06.10.2023 16:03, Marc Leeman wrote:
* Package name : openvpn3-client
BTW, why it is named this way?
Is it client-only now, without the server part?
Previous package is named just "openvpn", it acts
as both client or server (actually the two roles are
symmetric, it can be both). If new
03.01.2022 18:05, Matteo Chesi wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "su-exec":
* Package name : su-exec
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Natanael Copa
* URL :
27.04.2022 00:03, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
Recently I pushed a new version of proftp to salsa. The configured salsa CI
Jobs [1] now fail [2]. The relevant error message is in the job log [3]:
This is not an answer to your question, but something else.
As far as I can see, ccache failing
03.02.2021 03:33, João Paulo wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proxycheck":
Hello!
Maybe we can arrange this small piece of software to be
maintained by me, its author? I'm not sure it is of a
great use today but
02.10.2015 22:18, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I maintain libgphoto2 and lintian now says
> that the package has "unstripped-static-library"
> (.a files). We (me and my mentor) believe that
> this message can be ignored.
BTW, why do you include static library to
24.06.2014 16:41, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lilyterm
Package name: lilyterm
Version : 0.9.9.4-1
Upstream Author : Lu, Chao-Ming (Tetralet)
URL :
On 13.08.2012 00:18, Nick Leverton wrote:
[]
diff -Nru nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog
--- nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog 2012-06-16 16:36:28.0 +0100
+++ nullmailer-1.11/debian/changelog 2012-08-11 23:55:36.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
On 23.05.2012 13:22, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I am trying to install qemu on my stable + backports system but it
keeps on failing with:
$ sudo apt-get install qemu-system
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be
On 09.05.2012 22:42, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
I'm checking the package now, it all appears to be quite good (as I
already mentioned initially).
I'm verifying now whenever the transition works correctly. Did you test
this place? Is it possible to downgrade back to current version
On 06.05.2012 09:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
++p = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, .));
++q = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, .));
++r = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, .));
++return KERNEL_VERSION(p, q, r);
++}
This will break with 2-number
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version : 5.0.6-1
Hello Dmitry.
I'm very much interested in this package myself, and
wanted
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version : 5.0.6-1
There's one more issue
On 06.05.2012 09:21, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package autofs
* Package name: autofs
Version
On 13.04.2012 10:00, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hallo Michael,
You do not need to wait for the NMU.
If you upload a newer version before the DELAY expires, the NMU is
automatically cancelled.
I know this perfectly well, and did not actually said anyone
need to wait. I only pointed out to the why
On 13.04.2012 01:08, Tomasz Muras wrote:
Hello,
A Debian developer has uploaded a NMU (moodle 1.9.9.dfsg2-5.1) to
DELAYED/7-DAY [1]. I have incorporated his changes, and added a new release
(moodle 1.9.9.dfsg2-6) - the changelog now looks like [2].
Is there any reason I should wait for
On 05.02.2012 16:31, Medhamsh wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rudeconfig.
* Package name: rudeconfig
Version : 5.0.5-1
Upstream Author : Matthew Flood
* URL : http://rudeserver.com/config/index.html
* License : GNU
On 10.11.2011 20:52, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned
by its previous maintainer. This upload will close #647088.
Hm. So I become curious and looked into its homepage --
http://dwm.suckless.org/ . And there, there's
On 09.09.2011 01:16, Tim Gokcen wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of mdadm which, on top of the previous fixes,
also fixes the FTBS bug 625392 and bug 63380. I am therefore still/again
seeking a sponsor for my NMU of package mdadm.
This upload is a fix for two trivial bugs opened
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
06.03.2011 19:02, liang wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package spice.
* Package name: spice
Version : 0.8.0-1
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : http://www.spice-space.org/
* License
14.07.2010 09:01, Russ Allbery wrote:
[]
You can just run man directly on the *roff file, but if you want to stick
with the zcat pipeline, just add the -t flag to nroff to say to run the
output through the tbl preprocessor first.
This is the most close of all suggestions. But even closer is:
14.07.2010 13:14, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:57:12AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il 14/07/2010 6.50, Charles Plessy ha scritto:
Does anybody know how a more convenient to display a
manpage the same way as users will get it by using ‘man’ ?
groff -T ascii -man manpage
There's a kvm package in debian, which is basically a
modified qemu (system emulator) that supports virtualization
extensions of modern CPUs.
In lenny it's kvm-72, in sid it's kvm-85 NMU.
Kvm itself is (or was) a fast-moving target, and too many
things changed and fixed since -72 and even -85.
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
I wrote to debian kvm package maintainer several times, I
submitted a bugreport against kvm long time ago, but never
heard back.
So now I'm requesting a sponsor to upload my packages into
debian.
You are trying to hijack kvm
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:15:46PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
I wrote to debian kvm package maintainer several times, I
submitted a bugreport against kvm long time ago, but never
heard back.
So now I'm requesting
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
[]
So now I'm requesting a sponsor to upload my packages into
debian.
If you are wanting to do a sponsored NMU (which is kind of odd), be sure you
are very familiar with the NMU procedure
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu and
25 matches
Mail list logo
