maintaining this package.
Note that the lintian errors appear to be legacy, as I used quilt for
the new patch I introduced.
Comments very much welcome.
Kind regards
Tristan Greaves
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:31:42PM +, Tristan Greaves wrote:
Note that the lintian errors appear to be legacy, as I used quilt for
the new patch I introduced.
You can still fix them, as a responsible maintainer :)
The lintian on m.d.o lags a bit, in pedantic
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:25:04PM +, Tristan Greaves wrote:
Many thanks. Please could you let me know which version of lintian you
are using, and which command line arguments? I am just trying to
reproduce the same pedantic behaviour at this end...
2.2.8
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.67-1
of my package siege.
It builds these binary packages:
siege - Http regression testing and benchmarking utility
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 521029, 521034
The package can be
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:32:01PM +, Tristan Greaves wrote:
1. For some reason, the latest upstream version of this package is using
automake-1.6 (as opposed to 1.9 as it did previously). Is this version
still
available as it didn't come up when I did a quick
regards
Tristan Greaves
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Matthew Palmer wrote:
[clue data files with copyrighted info]
One option would be to NOT include those two data files in the package, but
then it would not be a particularly user friendly installation.
Producing unencumbered data files would seem to be the best option.
In terms of a
Hi,
The above issue hit my package, and I'd very much like someone to check it is
no longer happening:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=siege
I have tested this myself under pbuilder. It does not seem to be
causing errors now, but would appreciate
for me.
Kind regards
Tristan Greaves
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the
_what_ but not the _why_ in this instance).
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege
My package has successfully built on the other architectures, but the
process does not seem to have run on mips.
differently).
- Removed fix_http_headers.patch (Upstream has included).
- Removed fix_man_pages.patch (Upstream has included).
* Fixed lintian warning: ancient-libtool-usage.
-- Tristan Greaves tris...@extricate.org Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:50:13 +0100
I would be glad if someone uploaded
Darren Salt wrote:
The package would be lintian-clean but for what I think is a false positive.
lintian (in testing) complains about a dependency on wish, but that can't be
right:
Depends: wish | tk8.5, libtk-img, libjpeg-progs
differently).
- Removed fix_http_headers.patch (Upstream has included).
- Removed fix_man_pages.patch (Upstream has included).
* Fixed lintian warning: ancient-libtool-usage.
-- Tristan Greaves tris...@extricate.org Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:50:13 +0100
I would be glad if someone uploaded
13 matches
Mail list logo
