files, mdadm-udeb_3.1.4-1+8efb9d1.1_amd64.udeb; I get a 403 Forbidden response. Sorry about that. The author of the upload class didn't think about udebs when implementing the stuff. I fixed it in our trunk [1]. Please note, the change is not live yet and will let you know once we deployed that change. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=commit;h=7225b6b0180128ce8d0852098085046240c5b27c - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOaPZxAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtHnIQAImt96kcsA02IAkxt5OEHgwp 7ouRzH8e3eOoO5KSq9rBWwJxW3nlZqNehx04iPyjKg1URObUaz7PF9mtMjn6jIYm jwelM6XsJMKLiA8qB5F6sFqHlQUNus/G5saClhHuaieMJLkczs+mxyT4iNi/+Utr SwxQ1S8xcvd/Wg2rLBz02SP2OL6bCIs/z7RWfbHc8rkS+PsAlrkFqXGlP5ofA5sT e6v6UCqIwgzaAUgcgSyhRlM56bnH2g4edcXObcAIwXFUSX7bRkJYJLj2L9qu5THA Ev4BhyG8DXUwQON59OB28ky2MiFwkvYpnerTrgxIETFSnczWpb/wUW5nyvhb9EnM nncWaZTRSREMgs3eX7Z9Dr7MBeGfYDZ9D1gbQwaNT9eXeu5Jpj10v+rscvEJ0KMM ZGczvLGG8bjmgfDhiNSsZnfhio0e2TigFOXU5UWEXm66yl8TVDfusvihV9pSSIft igIhzPp7R4KW/zxd4VL+Ep05b8tf6+QYKiTgmIyVeZAal/pX3KbbFVAnv3XkvISC f9sj3Cmq3Io+hVun8fH9Bb2mNQG/+gK/5OhLAmuZFufZsYZnkFdi9MPMZA89vPcS 2m/NqBRprNv32mOehmfHXnEJ2+kk1kfnZhaj+y2Qay+SuGZntox0TUMHBBvDnFBf 8ddP4viENjbYRWB5OjgE =nlwV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e68f671.3030...@toell.net
Re: Can't upload .udeb portion of NMU package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08.09.2011 19:08, Arno Töll wrote: Please note, the change is not live yet and will let you know once we deployed that change. ... but it is now. Note I had no source package with udeb ready. Let me know if it works. If you are still facing problems, please send me your source package directly. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOaPzbAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtY9YP+wUMB+3WhgvxuknGfY91LtaP zg0Qm5dnHihLA0MXiP4rYfbEdaH3VK/XkWyOPVto1eM9t1LSXCVS4HJeYAhIV14B Cv6UyAtT7RskjO0GM4n9hJQ2uXGUVgdkBvqH8KVbfWQKLrfs9dlDW7n3rDPKWwuW qNKlt5DIyDWbCVU6ChBhHnCHRdA/n6vHPUdLrtBdnDuMpFVzSpQTWg8dGq+Gm3Ji wi/9PxLpflwcM2PMXqGmhipF1HYgmjaGw+5GJdisHZOnm5xbjU6sK8ui3kdwPa7B fs5KSBTPMe5qSWvW9MMeRWPinJW8ByltOgxRfRBVfuMxZCBmPjhJMm6gwrYxiivE qw1MCnOux/MprpBL/+oYAAAcswCAwNuH7rfSrIX5vrtQl5jCZv/NEPhR2TU9WaaY lYZ+NSm+1tIeZddfFISOwjGRu26YwVd3iH8uTHnnG6hBdcLJpat4bbO3mHKH7Vp7 Fqk/nbIL2gTPm+jVr0UlfeASSQPyH7/hhge6KCv87XBEylF0G60iJBHnxF2vSvnv 9+YqtoiFUOZr7QbPd5Lz9ksPU2Ko62rMKtp6bA//egK7MxxfNPp0fbVKgM37/ruu jtE+ticj/T8dHEmYI2CRZnoRge8/4pVQ7xFtS5X+uYpT2LvmYT4PeNvQ7GAmZSE+ F43qlvm5hgsmoQeB0AGm =nr/f -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e68fcdb.9020...@toell.net
Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 06.09.2011 16:49, Paul Wise wrote: I'm concerned that this might turn out about as useful as filing an RFP bug against wnpp; not very useful at all. I am not sure, a mailing list is better suited. I was not thrilled to use the BTS when I heard about that idea first, but the more I think about, the more attractive it gets. To be honest, the current procedure does not work very well either. Some RFS mails are lost in space due to the high volume of requests. The same happens for some comments when the maintainer files a new RFS thread instead of replying to existing reviews and so on. Finally, nobody knows simple things as how many packages are out there which are seeking an uploader, or what's the status of a particular RFS, without digging mailing list archives. By using the BTS all those features come for free: * We can merge, retitle, reassign bugs. * We can tag and categorize bugs (pending, reviewed, ...) * We can easily see which packages are awaiting a sponsor (ok, that could be seen on Debexpo as well - but I don't think the Needs a sponsor flag ever helped to find one.) * You can finally close bugs with wontfix i.e. wontupload instead of politely hoping the requester goes away. * We can track the entire history of an upload easily at one sight. Just open the bug. * Its easy to tell Debexpo about the status of a package - it can just use SOAP to query the BTS, instead of guessing/parsing mails from mentors and devel-changes ... * No more broken/incomplete RFS mails anymore (reportbug could take care, or even Debexpo could be filing the bug) * Its convenient and controllable through a handy mail interface to sponsors * Having the debian-mentors mailing list as pseudo package owner still discloses every RFS mail to the public easily. I can live to keep things as is, but please let's decide NOW, BEFORE I spent a lot of time for writing interfaces in Debexpo to either solution. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOZ3dDAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtMnMP/3pqdRQb30iEfB3/vTBjPQXl B8ORKdRHGFs+5gEgXdeUBRBz6hTKGu62xIChcnsm3FadJiHmH9IgfKo12kBLtq/A nhutsFoONGW1hJKs45BzqWXKRMtMXqjP/c1Ek4Evq75T69KQ+dSIrU03dinUVEqg nyEgRs1tWnDoKl6klID3IEdtJZUS6oDnuiOQy7iF/Aodxq7OrMygLnaM5/P2MUOX 95cIsNAxA9LGrFi/Yw3uV3Xr0DVcqWkkZd/wdchaMvHJWX0EHn+tJKkoZk8HJOfU I8bOAyrWv15eSnn36e/0FIJkBGTKJkS/EsRGkaFIsV8kxPmKZIKpJHqWp7QKDimM 7/xp2v3kYsLs3AXt5P1uaHt90/IlKjj1wEbLSmg3/YkzvMEdU2jtFHMLAxfvL7Yb ee/1F84cvROxnv6xE1l+76pxI6rWEDGqzFtWznL3gi8uTzQA5UTk9lwRVXgtLla/ t3taet8jhhQMEfbkM7bJDxSXbMEUED+8yk0IbSKnLEh6XvkKDJaFyROFk332iMT2 AEjLRBGb8uq3We/GSpYc7q18kjGyLkC6F7Hjfpux86MYeHK5x/Nji75ViLH5l1/0 c4IiY3TvvBxo/RsZ7CFyK8qUzD9b/7fjxoy4UQEWh16GzWxkyAFb0yi/P3a09F/Z FRLT3JftDjmm1bEY2+/W =o+0W -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e677743.3090...@toell.net
Re: adopting a package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shaun, thanks for your interest to help Debian. On 07.09.2011 12:37, Shaun Silk wrote: Do I have to find a sponsor for this package? How do I proceed? Yes, you need a sponsor. Please read [1][2] to get the idea. You may also find the New Maintainer's Guide helpful [3]. [1] http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers [2] http://wiki.debian.org/SponsoredMaintainer [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOZ36LAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtwTgQALRIm4nE1wMHBpYC7TyAbOUl qAA9Qqhn+PIJL18VZ0vUm9TiVcsSxJBLZPVWTi1uW6N81kr5tlt9WO2MjaBPay9g V7lwO67yhbjfY5bLPCkreTfxVYCsTvkbWXldOsg8XjnY4BAbv0wsEI8FQFsYGM8b JXJHiJfurJ4VqC0E4QeLVMZSs5FuZj41meUkl1+jzP1m2dbOj5sZa2fAs2EERzRo b7QhGbr34+k3nydh9oaAuU346nRyI3lMKp/hif4ADuXBpdt4scQLLILnB2p+/er9 rn/yRbcgheMyZUkukLPdj7ZMg+A5cMGPPkfgxs4HQRJUllHqFFL3CB0qhjQK4uU9 PcWI5DohJinWO/0TOTor+qPQD5XjUBql4xAU9sWhFul8LipljluOyQlqSXBDHBiR hyNhh6HGHCfXyzW/tEmvb6QjlPmcl2apL+7dYsWnRg0Cj+Ss+CpH60XYWPWSusoP 54V6JkjWjpZpdHLJ1P7ccfqnjl2NNaNE1WWXz2LgQEaHthuMtGRyLGe3tyDka1al imR9N16ZUc3UNiLc36ZZXKmVp4jFJquHHPb6UdWdK2s47OLIw5UCp8wcIlQrJcoP zj6uQTmHXuKhR98a6yXU/1Z2mj06HbcR2M/HllCLtOVWMrogmP3NV0KsKY8BO1vz FPaPn4php+y2iFQU3PE/ =aqky -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e677e8c.6090...@toell.net
Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, as I see this discussion going on, I think I should inform you about some things going on on mentors.d.n right now: * Asheesh and we are steadily improving features on Debexpo (the software behind mentors.d.n). Its not finished yet, and misses some features we would like to add. * I was thinking to implement a debian-mentors - Debexpo bridge to import comments made on the mailing list to Expo. There are some stub functions available, if you are interested have a look to our devel branch [1]. This is something to come in future. Basically I will grab RFS comments made on the mailing list, and import them to the package history on Debexpo. More advanced plans include to keep track of the entire package history. If someone else is willing to assist me here: any help is appreciated. That would not change the workflow for MUA fans out there. * As a result on the dc11 sponsorship BoF, I think, one of the most useful additions to Expo would be sponsor metrics [2]. I prepared a newsletter together with David Bremner which is in the pipeline and we will probably send it out very soon, as I get my stuff on Expo regarding that done. * Lucas Nussbaum made a very interesting proposal to make a social peer-to-peer review platform out of Debexpo. Basically his idea was to have some karma / teams. Have a look to [3][4] get the idea. * Debexpo did not lose packages being uploaded to the old Mentors infrastructure before we switched. For technical reasons we don't have the precise upload date and/or package description available. So I gave those uploads a random legacy upload date. Besides they are fully functional. * We need more contributors to Debexpo. We have a lot of (wishlist) bugs. Let me hear if anyone is interested to step in. On 05.09.2011 23:09, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Could you please be more precise about that last bit? What exactly is hard about becoming DM? The fact, you won't find sponsors easily which makes it pretty hard to find someone who advocates you. Here is more to come on the newsletter I announced above. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/devel [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsNet#Metrics [3] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=313252group_id=100127atid=413115 [4] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=313253group_id=100127atid=413115 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOZT6pAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxAcQAKuPnlmV+XSNuUUtXDeHWZ72 pNnoh3iURW7u8a+Cgtz7q8Oi+Y/WDl+X1MbQRQWs/F1tmm0W7aG8k42DHT2sOFFn 85aG+Rh3qlzjsEW98ahw0VtYo00Lm3BA2OdxWNnxlL3RgYeeh/JF54oqCvuLAypo Sh5UFw910Mz0F/7PuN6Obma3cVL82OShUE/lNDitvKZi1OXQ6+9ZFd5YIMd7mDYM jo2IWbwG80+qiM4q/pQDj1jUAs+H4esYHw51Ji3JiHa5AFU1/pQb8CoENlZsuntr mImwrmxwvHzL2wPtW3SdVIhPix/5Z+Bif4t1/C8NR+pzXEhkE0hIfMDEbdK3UcQa NrS6nizpcRG6LkIru79guOfRZZiXOCSEV4RrGyv745jH9L7KZiNhjYJMn/1E4Th4 LG9ilK6QrM7r/cdxd7Vl7tgh45jI5RXJQeAvXom4tZWuuS5gfMJnEPk3lkrOTAz0 XeGUzAblbOcoyvod40MrStEhQ11JgH48hRE3zjk+w8xFCVJOoPV0BVROGrFpy6DR usERHjSvnNErzVMqcEtIYHULEGT/EBr4ViMUtcG4r9yoC7eijasc7Z4ICb+vUgFJ UlACoaQcQlrjDXqsvr8jceG1qI3gQWz4BVc4IKgr+RWivBeggnR31xeBQZTC5Gcc LMD9K/nv3lQbFNpwky2U =skHm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e653eaa.7080...@toell.net
Re: Cavalry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Misha, On 31.08.2011 13:06, Misha Strong wrote: OK, I'll try get the src together. - From your ITP: * Package name: cavalry Version : 1.15.0 ... * License : GPL That's not an optional step. Presuming you give out binary copies of your program licensed under the terms of the General Public License, everyone must be allowed to access your source code. However, as far as my knowledge goes, nobody saw a binary code copy either. Hence you are technically not violating the GPL (yet). Please note, for Debian the source availability is a crucial requirement [1], unless you target our non-free repository which is not part of Debian, technically speaking. [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOXh4DAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt6gAQALrUxtgnDqe/oco/coW9eA9d Hr/Y8T+2H2m7SoL7bweiEFuaMbrnAiyH1sBgm/wTQG3/QRhkRfLqING6JOZIOn5W Dikl1hkVpdERB/lbLXxUm2XFRLHxt72bTwN5ZvodzMOLyFMThocTkZpg5z6xJQUq 1zSaq8NMu2B1M0nWovT0ek9mXibISf6I8+C5RewWbbFN2bOKh+OOgWL7WWRgZ5r0 rxEYcDs+5KBFKBpO0oaI6d4nTOxArd9M8Awdzn2YP0ljtEsd1+2HkAfEuExkanBZ /quHzCADzDtkf5CXBEPnNO6e1U2Us5Qg7xXU5WLZoamllIQrpn/HvJL5OeIAJ3f9 mq8mXqThqUoBSNCzHYCU+OiI3FpQNNvWU8D18ZTh8lHUDCwpz0pEetSHzVXMPbGD ux42b3FsGADk9kd48ELxasdCFynJEK39O/BHy4YHkn8keTwh/WJxUQkAOzsb6qji N+tWilDrBrmdEYXHXdhj1kxyeVv7IbE4KGjV1Y26EVY6HIKv+TrIcgGB4rgR+lWu hikNtLoBiulP+F5JK/nh6V7IDCuhwyufvBX9831a7eQD3F/z6pleumPzc1xM8SW5 KxlUhlG+/2+uarzD9HAuuxRuvSbvYXcVkVv8n4SJQQVbaboKjg0Rwy70+c1RLufb jqZRrOZGN/0qv7D3zXV7 =8pv8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5e1e04.3060...@toell.net
Re: mentors.dn package removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gregely, On 28.08.2011 22:13, Gergely Nagy wrote: Someone, somewhen uploaded a dpatch 2.0.31-1[1] package to mentors.d.n, before it became debexpo. That version is well.. lets just say, obsolete. in hope nobody will miss the package on Mentors, I removed it there. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOWrrlAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt94sQAJnSSotAMIyhG54O0Xou8lEt Aya1tseKfCIcbV/nFhLvMapM/bqjcRBJVEF9lYJuQSXYxm6D5iz8YYGwsCeJB8se yoLdKMgOH1bSC2ocw3Pu7NI5qjiaJg5aHZxA4o9qwgBJ5/YJIDMuUo5N3qaB5mEL 31YAQBLW7xr4WdVhbFN57y4gxL3MS1gVDYxleszL+PCPlB/TigsOirC4bf5NG50Z 0XBytS7+ENa9NNUf0iqiVtgfVce5d9yOa7ZbYEGIaJvFCCrFU8yNENR1NEKaFmPg nakAt2WAU8sR279PgZgisEXC7VVbBjLPZS4lRGfHYKVgJDrx7a4JOmRadGvn5gWc e+9lnAQQXFMH3WBrDO6PO151y6f0eDo8tV+Jlwztm1zCEzn9iJ9oFykWE3FiutzU /bqeDMMFEUZrsrO/bsVCUXfmq8YrawJ+rpGld4quNg1yBcJvmOe+Q/FWSP7oNt5A /7eecz277asRRfdEZo8kFA0BtDupgom3aLU4rtGb+S2Q/GsLfQ14EtHSBMPV8TkS OlOsC0vu/rhKJgG45FJvYfG5H5MXpT1U7QOv+khhxUm5gn6DX5ljaC3uzNSs4ZvN PvQ057tzJvQVWjNury/dChJlwtgaa+VFljb5aa7QX4aM1QSqhifzRFv7DeyFkBxf 9SZUfQtIJHENt63ozw7g =x2UG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5abae5.5030...@toell.net
Re: ITP: i-news (2nd request) -- GTK-based highly graphically-configurable RSS Ticker - Bug#638999
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Emmanuel, On 26.08.2011 00:05, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote: Thanks. As I have to decide now, please let me know if I must change the package name or not? Sorry, I know this is redundant but I need a final answer. You must not, but you can think about it. If you want to increase your chance to get your package into Debian you, can - perhaps - consider it. If you think the name is fine, keep it - but make sure you don't install /usr/bin/inews at least. You have been pointed to the problem of (too) generic names and possible name clashes. Value yourself :) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVsq4AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtTHUP/jo25Hj+pDQaz0sgmmdsHkrn YEXKjXUuNOuFFox0y1MVdYJWvgvCkfy4SsE2GYXaa9rcprBolv9eFXYatZWeyv1P fL9ymtkY0SUO1zAgr4/aLKRgHteE8cEWlSGq1hkWS3e1KNXdHbqYJT5x+41heaT4 WOdGIIuR6aJjtyyDEQ9uSOaGPkyNso4l20ihyXZ8h81hUNbo5liB9appWrHAr+Zp GygZJVM78rNulq3o6TtpbGuK/ykQMTd9K64sDPsOZh++2iLE8mfSTy4iCp0AR46p RLZxG+pimFYGm1M1JTaP/d7M8uohfAhct0JHoyOyLhnQpy3Ybzdb6hY1puImcLSs NRux9WeTpSp+IALBr4lOUNqLIWDgzkA6mpWgqOtO5JRddicnv0CJFeEvspXM9yV6 vyxfUCjHhGvYY8lhj+BFnS/o7PlTvkUXREW0awz5zllIA669fThM1gwKubVnXj4y 6pKMNeb9veXBhdxeHS34ouiEUx9sQsTgV07+7+ewgiqIahJyGBHp6r47ZYoER2Tw FjNhP8z6zriarzTUH87/0oHpIe5lfD0lxw+ZvEEq0Te6tNmYrg9AH4mM3HG7NRro itGDWn/0r2pdTdmjH9MeHX4RUqfl/mTT3TxE7BWPdBQ/gy8Z4L+8gcHjTbh1Zg2W D8CCBnhwLeYGkwdVlboT =MAt0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e56cab8.6030...@toell.net
