it is a feature, a usefull feature
Package abc should NOT overwrite files of package xyz.
If people have problems with the contents of xyz.deb,
they should take the source and rebuild a modified one.
Kind Regards, Geert Stappers
-
The Future is now, be part
At 21:37 +0100 12/5/01, Hereward Cooper wrote:
Hi there yal,
Is 'fileconvert-v1-to-v2' a suitable program name within a package (this
is not
the package itself, just a program is supplies). Should it be shorter + more
relevant to the package in comes with?
Yep, make it more relevant to the
At 0:28 +0200 5/5/02, Daniel Lutz wrote:
Hello
A user of the autofs package did send a bug report (Bug#145768)
about problems with a manually changed /etc/modules.conf file.
The problem is that update-modules fails in the postinst script.
There are two possibilities:
1. Don't catch the error
At 16:32 +0200 8/9/02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:08:46PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
I have one package (radvd) that builds only on Linux (and the *BSDs),
but not on the Hurd. How dow I specify that arch requirement in the
control file? Policy D 2.3 seems to indicate
At 16:01 +0200 8/10/02, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:19, Geert Stappers wrote:
At 16:32 +0200 8/9/02, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 04:08:46PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
I have one package (radvd) that builds only on Linux (and the *BSDs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 16:50 +0200 8/11/02, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the problem
there. The package maintainer hasn't to do it by himself,
he can/must/should
At 21:34 +0200 8/11/02, Russell Coker wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:16, Geert Stappers wrote:
So you think I should keep my selinux packages as architecture any, even
though they will never run on on HURD or BSD?
What about the Trusted BSD support packages? If Trusted BSD gets support
At 8:49 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
itz Hi, how can I easily determine the host architecture string in a
itz maintainer script? dpkg-architecture is in the dpkg-dev package,
itz which I obviously cannot depend on. I could massage the output
itz of uname or arch, but that seems too ugly
At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:42:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
On 24-Jun-2002 Oliver Kurth wrote:
Hello!
I have changed a package and made some files in
/etc/pcmcia/ip-{up,down}.d/
obsolete. Since they are in /etc they are conffiles.
At 16:14 +0200 8/18/02, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
itz The package uses a generic name for one of its configuration
itz files. I want to create a symlink from the generic name to the
itz correct (architecture-dependent) one.
Geert Could you tell us that makes sence?
Could you tell us that it
At 11:39 +0200 8/19/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
At 1:05 +0200 6/25/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
In principle they have moved to another location,
/etc/network/if-{up,down}.d,
and at the same I have greatly changed them. What happens
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
Dear mentors,
I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
architectures for all the packages that my
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build
At 20:47 +0200 9/17/02, Oliver Kurth wrote:
Hello!
Hi,
I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version,
which has the bug fixed.
I have submitted the bug 14 days ago, after another week I tried to
At 21:42 +0200 9/17/02, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 08:47:59PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
I would like to make an NMU (via sponsor) of nxtvepg. The bug in
question is #159525. What disturbs me, is that it is a new upstream version,
which has the bug fixed.
Well, you can try
At 9:10 +0200 9/27/02, Carlo Contavalli wrote:
Hello,
I was seeking for some opinions... I'm working now on a
package that relies on a script that may be modified by the system
administrator, and I'm wondering about:
- how to manage upgrades (overwrites co.)
- where to put it
This
At 11:02 +0200 10/1/02, Daniel Lutz wrote:
Hello
A package of mine, `synergy', does compile on every platform
except on hppa. hppa needs at least gcc 3.0. But this version
of gcc seems to have a bug, synergy doesn't compile with it
on hppa. So I need to use gcc 3.2 on hppa.
Now I tried to
At 15:32 +0200 10/1/02, James Troup wrote:
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All the work you are doing is to work around a bug in gcc 3.0 for HPPA,
that is fixed in gcc 3.2.
So just upgrade the HPPA gcc to 3.2.
Some day it has to be done away.
Err, no, it's really not that simple
then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected.
I rephrase that as What is the status of NEW?
I do have the same question.
FWIW there is the Debian Archive Kit[1] but I don't where to start.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
Cheers
Geert Stappers
[1] http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak
pgp5jibRE3qQW.pgp
, but not the permissions on directories warning.
