2014-03-02 0:41 GMT+01:00 gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 22:55:20 +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
One minor challenge that I faced is that I couldn't get the commands to
run using su. With the help of Karsten Hilbert I understood that the
issue was that the user being
On 02/27/2014 03:37 PM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:07:35PM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
In the pre- and postinst scripts, a command has to be performed as
that user (e.g. make a backup of the database).
[…]
I am wondering what the best way is to fix this. I see 2
Hi Mentors,
TLDR: in order to execute a command as another user, should `sudo` or
`su --command` be used?
I'd like to get your opinion on how to best solve this issue:
I've got a package [0] that uses dbconfig-common to manage its
database. The database is owned by a specific user (not root).
Thanks Niels and Michael,
2012/11/26 Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net:
On 2012-11-26 08:24, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Emilien,
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:54:59AM +0100, Emilien Klein wrote:
...
As a general question:
If package A depends on a specific set of releases (like
Hi Mentors,
2012/2/17 Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st:
I have now updated the package to the newest version 0.0.38beta and
uploaded it to mentors.d.n.
I'm looking for somebody to review my new package and possibly sponsor
its upload.
It's a web application used to maintain one's own
Hi Mentors,
I have now updated the package to the newest version 0.0.38beta and
uploaded it to mentors.d.n.
FYI version 0.0.37beta introduced a new JavaScript library that wasn't
yet packaged in Debian, so I have first worked on getting it packaged
in Debian. To co-maintain this new package, I
Hi Mentors,
I've added a dependency on php5-gd to have the thumbnailing service
work properly. I've uploaded the updated package again to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/shaarli
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
Hi Paul,
2012/1/16 Paul Wise p...@debian.org:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Emilien Klein wrote:
I've worked with upstream Shaarli to fix the issue with the inclusion
of the minified jQuery files. Upstream has released a tarball that
uses the jQuery CDN instead of the local minified files
2012/1/14 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st, 2012-01-14, 15:56:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shaarli/shaarli_0.0.33beta-1.dsc
Shaarli contains the jQuery 1.6.2 minified file,
…for which we have no source. This is violation
typically have in a binary program, etc.) Please let me know
if the man page is mandatory, and what kind of information you think
should then be included.
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
+Emilien Klein
P.S.: Please CC me, as I'm not subscribed to this list
Le 14 janv. 2012 18:10, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org a écrit :
* Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st, 2012-01-14, 15:56:
Shaarli contains the jQuery 1.6.2 minified file,
…for which we have no source. This is violation of DFSG §2.
(And additionally, upstream is violating jQuery's license
.
The package will not hard-depend on Apache. I'll create an Apache
config file with the alias shaarli that will only be linked to if
Apache is installed.
To respond to your points:
2012/1/5 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org:
On 01/06/2012 07:13 AM, Emilien Klein wrote:
By default, those directories
for your convenience, would you want to have
a look at it.
- Should I handle more than just Apache2 (other webservers)?
Thanks in advance,
Emilien Klein
P.S.: Please CC me on your response as I'm not subscribed to the list.
[0] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.html#maintscripts
Hi Gregor,
2012/1/5 gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:13:44 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote:
- The current version number is 0.0.32 beta (including space) as
written on the web page and in the source code, and 0.0.32beta in
the zipfile. As the version number in Debian
2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com:
perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
override_dh_auto_build:
rm -rf ./cruddy/folder
dh_auto_build $(FLAGS_IF_ANY)
I've added the following:
override_dh_auto_build:
rm -rf nautilus_image_manipulator/upload/poster
Hi mentors,
I maintain the nautilus-image-manipulator package in Debian. N I M
contains the source code for poster, which is now packaged in Debian.
I thus want to make N I M depend on python-poster, and remove the copy
of poster's source code from N I M's Debian package.
I have to patch one
2011/12/12 Paul Tagliamonte paul...@ubuntu.com:
What is the correct way to remove an entire directory and it's
contained files with a quilt patch?
Why not do that in debian/rules ?
So you would patch the one file that needs patching, and remove the
whole directory from debian/rules, am I
Hi Alexander,
2011/12/9 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org:
I'm sorry, but personally I don't like to sponsor your NMU.
Makes me sad ;) (joking)
Some of the reasons are:
* Only fixing a wishlist bug, nothing else
* The wishlisht bug is a new version not detailing why the new
Hi Jakub,
If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are
acceptable for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a
newer version that is free of the bug due to which I have to duplicate
code. If fixing part of the Lintian warnings are not fit for a NMU,
I'll gladly not
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org, 2011-12-09, 13:56:
This package should have at least a new co-maintainer,
Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug?
It's actually failing to respond to 6 direct emails and 4
Thanks Arno for your detailed explanation, makes complete sense.
+Emilien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
I'd happy to sponsor the NMU if it fixed this one thing.
Great!
One more question: For my initial NMU on 2011-10-27 I used version
number 0.8.1-0.1. Should I use the same (since it hasn't been uploaded
to unstable) and just pretend nothing else happened, or
Hi Robert,
2011/12/9 Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net:
politics aside, I'm happy if you want to add yourself to uploaders or
even take over the package.