Re: unable to upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24.08.2011 12:12, Gabriele wrote: Ok then. But this the first packaging for pygtkplot, and if I use 0.1-1 as a version in changelog, lintian keep saying that no bug has been closed with this new revision. So how can I create a non-native package for the first time that doesn't need to close a bug? That's because you should close a WNPP bug for the first upload. This does not imply you should invent a bug or closing a bug which does not belong to your package. Read about WNPP bugs [1][2] - which you are supposed to file and successively close. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/WNPP [2] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVNOKAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtFZIP/1EMNQoBG2V3zZs6uUg1FpVA FlkXOEFlaHV88j17MUzl94WnMaEurbHCkbIELdgTt/3LMbwwmsiqY4fHlF+fS7xO Am67n618NdeVstLkdnc1GbC3Q9Mmr37u9m9TqadAQYUoTK+uJ1cCQEWe5z6PFqcN kggkQfdjOgn8FmGy4qwjc6gY1wbLiUxvuiAF6zfQLBeFFGDMjf0ZD3bB/hz+HJNL Z0EFgVWtQlQZ/6KQ+6atx2Me5qgctaMs3nuFppZrXDHY573O7uBa44JOuMTffQFl C7YCP9ohcHBEJhWlBcpNMlhmfSQAFH95a7jVx2yXwjLu0QQwsqymA+jAOKN9xMDP HrrjbLgJolnaR7ycxRqmh+3Znwq7liAAb1KAmu8OPYMsVOl2ecWlayWOuP9I5JIh JQUTttOo6HTi2ztoRImOrdzkAIRV16WBbWim6ZYCWp46Vb4cIxBilhUC8RBjVYx2 fcEf9Me++8fs5JMZjAeXIHaM9NY+OpLCK93CCZQF0U3OUkBBwdZ+WkHZi4m1FWBL Eiwa1kS+5brX9zp0/zweFcqvMNcb/Ivt42MN8riqafR6ax2ED1gJKLttmVxTh6jA s+CGRexS214pRLjPJPt0/QgNzcy/K2Np4/5D3aO78Rfa5g1xy/6/n1w+Gjkf3nMS v26Lw8HcLWdpRJL4gqq5 =TYi3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e54d38a.7080...@toell.net
Re: unable to upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gabriele, On 23.08.2011 22:42, Gabriele wrote: I'm trying to upload a package but every time i dput it I get no notifications. File transfers are reported to be successful. It might be helpful to tell us what you are trying to do. We have no clue. What are you uploading where? What makes you think, the upload would not be successful in particular? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVBcOAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtAqkP/26uPz7KfRNcHC7kH7rUy4WT rTJGhT8XEESzlYbtInRKVaKHi6gNipC3YwRWLOg4waeBW5XEkNZytGy85+MrodzR 7A4LZi6fPU5CWMZw84bsYkWmgKGstFU+1XVzHn+jy0LhrRJ/nMqCPIqXaVKU+R6/ E1AqvTpErMPkpytQaQRP6ATvaqBeFwA92uoV9aZybBpWDFRPrUbee8QJV1b4CqFv 1w+sIuiyXaMKiVQ2xlfuDEenG9vQ2hYdehzKcEbKs4bQreYrOpZfXzADKgQFWjjV 9Gtnsu6Rr/lhdbrfa4PtEuBI0KFUx8Np0w8N+sgELCwWJe9sJNx73g3C+s3/1wV3 9df+pTo4ArFaRioemUWII+SuAvIUDNqDuzTOYMvmsJWq/KFFHV5ETK6y44TUE5h4 y3gPSvnSTyAr2r7Utkh05q9ab7dbhgZ9QR7aP2v2P+QQ+gMrLh3kb+zR6r9Hchoq NPOLBiyNLbS2HJlLHBtXoVS83OVNF7TgbjA8ek7P/aYLKBQ6MJiQPIkj4B0G38za BFZgjnnn+cZq1QkjDsTCtyiKkRW1x224mhi2Bq42+TvAXwCTz4WV4SB6s5NwTv6a 7FzRm2J9ijxup3qwQJTxWMlHgSRl2QcfSgS6KmOZu+moBLG6e8T3t/hQREAZ5mnU 7hAIjMDKgZTpo8WaxLQH =+fw4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e54170e.1060...@toell.net
Re: unable to upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael Ole, On 23.08.2011 23:19, Michael Ole Olsen wrote: the package first shows up on mentors page after 2-5 minutes or so, and it might never show up if your package has lots of errors I think(read the faq). No, mentors accepts every package which meets certain minimal requirements (e.g. it is a source package, it is complete, checksums are correct, ...). That's not true for the Debian ftpmaster which runs Lintian and has a list of so called auto-rejects [1] [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lintian.tags - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVBoYAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtw90P/RSmpV7KnhFnpjb4QBARorjL 1WjWJd/lyoqqopt/EY/A+fK3Vxr1qwMahNoYc+BtqkEXHUX6DPKKyV74Dbbe8hgn FCwqCysb3ilJ6aKW9gE/VvtKPEhN9RD34oN+nFBmVvJmvqgK2B34d0ES1Ws2OBra X2pOI/ajLmkMO66zwG0x+dZjVNs/MHcJhUkojr6LEk4q5sFUZWwSbWwMnWddJZqI EnsH9TRfcbVLxgeszcbeiK2fBzRfjSoe5AjmxmSH305bLuPEaPwpvy2NQQ+BHZyO +vfdafX1K09PtLsQM02/hnfAmQY5GBa0/BZYcjV7BZe3tAPnvzeH7M0636KtqNR3 ZY7MLPtyrYMoUUGeA4ptyR5a/ruO3dKJ1Oqa2NgWWgWIjaHOMVFldYELAubldU+Y tN2FemEoLPn51XQ4n1TtuFfmbuNby9WomFL3x7rgdpbct2a83Wpw4MGGn5gKyexS NE9UEvPrumr4w8RVDLcWMujkYzRysmz+9ftRJ1tp7TN/PVodieDMDwL8pWGbsdSQ dAY2AnY7fWgG9ORAhb+0haCBUv/F7WhZLvaXkGBv4OP25pJgSxy68iaKX/hERBlL XHIC4M6D6HWxaSZYNUTLU/XKCuC5LksXWNjc2m9EV4Lm4R2tivSOosBslD7dnRu2 +uE1J8+GEhhmK6zUNyoL =DBGU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e541a18.3030...@toell.net
Re: unable to upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24.08.2011 00:32, Gabriele wrote: Successfully uploaded packages. ... but: 20:40:31,102 ERROR [debexpo.plugins.closedbugs] Bug #12345 does not exist I agree you shouldn't crash your Debepo import by specifying an invalid bug :) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVDJOAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtd/cP/2ldX1zPdMa7klvttta8KxxC wohkGrft3XZTkVariVRxMQ2w5c0G5EdQ6h5jRCWmnuPXI5kWisQd08x5Vd8DI8X4 bR9fC0jSFqihd/95ynTKfK5g0l9Sjtfg7bwq6tJffbiE1oKfipkVRnIk4q9gXl6E 9VlYAce+/4rX/Mm4tB2tyWX4aSduz2tSesAnLePePKEZbuW7cWJbZtQZvZgQSS3I NdNrLlPzqLMEO0UH/awijKD3f3GvJsfmurrqcNn57EbXKHkrfhYA2vpvCxa2SaZ1 6Fodcu/ZpgEEXyRR5sQ61J/3GK4UIVWTd9p6MuzDhCHnMb/hY+nDP7Elo4rjqMeR grsdSx0ZbiHdM+dVAQHMImJf8SjUmlkgjoHnacPBMuiiOkofeUaz+QC76UfSTAVA r4BGMFX8UNSahdvFk/FnKSSqhE9k6VMvsgrk6yzOdvq4/OfpuQuU/5X6F+yIPH/v q0SNc1+W4wgM7rbC/CqPSiIGNrJA2SA0lglm+XbGNwgTGE/pqIvmWgIc7KfMQyp5 uuMYiz7i/hX66h003bLPLq6mnyB+h5Z5eDOuuMG8X6Ema3CnOvLl4Vn/U11m3h6/ IiO/6s2KyY+QRpVGxmyPmYCwjfjrEJU5l/VVUkJoKEelCshGJQBkjK2xnhtFLIQc kRPsGcGr3k9qpbDSpjZu =u8ZX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e54324f.3030...@toell.net
Re: unable to upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24.08.2011 01:05, Arno Töll wrote: I agree you shouldn't crash your Debepo import by specifying an invalid bug :) ^^^ Fixed but not yet pushed a bug fix for that problem. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOVDSeAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtn9MQAK4XV8RmVdCdKP3vRGdmdXRM 8yGmzuYoH/KQPEh4cK8aLQVqVMexCuGzOcUzSfQxL9Oy91m9zkJMpjtXMe34pwb9 ubzMEaIFu2pXSbR0MLdJ9FS6gz/Mh1OEED87+9uNCZlNOEAqNiLYzZhR8NfOVupz RqXZOTjUlAyGaW5s+Ic2O/MAEyozbwmH4T3RWJ9hzEv5f9mhWTVVxGT/kiK1tLZI Dw/ZNJwxIMPiShj1BpFKYu/sVV5YHy1Ot/xTeiX2B6w4HuTikcOn8AMlZm/CVKau bx7K7ehkQnysQBtSIahcUx6WB3Ba4MiO5wSW/hIhkCD0JNRL2HSLLh5jl1i0p03t gjb//hBY98ereewt4vU3PR6rqcDk8ifIH4lN0Bor8G7jodnjuJh75hzutvMkmtc+ j/9hnwRnmEecW0f+74f65H6YxI6lNVdmkRPYMUffI9YNojKd9Uxw2TgoqQGspd32 iOqFaNhNTJOj27tAx0vhTKRK0kuhzqQ0NpTFIXEC8Fu8id2aqXyKzuX1lnItxejL pDGG2VXsABa0V5bYnaDhrvx49KFGpig87b3wKfY4jU3IBaKQtQ6FPi8s2jdOd0LZ kjKOELzXE9HAZIOpRCz3Rrcuoc4L2v6BuJ1C4I6zXrtG4EKTA9dgiFRFbEEk3lTs 2k6T+ZSuP9NO0+nkeS44 =Y/+v -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e54349e.7050...@toell.net
DEP-5 requirements (was: Re: RFS: pygtkplot)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guido, On 22.08.2011 06:15, Guido van Steen wrote: To be honest, I had never heard of a DEP-5 requirement. Therefore, my package does not contain debian/copyright file using DEP-5 either. just in case it was still unclear, despite of Vincent's reply: debian/copyright is mandatory [1], its format not. Technically you are allowed to formulate the file as you want, as long as it is there and has all information needed [2][3]. DEP-5 is a draft for now, but may end up as a official policy at some point. As Vincent says, it is widely used for all newly introduced packages and mandatory for some sponsors. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgcopyright [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/12/msg7.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUitwAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtv7IP+wU+5Sy0dwVzWUePdrIQmOrg /yhkHVj0xhjE3+Cc4JU90hePBPwIf/ysliVLFOriEoBTMEbB1qwQaL4CVSQSMX3q WzaJiIblPjDei+MGt8p/bykqVCfBEWhEkI9O0oIzIM95r+xzWNwDncv1L/5oarcZ kbQ2fAg2tWvtPwJLWqapd/ez2DEJbRlYaAQiuKC0k6RtZmuQ7MZ89pDk5ZvtJDCc G7CWPV4AnwIVG1g219kJ3B65ZwNc+2/TZ/F7wIdn/0MLvsCz6+hvggrGvFsVmTpp ItOODBKLvHj2Ov4kpCfRYZ0ulLD2t1nuaTTNQZCWR2ghOPk/rgSrH3RZa5T6sLEh ZXh06ouw1T4dQ9+NdX/AqfE93fyAWTRt87mBFM0VY5pzWG/ZW+w3rip9Ax+YqblP pCO5CtHM25Zwk1zWFZm/lrDIFir1/5gUhxyqQu0bsCRafK7sNDEXGFEjcuGuNxE3 XGd4t2kjnlYcSOLuk5EPgaqofZS5Ro0TuhFfj/mL3FMZU3ARjIJHniwWcMcEYUks bjJc8zHZj8Y2lB3R27YtHLhX4HzhU0W3zDrUlj97MmdSNf6Rj3Gda+VvtAt64eGy TWmkl0Jp2ei7GyMqm7vNAO7syrPtNqgpuMhdqYRCEycfSMg3Y3ie91peRYrcSw6g F24RAiQqSzsTNIeHdxr1 =6WIX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e522b70.1000...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22.08.2011 12:24, Jakub Wilk wrote: I suspect that this is a mentors.debian.net bug. :/ Right, but that's only half of the story. Dylan did not upload any orig.tar.gz, so Mentors tried to fetch it from the Debian repository (which is a more or less useless hack I think), but failed as well. For some reasons the HTTP response code reply was hence threatened as Tarball. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUjKZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxFgP/0Hqge3opJgBoHEmgurWrqZ9 Fezse33ukZXgTGIwbFJXuVOybKfMyF99GkE1po9RoCV9wTQSONtMnNDcmynTeOpj dAEcbwhizGCwLc692XmBAXQEabNXPBHila57DpaK7pg1BrY3qJeExiQ8cPVXWrx7 ensCKL6GGTxqXtBCwkgVBGN6fVS7mIcrJPCLUQ8kawecNtWZgEGBw00ZdEbeOLU/ FYYxi6rbdR6HUnoAE7z7y+iA29xvkayHZpmbjfYHxN6NUWSqbYZAGjux2VcYjE1U he/geBq9MWsEo6pK2+zuYV7Pah9Hmda09FGunzHYv/GokwLjgpvqW97uwAuYydk2 fc6Re7GnsgkNS4HifCRy9C8KM6OWqQt8DRvLn16uPNFetf21v5SN5lqM8CS7WrBo XbgZELUMDT4FbFk7G2sagbpRxou/6sINJoxop866bdgLEzCwkSQPiU9yrZ/xKgKq johcy1JIiM9LntgUYzuQp+KSWsQ0JcOG0dnGv7fLSEWARobiQKCMue7wlfwD0aSF mN5pNkvMSXWrYK2l4Jh/BcEc7QVdrmQzUWuyRz3p1p/27WJwoFla30MNe6+Wu9wC bCB+PRecZc9idTIrJuB9prK1s8azjrLSyCHuVCRafmYSRPV800u80ufGA0gfx3TE SHwEGkZHY6E+R+fdLY9N =26HQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e523299.50...@toell.net
Re: DEP-5 requirements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Charles, On 22.08.2011 15:12, Charles Plessy wrote: DEP 5 will be distributed in the debian-policy package (see #609160), but there is not plan of making it part of the Policy, in the sense of being mandatory or strongly recommended. I didn't imply any must/required constraints as per policy definition. I intended the may in my sentence as normatively defined in the policy. Yet I am curious, whether you know about concrete plans to integrate DEP-5 into the policy. I don't mean the wording itself, where I am fine to have it referenced in the policy only, but about the normative meanings. Your explanation implies, it won't be must or should, so I can conclude may or no reference at all? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUl9DAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtgsMP/14Fg/pAB1KubJLTgzMKsKLC TUZ79Yz0t2s9EdOUZeJ3DdtrK3wuGZPMS9xm1sCdARLCLf91tmYO5OdEcepYqyAQ MP82WJIBDOkNEE0sv8AMZlrkOZCqCx3jyEYOJSbr9N1t5hEOgncyh8ZRH1oya8Jf QnkMGq3hZWeFj0ICVlpMTTBzTuiXCKspTF0Pyn/ljINxZIFNjw9kOPjE/5ye2Jv8 rpWsuCo8OK5VDlZDVADj9a9pbRIaz7kh3AYmqTeNz3vggDJwYts70Oq8mcuwEbTP /880/k93fIgC+DbZFB8a+HXe4Es0B+qEhFhRuAiWXFgGsDO1novNGDN0LY0Llcb2 7+YdMJ+N0HNuytROfN5WzsFZWFs/P0wAXhLrJyVASEEFa0um8iqDBr1s+uwqAR0L qzRBVilHr0CON/g+KcSlcl7KcYfaGVKMySrqILn3wbM+fDOXZMnbrsLwG6317DjA Ems3lakJHxXiuPn1koqw5nDyMNDmiRlj/KI2Kc0rpyk5+fbLZTw6KpHfjJlwb1GF P3caGYk1dO49lt6wLsilw1OOR6/DJhhcmaBdLE9AAbmF1zHfdEcQISloNqQcBwyu d9XJ3dIHLsx5W/Y8x884BLjFb8iAvSLbgXa9eGSqr/Q4dWx0SXb3cFr9+wWVe9ZK SQXLIaS9Hq0ROodu6Ht/ =EXDA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e525f43.90...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dylandotnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, and Dylan, On 22.08.2011 16:11, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Is it's debian version greater then 1? If it is, it will use -1's orig.tar.gz, so you don't have to keep uploading it, since the upstream version is the same. yes, that's the problem. Dylan is trying to upload an increased Debian revision (last upload was a -4). dpkg-genchanges does not include the orig.tar.gz in such cases unless you explicitly force dpkg-buildpackage to do so (give it -sa). Maybe we should refuse such uploads as the old mentors did as well. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOUmTHAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtjQUP/iWx9ZKN11lM47TWVYdCLZF6 J8TYNHjJlMajSl+ae0le8NP4To/xwvgMr6U/Dv4CqjqOwYw2WaW4fa2hJOrIu/42 0oveUeYfQwuLtnOad4aqwt0QBrhYmr02yMm/UTPPwWY8vnNDPbWeWAtGvRoOsmN5 VVJKzIukUAR3FG/UyK0yi3uos7G6Uyg+fP9C8sqNlgKpuQE2R7OtMsbAzJVzW9OO U/9daiZzk4NCX8iPjIUGtFa1+EroepxhO+xWbS1iGmgikaE2O4RNZfkRbXsC/dZL x8FnqysZzOvBe2T58XAaUMOydAvbGNp3u9i2CRwpL8OM5uw2bEYwHeO8+Fdxe926 o6++MFd6Es2k2PS3h0G0+4Lk1KIl6E8Ri3ZebfaeS7pY+0UYj2yac94xPlR2AKGU XQYH7JsVmPy/yZeTAHIM3bp4TDvVah2fL17z5wpn8fZawuaYIsiDpkOQtp4yogsO wMGcok//r0oJ101zq/n2RXxfDIXKtVW5W9KH4C7SDnYydtZlc2wtH6Waf2iRG+Gb Bn6htVRbDMi0yCr/tP4/kGPLgS2jql4mo5gmllSAnxqScRZHP4HZbxVJuxSnwtbn Wfsrsh9prWfyEib7buJy+6IXLvEAqnxR0xpGQzgsC75kK2YY553lQSFkX+i72RXB MMhmqpX+88GgE8nYeoeQ =50VB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e5264c7.3050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: news (News - RSS Ticker)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 20.08.2011 11:05, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote: Thank you. I've been looking for a not-too-long, easy-to-remember name for binary/command, so (it may be a silly question) can package name and binary name be different - package name: 'news-rss-ticker' and binary/command: 'news'? yes, that's certainly possible, although we as distributor tend to refrain from such changes and let upstream decide how to call their programs. As you are upstream yourself, you might be able just to rename it. The problem with /usr/bin/news is its generic name in a globally shared name space. In fact there is a already /usr/bin/news in the package sysnews making yours providing it as well a policy violation. Please see Debian policy § 10.1 [1] in general and examples like [2][3] for a little more background. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-binaries [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/02/msg1.html [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611698 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOT3rDAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNttGkQAKBsTl9hD10hfr/yW7153sdQ v06Ne4Y56gjNO69/7Ebg4jLzzryec7dUwr02E0C3jaGD/K+kY7W2CpU7nmi6KJdN PMh7S+Yz1090oCfc93aCR7wz3Ni44JpiPPmiMKTVy8J+eL8MpAIWMrddECELYJtr tpEYrmisf7Q4HpVTgoQFpnbszOGBKnmecb7bYScqkjUiVpMH/bVp7ibXcbh5sc4a wDQU3BGsFitwLq/FOleQSYyFacqaHZmrZza2mwSMUHw8uxm7vFhzyjFqwkl8E0cF maO4gE89bBD1BlR4dHSsOOZXWX7dYtD1c/gFpjDlZkHFXlBGdyWLaGlmJzhdmjXk S9XUf6dCVyuhUS5bMgT7TC5bKqkR+jOWsbCxsCwjga3bUitI4ZGhDfetaT29qYEA 7lilFaA4pxrZn0pNIId+VsQm0St5i9zYAZQe3s5kFO5nTQlhL0OBCElwcel/JTcw cQaQLn5D0P3QPh8ODUN5WDzFyAqD6NeOGaGHtDMkiDyJY03QfObdsywd3JZfc2vq YYLZNafs/+nYE0tuEbD/Q/mIIiGK4X+iGUJzu11yHcIXg7IA7hg5psIhNKqs5BRY Dvtki5eFiH2ENlHpRrhs5JC2FksAJqjo69gF4jtUK2noKFiycW3ox2+BALFBlpEf Xg1Fhvvp6lnQ6Y99tri4 =a2Ia -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4f7ac4.8050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: dfu-programmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rodolphe, On 18.08.2011 14:11, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote: So the new upload is not a NMU anymore and it could be my first official package :) Here are a few comments about your package: * Please consider using a more recent debhelper compatibility level. Version 5 is quite outdated (although still okish). Generally I suggest to bump debian/compat to 8 and depend in debian/control on a 8.0 version. That works down to Lenny with backports, although your package probably won't ever enter Stable or even Oldstable anyway. * You use a VCS not hosted by Debian. That's ok and legit, but Alioth is nice too, and eases life to other people, potentially interested to help you with the package. Regardless of the repository you choose, the VCS-Browser link should point to the trunk of your repository, not to the project home page [1] * If I understand the purpose of your program, the section devel is not really appropriate - maybe electronics [2] fits better. * Upstream's NEWS file you install as doc, is in fact a changelog. For archive-wide consistency you might consider installing it as upstream changelog through dh_installchangelogs(1). Figure, that would also make Lintian pedantically happy! * Please remove unneeded comments in debian/rules. Those are for your information, and not intended to be kept. Good work, your package looks good. As you might have noticed, my comments are minor pedantic notes. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs [2] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/electronics/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOTQqUAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtFcYP/i6fgDAh4cWtoC590bIR5lt9 RRmOF4/rfhy/f1lgOPUFm4UuUrlojus4uFHagVcKu9NxAQ7KGijwDXHO7hnc2iIE kvvwhjAXpiVFTRgnxX9Y5LHWUrl2geLAXva8VwyZO30Gg4ngGefwbSVT/dVb3kXq n5KU3DROh7h4xzIjzlaUxuOif8ha5AXKZO21qRw117ZPXZhiNCHIq5Cmxe3bpj8y AtLaVlgaKDIAdn8usDTGBlSWYC6Ub3vD+c3Iyku2XskkeWjwcUPkS5YoshsqBibe c+tXUP0VrL0sghDBouvYCEKfEutF459GmPr4d7JZaLPnn5/Fz1PDn9jVgqXDOwD+ 9quBXaD/3zAWVOI0yXvfCyIIrgedn+RaAovS/b75B4HDn5Kovh1a//lIv+6fAwCJ Skln0BZu6DWd4rQ1A5I0BBToAbCcXCkLHZgck2DA6xAuzVW8kDyUaDL2K4anNa5k sbK4oG4NiPDXkULta1WmVwrvQFg5adYOSZkNQ6aKQRBrrGr+yyIDIak5/i58+RXz G+YnafD6oYYM3jaDv4AJU03k9ZGgUvXI7Zc1q1nvoVvuiYrtWzr4nnVCA3Bg+0Aw MHWxNNr94xU38ED471O53/8kkYkdpjmkZ6FjqMw6aEMv7GsiNgYpkDDsZJ2i62a8 VrIMNx3i9M6L6j4HVAre =Ur9O -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4d0a95.4080...@toell.net
Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stanislav, On 18.08.2011 15:57, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: For some reason, the report of uscan is shown as a Warning:, however, there is actually nothing to be warned about in it: it just says that the package is found on upstream's website and is up to date. I think, in this case the Info: tag should be more appropriate. I fixed that. Actually the problem was, that the watch-file plugin checked the wrong exit status and thought uscan failed. The new (correct) behavior is, not to display uscan output at all, unless there was a problem with it. Thanks for pointing out. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOTSwlAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNta98QALWGW3rRsdSE9ciGMQtzfWwT IAJv5Jmx8+O1EpznkDinkNAsQ37BYWjzbr/pV2aQHefv5DIqnooCUFwFNqWrK5L0 BH3jQMwTLC2qw0rd57PaF4dzOnXeDQAefIzH4OuL8Bhtb03eLxjiK4+y7e3Q9MJs f74gKbzlzgkDznxGXY3sSj+q2l/VSAgy8yR4UALU9vUCOquL8EnvAQbQVzjGeiz6 Dzh4Mv7t16Mi2Nnuhn4eTrmpg88UOZcqMBBdGDLHQXfFw6swOEfeoU+iWShFSsHQ bJvLkz/HxAhupFt7SvbZMo+DQuT4s9wcm7yOsg01C3kbudFxw6joMcTmvKGDhChH Lw4MwDbtjiDeAWnjI3VRux3OCxOSMUvvMePgV1BO2MBJQ4Vksbj82lugbaq++Y4P 0hQzNsRNenhnAcsxDRkx887TRIgJROg2Nxktwdim45FDdhG9JYV46mvh0890VmUN J60H1f4J3goOBlW3GhynuKMCsorMrrfssF7tHGTkb+Tn9HlrNFk2epb7QRQs/gWs 6NQINfKBNT0MsQjtClJJm1iwjqFneN9kEnXiZ9lhOKWcm/t9CCOdg6Jlsk5Otf69 +HS51UEd5V/rpHp0A30FJ2JLrtkEItZ7SgT//EfAhq0Uz+5DThY+stgchBvW5zaQ 9BIBpbMqpgUp24PZvVSl =zy05 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4d2c26.3000...@toell.net
Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 18.08.2011 18:26, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: While you are at it: can you also make clickable the URL of the project homepage that appears in this field (my package just used as an example): Info:Homepage: https://github.com/qnikst/kbdd Currently, it is shown as simple text (not a link). at some point, yes. But for now, the QA plugin outcome is just a not-normalized blob, making it non trivial to put a htmlified view around. That is legacy a design issue we need to fix at some point, making the QA output more ... err ... readable. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOTT5SAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtkAYP+wXIiLwxT3hrlpWUdtzkykCl wh0tu0Ijl5mYe5oM2/O7sZI1TemQMG9QZXe7zTUaaYhmTuTX+0MML9s+zRC5wyLl vOXWwFSqNAfubrfIWb7KmZWzPvc8WBNvQ1ve2o+NkIIYKTl98ruN5vSrPq/IS0Rb ACGUeOKeSsGUGcnnNZ3/jsMnXWRw+zS16CZaz+BnNYdIopwhMIHSuuCXlsW5Jr3D Wyq+SBQQKDMSP8VmPd9utl2rRekAVjFtb1HqJm48QWt8O4kqrMo2Nqb2cs728azW A7q0ngbOt/4Iw3JsWkTXDV+KsEecKjcp3qckEWXcILau6JMEWnBKFlf91SQFeua3 t1HhJjCYjE9SejUR7l9ldbAEv+NH0Uiqex5ufsOXEQk2Kba8pFjvHsioSnkvawrm v1CrEIN0XDAlfLC8MsxzIe8WXLxDd+tpS2ppEh2c9tf5GqnSQELMdbnx33Mx+Tqq A7cpxVcidMBs3BuCt6PDNdE/kn0MyJX5/ktN0NDx4O/b37i/YkGJLux6VnN7AEY8 Fxhk+gENGELSfP9USy++Eece4/9Q6VoZ0O5v6uRyIWKWhgbjkO76iq3ECTvRpj2C xDf6bxtPZzKkdSW2cEHnVj/MO/v5u6DrZSkC8o4aylqwj6VdtGhfT0AbSdAY/k/g vYr03pQlYPGjAnJhV8m5 =eGJP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4d3e53.6050...@toell.net
Re: In a single binary source package how does one fail to install some files?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 17.08.2011 05:52, Vincent Cheng wrote: override_dh_install: find . -name *.la -delete dh_install a single binary package most likely installs a single .la file only, so a recursive search seems unneeded. That said a simple rm path/to/libfoo.la will do it. By the way, dh_install also has a -X option ... -Xitem, --exclude=item Exclude files that contain item anywhere in their filename from being installed. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOS431AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtki8QAMhpr0wjJUGHol/42N+eE70l X9h6hfTbwrFd27MpFbj8JP4rzWM5/J9VFzcgShKAoxGTjAS95IXbxj9dIjv9VWQi zQXpAWI57dcz5AZ72T7DyTYFCyMRGxDqGPf7aeMLXLvKGEwErquDl+NYBNKaJeL9 iDSHfsfXNxNGmwMUAGgqZajjHZQbtCRzmgNN4OB+pe4eO0OM+XuwjEPY83Wyj+Xe xuLtggb8mQh5yBB56FH5RFhzlCpNd6XecliB9ZzLb8ZW5VlQaa9k1OTGzOmLBfph 8WnX0CtZ0XSxBIvjHZcuMqhiZqsqrhjP8ddwBPl1H9I/3pEnYi+IwMJmaRpD8zui 4ala4yY7Ln+5irQ4ONxxH3S9Tnv7qN7UfXsfKyYpVIuUp0gu2aR2yUf0gAAJkf84 Qj7pAVCZlk5DgaytCwP0o5FKdXqQtXFKFUEbdXIfGgXH+KEnppJMQ4TV46B+hKL1 MrJNcyKHL5kPR0BocgDVL2aues1KzoAOispnP5LA+F/kQdetX0KJC7IT1FPaadI4 y/zm2b5CjUyDn5aRaCE6Fb8UJhzpfiKbuKSZO3bvJaSdJxFqroCw4DXSAR/L5/RN 12xO48C2UohGvilBsiF41WsKb5nb/0f9hJZZofs41HU2K95Ov5tjI41vc9i5YBp3 /fFtbLzQodnxGyNQdzNT =fD9M -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4b8df6.2040...@toell.net
Re: Updating files list on packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mochael, On 17.08.2011 08:47, Michael Wild wrote: Will it be automatically generated sometime in the near future, or do I have to do something to get it there? no, you don't need to do anything but wait. However you are not the only one with that problem, it seems that for none of the non-free/contrib packages a file list is available (#451755 reloaded?) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOS5KpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtLuAP/3O71hKT2QIxjodKS1KL2Q21 pfLyhFGbsoQZMDsudRZbyE343/n+6lmvUPW1DwjCuYQzjz30H2DLjj046vP+Z3b4 gvwSTzll0hxXOmdF4d76wXbYMr3TmAgjrKBaPKQuTQelqVBGemu9iXKTglYwnyri 6yeOF99XYzyr7wmZ7nvYIf1UP+yQOwt4UtEWrVyLWkkcRsM581VxMmjz/DZ5Y6YO CeHiQgFk0gsLFTe1yLbQ4D+SITxYXsrSmX2iLXX5JcWvUcmhmKldG6iboVexpqnt r+Dl06UzJ7s/U6ObGjar1d5yiPaZBz+tOnIluiipSWESSFDlqa3igEvpjqF48wvw j+SHttPOU7mf1vz/U45E95UPyWdxHjm9UETkQMo3BTKY0drsmfDtffagtYFoGFCA DyasZ/7i97bmhjYSVKtIaqzll9WU9HdXxWiJc4R9YEOGPih7iVtXvGGtlJWWDrIW Vq65cmqMvXrF2+0fwhIv4+wWag72vqE0iw8tjSuHybdNXNKqUXzwLLh/K2ifCnRw 6Bh+AP1St1XUCu5XOk0aqS0aBQPSeyxBY4SeU7+6rIYz3Oot8tTX27pdaeTTTv2e Rzd1rwuZltkcX4YGexf7VYGGGgwuHK9ynpvuLHlh4TG3/Bb/CNyxysKm5y+qflCn hqVMGuyJum5LmvGGQf9D =1ZRg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e4b92aa.5090...@toell.net
Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 13.08.2011 18:16, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: ... still points to old package! Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry... One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a new package with the same Debian version to official archives either. I agree this is helpful for mentors and this function might be supported (again). However please keep in mind the migration was not in a hurry but due since years. Debexpo was due to 2008 already, but Asheesh finally brought it in shape to be able to replace the deprecated / hardly maintainable mentors service. We all finally wanted to deploy it, as Debexpo seemed to be a never ending story for a long time. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOR6riAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt8agQAMPePpz4Gwl8R1+3j9TW0UBX qOgDudeEbJkRVSGTMvFCV4RIWJg3oNi/gBYTCyb/+B5aHOZjCrNeBtumvwWhe90k VoX6F3FAyqVJDXSquoyHwdiSmhSwxqsLhVzSMiJQk5nYQYk3SlSZEDvviR9yWKsK DjbzTziLvskmSAnAC0ENkYGbQHJaKdWSDhD41VHfMRcxl6Tj/oBmZNsIFmKxGzme Zq+gUmT3WpucXoB90KesHR0aelhQsuiVAYwLQfBxdkGZry+as6vHE8/cyPMUtsfw +YdHOUVlxdm4RzM28xD4GbpJ9DVOCtNk+gViJhl7Zjq/jvyBhBRXBsT3+u0DjS3a kdDx/b+1z9vm+b8GS/2l2OkzLMqnEh43E4jIm219Pu6bqW9dfbrhohB0+oYXu3N7 GQaK2zMieR8uQsCoirQvEPgUT4GmmVD6bjHdz6nL8znuF9vgTbiD2DKhqxyqsPLo fI+Nrq2eEQnRR2IOpg85E7C6H/HMkRTFKbneJ7MJ0AAPbURXDWJN5I6PFCFmRJsM Befl3MmGQ5Hz0o6qDG9K4uNXRlOYXrdbqExB6dpwW5jG70SJ0jLholbBS4hYLgFH AKfN63zjn7jvewvfAQw9l6hsMukjCA9JJJ5fUlILk8nGShvS5lFlfTWtJ2n8bFeR xO5Ige5+1JF3t29zOTJg =FyKa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e47aae2.1020...@toell.net
Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14.08.2011 13:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the iterative process of review then. I sort of agree, although I wasn't involved at all in this part of Expo. We certainly accept patches fixing this behavior. However so far nobody had time or cared enough to address this problem. In fact, until very recently we had no support to upload the same source package several times at all, so the status quo is already an improvement. As far as I can tell, there are the following problems with (multiple) uploads of the source package * Name spaces collide when different person upload the same source package (e.g. bpo packages versus regular sponsor uploads) * It is not possible to overwrite the same source package (may collide with the problem told before) * Uploads of the same source package don't push the upload date (e.g. relevant for the package list) and can't be individually flagged / deleted. Volunteers? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOR7bRAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtJbsQAIzV+q5xng8wSKXIKpXnmFjf 6oUlMPdGb6QrUBY2SfIwViyyuHPQrTVE4WjRt6N2/3zwohLIorbeZ4iRtj5Iw1d4 NmfJnU1LXaqhwqRKtQ68+KhIG7XNVM1mUJJxoPWB/JYeR43Nu5/N3HuFi1dMewqd e2FE+jk7anbz/uTID4jCR6aKWlMrQCAaeTlV5GQ8iedbOCttrHSZj9Z3YaEUhvaA qWMMiptAL1YbUzFgr8PLFZ/NylGkj5wv9jppWfRHslfDgsVwj1Q5n2I6umfu+pJW U1Mqx0KsmXQblk5L1N/47GA3O/0m1yAMiwx257yTZvkUQPN2oEHHHDD9LXxl/VM1 yx6wqjR0nhRSz49HajmWr99rR2r82/MxeoWGl73KKW6moZq9PfEuOJ6p/xSGXXly wiNyoQ0l6E2GSjUuOR0n85xvWledc5pDwXiEk3JHt7V1XjJ01cbcnvL08vEKMKRi B220bqky5ycPHzSPXgGCkhaWveNF6PZJwNWgzmeZUPGtckX8uwhK6+6IkUP8AHLk cHXFwB16cE6wGuW798axINNtbyZvdMnhLaNS6EYfMbAFBP/1hhYiATwDkP3h0Eup QWlxRV9dqYX91BG5S31rctfd5oBTIqwDhliqYCDJt13nXBF5lgm8bMuhc3VHukIC v6jvR6WQNAscfZxcBjsc =LLk5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e47b6d1.3040...@toell.net
Re: News about the mentors.debian.net transition to upgraded software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stanislav, On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the uploaded package. FTR: I didn't. You shold have asked for external testing and help *BEFORE* switching mentors.debian.net to the new system. It wasn't me who scheduled the switch and I didn't do it. People called for help since years. Its not Expo came out of the dust in the last two weeks. Expo is around since 2008, seeking desperately for someone to help and to finish it finally. The truth is, nobody cared, except a hand full of people putting some stuff in shape every once in a while since then. For the migration itself, I did assist a bit and I still think it was the right moment to do. Expo is in a rather good shape now, it works for (almost?) all features as Mentors replacement and it opens possibilities for interested developers to extend it by a lot of other useful additions in future. Its not complete, and it has some bugs, but I oppose your opinion it would not be ready. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOR9zpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQHIP/1meH/N4v9m25NtFbVwsbFRu qfsBxuftWks0rWr0bSwWz/ezn69BjfJBGQ8+CG9xZeiLz8pmNE2LxB9DB6lKUpqz f5ixIjt91v8mEPVjw0UYvA+kOOBWXAKGZZHjy7XtMBjx7cKWnNhhijc2Gvoo8q25 CHxJHAXq2setSdCnYTg/lNX0UgQ5RKUBs8ThCIM4x2Jq8NI8Gjf80VlK8UEaBePd jMylmsiYMuq8ZV7w0QjMM+NpgwB++bL1MC+qBjHW7c3HqRwYLoxHMoJmLVYfQI8p FkXVyO7EoMJ+8pubEKXEjK6QxiFBjxGq5S1QJEd5MgEqHo2vEXv6G7KAy0jtb/tz neSO/lqfqop45rFllBTVjZe3LbsFjjAkUff/KlMGi7PoWmIXAHM9H7ZBpaaaCujF 42OxeDCzZ8NQ3PjavVeuQxhhyeYHekdHLMTxLKjsnLW9uwKGQ+5a+n7VbFpgMVn/ /8ez/KDnztARY3OCBn61UvVAiV/CH7RqhvJLqPY0MQNU8NBiyiO/ErHd5snYwyJb yt3yoT4n3d7QMs5Oeqo33BHd2wKrMOuV1gxTg4hSWGKSA3KISskvGzi3bciOOzMH gM4t/t5UC+3Udn/4U8R35nyDp26OSALpiTfBXdjEfxpVZ96NC24Xl+0jTJLRQ6ao WvtHjVFg2oNGq/5WUD9U =mHCy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e47dce9.5070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: mactelnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Håkon,
On 11.08.2011 01:27, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
is a git log Changelog good enough?
Depends how verbose you are in your changelogs and if the reader can
denote the package _version_ from your git logs.
For what its worth, it is to note, an upstream changelog is certainly no
requirement to get your package into Debian.
In debian/rules, you can remove the commented Vcs-*
Thought about adding the collab-maint alioth vcs here. Someone tipsed me
that I should add the debian changes to a public vcs.
Is this a bad idea?
No. Thats absolutely right. However you should point to such a VCS only,
if you are actually using it.
This has not to be Alioth by the way[*], if you are using your own
repository for Debian packaging that's fine as well.
Please note, you should /NOT/ put the debian/ directory into your
release tarballs. Hence you should use another branch for your debian
packaging. Consequently your VCS-* links should point to the repository
where your Debian packaging is done.
Any tips on how I would work this out without changing it upstream?
You can override an appropriate dh call and replace it by something
completely custom, semantically equivalent. That's helpful if you can't
get dh_installdocs to do the right thing, and its only purpose is your
README file. For example, you could do:
override_dh_installdocs:
install README.markdown debian/{package}/usr/share/doc/{package}/README
If your README file applies to every package you build, repeat the
procedure for each package. Alternative ways exist, maybe even simpler
approaches.
Thanks again for all your tips!
I'm really happy you gave not up yet. I'd really like to see your
package in Debian.