Which tool do I have to use to make these warnings visible?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpsXseDHRUmz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:15:05PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote:
hi,
Hello ftpmaster,
(Hello ftpmasters, ;-)
Hello debian-mentors,
E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file
W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/
According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share.
Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about
for
^^^
~ smooth upgrades. It can safely be removed.
The package is lintian and linda clean.
All suggestions and help is appreciated!
Provide something that is worth spending time on.
Have a nice day
TNX
Luk
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgprU8e9CGvvx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:22:38PM -0400, ron r wrote:
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
Try http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
thank you. ron
You are welcome
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpO3jJCSKuEA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
directory.
2. I installed the Debian files to
snip/
other E-mail
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
Very interesting howto, enjoy it!
The original poster has a .deb package. The question is about
how to setup an apt archive.
Those who have an URL for that topic, _please_ change the Subject: line.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is it? If the binary packages aren't available, you'll
have to specify the name of the source package, which is often but not
always the same as the name of the binary package.
Indeed,
stating the package name would allow others to reproduce the expriment.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 12:30:20PM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:56 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
stating the package name would allow others to reproduce the expriment
No worth. I'm dumb-ass.
Please, some more respect to a community member.
However I
Packages.gz and _not_ the Packages.
Bertram
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
Becoming a DD is being a DD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:22:46PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 09. Mär 2005, 09:38:33 +0100 schrieb Geert Stappers:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:20:06PM +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
The `http' method seems to need a gzipped file
`Packages.gz'; the `ftp' method can
!
there will allways some who _have_ to try.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; urgency=low
+conglomerate (0.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
- * expecting new upstream version
+ * new upstream version
- -- Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:58:34
+0100
+ -- Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:36:18
+0100
conglomerate (0.7.16-1) unstable
to see it running on more places.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
about what is actually on the remote
server - it simply keeps a record of what it THINKS is in on the remote
server, and works from that.
Is this Request For Sponsor about _duplicate_ work?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
information people need to help you.
(they have other things to do,
then search the archive for your previous posting)
Thanks,
Stanislav
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:54:34PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
Post in a follow-up message where to find the AVInfo work you did.
And see if you get any feedback like
It compiles fine on $ARCH
The package is on http://users.tkk.fi/~stas/avinfo/
lintian
cross-references, extract elements that match a (CSS)
selector, etc. Most are meant to be used in a Unix pipe or in shell
scripts.
Thanks.
Regards,
Beverly
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to try to avoid name conflicts. The package is lintian clean. I have
contacted upstream, and he would be glad to have html-xml-utils
available as a Debian package.
What thinks upstream of the hx_ prefix?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:44:20AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote,
in a off-list message:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:57:28 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
Package: html-xml-utils
Version: 3.6
Section: web
Priority
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 10:46:56AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
in an off-list message
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:58:51 +0200, Geert Stappers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:21:01AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
Greetings,
I'm looking for a sponsor for html-xml-utils
will
follow that procedure.
See the archives of this mailinglist.
Yesterday there was New maintainer checklist
It covers the same things as you are looking for.
Thanks
Deepak Tripathi .
(my blood says Linux positive)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-w
so, the extra hyphen, the trick?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
( please honour the explicite set 'Reply-To:' )
Hello Release Team,
The text below is from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about a Request For Sponsoring.
My questions are at the bottom.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:25:11AM -0500, Reed Snellenberger wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09
-follow -type
f` md5sum.txt
That re-calculates the MD5 sum of all files, but you modified only tasksel.
Again, thanks for the input.
You are welcome at debian-boot@lists.debian.org
for advice on debian-installer hacking.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
created a deb that works. Could you help find a
sponsor to me prepare this deb for inclusion into Debian?
A good start is to read
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
where maintainer developer can be considered synonyms.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description
html-xml-utils available as a Debian package.
May I interpreter that as
Upstream as included the hx_ prefix also
?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 05:49:05PM +0200, Miros/law Baran wrote:
25.06.2005 pisze Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have prefixed the names of the executables with hx_ to
try to avoid name conflicts (this was in the upstream TODO
file).
