changelog that starts with
"initial upload", and I am not sure what I should do with my changelog entry,
that has entries before being uploaded to Debian.
Anyone have any advice ?
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.
that just being able to execute a file named "ssh" is not enough.
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha Universit
t;ssh" is not enough.
I'm pretty sure your best guess is right.
Now, what about a package in main depending upon non-US/main.
I thought the agreement was that non-US/main is in fact "main", but I am
pretty vague.
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
... Long Live Free Software, LIBERTAS OMNI VINCIT.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
not agree), but
the generally accepted form is to Find a sponsor, and adopt,
even before you are assigned an Application Manager to help speed up the
process.
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.net
error generated from lintian, and yet they do not seem
to have the shlibs file either.
do they provide libraries or plugins?
I have no idea, but I guess they are dlopened by python (i.e. plugin?)
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
da
. :)
A slightly prettier solution is using the "-l" option of dh_shlibdeps.
I think "-l" added things to LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
ainst said library. Note that the
paths used must be absolute or dpkg-shlibdeps will
become confused.
regards,
junichi
--
University: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of
D]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Netfort: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
PROTECTED] Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dancer, a.k.a. Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
Dept. of Knowledge Engineering and Computer Science, Doshisha University.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
help some applications to compile?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
/init.d/
#!/bin/sh -e
# hacked version of Adam Heath's code by Junichi Uekawa 22 Oct. 2000
# modified 25 oct 2000
if [ -e /etc/init.d/$(basename $0) ]; then
# inside chroot
hostname -F /etc/hostname
HOME=/root
exec /bin/sh --login
else
# starting outside the chroot
dir=$(realpath $(dirname
to your new
mail address, it should change.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Othmar Pasteka [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Hmm... anyone going to package manedit ?
I tried it. It was rather fun to play with. It edits in roff.
Should I upload it ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Hello,
Upstram of qtecasound has depricated libqtecasound,
and the only application which depended upon libqtecasound (qtecasound, and ecawave)
no longer need the library.
How would I handle this situation smoothly?
Any ideas?
Would I need to make an empty package of libqtecasound to ensure
Nikolaus Regnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit
I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a
package from a libary. Is there anything like that?
As far as I know, the answer is No, and I think we need one too.
You can see some of it in the debian-policy.
.. sounds hacky.
Anyway, I was trying to do this kind of stuff, but I have not gone too
far. I stopped at trying to set up a buildd for athlon (I have effectively
stopped at making athlon-builder)
Please do.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http
versions.
I think it involves
(mkdir BUILD; cd BUILD; ../configure )
kind of thing...
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
idea to do this on ia64. The details are not available
to me.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
.
Don't use debhelper, or keep your debhelper compatibility level
at 2 or less, because debhelper v3 was not available in potato.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
many notes.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which simply depends on the above three
I have not publicly released the packages yet, but I can point potential
sponsors to a download location.
Could you put it up somewhere public, so that someone who cares may be
able to examine.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi
, but not quite, lintian clean; it produces one error ---
Have you considered asking the upstream to
change the license ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
.
It is not for a normal user.)
Packaging of setuid programs is very discouraged for first-time packagers.
Are you sure you want to do that ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
-specific modifications.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BTS.
It is pretty difficult to see if the person is doing anything useful.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
| # define MAXPATHLEN 1024
| #endif
[everything else dropped]
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
?
Not yet.
Please do.
Reducing the -Wall warnings, and other things will
benefit everyone.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
similar
libgphoto2-dev Package would probably contain
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so which is a symlink to
/usr/lib/libgphoto.so.2, and etc. etc. etc.
The soname is the number 2 in this case
(but I have not looked at libgphoto2 to check)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
running it?
Can you please explain me what I'm missing ?
That's what I want to know too.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the newer version of the ocaml package.
If that is the case, it should be enough to specify ocaml (= version)
with high-enough version number (which includes the previous camlp4).
At least from the information given from your mail.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa
?
Binary package names are incorrect, name them
libmowitz0 and libmowitz-dev
The source package name is fine.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
libmowitz0
Are you sure of the soname version number?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
it
0.3.0 (well, it's only natural).
However, in the library sense, if it is binary-incompatible,
it should have a new soname, i.e. 1.0.0
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92
random segfault
o irrational behavior
regards,
junihi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
affect.
I don't know if there could be a systematic way to do it.
Warning might be possible, but not strict and real checking.
Lintian won't be able to do this, because lintian only has access
to one version of source at the time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Well, now I updated the doc a little bit, I'll post it here.
I've received exactly one response so far, and I'm feeling a bit
naive about the contents of this document.
Please comment:
Library packaging Guide (very much a draft
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 00:07:47 +
David H. Askew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok.. so i'm working on packages for jedit .. and I'm contemplating
splitting the documentation into its own sepperate package.
That I would object.
Splitting the docs when it doessn't have to happen, it not useful.
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 15:04:41 +0200
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:42, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
I know that policy recommends not to use uppercase letters in package
names, but I'd like to package jack (jackit.sourceforge.net).