[*] Some sponsors may disagree and have their own guidelines.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=Q39w
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e440d7b.6050...@toell.net
Re: Dependency problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11.08.2011 19:04, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: I wish I could do something as simple as Depends: python-wxgtk2.8 | (python-qt4, python-qt4-gl) | python-fltk | (python-gtk2, gtkglext1) I'm pretty sure someone suggested such a syntax already once. Perhaps I'll just force the user to install the WX frontend, and list the all others as suggested packages... Don't do that. Its wrong in several ways. Suggests does not declare alternatives but enhance functionality (policy § 7.2). In your case its a dependency, even if satisfied by another package. Given that, you don't enhance anything by installing your suggested packages. Moreover you possibly force your users to install a hard dependency even though it would be perfectly valid to have only one of the suggested alternatives installed. Use jwilk's suggestion, being ugly or not its the correct one. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJORBQgAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtOLgQAMRcf4zf3xf3hF/sKWs8uEME V9uSgtz/gqB+NZROFaslkCtpFmxRAtxNf+lv8ad3abj+LeeUlmEe5rtCt75lXUOQ V8U2SdVK9+byoa/4akOdIRuk201gdA23o3OiPLNCAIl8L2iPd5lM06kjERuCCLd3 vfIWknDZmc+zjOVMrnx3MVO3l9C1qgCoJvSoFl8rmix5NICrHTmO1c3Iu2yj30ID vFOdMRZWJ3QdG6YlJLbkKeArvRsz1E57xPwl6YYzcPeNX/fTshBBBZyUtdh0TJCM pw/x2mI50qw9NRg0iJyGGEGZ/tkRr/jZdmmwXgu8ZI4J2hKskMS6oBitY0W3NDKi cgyOwfbeOTsWQC/C+WHxMSDWE0FJ7n4celzLhycenuejTvqcDpg3taQMlafMzJHA 8BuINoVpkbKQmuU/xS2E1mEW9QNZFoJYx7og2j27YJjR2KQcg9JyEF07DokVNj1E /q/6lb13CuuZ0r2idgE7RqapQE9nke0cK6AnPAlKT42ZNpsvXb1Z3fxNIpPVd4ZS APgh2raakjIpcwlhWBK0cyYwN8Q9D8T70RBcYbDRhjOshC0Zn8DPJ8F9vnZ7x7pc 5YY3hbJDvlRLOc7Hbxwa3bPk2ERJTDn2pJ8xZPdMZth6HZsEyBoNGzRCPgSpaYBL cceqn2hI+tJV+K3m6mRD =sCzl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e441420.5050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: airoscript-ng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 06.08.2011 22:54, David Francos Cuartero wrote: airoscript-ng - aircrack-ng user interface are you aware of #588588 and #605519? That's something which needs to be addressed before considering an upload bringing a new dependency to aircrack-ng. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOPbL6AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNteg0P/0ESMbeceZoAjciEC083AYGv jAdkIZ45S7cUPRtWjJ1XKp3/qfD7K4zYy8qeoFpJUs1V34WgmKRNqGKNN4raqxN8 8tcXC1evwJNzYAsuM5O6yllKhJy2rh8gZsmog0/JG5C0J6YTkngYzxUjtpnjoD1G cTBSHwugQkNPMo2QAbckAFAUp7tgCGvWxYCpxengO41FknqBxNjsRaEZ5/6jx4TQ wsTjOGBayYHwf6cukk95FV8Y87jWOc//mY+2GplP4Jxms9yNxOdXr/xMb6TI78Qd PP3g2b1gW9NxhFX4Ou4IojgXl4CCmlxwjX77HhLl2/5tjiCFqwBPICRKjRUFprQo a4RXW2Hdd/mcd+Qyp20HGpif2aEIlIrc9bukSd1AFMwd1Txe+PXJ5y/dgJHECRCD tggKj/Totfw1MdTTsS6eI32+WkBmicq9f/uobMVqG09TatXIbD77O7hBHSpxj12M aE7f15xZgA2nAEvzvgJrOn42vSncMcoihaZYMQ3BejS5+HNozu4uzqnk5JLZLwxS pBnvHH2QXgRW9FRfg+5BgzfiB/Bv8BTAcTEq+ZXSstJcWeeO+jzpqN0VX0H+tno5 jpPe1T4otDZDiH8vfgghLulntxJ2VUl1uuH0sLCjiCvykQ9joH10jAdgcgS/fOdl X4ZfD3uz0FdiBG1XlJbx =T947 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3db2fa.9010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: ndpmon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi John, On 04.08.2011 17:08, John R. Baskwill wrote: Thanks very much for your reply. This is my first attempt at getting sponsored. The first upload was OK, but based on the reply I received from mentors.debian.net, I changed the clean target and uploaded a revised package. Should I have kept it at 1.4.0-1 in that case? different people have different opinions here, but basically yes. It is common practice to reflect version number changes only for uploads targetting for Debian directly (in fact, this is a requirement there, its not possible to overwrite packages). For mentors.d.n you can pretty much do what you want, including overwriting the same package again. Please note, an upload to mentors.d.n does /not/ mean, your package has been uploaded to Debian's official repositories. That's is just a public platform for peer reviews and sponsor searching. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOOrbdAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt2kcQAKExETXQQ6NM9nQUTkaayZLW OLNxBqSNRukVFWuP69SRwj1/jJddzeUruN+LL+qUPoIiwLUeCzCpMPQ0A99/4nsg XzYK3uGaGlxwhxVmM8aYpU5h5l6PsBy17PN2YSZ/PjwII0V36B+HJJf/gw3eV3zm CU8N8md+0eMObp/X19STCTrsKKg0dkWJaDa0u7Jji/tXrBZD22dOCDRtoOSQfYto sCS5rR77gpnITbA/LTj+4teGKaTJmFoj2p4HLDr9fE5kh/yOMFgBBbKhMFQ5PPY+ sSMB6ZLdjPpVxS4Ac6kKaUgTk4pnLYmVTu6URnM03+DAbo5j4d//hxgiPa2Ocq7j Qbc0+Ja77dO8KjAEguodxq5wGIaTnMS1zDXjIyLBxXmRgoIdb0goPSyjzfZ/9yTk IjFzP6kIjSejtpsvIIoOnt5qBEvS/KlOnWJwP+7eTVtw5T3U6wmOfKSFptVKJjxb SvB+zQrZ8FhshXjJr/TIyf1feIrNk4+HtY36lOvtExlk8QZU9lotCNXMaCf5ElX/ S8dFVIuuKzRi082Kn9b51e5Uu9Ow3DQ8bDiDRz1ujLIYmNWlVI93epVAUBRFMOY0 39sMzwl3JlVMyA9SqjF/iolY0Oymjznm0wt6O7TdGtGgIcydqs4ViLOvAwLD0v5P iOeNAY0smSAGZkRhS/de =P+V6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3ab6dd.1080...@toell.net
Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Paul, On 02.08.2011 23:34, Paul Wise wrote: Which version of lintian does it use? It would be nice if it were pinned to sid or backports. I guess it doesn't process the binary packages? Currently it uses 2.5.1 from Sid. Asheesh installed that recently after I was complaining (thanks again!). :) For your other question: Expo runs Lintian on the changes file which might include binaries. Those are thrown away after processing, but for the checks, they are still available. You can see the full Lintian output for example here [1]. [1] http://expo.debian.net/package/trafficserver - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOOHPoAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtoAQP/3cjaIpGuq0d/Op0bY6Weldw u1c8yw8fgJVtgwcDBEL7GEwsVkaCLdQIMwyYot+/bz3H0ZVa2RkCm4DVCT0NBf04 v+TKmnl9GJ6XzrwRdIphO4kIdDHWhT6ProS/UMCBRWDVwG2p9LkyAygcZmNUFjCp eDvcR08y0q2nY3uYc7zqtfNG9nDEKXHydv38cPAxaZVJ1gcAcs+uuCVNfbmoJf06 DmsYiZqJpmGNQbXGU+P0vEwXN2gFstC+/aHTgzHCb2ZsxF+e+1bDwWTkqOO5rFm5 TSH4dUiK/vyvO6D9bqdWoCpXionriDncU1qeex/jeo7cdyzqJwc72LdjgFiCUHCs ps4brcO/vHGycpbMLyYe/rFb4FwbplMFP/utZz0kdYyUSaC2HX/qworaoCkCDfKN cPfuXObNIp8DlBG8XjvBxDdJpRzCt5RSAB1lnhSxVEbCFzQnPSsjjnmbXV8UOrDB HOPqRxxcHImC2/mDzU4mCdSs6wrMaPOLtKyRNw0lF1ex4Nfb/nNieKL5+1t473tl CCaUgcNino6ZUgmBLqRk0XQe5lMd09QNOr1DI07ym/Ojq7vPBpzWh7OAzzrjhB6Z xTzKzk5/KuyFvuMSONyw7FoA+cBUiMk1/flH674xePPtvaaA3y36HSEMDQaQqg9o GGiqkSYB4PRv1CCY/JA0 =WXNz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3873e9.9010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data (3rd try) (new upstream version)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Oliver, On 30.07.2011 21:20, Olivier Girondel wrote: 2. OSS as default audio driver upstream (and thus Debian patch) lebiniou also builds on FreeBSD and NetBSD, and for these systems only OSS is available That's perfectly fine, but please note Debian also supports kFreeBSD which builds a GNU user land around the FreeBSD kernel. Your patch effectively breaks such systems, as there is no Alsa available as you said yourself. Nonetheless I agree with you, that defaulting to ALSA is a good idea for Linux. Is there some conditional to override this compiled in choice upon build time? If so, you might consider making use of it, to make your package build on kFreeBSD with different defaults than Linux. For autotools based build systems, you could make use of dpkg-architecture plus conditional branching around it and pass host architecture dependent flags to its configure script. Alternatively you could do the same branching based on compiler preprocessor flags. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJONF6NAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxdgQAIgYutl/M9QMfGaSmpC8Odxv fr284zDxlExblXIAYyfNuEg/cwNnoZzRP4FAcHijdkG0YCFZRQi3mmQgvRJbvpRm zw69rr326PDHxEP3L8u3TSI2mVQIXPsvrmua8XpNCH86Yk3oFeXWeVS0kDSJJACm VZdFm3hz2RUwlmz1WyzY9rWHD1HTgzq8GYiLTct+MqomLuifuV0UngNlu8G7WkKm iVrqScsRl3RGubYwoKgub8QqWZeaTbBe4VC1dyW78XL0/h0goj1jKobWgux4ZuhM a6w3p3IhqFpcB80UzzWMow/5kIkMoM7fIKIcCDgKEGzZLPsDn9uniCWdNT8s9CDo 9EVouyobXodKFTDtHhUR/Y7gghd/hkg+mBv9O5jZ+QUi5Zla0UeFLSTMnsVct7K9 NxsbjaYyU7e7Vl1JGK1fBMFn62g85ZOwslfyIVNEjQACbRG5ZcOYNWkn2LY1Rs+o UsHtkvT/eqRAPL4UVbB3KDKEi8ZFHNgbFNgZQm+1C+aTGCMdE52/M//25UanBO59 K03DVLmjy19w9YFqi/GINmKjVHoCjYeinYFutAJ3wNk1Xqft3C4HVUh2BYflklvj 4vdxLa+qoWsk1Li288NzUwOT5r84kOkVq/KY3Ymfp9kXmS0JzdvTb3kugXVlzPFh OUuQBUR48C0y8zI+cwXO =x8ug -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e345e8d.5070...@toell.net
Re: Please try expo.debian.net -- a replacement for mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pietro, On 27.07.2011 09:12, Pietro Battiston wrote: in fact there is no hope that we are going to have something like Ubuntu's PPAs for Debian? Is this because of a political choice, or technical mess of doing builds? this was heavily discussed in the kicking of Wheezy flame^W^Wthread. For example see [1][2] for (some) relevant sub threads. Quintessence, in my opinion, was that there should be something like an Ubuntu PPA for Debian, but with a slightly different focus and purpose. That is, from developers only for specific tasks. For example to supersede the current practice of developers to upload their packages non targeted to the main branches everywhere but not really transparent for their users. That said, the realization mostly suffers from the fact, there is no software available to do this on the software side, as Launchpad is not free software, and usable alternatives don't exist. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/threads.html#00029 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00121.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOL89pAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtLOIP/1nXHgIEmhORzDs+3JfRYcP6 v9t5NeNGnMlwDkvwg0Fj/jHgq7yzsC8LH+s0nVCsXLSh6bEbXNcXBEElq8gX+Xsn ti5kXObU2gVypFJufcdRXgIq3NiSlyy5xyvyfwyOFdCHDS+16Ux8TurDlPysX3JT Hgjd7vtDjMl7Vq1Q0DWHnJLzuTt0avyGxQgtHccnd+P/lAu4TE098q57BxHkCj5p lEaCoioitKsTmTO5mkTEQMtcY8fOJ1tEHjw+yi7TQcQD1NW9lNwB/5/Elb4OakIc UG+o3jTKuBvF5kQE4j8INIMTa5b4eP3NQu0RdwbUr04Ve9IziuOZYeSYbsyoRepd IkoIg1FI50rg+PKefwfYHHABKFfoWqKKgyFg69jbDEvk3jsQfZZxWFft0boZ1Iac EOenDR9iHi4Rz+zFXUFOfB/9WNll3qtqXUnXdIHnL3aZ92XJ3JAJFKlnpw8HLszx TZW8x5vKflos2z+YgQD0mhfZaMj2z0w2phN/nbhjq3SdlEnAepl4Z1zoO924Aj7a xWyAu/G+2h0U0Dv23QlYoKL9HaP5UO0qIFz4x/BvH2s+35GfMNVsB/z4AMZOBlGY Za5Vr7G7G7a7fxliS1lI9r0ihHTll/DSTPmtP4zW9/zblO2WrAyZhvrcH/Hvxa7Q DW5j05DJvvcP5liyvs52 =P6DL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2fcf69.1030...@toell.net
Re: Please try expo.debian.net -- a replacement for mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kilian, On 26.07.2011 22:25, Kilian Krause wrote: I'm not entirely sure if we want to run get-orig-source targets to rebuild ~dfsg tarballs and compare them. I don't think, you really want to consider to run /anything/ which has been supplied by a completely untrusted sponsoree. Being it a full or partial or just a get-orig-source target run. This is an immediate risk for the infrastructure, being it well protected or not for little benefit. (just my 2c) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOLyTpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtB40P/jKI4+ml59JN8jZ6Ps+3pDic pgU8lVMjb1QMeRsCc4RjM14+khYmjgja31HpNP/s3GeDnHdjDZha29oPAmTuGLkt 9CC05g9dELKS/eRiY7JHOeEG6o/Y9csnQR96bhaAzcHiSmYqF1NMj4Gl4pPN5RT6 WTOTLog1E6S5kcdfAvtCo7RWU1OWdOV6u8yI+fEFpsEFnc4bx3lIkbJXXI3vJVjH uhWDIP1zDBUmw6Wn8LAWpa9wQPbonx2lX/ByzaccnraCk/fF36hDotoDnhqDM6iG k7d5jo06xU/1HidtZ1BJIFMYCKP8DJT/sdExXjA+AqzC+g04fArQXMftRVRofRkb ffAlTy+kP/PMv4SnWwRtnqdUpoBoU5VGKSWJsiz8MjUdU8OQ4x0prK+pF0BCvShe ZtklUo4JAs3WYOwuTtb/VCDtcHPzZr9RzgV9FHin0Pz7zW4bD51ewgRWLN/rWYip Pbt3BQKp1ZxtrvfA+FabocKyvvC55vjhuG/XY07hCSUg0KEIppg9lMq3PXBkDPy9 y4laBriwO/SyfBl/nLRhSVs8May3bNfu1nQa7XlFFar326O95Gdh6S7jWfBSnDqD RqfhnhEPSHJsrI1dasS4Ay1BvrmNklGCG98K9Vy1vfyBzOejG/8BeE+TPrqv1xWB 1aRy1WEJhg/jhmjlOaI+ =Ou/Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2f24ea.20...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 23.07.2011 18:30, Peter Bennett wrote: Does this make you my sponsor? Should I update my package on Debian mentors to say I have found a sponsor? It does, yes. You should not need to remove the package on mentors.d.n as those should disappear automagically. However this was a known problem recently which should be fixed by now [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00486.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOKvyGAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtJigP/jIclrF3t3xAVfGy/y4cQTjP aFIWWxjOf3Afwd4Wx0I5WlyKjwJ+U+hmlrvBpC5+fzHlYeYSDbhut5rcrwgY9z8g L/SFx8xdTkD67+0W1QSPtvqc/t3lsTs5ATgYX7qmh8GVIxMrDZbfDMskznZu/PUc SCga8RNRTPYCwZw2u4xDyEioJOxDjuadSg3nUyDkjdapB+JUryQ3psuJDCcz16V3 RFzqfcMIo216EQJ2fxQrd7RwJ/NUI/fvjxLpaEsi8Kq6gJ6mcphrVfQfMgAycPnB Qorx3Y47gDbiYpZSFWpuNrYe8SOvoN4eBa1HKN4vnIN0TV9dBi0jm4Ixq3jelgHE RX2x4k0wc+bh2Qz/Ci8i217qgqQTq9lfSSA/vHl+01Va5nzLzaW2O02po8QGoEqu 6TpoXRr7Sh/+lTTlPyCyyMmUoNm5K0ALzNCYonxfj9tfLLsnwxmqhYZhCGSzNDea DfzDR1ArFXwXe15GEI8vPWILpZAr5Ldg+ziqZdWUecLgGPRdPtRx1cBlpp9gV5QO CiQSgONxMMyKblOxONDR8Bao7VRfTuXVKsO2Ujg8gLZUFQ8LO9OC4QjoNzEPf4nu M7ct0BgRs+pgRtIFi0dL+GW5UvVLlHMM3rST3hwZN6458xlF7gZSbuwXPCIor06L ziimj/FVwDoNZPUAmWiO =vk3r -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2afc87.1030...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23.07.2011 18:53, Arno Töll wrote: It does, yes. You should not need to remove the package on mentors.d.n as those should disappear automagically. Another note: Your package is currently in NEW [1]. Until it is accepted it won't appear in unstable. This might not take too long these days, as Tolimar seems very motivated : While it is there, mentors.d.n won't notice it was uploaded. [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOKv1VAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtwfQP/RjDoEojic6L8g9nDQYluu6y UvlMceAQjvVdQpw74cNoB89dSdUX2/L9ObrW60hBVgtB18a8biWE7XCm66SEhBgG oTg5Rj7MAazADET4lc3wpxFqwr6ifQw4MkR2vgdRpeZNNgS69AAZQHwb3f2spuz1 Sg+/IIdZbMCHNgUdnGwkEYXQG/xbEyu+1TbSdzXtDCyK3G92yPrZM1o5F6nfoPKy tsUp4gtmSB5SWtINzwxre+Eh97MXe/mHDsYIEw7ZlyNDOOU/V+FlDIMsl0DD9H65 OB851M5jvX1FJDqZFHLS1hmMLtt8Z7/LdrJL87cC7Spp1IUbMZWkgoBfUeNfZIem Nxg5wj2O6Ue4N7OlJhw1SEtiCBMFpPq13NO9AxtkUTcXmeXEUz3zQ/hyBNoEdP/X a/8tQRqkg0CABbPVBdNeflFA6+VIfXOO8elmnMKwTec18qtMUeqF2+vAkU009Cm4 /wIDB7qXl5Z487cVmxRCZ9DdHOniAqv4g8CO9FASmaP00EkzOTOBvfuEKXkt3RAI M8wlZY14xrVs6Z7cF6XqLf18y/C0VxznplfLL/LSzYTx1Lua3/RewfzqIaS2LtCs IA05QQTY8gRJ+eQOlXJbTo5v/AvBZ2F8HROuTsSdJcCUWiGUVLw+5sxNRbh1H4Aq bqvmTd/lEtsACvgWYLvz =7XMm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2afd56.3010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: phing (Another try...)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nicolas, IANADD (twb told me, I shall be lazy!), here are some comments on your package: On 21.07.2011 09:13, Nicolas wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package phing. * Please extend description of the -doc package. Its a bit too short. You don't need to be too verbose, but please expand it by a few words. For example you could tell what exactly the package contains and what its purpose is. Compare with other -doc packages in Debian to get an idea * Your copyright looks pretty good, however Copyright: 2001,2002 THYRELL is probably a bit to few of information. Maybe add a contact address, I noticed in the code is listed one. Same for 2003, seasonfive. Yes, this is pure pedantry - feel free to ignore this. * There is a new upstream release. Please consider packaging it. Besides, the checksums of your orig.tar.gz don't not match with upstream's package, being it the full package or the PEAR one. Please don't touch it. $ sha1sum phing-2.4.5.tgz.1 bf4c5e709c9141555c299e02aab8ac80cddd2cf7 phing-2.4.5.tgz.1 (this is PEAR) $ sha1sum phing-2.4.5.tgz f3e2eb295317b79a9e4223c193430a2896883967 phing-2.4.5.tgz $ sha1sum phing_2.4.5.orig.tar.gz 367c6a92bee3d3c73c6b36c9afa35a122c1eb11c phing_2.4.5.orig.tar.gz * What's /usr/share/php/phing/etc for? Those files don't look like something which should be put in a etc-directory. I'm fine if you keep it that way in /usr/share/php/phing/etc, I'm just trying to find out, whether those files are meant to be touched at all. If so, they shouldn't reside in /usr. * In debian/rules, please remove unneeded comments dh-make produced. * Please generate your manpage during build. It seems to me, you ship it pre-compiled from the SGML man page you wrote. * Similar case for the API docs you package straight from the tarball. The DFSG mandate that a software package is available from source and its processing must be self-containing (e.g. compare with the preferred form for modification from the GPL license). For the generated API docs this means, there must be a way to regenerate those docs by means the main archive provides. You don't necessarily need to do this when producing the binary package, but please add at least a README.source file, where you document how to regenerate those API docs, upstream ships, if desired. * Your upstream tarball contains regression tests. Consider running them during build. Good work. Those are almost all cosmetic changes. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOKFdFAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtNsoQAMUK3PphZGXhVNczYPMDMffG DGlZdGJWkfpowsir6mVZiLMBVMxUsFTmgGuBZtWs2C90bPugPadLXLccs6AjT44f /8Y8nIqDvT2kCwW2O/Izh7QxwnnxNn6X1ryFQlphsJd7uPe6rGX4hHAs8xxEOFCL 06iJCIipq1yH2h7LhoaryFUh5Xng1fTSyzK7R8axEESPW7OUSiS94yrIEQA6d/Ki 4NzYkZjgLiFOqlX5rqa/k6tFs2qwoLVePc1bcwmbJB0ErC32sgnMC7u/gIEZn/g1 t8A11dw4BHwOWwHX8IqkjuIKC7IibSvVuPIIzg+GYRJcoXrgY/Vww6xwIFaK3wPS frhgxRSh8QSFNnHLixEIuZ1YyvunDpMhN6o33oPLaMWvWsoQAvNH2vHUEXIQIxTZ kzddqn0Y5XuuwjpXqIMJFytzL6nYMRSkJyRZrb5n1csgyNK99gi/Gczsm099YTAD ihHXtv9Cwgn3JYXfNdtchkJaLhRuh7ExdzmbR7/VsJ2/5HEpjVtuZK3Fpc8psckP UNRQDbFRUYNWhSuC5brnte++HbV+ZTInkOLi9Jb5lRr5/fdxVigfEK4ph1xV6rh4 me5/OYg6LxgXxlePYfsYXll0KaHTMWEuahzf5k1DQMnH3GFk6NSbpq2hYBt6DQHY P39Ag9vBdig83Y4DSoh+ =KAoz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e285745.2050...@toell.net
