Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi mattia, umh? So, I read a bit the manpage, this was enough. IMHO, you gave up way too early, and I really much don't like it. well, thanks for your patience. i did think that i had possibly figured out the correct way to do it, but i wasn't sure. it can be hard to tell if you've done

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

On 23/05/2016 23:52, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 15:39, Jonathon Love wrote: hi julien, On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Hi Julien, exactly the some days ago you hit this too: On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000

Bug#823478: python3-protobuf3

hi, so the advice i received regarding the name was that i must get it renamed upstream[1]. i don't think this will be possible because: - upstream is an established package, present in PYPI and macports - the developer is MIA (additionally, the official Protocol Buffers 3 supports Python

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi, the submitter of 776083 has let me take ownership of the ITP[1] i have updated the uploader/maintainer fields, and committed the package to: /git/python-modules/packaging/python-nanomsg.git with thanks jonathon [1] https://bugs.debian.org/776083

Bug#824121: python-nanomsg ready for review

hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except: Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

hi andrey, On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:17:27AM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote: Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flatbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc This gives 404. https://mentors.debian.net

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

When you upload your package with dput, you can use to -f option to force the upload if the same version already exists on d-mentors. ah! good tip! i'm used to Ubuntu PPA's where you can't do that (i don't think... i think if you -f it rejects them). OK, the package is now available from:

Bug#824121: RFS: python-nanomsg/1.0-2 [ITP]

msg-python Regards, Jonathon Love

Bug#823478: python3-protobuf3

hi matt, thanks for the review, and sorry for the embarrassing "does not build" situation. i was packaging on ubuntu, and my experience has been that if it works there, it will work on debian - but apparently not, i'll be more careful in future. i'm actually writing to ask your advice about

package name for what upstream calls protobuf3

hi, i'm in the process of packaging protobuf3: https://github.com/Pr0Ger/protobuf3 this is an implementation of protocol buffers 2 for python 3. according to debian policy, this should be named python3-protobuf3, but i think this name isn't ideal, because it could be mistaken for: a) an

Bug#823478: python3-protobuf3

umh, you force pushed everything, master, upstream and pristine-tar branches. WHY? what did you do? oh, sorry, i never intended for you to look at that repo, assuming you'd look at the debian-mentors one. And still it doesn't build, if that was meant to fix it. Without thinking of it I

looking for sponsor: flatbuffers

hi folks, i've been packaging the flatbuffers project. i think it might be ready to go, and i'm looking for a sponsor. i've pushed the work to: /git/debian-science/packages/flatbuffers.git (i normally work with debian-science, but this package isn't really science-y) the flatbuffers

looking for sponsor: flatbuffers

hi folks, i've been packaging the flatbuffers project. i think it might be ready to go, and i'm looking for a sponsor. i've pushed the work to: /git/debian-science/packages/flatbuffers.git (i normally work with debian-science, but this package isn't really science-y) the flatbuffers

Bug#823467: RFS: flatbuffers/1.3.0-2 [ITP]

latbuffers/flatbuffers_1.3.0-2.dsc More information about flatbuffers can be obtained from http://google.github.io/flatbuffers/ and https://github.com/google/flatbuffers with thanks Jonathon Love

Bug#823478: RFS: python3-protobuf3/0.2.1-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-protobuf3" * Package name: python3-protobuf3 Version : 0.2.1-2 Upstream Author :Sergey Petrov * URL :