No, he hasn't done that yet
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:21:41AM -0600, Beverly Davis wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:24:07 +0200, Geert Stappers
snip/
May I interpreter that as
Upstream as included the hx_ prefix also
?
No, he hasn't done that yet. I went ahead and did it though because
otherwise some
Geert Stappers
.
Homepage: http://www.sysmon.org/
ITP: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225069
The package can be found here:
http://www.frasunek.com/debian/pool/main/s/sysmon/
Thanks in advance.
Just my two cents
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpAEHKxbYxJX.pgp
Description: PGP
not comfortable with their packaging.
Just help upstream, at least communicate with them.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpRK05gK3kx9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:44:39PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
both on this ML
[...]
PING tests.
Please add
.
Homepage: http://www.sysmon.org/
Well as far as I remember Policy doesn't describe
archive,
there is no reason to start with -3 as the first one in the archive.
Use 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ectera. (sorry I have no URL where I red that)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
against [1]wnpp, which I close in version
0.8-9; the latest version is 0.8-10
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=246481
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpn76LYEDkrg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be avoid (by you) for your peer reviewers )
* Current standards-Version is 3.6.1,
see /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz for more
information.
* files with a name the ends in .ex are EXamples, remove (or rename) them.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 03:23:41PM +0200, Matthijs wrote:
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 13:55, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
snip what=irrelevant signature/
Please delete old text,
so it wouldn't send (and multiplied) again.
snip/
And where did you tell which files are for which package
comes in.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
TIA,
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpIlcmEqeIi7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Die Diktatur duldet Reden. Aber keine Widerreden.
-- Werner Mitsch
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpXHAh2Lj0Lw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 01:27:29PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 12:54:52PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
I got several mails with questions how many packages did I make in this
month... well I have many spare time right now so I try to use it for
Debian
.
A mailinglist works because people are subscribed
and contribute where they can.
Thanks a lot,
Fabio.
--
Fabio Tranchitella
! kobold.it, Turin, Italy - Free is better!
Just pay the price for the freedom!
Cheers
Geert Stappers
Mary WHO ??
Merry Christmas
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpQKxWdmywzE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpYowj6HYsku.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
The proper way is to simply not upload to mentors.d.n with
'official' debian revision numbers. Assuming the offical version
will be 1.0-1, use for example 1.0-1~mentors1 (if mentors.d.n
accepts
).
My work is available on http://www.kobold.it/python-gd/
Thanks in advance,
Have you contacted debian-python@lists.debian.org ?
( they are now reading your RFS )
F.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
with -0 ( e.g. -0test1, -0sss1 -0.1 )
so that -1 can enter the offical Debian archive. :-)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the time being.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpGinTXNWp0S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gone to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My apology about the mix up.
Making now this noise, this E-mail, so that other can learn from my mistakes.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is on-line again.
pgp7ra56aX56D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mailinglist that have
interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
This posting is only to get attention for the package it's deserves.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
and you felt the itch to update it.
My first thought was looks like a hi-jack
http://packages.debian.org/gwget says Can't find that package
So I will calm down and don't lecture you
about working together or co-maintainership :-P
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers
Geert Stappers
be reported to the Quality Assurance, QA, team.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpdjK5tncG16.pgp
Description: PGP signature
then, but no sign if it is accepted or rejected.
I rephrase that as What is the status of NEW?
I do have the same question.
FWIW there is the Debian Archive Kit[1] but I don't where to start.
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
Cheers
Geert Stappers
[1] http://cvs.debian.org/dak/?cvsroot=dak
pgpzvh75GH73X.pgp
, but not the permissions on directories warning.
Which tool do I have to use to make these warnings visible?
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpyF82IuumP0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:15:05PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote:
hi,
Hello ftpmaster,
(Hello ftpmasters, ;-)
Hello debian-mentors,
E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file
W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/
According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share.
Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about
for
^^^
~ smooth upgrades. It can safely be removed.
The package is lintian and linda clean.
All suggestions and help is appreciated!
Provide something that is worth spending time on.
Have a nice day
TNX
Luk
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpck6qGhXLlL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/her.
A tool like dpatch does help with such differents.