Re: Debian Uploader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rodolfo, On 22.07.2011 00:30, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: I have a question about debian uploader. I am DU for one package, but when I upload it to the ftp-master the package is deleted (after some time). I suppose is because my pgp key is not in the debian keyring (it is in mentors), but I am not sure. By uploader you mean, you are a sponsored maintainer? If so, you can't upload. You rely on your sponsor to upload packages, whether you are listed in there or not. This is by design. To actually upload packages to Debian, you must be a Debian developer or a Debian Maintainer. The latter have restricted upload capabilities. Please read [1] for further explanations. Also ask your sponsor whether he's willing to advocate you (and set the DMUA [2] flag successively) [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-DM-Upload-Allowed - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOKKufAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtZUIQAK3ELzCKQOD2j/WP9re4f9A2 QlMWplTW1ilVwgpsPMGjEU7/8huG1dUjYlfHzOBw72broSi4hyWYWBF///G3H1uK bkh4gTxQrla8AJ8KZ5sSSpKQgfy9J+FX8RIdFOTDGmQj/w1awDPdc7/PlNzlcfkm AAKLvzGrA7u/uP/ilcSXK8DPGc3uoaEjbj5o0obJLPenPxKptKU8grV2eEXC2ND+ jTeJMkL0GDcmV2YHciVd+I37MENZz9qyR1SW+RfxzQFQhkn6QoZ5ZLXClq/+ttFA XAzeS9Oi9yh+6w0ibK5i6SPJgDTPpmQ83bKgGx+YRbFJ987VqviO2TaMGQAE4wEG gof223RtPlZkuoZPBq0j+aoQCqDUKzTaGzw0mIeMksJArrcRV8I3FuhruH20OdmG 05/uuMS9KwBA5i56qNyrifDky9grNZiK69L1/l+oyJtKnXtybPgIMXitKaG8FFSk do7ZVx0hW0RtZFe72ynhlj+tr8Are7cu5u8HJXQxzmJEB7QhdFzxSrV/GqUMJjN8 1U0lrJiz646D0HOcRJ+clIHUH3bBiUxPwvEKipliusPg4JDfcnDd0bLi47dDGCsD pMbPGylZZi5jNcLUFE3M5YlK0uBgcR0Pp7xc5Rl/rxF8xmX06MoDM8mjwEGJ2Psr 668pUjBGbAqPOVKWz6a7 =SUk2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e28aba0.1060...@toell.net
Re: Looking for mentor to package dolibarr erp/crm - ITP 634783
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Laurent, On 20.07.2011 23:05, Laurent Destailleur (eldy) wrote: The package can be found on URL: http://www.dolibarr.org/files/dolibarr-3.1.0-dev.deb and Because Dolibarr is a PHP application, binary package is also source package (no compiled binaries inside). I'm afraid, but this is not true. For sponsoring, a source package is required, not a binary (.deb) package, being architecture independent or not. So please, re-upload your source package if you want to have it reviewed. However, before you do, please fix problems with it. Lintian tests report no errors. Please run lintian --pedantic -E -I dolibarr-3.1.0-dev.deb (or even better on your *.changes file) and come back if you reduced Lintian warnings to something in a more sane magnitude. Moreover please read again the maintainer guide and the policy. You are massively abusing most^W^Wsome standards, including but not limited to package relationships, embedded code copies, purpose of maintainer scripts, source code distributions and a massively too shallow copyright file. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOJ2pgAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtWSIQALARqTr3dY4yBKiqcXVHw3+s /CplriZKJVifQ5PjJNROLcr6G6tgLZTTvA4SPvQ5fWZVPXd47J3wm1XqUndrj+Ia 4Cm32TCpJvh+UY4ukBdtNRBb9whLVkNwp0KChBprINYoatB4e7jNYq8rdNejfoxX RMy9gBrWaSTchQ+2sNrOWm/POpnPo+4dFCc7sTeUnYZaJTCZyFYm8YoTT2tTlscD pyoigp5Ihxg6iY8gfyHR5yJw1Hp3NKmLlSlRdK5vkYU483CA4ZU7sA0epzkDQvix KcaV/aGm1xmZfKR5OyR+Jhb8vSx3hs+mGlbpDyQxWDX7Cr8JBUs0krKmgAXmAzRy ODSffhbQPLoJ1F5nd88C+9bhnFvWCPS7diEqA+zl+Wexz2iHoVxQQ42QTNDw4f4M RYREkK7r1uSt3P3MAq9UnFQwQJm43opp53O4z7SwzUT4bpic0L8ycaXI+/qzAbLE HTtqQK5XqSZHGAvpLBMh7PM6psFc46BtCduWAbOt41Y1/4TeHNKpykFov60nUDq6 HlgoE+IH8hGTGsJkmyoUOdxCA4VBheYy0FT44c21WU1IZ4PS+9wF2BdWIb3WZ7YG SCGFUdxe3/p8D8x43BaAGRHn2TXR94F1xno8SEcpj3MZDGMbQPbK/o0DEM76rG5q xPudhs47Q4wutKz8Q8M1 =h3gv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e276a61.6090...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, without having looked into the reviewed package, just one further note: On 18.07.2011 12:52, Thomas Goirand wrote: * In your debian/postinst script, you are making the assumption that there's already apache installed, and a group www-data that is created. That might well not be the case, considering your dependencies. So, I would suggest to either: - check, using getent, if the www-data user/group already exist, and eventually create that system user (if you use adduser to create the user, don't forget to also depend on adduser) Leaving your remarks on Apache untouched, I am pointing out, this is not true for www-data. www-data is among the globally project-wide assigned user ids that are known to exist on every Debian system. Please refer to policy 9.2.2 [1] which points this out for user ids from 0 to 99, www-data is 33. In Debian, this user is created by base-passwd [2] [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.2.2 [2] http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/base-passwd - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOJBceAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtEkMP/2bAda5jPN/afLyUedKQ0o/3 US+3O1vze8Yz+SNoloJ+Oyglm5kAbyOZhF5YfT0F/TO50dl3r05tj4Z5FbmVAwg6 0q1O2XMpSpSpk+SkxMqFmNVXgWzgyx6vYJ+d+p0VZb92z22QcwBakx/CefsIwmv3 i4OjMSFiZppEmm2fgld/9TNKW2mDJw5Inb64k7KPOY5utZPP6LVyLHRJrjzruje/ 4Qwewdvj6iVywhPTuLWsWVeRjVyMM78u7z4zF0qjrRGkWvC5HYxbr9gL3PTZ39rk oIt/F1gFf6TnPif9eqotmPqO6Acg4yVCFxnISVDSlPpI17tXhOqdazZUp4agYSW6 ReBK2vBoIs+Uw1mFaqCX+odTB23+aqImTu5JQ/bboz2RuM9SmHWUZmOQXn9aab3y KrlkmLHdCqUl1HUvHrhEqCWZ4bZ36TnFDXAXsQa4VSNQ2v5hHXcd9y14aS/QySRx AlrT0BiRTgSr9jZO+6ULNBFWTqDi6RigTDvCu7UJE0izVS1dDoh8+lWDGhLOuxuH OjP45WQvkjfOUTBSU3U778H5ea8HkRu+ngGwRzqci9Yb1+DJtK9t0D59NnTsJ9KO A9Y2ldI/yIKiClfzYRoHkFZ0nRdtxtiXA4KISpDUYDgA1CXKwQgsNg0q8+AZ+J55 SKEySX8BH+Q0px+UxtI5 =CJ+M -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e24171f.8030...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 15.07.2011 16:45, Peter Bennett wrote: Regarding the dependency quilt (= 0.48-7~) .. Your rules file contains: %: dh --with quilt $@ that is, you explicitly invoke dh_quilt. This is not needed for you, using the 3.0 (quilt) format which implicitly uses quilt. Hence it should be safe to remove the --with-quilt flag for you. This is also what Lintian is catching. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOIFjmAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtCvoP/i2cYLPy0Qg9MPqKXCx83EZ4 sPNJKTWdVlAo4OOG9f1Jmh3SqzgmWF2oW9MDZ9KZzGhEqqOngNbvQiY4kLHHbfYD lbkllgsYZPN/uobsIjPCgriZ00T5yNyI5eJObg5/hZ2c/C2ArFPmAygTeKOEzJlG NYuHMQHBG4f07I/K82Q8lMVXikiEKWnfCj6EeQCe6b+ArL3HFah0WTGSBo4LNcTn pYzGowc7p2R59Feq/BSXG2Gx4ZTthQ73Ab8zsWgQiJtWitcoyTH+IMtYMC/jvWqZ K1iQgXWVTxgWh4a1yIgPPEUr2NzldFAbVRzZiZyirmY2FXudoFpoysgtxwf7PTaE w//t/J8okT3pgvQqZb7ryigPts92wDzUoh7mwhXO40N4iaET564wmGou5iM7by60 FBVKdqIs2vSkSNgPpwKq6njgj+P8WefYoFxCqvLeBSeUIRl3H7X6qWp9kb1Dpvjy A3avaviQQzjdh6mgKAx/tbiTQyQeOc+qlj+4F18wuA8u6tFpHNsWDl1nALBDpD9+ VzTwg7DEhveSWptlZ6y3eLiZMNz+VUd61GIsu+kSm+tO6pqqwE9eWINQN5NaOopF qIcDgidzu9xALWwwBQ9K7WJXCUpdy1J1B3Xnc2ghziJp6zsqWtbjXt2JFelnl0Y1 ex09B/FqWL1Md6E0ev+3 =CyoO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e2058e6.5070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: evolution-tray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14.07.2011 13:55, Max Tsepkov wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package evolution-tray. For reference, there is also an ongoing discussion on debian-devel regarding the package. See the corresponding thread on [1]. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/07/msg00198.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOHuZEAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtpLMP/2SWnFhe+ZB+O/1Uocn9FjOY gOqLXChydMws8Fl7le4uLavQW9LFOqWq6M41zhXNBQX/d+kI/OlECypACBSmdjyL lrdfJtyWuM/Rawyf+wpxHTmKZBSA2ebBajqG6EJAioTZG+YplBX8k+GtJdilqlXa lkVF97W/KEM8HRbnOevUaedKkyij0bSmA6wRNAHUVpTaArYKm8TeJRMF+pw/s5FU ssnu0jyZoAStVIp8+mdWMF6ImEUEpZcc+Tn8zEfRkSrPMj6//uHzefz5OhuSoMIY y8iIoIiiBWrJny1tIZDUp4qY35osBqHz4pZEjH8khQmB1beZG2oKpcqHAjoDYc/1 cFNFFMcVlle1Nam207PWgspaukuN+f1gdRxVdRgBVYfKaaYwOIoSg+BkP4uCkqSu fIEJxD5d0Y/S7fdLbi18KbJ90Fs8FWynr0zx2x+8jGH1FIvGQyP/BqK3IhJ8Kdbi Z9HFOiJNReXd10/po68yEHZSMMhpQzCFRsupVDUvnS7/WDEcGSxVogxR9mA6LQSF uIpmQgKXgrFhZhxh+f45ma7uXkT7nCmD4bPkVX31xmUanU5JnQkonAV3Jfh8203C SSr0oYq22IRqzG9su5W9FFcNjcwROibLSRCBItAJ+j7L8ZH0pqlfdlBNvIonDYOa razusD8vvAle7NsuiJ/F =oaxW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1ee644.7070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10.07.2011 18:21, Peter Bennett wrote: Hi Arno Which VCS links are you referencing in the control file? I am using the sourceforge.net subversion for the debian files, is there a better choice? Please see [1]. The VCS should point to the version control system YOU are using to maintain and deploy your stuff for Debian. Its not about the upstream repository. If you are maintaining this stuff in a Sourceforge repository from you, that's fine and point there then. Otherwise I'd suggest you to go with collab-maint [2] I am cleaning up the descriptions for jampal and tagbkup. Regarding openoffice, I am removing it from the dependency lists. It is only used for a couple of commands and I have added error messages to those that will tell the user if he needs openoffice/libreoffice and does not have it. Fair enough [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs [2] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOGgjlAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtxoAQAKfK0KJIXVDLh1AJfhOgfu+V 7umPofYocAV66eVkBQ5uPFg4T0CGYXwdKJVxPNZjo4Q6SX5EevaJDgpnnl1BvpLG J3YK2yCJ1Up7fm2TT/wnJsS/Nsqr9pUaYor54GW7BmOpoRujaulAFiEiRbSO9AK4 pJVxIUgj2u4Yq6y8r5nyQuUPOYLXRQ298LJy6lQOTMvBYRH62LjbwOjwK9Gwkn9I nblH0qbcx8NI8N6ov5MmpkA210Y9jlmSa65aOEPeRmARAysgYATBWYwY73pdtNsf rSodVtZEv6EmaYfFS8pnuJOxXNgP5e9dl+UPZ5X6YwF9KFbGXDHE6YWRo9+7Rzjn jRrBCVySs57o1K+j3Nr0B7hDw8ChChDnhjM8KJldTz3JevxKk1hbiGDEqjQ3aQpH 0DTtRk6rs/Qg3C6jliYxh5OlAK4fY/tQtXDys0pkRz3YWEgwr1TecWOEHjyMx1+l Buaeg6LhZEwX7Zk9mj1S694XZdqB1NrPHcbxAGNCDzZi8NgcotugTWkwPfCuNOm9 3Mkqgk3F7+Qmz2etAjRfbXfWL7JavZ29eDhd2fAsQRAwcHaL/0UrzoZCE+ka6qYr mSeVIFVaQRXHQrbAt706t57OTH0RFWBgX7eQCjwxaEHXHW7lxd2htUnAx0AcA8KI DpHt/BK0qv41WVMvcYAM =skjh -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1a08e5.8070...@toell.net
Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sven, On 09.07.2011 10:36, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2011-07-09 10:20 +0200, Reijo Tomperi wrote: Automatically running code from random people sounds rather risky to me. ... And now you're even giving them root rights! I suppose this is out of the question. Well, this is not necessarily a problem. There are enough possibilities to come over this problem, similarly to the official Debian build infrastructure (sbuild/wanna-build). I guess this is more a problem of someone implementing it, rather than a technical one. I believe, Asheesh would certainly accept such a thing for the Debexpo project. Or not, since this requires quite a lot of resources. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOGBvJAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtSGQQAK+dLdTkyjRwha42ZmJrvbT+ C3bWVlXeGFzXlnwLzDzaZbS56srWqqWYOP8RMrlxlDYnKOUH6leqpHc4IHb/T20W ugoDJE6xVt5HBI/PcKiabbC/AxqyUbH06Cy0QzOY1wllNhmUjB1WzU1eJqKD8Gje oevYG3ThYvl7RpZsHXzqin1riBPJfNCkYGP1IZQokA0einGxifZXyS4IUEIldfu1 Z3iL3uOBZIElNvpua1UfU35aKaiYOO2tsyRvMOsBZLtwh2YX/q6aUK5mMfhxkEKe Ara7jC+NPyLu7Ol6xWv1AscHfw9jwBu1SyaG7HqVtkXCm0ZuKxVgDUlMDnNpZXkk ukhz+PGrG5kStJrQE9EZxA8pWJXD70t5h+MIjmAhCHsgUuvzHcwbzPT5xH13rbce tIBSTZQ/rVyZkCPzVImc5U26USOVRle52HOKYk2Eh1rSGy0DZBFnOrfXBDkzty87 bDMs4ku+em7EPL7GEcuygApbgx0t2JXZVEMsRHKSC8exLvcT0Ia8WahTUzR7BL0r W8baiPYoQpIk8ntw6/FdITrz7RyHIcqcDhim/8A3IhO3avD+heQNM4PW9QY3bnJp NcEwLjTDGem/761RcALEhsedQODOaLnTzNszCs8cd+oaiFmtf03SW/ESh+O0hRUf LmmEGsc4gIQWt5mrjc8i =gmbK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e181bc9.7060...@toell.net
Re: how to get people to run lintian on their packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Karl, On 08.07.2011 05:49, Karl Goetz wrote: - The -I and --pedantic options should always be used. Why is that? the manual entry for --pedantic says Pedantic tags are Lintian at its most pickiest and include checks for particular Debian packaging styles and checks that many people disagree with. Expect false positives and Lintian tags that you don't consider useful if you use this option. Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort. Wouldn't requiring people show tags that aren't relevant just train them to ignore lintian? its not, pedantic Lintian warnings weren't useful or /only/ false positives. There is just a slightly higher degree to encounter false positive or screw you Niel^W^WLintian I don't care at all tags. That said, some pedantic tags can probably be ignored but most are nonetheless still a very helpful addition one better should consider when packaging software. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFspQAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtBAYQAImZYkvpFb+gTm+y3aBmQKR6 akQDZbquNzEYCPsQdXECygWTQiik7NSdjwtvQRPDDOfmzzgWqP1JOGnjZ2GiW1jU PSw02iVLdxd/Wq1MVwSSHOT6j0RlgVZyIcD70ChZ7lv0fdMJmSkcsDPYTg959Ryr OJm0FifS7UBbi8pIdDK/VbMyfcynHQESjNerDJDTaFV3Og/TChfyvpicPSbkJash FIkD4FN0Fw9lGJN+qNHOIxZpkIP60sNWL4P61nIVpu7+Jzv1jLlQ4jdXGfANXv+T 6WIKuCCdlkSOVbGX3Y+rI6WvMiMyXw9pZXWoG7Ftt8oZqAjPN3thTsX31iNIm9Od JbI7DC/+n1WLOLKDZTBwIP2yQfYUm/jQLdp6ap8RhprvA3vy7RyoAsqvgiyPeHEF iVnfft+In5V8Ekpzk4gQE9Zt5h5bfMOCmo1munvr5YZyIibGXU/nt/9Vs1q0IXf1 EWX6SklE2DlqG2MrnA1TpYzzNk0FGM21lluwRc+v49dfBLQvbZgfZ1CCI7mmIpAk xnZvDS4MDM347uBU0069t4xw6jhyHWbl/aHMTQds0DJJY0p185FNTYn6zdJFFH2Q lLZUMSsj0bCOPsr5hkFsRl/AAvFyFN9DcG/7hmmmZ8PS/pyXMQePzGMMs8CvdeTx HRSfl1ehZt8x/gexMkae =kZWS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e16ca51.3090...@toell.net
Re: Nitpicking: you are doing it wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08.07.2011 15:56, Wolodja Wentland wrote: 1. You're using debhelper compat 7 and also only debhelper = 7.0.50~ as Build-Depends. Please bump that to 8 Seriously? Is the sponsor suggesting that one should be build-depending on a newer version, even though one does not use any features of the newer one? Also, the sponsor failed to explain that normally upgrading debhelper compat is not a matter of bumping a number here and there. I can understand how this applies to older packages that have been created in the past and just don't use some of the new functionality, but I guess that the points are valid for completely new packages. I had the impression that it is desirable to create those in such a way that they use the latest compat, debhelper features and soon-to-be policy additions such as DEP5. Jakub, I'm with Wolodja on this regard. While I totally agree with your argumentation from a technical perspective, and I admit there are few (no, even) reasons to /insist/ on such things, there are still good reasons to suggest more state-of-the-art alternatives nonetheless. Its about the wording, granted this. Maybe the reviewer should be careful to say something like Consider upgrading ... or There is a newer compat level which is the currently recommended mode of operation but not literally Upgrade to compat 8, yours is wrong This is because I still think its wrong to introduce _new_ packages with older compatibility levels or older, but still policy compliant practices. This is why I regularly point this out when I encounter such packages and my sponsors did the very same with my packages. We have a lot of older legacy stuff in Debian which would not pass any RFS as of today, but this does not necessarily mean we should have this level for new packages as well. This is why I don't consider a bit of nitpicking wrong for new packages. Creating a package for the first time is a time consuming process, but should one not target the current state of the art? Seconded. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFxTVAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtzuUP/3oJJMDmGYOX7xxKYT3tmfBZ ZamjLau6mg2c1qxS08Xkfc/+ts077qXBH6ddb0oKuhq6Xk4ap9cE/1ynT09Qu/dY 5/Z5VBLyeKC3wN5gSiQw4sdd2ucUEG1bCxmmPse3IbGdhJG+w6qImRoDmj/N291J EKd6qMRIZ7nCgKMXexloDW2MOiBmxE7vdpeTWiH6M4WnFLYvVO96l+QgL4rdezym d+rgZRKUzNkU0l/foxqZkBSSI2AqOLEXYJLAzuTtPvZJgcWAT4V/M/SShTWZ6BMN R5mYiUoCW2Pbj0V5KglyNaP/1k/Ew64b8FFePOXeZFqTo9xaXkT/+daqEWyfX3gz mhDSb6ISJEuVdhOK9lFjv40b+fp5HuUkVQXLAlj57mb0DOLrZ2njJcmpVsTNonPX aC+AZgL9lBVqO4b/W4YY+bc7+2SgbDDxHWDgT1OwyFtU1ctOjG5T31rSyIQaX8J4 mB6JXO+0Eg4yHVY3a/MPghXD14pddhIF+e2/eQeKm7CB980FA+Dne9rwFhw6TMCG 6T6u7rT8AHJULZADTYRuGECpv2lXuVJbejrbVhg0uMIwzmk8H0R5I0vwRyBdKPb1 MTqztO/0HD/Ax2Zq7a8+e1nJMVL7Pwl6Q7TkVv0b66ac8TJqmT0p3YrREwQ+k3MI pZau905i54ydUbGXxsAc =pr6u -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1714d5.3010...@toell.net