Thanks for you response. I'll make this upload a NMU, and will work to
get that maintained within the Python group (still need to
Hi Jakub,
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
* Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st, 2011-12-09, 16:22:
If I understand it correctly none of the changes I've made are acceptable
for an NMU. That's fine by me, as l'm just trying to get a newer version
that is free of the bug due to which
2011/12/9 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org:
I uploaded the package to DELAYED/2. Please post full debdiff between
0.7.0-1.1 and 0.8.1-0.1 to the bug log.
Thanks Jakub for the upload.
Full debdiff is to be found here: http://paste.debian.net/148759/
Please let me know if using the paste service
Hi Arno,
2011/12/9 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net:
no it is not. Jakub meant to file a bug denoting your NMU to the BTS.
You can use the nmudiff to get the idea. #610114 [1] is a random example
of what we mean too. In your case you shouldn't be filing a new bug
though, but reply to the existing
Hi Mentors and Alessio,
2011/11/25 Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st:
Hi Mentors,
About a month ago [6 weeks now] I made a NMU of the python-poster package for
the
latest version 0.8.1, as suggested by Robert. Unfortunately Robert
hasn't answered my last 4 emails on 28/10, 2/11, 4/11
-of-date-standards-version warning.
Thanks,
Emilien Klein
-- Forwarded message --
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
Date: 2011/9/13
Subject: Re: New version of Poster - Update of the Debian package
To: Emilien Klein emil...@klein.st
Sorry, just been swamped with new baby
Hi Mentors,
I have released a new version of nautilus-image-manipulator. I have
also packaged it for Debian and uploaded to the mentors server.
No particular change, apart from the debian/changelog file, was made
to the debian packaging files.
Thanks for checking the new package!
Cheers,
2011/5/19 Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org:
Uploaded.
Thanks Julien for uploading.
Do not hesitate to contact me directly next time.
Will do, thank you for that!
Cheers,
+Emilien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Julien,
2011/5/1 Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org:
Could one of you please review the latest changes in my package?
I reviewed your package yesterday and was testing it.
Thanks!
As for the packaging itself, I would still clean rules file by removing
unneeded `find…' call and the
Julien,
2011/5/1 Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org:
Le dimanche 01 mai 2011 à 15:12:48 (+0200 CEST), Emilien Klein a écrit :
I don't get this empty directory when removing the complete dh_install
override...
Looking at the bug you reported against python-distutils-extra [0], I have
checked
Julien
2011/5/1 Julien Valroff jul...@debian.org:
Uploaded - you should now have received a confirmation the package should go
through the NEW queue.
I indeed got a few messages. Thank you very much for the upload.
I'll keep monitoring to learn about the upload process!
Thank you very much
Julien, Paul, Niels, Stefano, and the other mentors,
Could one of you please review the latest changes in my package?
Thanks,
+Emilien
P.S.: Please CC me since I'm not subscribed to the mentors list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi Stefano,
2011/4/19 Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org:
Drop the unnecessary preinst (it's a new package, not one migrating from
pycentral to pysupport).
Done.
Drop the unecessary unexports from debian/rules.
Are all the unexports unnecessary? I currently have those (set
automatically by
Julien,
I have found a very useful blog post by Raphaël Hertzog [0] that does
exactly what I was trying to do, i.e. ignoring auto-updated files.
This is done by passing the --extend-diff-ignore option to dpkg-source
in the debian/source/options file. I have thus removed my command from
Julien,
This is the wrong approach: you cannot rely on the orig tarball being in ../
- also what would happen in case you have various orig tarballs there?
eg. I use pbuilder, hence my tarballs are in ~/debian/tarballs…
Why not simply try and avoid i18n files to be updated or, even easier,
Paul Gevers, Julien Valroff,
I've created the package both with debuild and pdebuild. The latter
made me realize I needed more build dependencies (pkg-config,
python-nautilus) that where used by the `python setup.py install`
command. The package was building OK, but since those packages where
not
Paul,
2011/4/13 Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl:
I have used pbuilder, and it seems to me that all needed build
dependencies are correctly addressed.
snip
That's due to the Lintian version I have on my Ubuntu 10.04
workstation, which is not the most recent (2.3.4ubuntu2). What are the
Hi Julien,
I have started the package over from scratch, using the resource you
mentioned in [0]. I have added some files I already had from my
previous packaging intent (like for the manpage and the watch file).
I have used pbuilder, and it seems to me that all needed build
dependencies are
Forgot to add again that I'm not subscribed to the list, please CC me
on any response. I will try to not forget to specify that on future
messages...
2011/4/12 Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st:
Hi Julien,
I have started the package over from scratch, using the resource you
mentioned
Hi Julien,
Thanks for your answer, which I just read (I am not subscribed to the
mentors mailing list)
I will update the package according to your comments. Question: do I
need to continue replying to the list also, or should we continue this
discussion off-list?
Tthanks,
+Emilien
--
To
Hi mentors,
I'd appreciate if somebody could have a look at this package.
Thanks!
+Emilien
2011/2/9 Emilien Klein emilien+deb...@klein.st:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nautilus-image-manipulator.
* Package name : nautilus-image-manipulator
Version
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nautilus-image-manipulator.
* Package name: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Emilien Klein (me...)
* URL : https://launchpad.net/nautilus-image-manipulator
* License : GPL 3
44 matches
Mail list logo