Unfortunately, there already is a
to care about python-version compatibility,
do they ? Their primary aim is to write code that works for them, not
write code that works on both.
maybe I am wrong, I don't code in python (yet).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
{print sum / i }'
12.3125
grep-available -FMaintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -sPackage| awk '{sum+= length($2); i ++}
END{print sum / i }'
10.3571
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059
PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
.
Don't just split without good reason.
Just making sure one of the good reasons was seen in the discussion.
Trying,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide
?
(is both of them maintained in a good shape or is only one of them?)
Note: Splitting packages up causes more work, and maintenance
cost.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92
?
libtool is quite useful.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
library links properly.
Also, use
libtool install whatever.la $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/
libtool rm -f *~ *.lo whatever.la
etc.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
at the changelogs, but is there a way to know
which packages entered woody last week, or given a package, when it
entered woody ?
I doubt it, but it would help if you name the # of bug.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
versioning than unversioned static library because it is easier to track
bugs on them, and fix them.
However, please see my libpkg-guide.
I'm trying to collect some more information/examples
into the list.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
having so many shared libraries
in one package, but this is what you get as a result
running dpkg-shlibsdeps on such package.
I don't think it will gain anything.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E
? The only one required is
Conflicts: libijs-dev.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
auto-generates debian/control.
I am starting to think that it doesn't really scale up, however.
I'm inclined to use a error-out-if-it-doesn't-match approach
(d-shlibs)
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455
/rules.
I don't know, but it should probably be done in debian/rules clean
target.
I'd rather use objdump -p debian/tmp/usr/lib/libwhatever.so | grep SONAME
than $(UPSTREAM_VERSION).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG
maintainer has
caused enough problems that I decided to write the guide.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
The x11 section is reserved for X server software, window managers
and such.
This package should be in devel.
Hmm. That does seem to make more sense. But... I can't find where this is
spelled out.
It's not really spelled out. Use of some kind of common sense,
and getting it fixed
On Fri, 24 May 2002 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
auto-apt only detects file not found and does a look up in the file list for
the package which owns it. It is not of much help during the package build.
It installs the package.
--
[EMAIL
On Sat, 25 May 2002 00:44:11 -0700
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thoughts:
This is not my bug but a limitation of buildd. What should I do?
Why buildd even bother to build documentation (ALL) package?
Can anyone give me educated guide how to handle this?
My impression is that
it was compressed
at a different time.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I have had a similar problem and solved it by exporting a LIBRARY_PATH
variable during the install step :
replacing
$(MAKE) install ...
by
export LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/debian/tmp/usr/lib; $(MAKE) install ...
NOTE : LIBRARY_PATH not LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Hmm... this hack seems to
] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
not already
read it, is in my sig.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
to
dpkg-genchanges.
Try something like:
DEBBUILDOPTS=-sa
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002 00:04:16 -0300
Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
A package that I maintain -- mp3blaster -- doesn't include libsidplay1
as a dependency, even though it links against it. I hadn't noticed that
because I thought everything was working fine, as I hadn't tried to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:08:16 +0100
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The average user shouldn't be running configure with a prefix of /
or /usr, and so the default is what they want. /etc and /usr are
owned by dpkg, so nothing should be installed manually there.
Running ./configure
that is in your debian diff will have no executable bit set.
It's a common mistake.
Set the executable bit in your build, or call them like:
/bin/sh some-script.
/bin/perl ...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059
to make them available for the runtime
linker.
What would be the point of restricting the shared libraries to
within the software ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
().
They are different in that they are plugins.
Some just do dlopen for the sake of it, but there are
applications which are dynamically pluggable.
(like LADSPA).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455
over ldd at this point.
You can try pbuilder.
It is designed to do such jobs.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
At Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:25:24 + (UTC),
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote:
How about kde4?
KDE4 has nice ruby bindings, currently available in experimental.
Oh, thanks.
When kde4 has entered in sid, kita2 should depend on korundum4
Hi,
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:46:54 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Hi,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
At Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:34:46 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kita2.
* Package name
Hi,
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:07:43 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
Hmm, no error message is available now.
Tentatively, I described to README.Debian as follows:
* Now Kita2 should be used under UTF-8
At Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:30:04 + (UTC),
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2008-12-29, Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
It needs more work than just change the dependencies to make it work
with korundum4
Are we talking about a package which only exists in experimental
replacing
Hi,
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:17:28 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Hi,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
At Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:07:43 +0900,
Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
what's the error message when ja_JP.UTF-8 is not available?
Hmm, no error
Hi,
Is it all GPLv2 ?
For example, this looks fishy:
sub genRandStr {
# http://orfeus.knmi.nl/pub/outgoing/chad/perl/randstr.perl より取得
At Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:04:43 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor gnview package.
* Package name: gnview
ITP:
Hi,
At Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:33:09 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:25:42 +0900
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for mecab-naist-jdic package.
It can replace non-free dict package, so please, someone who want
to make Debian more free
At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:11:24 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi (CCed to mecab-ipadic maintainer),
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:03:53 +0900
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
It can replace non-free dict package, so please, someone who want
to make Debian more free OS, upload
At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:06:16 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:28:46 +0900
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
It's less easy to maintain patches.