Re: Nitpicking: you are doing it wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Adam, On 08.07.2011 18:24, Adam Borowski wrote: If you don't make use of newest shiniest features, higher debhelper levels just make backporting harder for no gain. There is debhelper 8 in both, lenny-backports as well as in squeeze-backports. Moreover Debian packages target Sid, not (Old-) Stable, and this is where efforts should be invested in. Moreover backports are something optional, not a requirement for new packages, or something which should even necessarily kept in mind when working on packages. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFzBzAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtw04QAK4StDmMDYWY3uagFLPRBUGL fHvQp5GipJxKi4vEeOpahORncq1RicLhpgimBQrAK4u054qmogtppMvPhpDD7sei k2cUEIUEImn94KD1Mwdm8fc1BOhul8Enl2f82NJOkZZVSlYsJM7W9AWJAjiEEBa2 6ioCdDEJZkuUHZL9iM9n8VIcM0dcbp/w+j0srmoQJPImkVLbsaI9VLojdtW9plPo wrC+tvxzbuOcQMSL1nGaPSB+Y1nZ3hHcmvuvXtql8xLea2mZ4hoH5N0ZDYGzqfzX H86rbRa5jwlr875n1C4cybUn/aMIqZQHZ7aZOFNBbd0vN4PraaCOv190bNSok7e0 EpfMi0DdQbvNxn+H9Jl+SoKpBXdkTchpBLqmKYOpbJ6w+8ecfK39R2X9HnVQDw54 7gVEB0alP7+pKfY758OQIxIwPOgjWXfFueZqbeRJ7DVg122ZkAMVEtA4zT5t/5fg 11ei6ZVGyjwQs95Ml8zlh/UkYz4LINuLKN/g2Uw0C1bfY3VWhUhF5OzZKNdMRlhQ /QS7uwGrvsy2Wm7Owo2GBLf3SVyd4Luzpx2zZj8HDNIh+QGbsXG0Xdj9Wce9spMC swFEedTE1DNjWrBAAwtXrZzv+QgenKMJK34XNY3NLdVQvDZlsudOppX1StFPWV9C FqTcpgzWBNd2GM9qQqdz =H3Ov -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e173073.9070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: lebiniou, lebiniou-data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Oliver, On 06.07.2011 18:23, Olivier Girondel wrote: This has been fixed, but I'm not sure what exactly the content of the Format: field should be. please see [1] and that thread in general. Some people have different understandings what to put there. The thread I am referring to addresses most if not all concerns with it. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/05/msg00529.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOFJV/AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt32AP/A5aKWbRmDV/QhDlE9rV0DxF MYOGfotMvDlK6usM0QpQjl86E+hG6jZ/8TWjPS1M2pkjVvkw2kyu2JWfaMSwYUgB c0g0694yf2qKAa+tiKZ/jvUhih6wDmkrEMqcWKAh/r8XFkibm4vIO9Mm4QDCc+jP qTXKcmkbIVXraJ88QHZiohaLCgcZ4eMJf/Exxr8yt+4zuLbBYi6fRdW195BSsiCk vJwiuX+k9ZzQOUnfm4E9Z/rAciAW/a/xqnU0Yw+4c0AfX96iDZe778LF/zQqPQ3v Jxz2bbukJ/UwXwm61KF962EhyIqFFfrDg8zKEvXRKz3NKaWyIVomKBMqIhgE+eOB GIPI9x0o0XWr1RPgaZ2iCb7Vsn4mRX7PFlEcdyePPfcZW50tOZmzOLGrQ3ajw1Qh Y742A8j1PRP0Xp0YLDnhXwTOmlOw7wIZl/YItfhj9NfwwyWuzD+WgFZA+Jh+a3pu btaXdhrogo1vvQDYd78La8ivBC4m/mqJfL2TU1OVY46m8R3Uh9rELtH/7Ii+t0yI 9gQnHQQ+DpKIqLGlHBc+5RhYwUp2tnPAIYHR1lDD0hmsbVoPqyT+wYpAi7bb0fGP ffWlbZiPWwtgVe9CmSG6BlRuXBQMka6mEAdDVvyAgdiTdDmRV0V1bLdCKQOG/rvj 4GW5X3gAtNc0KUgzrCFd =8fKi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e149580.4010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 05.07.2011 19:39, Thomas Goirand wrote: I'd add as well that there are some other issues not highlighted by Arno, maybe because he doesn't use PmWiki himself. Indeed I don't. Moreover I didn't verify installation paths at all, as I discovered enough issues in the packaging itself, hence I thought, before looking into the actual files and verify whether the package works, I'd like to have the packaging stuff addressed. Therefore I appreciate you did by now, as this simplifies life to Robert as I clearly admit. Thank you. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOE1sQAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtf1gQAJzyqUUaqxdCHag8MMZiEjfg wR/QSOShGdFYT04fYGP4et07CFXYLuUch5sgfrJvKA7g8VmLtKwhRulbeB+Gv8Uk 2wxCoY8KW4SWUXTSCi14G4H1GId+aJyXW4WLu2qc4OE5v+CSrKeExVfDNOdXx5Dg QSJdXIXJ4zLagQ8oz6D5C+RZhxySjnmzZhA14heRA9nt1WaeEG8UTjbFDqzJd46K kwHkl9/b/VBd5wb4r7JSJMLqVTQT5ltExzOu8KdFGUZLS0N/gnU6/YqMVbY2G2JC 86wW9uuIOm1yG4g1jEQzraM2iUqv/8XYnR3HMsMMzuac6rpPlR1bxWfhgcR7ilQo KMHxkJ7wlf5/2DUcEedJlUx8Vs1aZYGkL8x0CofbdBSruGCXzu+gJFKrlTobmgTC 7G5xzuGRvzdDX4TdQGoxNgwSsYK/41wICUO2aHUQB+erAue8JTUVoeJC75PuLjFR i3Y9XPQm734hunkVe6ueoUiS1pESOaz6JGlZwscNugwFWseU+VDnlIZ1u9QBozzg k5MGmhTjb92dl8prPEPaqTVeOQ5vsQbBarDYdZr2SPGn1ogde7H7/H/Od0YmwYxD dVv3TRLSJFZgT/L1NpS1GGghQT52uuWreKUYj9sJ+YBG7RNfzn1ZC2iuLm3X3Jtn pxINTOmriP6VZYLX8ip8 =VVXl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e135b10.2020...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, On 24.05.2011 02:29, Peter Bennett wrote: This is my second attempt. I have fixed errors that were pointed out to me last time. glad to see you fixed most of the problems I addressed last time. Thank you very much. This time I have some minor, mostly cosmetic issues only but please note I didn't extensively review your package. I was just looking how you are doing. Here we go: * Your standards version is still outdated. Please push to 3.9.2 after verifying eventual changes [1] * Please remove the VCS links in your control file if you don't use it. Even better it would be, if you would use a VCS for Debian related packaging though :) * Another thing I mentioned last time is to eventually push debhelper compatibility level to version 8 (in debian/compat and debian/control). This is the recommended version as of today. * Benoît already mentioned the concerns about OpenOffice I addressed last time as well [2]. You can certainly recommend it if you believe this is the way to go, see [3] for the precise meaning of package relationships. However you still need to exchange OpenOffice by LibreOffice. Its the latter which is in Debian now. * The long description of tagbkup (glad you made a dedicated package for it!) contains something like (use the -cm option, see below) which was probably extracted from a manual or so. Please rework the description since neither the switch should be explained in the description field not does below exist at all. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/05/msg00307.html [3] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOEjjjAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtUlMQAL1w2dqJX3AuGTjGdiN9D5D/ bf9AtaudC3VVj+CiQRtMaArb6IwM8WgqSoVM3mAuNOsRETBIhg6MZAHnIiv+T1AX E4HqjJmzz1XVTG1HQIFmvLBwkse4aIJuZYJHbRv8y+BwvTmVLbKmlfGIobTZ9at/ 5OSnA1AkMpMm5OFS8y0SfJUiWzEOJd6ik5w+dyXK9KYr03cF5EPuFPQr7yISXHPS +NElnDHazTGeeLqbqXZ8N8ziTWu8iCHUqv97W7ioB7cQhWkq0m0BNR6uARU9n33u 6n471gBcv9UHlZM7jRskAIUwIPtC93wGaSMw7OXBz/tj9TcV3ouWA2iyaGnFJSkk +v3xOxxMnjQhpyVX6r8KqommrqtEbrl97++gAfl7Wv9h4diVHdTcKTRLju7K2BeG sHqy/hatiWbAQ6/n1Fw2uN4xBKdBSGpHGF4TshLbNPHERWnWugee4XxB+xEb03D5 ncRLUsfYSd5Dv0FiRdYFhpTui+0xZrluGuviz1WtPSeLCFlb4nvTyc2mCH7BxpRk ZH+whEbBZEevGax2NWQIYdBKhgbjT5AfyrUBqVBt/+OXoedkVmOadFS3nGPYYWHT ylA1a2uTFuNJVs+4Syqilz/z9B92MdGhUBZCkp3hnzgMM4fiPOGugXs6gw7+SsE/ 1g+1/llE9GrjVa5dTPAy =Szwr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1238e4.6050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: Sponsor needed for pmwiki
://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/03/msg00368.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOEkfXAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQVkP/0O6tOdHRRzXEb1SilDIl42n FwlclBkQmTY7pXoadTg3nQ6ir1ZOrtcnKhcoeSrdNUoTwJuCY71c7aWe337N2N3x tbWg3CCNfJx0Jt71EsFhszYDKyWG15//LQNMfEmaDLhn8V0bZxMPni1HS9/x2ubA gQpMi3rrTNEkjuQYTKYnGadTc2oVp3rs9fHf87mLMsodrNJ90ZkcphgQOyyjwXaj 6iaL6w5lDQNVtKfl/2wTWqf84PkiEAKlCFT2SYazGurc4nVhdJEqqVh1pUVigayg pSPvOi6+ZWXzB/oU16WICY29+8Eyuy0mjcFJ4rsk+5cfyNHSMaCVBT5O8mSXI8gf ePLKX3zxXVwHQeQ45vJLZTcCaiK2YZMKXfUQrGpIasp4BJwsx1V2zi58iLPZKwVN b/qViuQsI7rzNwHwcmha+4kgh1FVgAA8Z9FEfTmY4lwVrZes6QqCKFaZ9WrMUj5+ tsxMfgcJz3orMGvK9qIj2MC11XIEXzHYTUVldB+EKkZzIQZeP3BM5qa+z5FVBj66 euM5j+JvGJLaGv5ZcKeTnA8k9gtDUEhaOEOr87Pjtb3hkz9sn1/wsB2aISdzVRcx VfNwTVXK74HhmuCt7vnvYxjlJLDt0HAUu2rnRRxp2eULOV9dUgjLJsNY32ju/LcI Nn+vZPkD/xW6d0yJoW2z =eohb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1247d8.7020...@toell.net
Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 10:33, Benoît Knecht wrote: - debian/phing.1 still contains the BUGS section I mentioned previously. that's not necessarily a problem. You, apparently a FSFE member could just take a look into coreutils manpages. See, for instance, cp(1) which includes a very similar section: REPORTING BUGS Report cp bugs to bug-coreut...@gnu.org GNU coreutils home page: http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ General help using GNU software: http://www.gnu.org/gethelp/ Report cp translation bugs to http://translationproject.org/team/ Finally I'm not aware of any Debian suggestion to change manpages to point users to report bugs to Debian instead of upstream. It is true, Debian users can - and are encouraged - to report problems to the BTS, but this is definitively not a requirement. A fair compromise, since the manpage has been written by Nicolas anyway, could be to mention both, e.g. similar to strace(1): PROBLEMS Problems with strace should be reported via the Debian Bug Tracking System, or to the strace mailing list at strace-devel@lists.source‐forge.net. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJODubHAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtuZsQAMHV72qxogKBIITJL4fRgwK7 OyvCub1Upg+d2gocoNLKTYAWFDpbo00v6isQxwfVEcmz+OoJRmGYJp7Bd8nh9q2w WKqpY8/UcSteW3h/ypaNewu/ZzAKop17FyNeZUibqYHtizsYhVHJZNEDcu8QxNwk UloISj3q3TYZO0TCwiK9vFpnn1QUgplvJqyExAKYssa9JdCmu6Z6tCsCBMq8V6UQ btMaP8KzNEVIH/e+y1UjKobE6O1VtIJKV1XKr2eQLOpAhDjafJ6Ib4+r3w03P6yt hBnUdLEKHNsa5NLtu3Q9mslxx9/A+uUc9AV6k1MDzbj2l5/IcE1/5Ev+yMb6OfpC 9QyKVVnjoAgQOdVjXxlO7I/oAolhXRP6nl9wckjSoLViT+jB4g+C6C8SCz576Vcz 7wpO79SQ68WIL0Aj/XJapV5b1Yua9TaRf1D31AyBlxIDZ+tzazHF7N6tzTkTvZke nc5c84smN7ZG8iUvMBS54m32w8yQJfaXvyL3ikilN8o2y/BCeCCQDB+Cy1/qVkWO zZnFGpYhNPJZQ3VuXycs/zFTHITlgL/2xXNAMbCxWaUBcK5hw8fVG2y7zixb4akD fWoIBvFvFIHQZ0RsqrMrrWKC+RgTO3g/sv5WRcbpBqasfKIBXAUQXNPfhISnSqkN 5purOVxo1f1qJ7NSo7kt =B1uY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0ee6c7.8000...@toell.net
Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 11:52, Benoît Knecht wrote: If it was upstream's man page, of course I wouldn't suggest modifying it in that way. But since it was written by the packager, and at least for now will mainly be installed on Debian, I think it makes sense not to advise users to bypass Debian's BTS. Sure but I'd definitively suggest to send improvements back to upstream. This includes man pages. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJODur+AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt0kUQAJppL+sbNvtcWc/vcmbL7+An 5vSMUZq2M0v7l2JZARvhnsEUU66jQYBlafAuwTkeZ+EpNlc/8cfMFd7mc4gYMESw t73Ae5ti+5ZkofybupKg58fi+spEljIKRyB3DjTYrPkEyp/s83axkk6sgkxxq2eX de4HgFmaUsp+WL+l9PMpoSrLSxGVqukUsL2xiqogQLVqjX5loYCvTBLwmUupUb2m bMYXY2sElXO9afw/eROADv01C0KMuO8XAMhHtEYzO4E3ZIePL3JxwQKYbtAqc5dL eX3DS3aNVeSsXSzJ7MHumr25yxlgYui4xefIJ8G52oa3iB5155Z26ht0W91FL6vQ phe8jCBGc970ADKgKCpJAHVFJQD4IM0MYW+BUN+6vc5Yk/GDRONn3rggb9iF0Ani qQ0fzOru3ZlacpQubmisLMELZLXlN4BbtNi2UF5v5d5Bj5BMwAmxgo+geZsJx4WK xa3d8VZs+XVmqdl800Plb0hkMoSb5qkD37k7hB4uOjTNiDA+KS1gOxH5IsFd0tC5 6sjjEn27RcRasjByWRzaGV7hjJlqRoCZiL6poZ2qqTkdN+UXNufhkTp842HQpIFr rzbgBlT16z+KL2h9Z+bgKxGKlksaGwvqJedNzM4DsH2SEDKj6+INZRccA115Q9PT IFAf6msunNO2cCHC00UT =U/lo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0eeaff.1050...@toell.net
Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Benoît, On 02.07.2011 14:10, Benoît Knecht wrote: - I remove email for bug. I'm happy with that change, but maybe Arno disagrees ;) I'm fine with that. I was just disagreeing with you, denoting upstream's preferred way to report bugs should be replaced by Debian's BTS. Not to mention it at all, is the solomonic solution but fine as well. :) - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJODwz5AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtXCAQAK3VjSqwg752d8l4K8fOLOq9 OcpKBHZgrvDoO5l12VouzCRFgy2t5V1ZKDn+jcOrpddE6CnUP7BgfnwKEhiBcGGe Zqacijgq0EypJbpQxQqsmbquwANwIfUmP2t3OJqXjr37eBCmoAcdgBYi75RGsJBh Sm6IWLSxcDyo4u165PY/2pr5Mf0p0JqbsbFQlVuGDuYHywWjqhmL3CatZSIvnjkR 5WrjbeWd9Bfp74ahxCZm0kWmmn0vyLRPUyMcaf5gqbPMGAbE8hSz91qOJGMnkR6k 3zkW2zy0ly2PIYm7yqkavmPyRJvlsIwXoXJWnGAF5VwPaQmYue1yFFGo/G/hZkvh EfSHlqGjYb5o11THB2GYldcHiHxM+8/5bq51/Xzh8Z0FgPMqeCzdRHRcGJVMFkml 1Ozq+rQL2gowmSZgu3d3/xIuW8eaZMYMcC+bdfk003BUUphhpkt4Gt8wvTslKd0f 0vxTjxEwWJhxKgWjZ1cKR8nwEiVeNo5WWEEfHjAu/cGCKGfttnBy/yY/4Xp4m0xX wRjBkNin6rurIYi0f9MQJF+ERfti+5pSHKvrJ21FRptjon+DbOqbSpsJNROc3mDu BDQdbfjXjdZEG1454QuJvI8zVvsgjlX6c6pYGkORHzs6R3k8bjj1VpcDEn3xzR7I wRCyxLA6OoE4OF3JRnBD =n6P4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0f0cfa.9040...@toell.net
Re: RFS: phing (Another try)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 02.07.2011 17:54, Nicolas wrote: Another thing though; I just noticed that out of the 18MB of the unpacked .deb, 15MB are documentation. I would say it's definitely worth having a separate phing-doc package in this case. [..] Good idea. I didn't have a deep look into your package. However now, Benoît mentioned the huge docs for your package, you also have to notice that Debian requires the 'main' repository to be self-containing. This is what the Debian social contract mandates. Having a brief look in your upstream's doc/ directory I noticed, you ship both, generated API docs and a PDF file, perhaps even more stuff like that. You have to make sure both resources can be regenerated (or changed, regarding the PDF file) during packaging with build dependencies available in Debian. This means for you, you should provide a target in your rules file, which regenerates this documentation the way, they are created upstream. While it is not required to rebuild them anytime (or at least, this is what most people seem to agree) you must provide the possibility to do so if desired. Otherwise you would have to cleanup your package from non-free stuff or move it contrib/non-free depending on licenses and requirements. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOD0UiAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtp+MP/RRmqNxOxUYXCecx0+a+b+84 a/Bauqy5Aya4lmhwaZ50N/qJwFvGJmJF19y4qBRNtne5MpORilWNCtqdRu+h8E/b VIhja3gijPN3b4ceP6WMuWs4q0eO1hi+aJiBKlhUDwZM4fRgtS92Qx5kRdpMZvhr xjUBMGA7VPBZFlUq4F90+9MR7jqlaYvkzb+mkWYo3/YhNTYuc8EyjHiDDG54SCD0 Affh+NPtIxNYwZdN4hFdJNVudjVijE+KIf6cT0GGW9iA993aNE9PVzG67zH5ejWc tk3okqGPxivYJa2HjswJVLUf5wfpfFtQZOvuleNccjLoaxJ4DbgfADEtmXT/8eXi XPu6U+Qu8qvsW3M9h80XxVHcNhqZ19SNHBl5vMb6vHCDrutS6MJiyW6ZIgZh+A54 R2ZOWhnkYDcVvForOshInGVeH5RQafAYB5yHcxFjakN2DE7xhg6iCS9QbwhuylS/ fQzeRVpiAslfXMpdUO3JtmqLqFeTrV69P5cgug2u1h+U3N5LxWh7MRJPJ0eTNVva 2Of1QpdUaiZgqsbUUya/WaND5NiIeyUL09S7Kaj0UmDG7nrkaV/ykSnvhCeFBq/G O9QFsCLYUAGhM9Bhdh7qDJwcr7QxntZGObANndwV4B4MllHGVbfo1UbcOPUsnPei cufHr+0K+F9kHPQA2m7p =riw6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e0f4523.8030...@toell.net
RFS: [QA upload] snowdrop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm seeking a sponsor for a QA upload of the package snowdrop. Snowdrop is orphaned since over two years but in rather good shape and still usable. I updated it to more recent Debian improvements (dh 8, quilt 3.0 package, ...), fixed some minor bugs and brought it up to date in general. Upstream development stopped long time ago, but as it is still useful I'd love to see this package well-kept. I did: * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) format, moved all changes to the upstream source to a quilt patch * Pushed debhelper to v8 * Switched debian/copyright to DEP-5 * Fixed some minor bugs (see changelog) * Moved (Debian) man page out of the upstream source to debian/ * Made Lintian (mostly) happy, I didn't bother about a watch file, since this makes no sense. The full list of changes is attached in diff below. Joey, if you care enough I can push you my changes to your git repository (or rather export it somehow to you, since I have no write permissions to your repository) Finally I hope I didn't bother debian-qa@ too much with this request, but last time I was told I shall CC you for QA-RFS mails. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/snowdrop - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/snowdrop/snowdrop_0.02b-9.dsc I'd be glad if someone could sponsor this QA upload. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJODIKIAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtigsP/jSX4v6RuHGM9DcRyjs8mMZM 4GTGA/V4aVXSGGY05nNvRsPEdYtlakbNEExCgnXF75iYdszlIoMG+e13DKz5pck5 q1afVCPthGF/W4pAn3+FTBdiRjI/xLwodxijmqE3SSIb8BRsb83+QUYXj+F+jbcK lmLKX9BXLqA40b6PU7Yi9/k2DhhW94RsljT7cTu7WIChEskdYp/2ZwmW3gZA4STU 3Hdoo+ZUiWhldH++hxEQD6Ta9wBbE53+HR43EBmrNG0e/gTjYFInA1KKqthZGB54 RWv8UGEbKKOCIQ7cd/wPDjexG7ihrH6CYhC0ppHZcdl9ATxFpIuci1foGZATvZcA W7BvsqyWLhXK5N/Pkq1JHczSAlvf1eBxgMQ1qbEHAuFrdve8gb6KEOgMTK9YEJGM EaHooNLcpfYqFnGN4x6JCY2/jPxYFXCSUOHXLc3oKYhBhQxgH4dRSN+bdq2pCAhM UaulUI9cKzaJR6bNPlqHpiNnTPDAMFY37lUrvmMDyWBfDTLp796bD/NC98GturQG 9V54q4yw/ZepHCINEkaE6Hw9V0beASThD3QAuJMVItjfX2DK57DGFew8LEtUpurg LKnWFNFiWL1qjH1PUFehVeLgVuykwvOhTDeoDR5NHk9iZENTGMdTNvSsz09j+LHc t7RKAhZvVDu08BL2GTjX =rCO1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 9492a23..dfb0ed3 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -26,10 +26,9 @@ VER = 0.02b LANG= eng engf c BINROOT = /usr/bin/ -DESTDIR = / -CFLAGS = -ggdb -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations \ - -ffast-math -Wall -g +CFLAGS = -ggdb -O9 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fexpensive-optimizations \ + -ffast-math -Wall all: modules snowdrop toinstall @@ -37,25 +36,25 @@ all: modules snowdrop toinstall modules: language.h @echo ; \ echo [*] Compiling language modules: ; \ - test -f /usr/include/gnutls/openssl.h USEOPENSSL=1; \ - test -f /usr/local/include/gnutls/openssl.h USEOPENSSL=1; \ - test $$USEOPENSSL = || echo [+] Using GNU TLS MD5 modules. ; \ + test -d /usr/include/openssl USEOPENSSL=1; \ + test -d /usr/local/include/openssl USEOPENSSL=1; \ + test $$USEOPENSSL = || echo [+] Using OpenSSL MD5 modules. ; \ test $$USEOPENSSL = echo [+] Trying to use RSA MD5 modules. ; \ for i in $(LANG); do \ echo [+] Building language module for '$$i'...; \ - test $$USEOPENSSL = || ADDME=-DUSE_OPENSSL -DUSE_GNUTLS ; \ + test $$USEOPENSSL = || ADDME=-DUSE_OPENSSL ; \ $(CC) $$ADDME $(CFLAGS) -c lang-$$i.c -o lang-$$i.o || exit 1; \ done; \ echo [*] Language modules compiled. snowdrop: snowdrop.c language.h @echo [*] Compiling main code:; \ - test -f /usr/include/gnutls/openssl.h USEOPENSSL=1; \ - test -f /usr/local/include/gnutls/openssl.h USEOPENSSL=1; \ + test -d /usr/include/openssl USEOPENSSL=1; \ + test -d /usr/local/include/openssl USEOPENSSL=1; \ for i in $(LANG); do \ echo [+] Building 'sd-$$i'... ; \ ADDME=-lmd5; \ - test $$USEOPENSSL = || ADDME=-DUSE_OPENSSL -DUSE_GNUTLS -lgnutls-extra -lgnutls-openssl $(shell libgnutls-config --cflags --libs) ; \ + test $$USEOPENSSL = || ADDME=-DUSE_OPENSSL -lcrypto ; \ $(CC) -DVER=\$(VER)\ $(CFLAGS) -DTARGETLANG=\$$i\ snowdrop.c lang-$$i.o -o sd-$$i $$ADDME || exit 1; \ done; \ echo [*] Main code compiled. @@ -68,12 +67,12 @@ toinstall: clean: rm -f sd-* *.o core core.* a.out -install: - @echo [*] Installing binaries in $(DESTDIR)$(BINROOT)... - cp -f sd-* $(DESTDIR)$(BINROOT) +install: modules snowdrop + @echo [*] Installing binaries in $(BINROOT)... + cp -f sd-* $(BINROOT) @echo [*] Installing synonyms database... - @mkdir $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/snowdrop || true - cp synonyms $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/snowdrop/ + @mkdir /usr/share/snowdrop || true + cp