A bad symlink could potentially cause a crash
SURE! That is why it is called a bad symlink.
So don't create bad symlinks, and don't use it as an argument
for not conforming Debian packaging policy.
IANADD,
Justin
Cheers
Geert Stappers
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:22:38PM -0400, ron r wrote:
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
Try http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
thank you. ron
You are welcome
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpK41JH8uMIS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
not being i386 enough.
I say: Screw i386 !
If you have a non ia32 system, then show that and be proud of it.
Do an upload with the architecture that you prefer
and don't spent time on being someone else.
Thanks in advance to all mentors.
Cheers.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
processing of more E-mail. We benefit all from it, aspecial
those who are asking. Good quoting is snipping (deleting)
redundent text, better is to make a summary and put that
in sqaure brackets. Another good quoting thing is to reply
below the text, it preservers the logical order.
Cheers
Geert
this.
To me it seems like you want to re-implement
the programs `alien`, `dh_make` and `pbuilder`.
My advice is to study those programs before you implement your idea.
regards,
ram.
Hope This Helps
Geert Stappers
P.S.
My approach would be asking upstream to provide the source in tar.gz
installs possible.
Let the computer do
if upgrade from version below
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 05:33:57PM -0500, Stephanie da Silva wrote:
To send mail to me, you need to add [laundry] to the end of the
subject line (eg: Subject: Random message [laundry]).
I translate that as:
I have my head in the sand to protect me against spam E-mail.
I feel no need
an extensive class library with lots of goodies for
network programming, system administration, sounds and graphics.
.
This package is a dependency package, which depends on Debian's default
Python version (currently v2.3).
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:14:12PM +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
Description: Interface for Python to the X11 Protocol (dummy package)
python-xlib is a 100% pure python implementation of the X11
protocol.
You made a package for mankind and describe it as a dummy
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:57:47PM +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
That is what is done with python. Please post also the description
of the non default or dummy packages.
I haven't really changed the description since I adopted the packages,
but here you go
with tablix modules-
Some external programs couldn't be started. Check that they are
installed and in the path, or some functions will not work.
That seems a the package doesn't work for me ...
Regards
Ralf
Cheers
Geert Stappers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at http://web.ncf.ca/jmranger/adm8211/
snip/
So please have a look, and let me know how what you think.
snip/
There are no signs of an ITP ( Intented To Package )
Doing the packaging is good,
Telling that you are packaging is better.
Please file an ITP bugreport
Jean-Marc
HTH
Geert
op dh_strip
-k, --keep-debug
Debug symbols will be retained, but split into an independent file
in usr/lib/debug/ in the package build directory. --dbg-package is
easier to use than this option, but this option is more flexible.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S
At 22:16 +0100 12/13/02, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Hi,
I got a strange problem in here - I am finishing (I hope ;-) ) making a
package. Mostly everything works smoothly - I stumbled, however, across
this strange problem:
[ problem report]
Am I missing something obvious?
You are so deep involved in the
executing it.
Those stupid programs are the default MUA on MS-Windows.
Replacing the vicious E-mailers is the way to go to extinguish viri.
Johannes
Please don't take this personal.
Geert Stappers
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the debian directory
for building the package and .diff.gz
That makes it possible to act as both package author and maintainer.
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
It is also at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200307/msg00023.html
cu andreas
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on an unstable system,
make a tarball of it and take it to the stable system
unpack the tarball there and chroot into it.
If there is interrest for it, I can set such tarballs
for PowerPC and i386 online.
Geert Stappers
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
from the CVS-server.
Ok i wait for respond.
Please, don't wait. Make your self usefull elsewhere.
Do good work, but DO NOT WAIT.
Andrei
Geert Stappers
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
though.
I haven't done this yet. Still getting my feet wet. But pinning is
something I will look into.
MfG
Goswin
MfG? (just curious)
Mit freundliche Greusse
It is German for
mvg
met vriendelijke groeten
WfG
With Friendly Greetings
Geert Stappers
to get a lower version.
Use wget dpkg for that, and leave apt-get as it is.
MfG
Goswin
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:18:18 -0500
update the changelog
run 'dpkg-genchanges' and take a close look at the output.
Geert Stappers
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