How do I patch a file inside that tarball?
Okay, it's not easy to maintain patches. Yes.
But upstream is quite
At Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:28:30 +0900,
Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:48:47 +0900
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
It's less easy to maintain patches.
How do I patch a file inside that tarball?
Okay, it's not easy to maintain patches. Yes.
But upstream
Hi,
adding debian-mentors, you may get a lot more response there to your question.
At Sat, 30 May 2009 01:39:00 +0100,
Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
Hi,
I've got two questions I couldn't find answer to... (at least in the
official guide). Could you answer them / point me at the correct
Hi,
We just discovered, that mounting XFS partition with:
sudo mount -o nobarrier /dev/sda2 /mnt/p1
speeds things up on all machines. The reason is, that the option -o
barrier was added by default to all kernels = 2.6.17, so dakol has
nobarrier, all the others have barrier. By mounting
Hi,
Hi again mentors !!!
I've now a strange problem creating an experimental COW image.
I use cowbuilder --create --distribution experimental but I obtain an
unmet error with e2fsprogs (PreDepends: libuuid1 (= 1.34-1)).
libuuid1 package is correctly downloaded and configured on
Hi,
experimental is not a complete distribution. You cannot just use
--distribution experimental. I think that you should use an unstable
chroot
and add to apt experimental sources. You will also have to provide a
correct /etc/apt/preferences (otherwise, experimental
Hi,
Heh, I guess we have a different definition of 'properly'.
pbuilder experimental usage assumes we can install everything from
experimental and get done with it, but I assume there are some
packages which don't go along with each other well.
But that shouldn't make pbuilder
Hi,
Heh, I guess we have a different definition of 'properly'.
pbuilder experimental usage assumes we can install everything from
experimental and get done with it, but I assume there are some
packages which don't go along with each other well.
But that shouldn't
Hi,
I am trying to use xvfb-run to permit pbuilder to build some packages
which need to connect to X. In both cases, if I do a local build with
dpkg-buildpackages, the connection to the xvfb server works fine, however
it fails in pbuilder. In one case, it is a perl-tk module which tries
Hi,
Are there any suggestions or can anyone point me to a package that
successfully uses xvfb under pbuilder?
In theory, it should work, though I have not really tried recently.
Does your chroot have /tmp/.X11-unix ?
That is it, I guess. I have a minimal chroot because I want to
Hi,
It would be nice if you could describe your setup in more detail (or
even provide the hook scripts somewhere). I tried a A00login hookscript
that invokes in interactive bash, but for some reason it exits
immediately when invoked by pbuilder:
I didn't do anything special than
Hi,
I am preparing the package of a software which provides regression tests
in a separate directory, for which there is no make clean available.
For the moment, I copy the directory somewhere else, perform the tests
in (it generates many files), and delete the directory in debian/rules
Hi,
Too, there are actually two forms of library soname file naming used:
libfoo.so.1.2.3
and
libfoo-1.2.3.so
Only the first one is mentioned in the various packaging guides,
hmmm ? excluding this?
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package echroot.
[...]
The description says that this is an alternative to the
well-known chroot. What makes it different?
Kind regards
Nico
echroot complements and extend chroot, run command with root directory
set to NEW-ROOT.
That doesn't
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package echroot.
echroot extends the basic options that we found in chroot, with
echroot we
can control many more options than executing chroot. Here I show some
of the options that we can happen to echroot.
What is the advantage of
Hi,
I moved to debian/patches with dpatch. Is this a reasonable
solution?
use what you like. I usually find quilt simpler, but really, I care
much about you beeing comfortable with it than me. You may want to
read[0].
Wow, quilt is much easier to use. The
Hi,
I am preparing a package for the mira software, and encounter the
following lintian error:
The package installs a statically linked binary or object file.
I miss the backgound in C programing to know where to start to takcle
this problem. Can sombebody give me a hint? I have
Hi,
Do I have easy access to the upstream version in debian/rules?
Of course, I can get it, but that'd be silly if it's already there.
dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Version: | cut -f 2 -d \ | cut -f 1 -d -
(I know, I really should read the sed and awk docs, it's probably easy to
fold
--
Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer
17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the value?
3.
I think there were objections to your Description before;
it only describes it as a tiny/example window manager,
while you have expressed it as a window manager of
choice for embedded systems.
Could you reflect it in the description?
regards,
junichi
--
Junichi
the
priority of other WM.
According to: '11.8.4. Packages providing a window manager'
It should be 20
Did I miss something ?
2. I've sent a separate mail about your description.
With these points fixed, your package looks good that I could sponsor.
regards,
junichi
--
Junichi Uekawa
to the simplicity, the source code in C and python
can be used for reference in Window Manager programming basics.
Could l10n-english folks proofread my description?
BTW, I was really surprised that it was really so small.
$ wc -l tinywm.c
58 tinywm.c
regards,
junichi
--
Junichi Uekawa
1 - 100 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