Re: RFS: s3ql (new python application)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nikolaus, On 27.06.2011 21:15, Nikolaus Rath wrote: It seems to be. Without quilt: dh clean --with python2,quilt dh: unable to load addon quilt: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/quilt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.12 /usr/share/perl/5.12 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 23) line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 23) line 2. this is, because you configured: %: dh $@ --with python2,quilt which runs dh_quilt_patch upon creation of the source directory. This is not necessary when using the new quilt 3.0 format which does this implicitly. That said, you should be able to remove the quilt addon from dh and everything should still work (untested). - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOCOHFAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt+HYP/2ZuwNIS7dQTslXxd+LWBpdd 8N+9AHYSOyfimdL8aM5LhXqNsasd7J8fqDWabYVOfL/HSh3RkHJ58ITZrqLBdaoL qRjok8G76RAcYStba+LHv+rUI4v3YI5nAZVRi/+nZ43dHLWHHFRsHQp02kzB8VQp PZAqoSSAw6uxK+bekq36yVlmJE6efezuPa+T7Q4WdPmSadJRbKu0ry7/rK5qTvbF eLGISJSzvpoIUmanxRLjS5a1zoHe258tWU0q/wjXDJ5x/AOtVkGQpoT9P+rLGwoE LrbOzy0ZTPj+x85cLt/X7CusNFAlbB5BvrlDHzD/3wrQt3J3OfOG4iP2Uw9cIngY OoxS7lbN8s6sdKWMLueKb6m+tH2gTTuX+oohtPge0I4LCKxsP/f5bfYTrtv23CJQ NDiW05uYXXglZAaIh56vmpR/UBdkkjk11s0+VAho3azbzbLJb5ZwtVMtO/4FPAp+ Sd5YTwGKFOxFqLm4SeJGkonjqd0jENYrOhkVvhkrFXKqUYXJudklQJaGzdQsBvgK bZMIhD6EvFpZTUNFX14ajfjXysPSoojiAeq4az0bepgLn9KNdLNuSG6cki7inIYw WsOwuorL6oSyABMRkkegeYP0TSXmKkVjIr5SQ0p5ATLX0OlqdH/jdTBGvsYFHRur rVbpBs1NdZDLs8zs9X3D =t7TR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e08e1c6.5040...@toell.net
Re: RFS: l2tp-ipsec-vpn
] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt [5] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN/jMcAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtm1QQAJKo0JnrxnaQRCh6VKR90W1X TDIk2n66/Og8dpQyR6l63Hpbyr8eLxrp8bkGOvl9NHBgO8T7YXkDsXB89GbYm3sd QjF4ByAvsugI6CbLKRU5ozD1flk+cAma9ZRK3fHOHCZsffny//C6mx5pngfPpVTK ute0f0D5UyPS0X3w0qKU5glrkyl2amX2eRf5M9DdzqlBRCQS+CmUgLF4PJNjfz6G 7UfEyWyeFXbT+MpfA59jWx7G3qGK+l8MCv+qCeqLtZbKrwdlLFH7cu/yZl17OI/f s4o1CKL9CjgxvV9Ae6GXATasWP/cMvSPgxEXSBo/F+RkWeZa62jjanOtLq00LNjT BRrFk3+fcbsqHAy7JYL968glcckuMRU77nrsmk8W6x7FPsKnlwI3jlq5s52l3ka7 1eKdLwjOj5Nlw71PTIBmR/BrOhnHRtKV5OmfFS5yI+E/E2+q+J7RiU9KfJ4c5bCi EHS8lYRFOO6opzC9ElN2TSxzq8vWhUEjr1r+dy4uhey1d16fI8cB79VLO/j2gwPr W2zVfQOQ8j7r+L3hgAZTKU3c1RNj5y79i3ujX40NPepVXghuePIZbWxv7cHh/0AF rs2k2MobTb50M5u0uvbnkLOHZYS+0oo9xx1R3ydgEe3AJmXRiin2x0yg6iNFbdpq 7YMnOIH8UjyRxFADhU11 =P9+X -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfe331d.5010...@toell.net
Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Kilian, On 09.06.2011 09:28, Kilian Krause wrote: the package name should be in sync with SONAME - no matter what ugly or nice that makes the (binary) package name. ... That being said, as Alexey is the upstream himself he can surely decide what's the most suitable SONAME ... this is exactly what I meant. I think I pointed out, the package name is correct by the constraints the policy requires. I guess I could have been clearer though, so thank you for clarification. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN8HdaAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtv24P/2/q/WVE8nhHeJAuQZ0psiKS FdRktj7M4iIDQg0q+t97G8kMXergWji3WwUTfTo47RV1dN9h7bQrYtUerF8f126L lpozWI9OJq2wCJpuioBIIVXm3xOmcq+5WqtoqtAeIpHAadF1ACOzq16D267/YWER 2hzhm0Wr7UYFw2XZDdJdyp7OZWpjpEIRcJQQtX/U8GrbTQUSqOuHACxhbnKsVPoH uy4CWJKCe0BZQzCCDZgEmv/E4ihmR9XO3oasTNj/mWlwY6O+cX97OwAla+Sfenfi UA9gYJGQ6T7zx0FcaOYoAuZc4AqezbvgCl3Kw1JXAeCGM5WnHyhINJ+PMYqnf3Aj +24hmoTFi1k1S30vxJ9KjJTxWigT/DKMsbqkBnhOh1DJfR0h7I8F4fH90e7NDhaO URx5nYJ17hX+Vl9U+0EXyfXcaqaWm5HjPkTa84CUj1DvcyTNkcqZmn3lwX9DZmud 6H0jj+Ko/2owyivH+TvU66d4x+BIgJiCnr3HCUOUdDXMBbSqPyj9lbVY7qqMmMVI bDmk4S3NfY9A4tp6S1yKt9MQ2mCzecc6oFhGsR9ehYvOi3hdHwJd3riMWpOdWoFO uQD8yVcM8hJhkfvADcE2UzTSxj6T6Le+1Tvpf0/cwIMKtDmENjDL82ZKhuVlYFKP N5XOecU7GrfnORzjij3q =9DMz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df0775a.7070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexey, On 09.06.2011 12:45, rhash.admin wrote: Ok, switched to 8th version for auto-running dpkg-gensymbols, but some DDs (on #d-mentor) prefer to package with 7th debhelper to simplify backporting. That's right for oldstable. But Lenny is about to become obsolete in a forseeable future and your package will most likely not enter Lenny anyway. However for Squeeze dh 8 compatibility is fine [1] * Your upstream sources are missing copyright headers. Please consider adding them. There is already Copyleft license file! Why do I need to add Copyrights? :) You can also add copyleft headers if you care about the wording : Your debian/copyright provides conflicting license headers. I'm aware yor package is dual-licensed, see DEP-5 on how to specify such use cases If it is not reported by lintian, then it doesn't look like official requirement. :) Because DEP-5 is not a requirement at all. DEP-5 is a proposal on its way to become an official standard which is then most likely reflected in the policy. Until then Lintian probably won't croak (or care). It is a good idea to start with DEP-5 for new packages but no constraint. If you do, you should do it right though nonetheless. :) Moreover Lintian is not omnipotent (in hope, Niels won't read that :)) and possibly has missing or incomplete checks. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debhelper.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN8KnbAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtbvAP/ifi2y1+gngBDvYrOXfdN6Rr Q9vs3DxfkqS6eYE3ZWP+iqDxf6aEk2zvAWSQ9k58ReQXAONd3qvk4V/q1FVpTArb ZStGvcJuI1Ef1JQnhO3K59KCSZHkgWxC2HGHvXF8ZDnM2DlvA/e6Ewl/8CbuDTwF cvM8JaGVsYplKxOsiMD8E+oL1TaGV2VeQmtt3aVGHh9bnqGFzLDUfxbQMCIjAPJY nwNWssszQqFbUCZuspfqsnyHM7xWUx3I4G+ZSkHJ63W/m4JmekQmZg35Ns4/Er24 hUcF5F2wIx7sBLYsyPDOV4CoX3CHCpXYuUmXZsPPB9OQiuTYb+yupqXVSmrCFReN /5mQlw7gXEITIw+E9AJmgMZUuRLT2DO/yccpWe+hkDBHiatowlW5gI/c9raE7iqT StNIucvN9m1S5hunhdTFxHdGRp+Vwq9DTjBDRm1G/zvl1JsjCXR6kTQOtQcMD8Rh mOKn4hz+LsEvP9+jspZYvHtidvIsZgK4SJ0xjvGn217CH87odvkT0V8zKm607fzQ vrvt2RoFurvxIuNWumv26fM2lpRCv49o48/fYCCd77idNaHu2/vwHezCWe2GblUD iYHtkCVDZ1vjB1PCPFW24/nq2XtwjX2zO88V2Gm4EFkQxP7IQPcK3MsJt9LSNATN wDZnodGcNpXcEGrUCWR3 =p+Ki -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df0a9db.1030...@toell.net
Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Alexey, On 08.06.2011 11:55, rhash.admin wrote: Hello! I need a sponsor for the rhash package! http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=rhash a few notes about your package you may want to consider (I'm no DD, so I can't sponsor you though): * debian/changelog: Please don't explain in the changelog what your package is for. We have a short and a long description for that. See [1] for some hints. You should neither mention the SONAME change there unless you changed it for the Debian package exclusively. If the latter you might want to elaborate the reason in a README.Debian file. * Please push debhelper compatibility to version 8 (debian/compat, debian/control), see debhelper(7). * debian/control: It is considered a best practice to have VCS links in debian/control which point to the repository where you develop the Debian package. See [2]. * Do you really need the minor version in the SONAME (and hence correctly reflected in the package name)? It is not wrong to do so, but since your package is new and your both, major and minor version are 0 you could probably just use the major version instead of an odd name like librhash0.0. * You replicate the package priority for your binary packages when compared to the source package in debian/control. No need for that unless you change priorities for binary packages. * I'm not sure what I should think about debian/Makefile-rhash-1.2.6rc1. Why didn't you merge those changes with your upstream Makefile, since you are upstream yourself? If you really want to keep it out of your upstream source, please use a quilt patch [3] instead. * Your upstream sources are missing copyright headers. Please consider adding them. * You could earn some bonus points for shipping a symbol file, see dpkg-gensymbols(1) * Your package synopsis should not start with an upper case letter, see [4]. Long description is fine, but I'm not entirely happy with the synopsis lines for each package. Tastes may vary. * Your debian/copyright provides conflicting license headers. I'm aware yor package is dual-licensed, see DEP-5 on how to specify such use cases, Syntax in [5]. Also consider the MIT hint mentioned in DEP-5. Moreover don't use hash marks like programming style comments, use the Comment header instead. * You ship some cryptographic algorithms, I hope you checked all legal issues with that? [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-debian-changelog [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs [3] http://wiki.debian.org/UsingQuilt, among others [4] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-desc-basics [5] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN8ANxAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtDugP/2Ytoi0rmN529vJaMSFT6LrR 4aFIK2OD1VTUmHg9vdlWkUnqdq9DdSxJte6b4pl1gyjGMHrg6kK7fk758QQexNBd xLmHiC2+cPCnC/Hhh4BJovViZzYm37p8E3uarzWhp81hzyrK8OrvhPppkb4M50wn n0+hVrSYRvVmEn3lI/YR7meQXaysK4HFNfogICCPJvUadJKJJqTmdPG/zzf1h1dq n2AqNrgnpZlZeSsPQEFvquSV94vpqyU+XdEZNTxdO6GHzQq6wD5lrG/Y8PiSBv5z LxvcAwmO6Owd5QXO4JFtGn1kneMgVDn9kK9PeESO79niAY2AbjGWRp4P0UccIgI+ yZ7woE7f9x4BcdVcZtk3lmtfdCZZspuPUwKeBDIpMRXQgjAqT7+4lUDW7g9DMmwa LnST9L+0XzG2s9EANNfVyL5wJKHXe5eioq0U2TQ8ShCZCtfhn6smYcrR04wRKHnH wJb1LYsPH3ygJGmEtEbBga0H+9+aY3zr7ZoM3hjI1veqna+N8SQ5YXrr34sYPNyz Ji1r4KQ5Mjewq85fvM/VLAlXKebdZ34FAqPrazCQHVuZzMRtVPqgFpcVi336S3n3 KDIl5IpcrBabmf05APOmhkIzqXjReyihFNqUWQjXm+gFUJjhyM6kTZhm+Wx4eFyS Yx3EkSvBItEw6A/QXicB =xfL6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4df00371.8000...@toell.net
RFS: [QA Upload] netsend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to ask for sponsoring of my QA upload for the package netsed.
It does not introduce a new version since upstream is dead since 2001
but the package is fairly cool, has a reasonable popcon and no open RC
bugs (but WNPP bug #487339[1]. You could adopt it - note there is a
non-official new upstream version you may want to switch to as outlined
in #586037 [2]. Moreover you would eventually becoming upstream as well)
I updated the package and it is in comparatively good shape now - I
believe at least, you may still want to review it however as this is my
first QA upload. I attached a diff outlining all changes I did. This is
in particular:
* I switched to the 3.0/quilt format
* I rewrote the rules file and changed the package to make use of debhelper
* I made some minor corrections in debian/copyright and package description
* I removed all changes in the upstream code (previously the package
changed a version number in upstream's README. I did not found this to
be useful enough to introduce a patch)
* I made some minor tweaks in debian/control, including the Maintainer
field (now QA)
* The package is Lintian clean (but minor pedantic and informational
warnings due to missing upstream stuff, e.g. home page, watch file,
upstream changelog)
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netsed
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netsed/netsed_0.01c-3.dsc
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487339
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586037
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=iA71
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -Nru netsed-0.01c/debian/changelog netsed-0.01c/debian/changelog
--- netsed-0.01c/debian/changelog 2011-06-02 02:45:23.0 +0200
+++ netsed-0.01c/debian/changelog 2011-06-02 02:44:34.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+netsed (0.01c-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Orphaning package, assign package to the QA team. Maintainer is MIA.
+ * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
+ * Start rules file from scratch: use dh 7 mode, make
+use of various debhelpers (dh_installdocs, dh_installdirs, ...)
+ * Set compat and dependency to debhelper 8
+ * Undo previous modifications of the upstream source. A former maintainer
+changed a version number in README.
+ * Bump standards, package should comply to all requirements now.
+ * Minor tweaks in debian/copyright
+
+ -- Arno Töll deb...@toell.net Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:17:42 +0200
+
netsed (0.01c-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru netsed-0.01c/debian/compat netsed-0.01c/debian/compat
--- netsed-0.01c/debian/compat 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ netsed-0.01c/debian/compat 2011-06-02 01:12:23.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+8
diff -Nru netsed-0.01c/debian/control netsed-0.01c/debian/control
--- netsed-0.01c/debian/control 2011-06-02 02:45:23.0 +0200
+++ netsed-0.01c/debian/control 2011-06-02 02:14:23.0 +0200
@@ -1,26 +1,25 @@
Source: netsed
Section: net
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Lenart Janos o...@debian.org
-Standards-Version: 3.5.7.1
+Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
+Standards-Version: 3.9.2
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.0)
Package: netsed
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Description: The network packet altering stream editor
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Description: Network packet altering stream editor
NetSED is small and handful utility designed to alter the contents of
packets forwarded thru your network in real time. It is really useful
- for network hackers in following applications:
+ for network packet alteration, forging and manipulation. NetSED supports:
.
* black-box protocol auditing - whenever there are two or more
proprietary boxes communicating over undocumented protocol (by
enforcing changes in ongoing
Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, my bad. The mail subject should have been netsed of course. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN50TAAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtkMIQAJEoVsuUGGWApiGEDl7LjduP RcPcieRTsOjeR2geSSCpTef7AjE2Pe/CdGx+PkrvreHhQpxvfK0dZIOyKnqeiqSo ZkpJKwvpIqhpTxN/RyTclZ4oQFbmj9QZiocx54Zd5+9A1g08vOzIhh+LKZf6WRWF xBEaGyhgjAZpUlRB0TlbxSQhx5X118qOSKhXd0WwilkzgjseX9VNGt6qmwgoOhcY 6zZElj0iXdUgaO3iNiK5pxR+fIr895k1qPaX+PS8EF165fLFvSH7683wgkMJ4lWL 3h9QNJh4CINjJU0gjAZxzm1DS1jbt/6pvBJKjk9S6OsqJNSzjktvoXbOMP9pT2pB rn3KGw6ddjuKLxkg8oYngHrGUDF9PrHNsOETNesCQsYttbo9p44Jr5YWc0sFYvQ+ lkdJhpo0TNLAl44PtRcXIZSxm9N26X8N7MdaMJNjef5bRkorPq22xnFtUTVwhwt+ lO901ZNPasbCqYO4M2TFQqN8I/yl/pUwD2b9NxtKkjNqVMilVJKqXybtkSK8a86I 9e49KX/gV8OcWwiHFjr40LVUzi7ULUR1cgfzdWumTpPzQLMStFCXMforTl/AHIOp eaGMP+RiQZp2aNN09mfLr6eKFOjwPHb1yy6+X/e5w3USKxxoj7oYioWWPQMOQk9d M0Y2qGgKAQruiTdAW9nW =Qw/v -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de744c0.1080...@toell.net
Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mats Erik and Sven,
On 02.06.2011 12:42, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Reading the bug logs I'd favour an upload using the 'new upstream'
version.
The bug #586037 is sufficient to motivate the removal of a package
built from the old source. All the more so in the absence of IPv6
capabilities.
Fair enough. I just didn't feel comfortable to package an entire new
upstream source for a QA upload.
Glad to see you worked on that already Mats, therefore I updated my
package and merged our approaches. I attached a diff outlining all
changes in debian/ I made.
Note I removed you and other people interested from Maintainer/Uploaders
and left QA as I originally suggested. If you still want to adopt the
package, I'd suggest you to change bug #487339 to ITA and seek for
sponsors for your first maintainer upload, with or without the DDs
originally interested to join you.
I didn't commit my changes to your VCS, I can do if you want, as I'm a
member of collab-maint myself.
The updated package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netsed
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netsed/netsed_1.00b-1.dsc
(sorry Mats, I mailed you instead of the list right before)
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN536fAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtTwgP+gLF/v3WzK2jZzpE1vTZsUT7
uI5VWhy87BzoWVJ/4GFxMeVNCWjnWeVEXlSlYxjYoROOmxToUmfk9J2QXKp2XyLG
27YIl8f0PGy6LeFX4BT1jGz3eRMT5zun+x+afFyoLS1oZQFCEb4TccDnD7Cq8hc6
jVyRmibz8tlOvR+laEDMS5UBMm72hLiDhigjIsFROvt+82Py5KjHbfPKg+yY2RiR
zLUK7nGMmAN+14SyuqUaHablPQG4XaHR2zXXg6oBPeL6OOt8UyPnUdOrkwk4t9SP
bBxf/CuOaXlf/OW855x/AvKi7f5F2kZ6QHeQP0AD7PfPSF/Te0Vv2bGd6qlUXqam
DVfFRgHS1Oh2j4hUNtc8E3ltzCbP7iobm7DdR8+Lg6mQgZ9kU89enC64ihrg/qd8
k9z5LTbe0uzv2yuHwOsSPU3T+V/cpePgv/9CuqDa6SI5A8F4JL3LiobslgyOVuhd
8h2VcEzVZbOZ3/pD45xnhAld/njvBkqp2B0Xc33AahgJdgp94LgEBkosejiuSP+m
a45Fvh2NFm5l9odmSXYuFTp2AU2vMq4Avwgj3LVnaTs6u+3u+wAA+lU2DXUSHqrM
T0/VMI60OLckailpdeNAJ2hcGXz9fBF67lzGwQSTByZ1NMchQttWZnC6OsJVnGC0
btwox55AFx234SO05szT
=F6g9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -ruN netsed/debian/changelog netsed-new/debian/changelog
--- netsed/debian/changelog 2011-06-02 13:21:52.0 +0200
+++ netsed-new/debian/changelog 2011-06-02 13:54:14.0 +0200
@@ -1,43 +1,31 @@
-netsed (1.00b-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+netsed (1.00b-1) unstable; urgency=low
- [ Mats Erik Andersson ]
- * New upstream release.
- * debian/control:
-+ Add M E Andersson as uploader.
-+ Standards-Version: 3.9.1.
-+ Build dependency: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), ruby.
-+ Add ${misc:Depends} to binary package dependency.
-+ Homepage stanza.
-+ Vcs-*: New stanzas.
- * debian/compat:
-+ New file, level 7.
+ * QA upload.
+ * New upstream release from a new maintainer and thus having a new source
+ * Fix netsed executes a tight non-blocking loop.: Change to new upstream
+source (Closes: #586037)
+ * Orphaning package, assign package to the QA team. Maintainer is MIA.
+ * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
+ * Start rules file from scratch: use dh 7 mode, make
+use of various debhelpers (dh_installdocs, dh_installdirs, ...)
+ * Set compat and dependency to debhelper 8
+ * Bump standards, package should comply to all requirements now.
+
+ [Mats Erik Andersson]
+
+ * debian/patches/:
++ 01-cflag_inclusion.diff: Sense any exported CFLAGS.
++ 02-ftbfs_kfreebsd.diff: Resolve FTBFS for GNU/kfreebsd.
* debian/copyright:
+ Rewritten according to DEP-5.
- * debian/rules:
-+ Simplified formulation based on 'dh' with an 'override_dh_install'.
- * debian/source/format:
-+ New file, format 3.0 (quilt).
* debian/watch:
+ New file.
- * debian/netsed.docs:
-+ New file.
- * debian/patches/:
-+ 01-cflag_inclusion.diff: Sense any exported CFLAGS.
-+ 02-ftbfs_kfreebsd.diff: Resolve FTBFS for GNU/kfreebsd.
- * [lintian] debian/netsed.1: spelling-error-in-man-page
-
- -- Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:36:46 +0200
-
-netsed (0.02a-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
-
- * Adopting package.
- * New upstream release.
-+ Uses select() rather than a busy loop. (Closes: #586037)
-+ Attempts to resolve hostnames. (Closes: #397420)
* debian/control:
-+ Add self to Uploaders.
++ Homepage stanza.
++ Vcs-*: New stanzas.
++ Add ruby build dependency
- -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:49:24 +0100
+ -- Arno Töll deb...@toell.net Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:51:42 +0200
netsed (0.01c-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
diff -ruN netsed/debian/compat netsed-new/debian/compat
--- netsed/debian/compat 2011-06-02 13:21
Re: RFS: tartarus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stefan, On 29.05.2011 20:49, Stefan Tomanek wrote: * You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this separately. Even if the perl module is only used by the scripts packaged? I created the module when several programs used the same functions and configuration data, so I am not sure whether a dedicated perl package is really that useful. you opted to install it to a system wide location, which qualifies for this requirement, yes. If you would choose to install it to a private location (i.e. relative to your program only, not reachable by site @INC) this could come over this requirement[*]. Note it is perfectly fine to bundle the library in a single source tarball, just generate a separate binary (Perl) package. That's not a big deal. [*] At this point I should note I am no Debian Developer. This means I can't sponsor you, therefore you are free to ignore my advises anyway. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN4poWAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtOQwP+wR9G92YprJheb5mQFaBZq8B 793xipJiHsmTTmoI7XLI3tWsgLr1pKCol2uMzGzXjvCMOBlvaRVdTJpmjI/q0WpP gqHiTQvTbMthXHy/H6gFp4OCCJsfAMDP76rOpRWGvigrOoXAZNxpJlo3FFIDMAlz D9tg8QgWtg+1XmNjsi5FsAihVdxqdiyEmeVboJSYMcZMSH9LJ0F8/L9RWAnvjWRX xEAfaZVjzjQqCq1GngA+cfQISHqcltTuID48QirfzoETnUsbE5eQrbXhU+i685YI fN+bH04ydxSP3UKpDxNAKwdiRlQrd00QEik3YDWHW/MxVlSLIp8j4LAB6tVbO3Ui ApIT1EGdEeFMDt1SKpKiWRk9m3lDS5L41+xHnTt8H1R01uQyOcAM3m+ElnAseDs/ lRuHd/ox98dFogOuUnp/s4W13ok/y97ea05vh25418aJd7cyUNBECB/RTfJcsUQ0 EhO8yV1kxYjDpHla+nrkztDQzNxULBoBJc4CDbUFj55iD9K2IsSKnjURh7VqBmyV lBtd0oDvbA7Kkf/0E3wo2ea0ie4EPRFnFGAdd4ymcTTg5MP7DvfT8+M2STHx2Uce yjbokhWhpvFr14PoA+VMVBcxslSc7N51DiWag92UQa9CYMQVwsLgfOJAigWXnITn oetDiYPA8wTakSIC+Lo4 =3r07 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de29a17.1080...@toell.net
Re: RFS: tartarus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stefan,
I took a look into your package. I have some comments you may want to
consider.
On 25.05.2011 23:18, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tartarus.
...
The upload would fix these bugs: 604447
* You don't mention the ITP you filed in debian/changelog. Please do that.
* You seem to use a merged changelog for your (upstream) changes and
Debian packaging related stuff. This is not the intention of
debian/changelog. You shall outline there /packaging/ relevant changes
in comparison to your upstream package. Moreover you seem to have a
long(er) history of internal used Debian packages you mention in your
changelog. This could be confusing for Debian users, maybe you want to
clean this up, once you eventually moved your upstream changes to a
dedicated upstream changelog. See also [2].
* You use debhelper version 7, you could bump to version 8 as this is
the suggested version to be used these days. Learn more on debhelper(7).
* You should use a VCS to track your packaging efforts [1]. If you don't
have one, you could consider to joint the collab-maint project on Alioth
[3].
* You bundle a Perl module in your source tarball. Please package this
separately. There is a Perl policy covering Perl modules [4]. Once you
did, you may also depend on the ${perl:Depends} substitute dh_perl(1)
generates.
* Your original source tarball did not match the package source
directory you use to produce the package from. This resulted in a
quilt/3.0 changes patch in patches/debian-changes-0.9.8-1. Please update
your source tarball accordingly and re-upload.
* You install man pages through dh_installman, but they belong to the
upstream part of your package. Please consider writing an install target
upstream for them.
* You don't have an install target at all in your upstream package,
eventually you want to add that instead of relying to various debhelper.
Besides of those things (where most are minor improvements) I think your
package looks good, good work.
[1]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-vcs
[2]
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-changelog-errors
[3] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject
[4] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/perl-policy/index.html
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN4YnRAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt6iAQAMvoyazA7Lnzn6sIfWrgFmWy
AypOedR0GGHHjfFtSgyCWd9EsjrTohty8FtMS0YEGfPja8a6KiBvRvJ9GE70nj+V
2z28Pfx3LjsSiZKtXtAs6K7RSaJ4AW/Y4JjKdESSXzhgqwbO8T5HhcSCNErfVti5
BvxnUMm8PG/Bfe5QY8cICC+5lsJy8hCzwQhdUiROObLRKz8cD9lm41A4GQPEjNoD
mWIr/DswyZEbek6ICHWobBnpCu+FyA63NUdwngCH9pZ8fTh4cvOPoSjus0X90UdI
AdgVzE+pI2/MjT/843Appvbl+OgJlWhnx8Gk4Lf2hi+K8rusjXI+cakuBP94DxA1
lkI92eyHfZsZKYYLUcdPIEzDCCFriWkPWK0MkUfLdK5f2m//EhsFigpfwj3F3uKR
O1/DOxaYqygNd6104Z4ZjxYVpe6fDRGK9zq1CT0eesqqZiYQBxm7/LYuAh21x9NG
gNeCmNHDmAOV5j4+y0xooBUWqsfvqeQ9NSgiRI7XT6K+VEHSwLjRsnLPG456m47l
lkFwrECKb+EA1hE2SdrvYArjTzZ3E5fX14mQk25Iqxy5rWjfG/Gws4lDsz50V84f
Tt4CqOzMtKQdS7T7FRzXEY/j35ZdvFDZ7AhaUaKYz7kvZvRsaKw7q1LFE1hPcD+8
j+zduSlzfWuPKaOfr0nt
=HbGS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de189d1.4030...@toell.net
Re: RFS: undo-closed-tabs-button
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sune and Ludwin, On 27.05.2011 00:13, Sune Vuorela wrote: On 2011-05-26, Ludwin Alduvi Hernández Vásquez alduv...@gmail.com wrote: It builds these binary packages: undo-closed-tabs-button - This add-on allows you to undo closed tabs via a toolbar button addon to ? I thought the same and looked on the home page (where you have to search this information again!). Apparently it is for Firefox which brings me on two points: a) Without haing further looked on your package you may want to reconsider package name and description to something more useful. Remember, it is the showcase for your program. The user has to learn what it is about by the name and possibly the synopsis. Be as verbose as possible. b) How is that different to the undo close tab button, being in upstream already? - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJN3tJiAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtBYYP/3YigpjBplB9e3LLOCXiTtCk PWggtQIOP0bf+bOdbcw3vUlrFdc6QRfuPq0DIuTbJQuCcLtojjky3pXKKyjvVYX5 /AOAc3aiqWFe5n9dRTnmXg1Dx3x4Mc4S4SgsdtDsDlHzkDJ0v6DuP5QAn8Vau219 D8mLu+E7SAwxTDXU4m/H8gqSaVaIOx0pK5h8HSmiPu4YEWAQYOEfXA6xMxiaaLCx p9IihxvgtOlBIB7zKd/i5GUjCrK1VEn4oSQcnxsDcz0M+NUtZ3152bJEq4koQ3cZ rOp7++W6wQtDAjE4H6fCrENI6X4TUL7ncQWDx1Ni1+SR7ApuXSxtg/ZRJuqYIHvK cY5KCsye8mJl6PQnFSh8AQ2gze9CG1aCcnFYyaKrIQqCAUvNNe+OzQaaHbLzM6/s 3swUeHX2cFr35wOgvc5cJVMX1KlMGyxnTgo06hboBPUw1HVQXU4w0eEJgff4pchs EicjYGRo6sCXncGwwuq/5126ifVFoVXJ0yliiArTXnF6QC3pSnkGq1ol+VvrKz3D uf8k/GZqg6W7zu5A2P/DGhTMLUe5kJ5Cm41lNP9mLVyYknMp0d8/EluypJqBVLLl cOh5rcz9bCcJhWGNGil8iIDrL58XseP2fU8GK3Capxbwzy3UPy3tZj522FLkBDiu pqxeAXN63DhlrbQduWXE =fd9S -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dded262.3060...@toell.net
Re: bt747: doubts on licenses and embedded libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mònica * Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header is: This is no problem. GPL states (verbatim quote from GPL-2, still present in GPL-3): If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. * Embedded libraries: I get some of them out because they are already in Debian but some of them are not in Debian. I supose I must get these libraries from its original source and pack them as different packages... am I right? Yes, as of §4.13 in the policy. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNz7SVAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtRngQAJHIVraAmnyjzkacHaDimbDt XdMRgugsuQGudwenwNd7iYlA8p6tEelCImIdlIDqOB5rXS6LCOE/36H58cWs1At1 PDFRRQA2Bn6vhvN4sF2C3aqZ6ECW4AgG/UQEwC2twTaxwVesI0xMEgVXQCYnPGEn MeDKa+mPhjeW8uubnTL5HKqt/M2wu0esdtOeZskwHSpl9Kzqwio5ANdBU/6m9ELy bC5mGw39sDUK0fhD5UDRfquMnZjEL/QJ+AufVLqyfEHPXVZ2uEkbOPZtCHBCK2g5 lT1XV0SYcoOZVWpRp1cZs+gcyuUtAzGX2OLVgf3MPcSECbFT22yFqQyCpxFKpn4L 2XiI8oSnmN5RkjCIfbVgsHrfKiMDmxU/ADlU++imjuJoKvNja3Goz945sagwWMKY A4LNnX4NvrDitYADerBpo3CGZj6hkVEiA+MGtKJsl6fcWPgposuM+wY+PaSi8ryB ClAOLJtTXK426RF+iYZTVpmNYc4067CkCztEbpLaD4Fk7sOOZzUZ1PrC0iKuK9DZ X735BZ4kF2mbrCHiTcHMd8jhXUT3fCZfjbLNhsdSSFsBwtBQddLRvA6ymAxaj5B/ 6+9MVSFFLVK4+u8A6+0g/cznsN4IDKGtc7n7KtH9d5SSsdwGheWQzLKcn1+1GTmJ L0PVPJqaO91Y/p47AfRo =1MXw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcfb495.6030...@toell.net
Re: bt747: doubts on licenses and embedded libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mònica, On 15.05.2011 13:40, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already detailed): The GPL paragraph I cited does not mean re-license it for whatever GPL version you want, but The author doesn't care. His licensed work is compatible to every GPL version (or GPL compatible licenses) you want to choose for derivate works. This means for you, you can keep things as they are, just give no version in DEP-5 for the sections where this applies for your upstream source. Remaining parts (if any) can be licensed to whatever is compatible to any GPL version. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNz8htAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtXfMP/1HOga82XOxLtiYC5TLUWGev ghRXK2dx3rSAJDVmE7oGy5dN4zY9OLyvke/6UHB+gasepHIukhVUQ7ZeeRGz8zO4 KX45BK0Yjz76rQDNLOEoWhWel+J1I4nRXM6JbeCYLv7+ajp1P/aI+xZbeHDh/hfz vqgOuGApikfvFnQDeyC+bC09A+jMv802Taib2iVzVA04zoO+h1UiIRvqRrGgyEuO tb6qlfvGlpP7uaYRFoliYnionV/HZEaS/RSR6TYw3l2/JwgH2Rq9mmpbvWrDP1WT EoBnnM+C9AVW/3IbgKWqc/yLK/iiI5PWyqWs45cnx5fUqX84fUR7QlHtyzf1gb3j aw19xOKAGyFDcuGPi55QuO2EGFwrb7pR9ldavN6UY/MjVLSyIaNx6vbP04hyGZRw 3FchDl9OoGF8jj6BqGJ2KrsOxBo4/bPNGx1DCaEpywsax6MPa29sXdMbGNHKFbJ/ Cb1CbsK58xrqlhVxWqYdzvFjAZa5GPcM7xOr8TLvYIpZqDrx0X6rjUYIQv4sbHJJ i8ioWrbfIBXP2c5Lx6UGq4eL9kKA5V7ZsP9AtTPuZiR5fQzlTyBUrb2iGFYJgg5i s4gBADt696+atdvKgNBWFiMd+/Feumsx3rIpXMDi2QmQv6bpMD10/BPL6bUL1aKw gt5ByPtseqU/9QBK3Uqs =iUf4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcfc86d.7070...@toell.net
Re: RFS: jampal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, please reply with the debian-mentors list in CC (at least). This helps other people to keep track. You can, but you don't need to address me personally as I'm subscribed there as well. On 15.05.2011 16:56, Peter Bennett wrote: Since I am the upstream developer I can make any necessary changes upstream so I thought it would be easier to make a native package. Otherwise I have to start learning quilt and other things. Perhaps I am wring in my understanding. You don't need to know (almost) anything about quilt. A native package is still wrong, as those are native /to Debian/, that is where no upstream does exist at all. All other packages have to be non native (being in 3.0 format or not). The only difference, as of your point of view is, you have to provide an unmodified orig.tar.gz packaging one of your releases, the 3.0/quilt format merges with a debian directory you provide along. Note the debian directory is automatically stripped from the upstream tarball if it exists. This is because it is discouraged to maintain the Debian packaging directly at upstream's VCS (i.e. yours). Since i was building a native package this seemed the correct thing. You would still not put any release history there which was never released as a Debian package. Please compare with the dpkg [1] changelog which is a (real) native package. There is one command that uses lame, it is not a major part of the package. I could take out lame and mention that restriction in the man page. Fair enough. All I wanted to say is, you can't distribute your package in Debian while you depend (or recommend) lame. Open Office is used by the CD cover printing command and I included some example spreadsheets for Open Office that allow for updating of tags by spreadsheet. Sounds like a good example for recommends, indeed. Maybe you find some lighter alternatives, but this is definitively not a must have. Ok. I mention 40,000 songs as an example, perhaps I have to be clearer. Maybe not in particular clearer, but more general. The postinst script for update-menu I added because lintian complained it was needed, although my experience showed otherwise. Oh, ok. As said I don't know about desktop applications. More important is the #DEBHELPER# hook which is used as place holder for debhelper commands which can add their own hooks there. Actually ptts is not being built. I should probably remove the source. It is a windows program that goes with the windows version of jampal. Please do so. Note, if you don't want to drop Windows support for you upstream as well, you may want to repack the source tarball for Debian (learn about DFSG tarballs on [2]). This is required for Debian if you target main as this has to be self-contained. That is, it must be able to reproduce your source package entirely with packages available in main already. Same may hold for other libraries/utilities you bundle (§ 4,13 [6]). tagbkup is a utility command that is bundled with jampal and used for some of the jampal commands. Perhaps it should be packaged separately. Yep. See my policy reference. Sound Video is how Ubuntu sets up its menu structure. I actually built this for Ubuntu but submitted here to see if it could get into Ubuntu through the Debian process. Apparently not :) [1] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/dpkg [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNz+/ZAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtiDIP/ROlQwDuow0RyQ0qHEzWN6pV oJWAEodKur/Qnkv8vf32Rc/v7zKhW9+6WSN5HgVy90TMOT8oWkp+plzf9AhUt2P7 iK8yEnEOjUJPednbuuyJ67PBBmm2W1TlE9D7+n9cVtSp8JeItFtx1CHB0ke00skL F5W9a234G5j9FL1y+g0vpC7fe6kLolh67rdYtJFd8Dj6KsUHQwxtlhZOJlSVOdjG SUXFi8eENveRiaQsAiqkZ/n2VQHnRph8HWlpo3HxlLAIgxOfFTCL9pYJhL+J63AU ngdBjYI2zX5mBobEl+6a7cVSQ0slu65NfNgP2uc63QuLI+JbHiWJkg/tNdmLdmuc HMzYlLJJ29csCIyJaofePpifbN3XOIBhUI0T6/XTbNX+wclY0s9lMkYLZXPn7Um0 uTm8k8EDky7DaniR1KAV5dBAcAq2pj5kIsKO2k/WqvLqH4r0xXA9wUvFrSg9If8u o6fQTUXynbUv/POsGydKVFyXYmqWQqc+lEBX0MEYufWIY75mpLwh3NIta4LGZoRn 6rih7Xmg0Ia3pQbXCGydre7x/gONvxGcZYdWICLm+ttPhU94HBuP/l4fTrYXEI4B 0BgSQomYtMEgLUFbBBaKuMNo9WQmXbeaW08Qgi5PL9FSyfThv4WA1kusqv6gSw0o okjeJc7oxcqUGMB9vLCK =kLTb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dcfefda.2090...@toell.net
