Re: CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS
On 05/14/2013 02:54 AM, Nathan Owens wrote: On 05/14/2013 12:19 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:12:52AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:55:15PM +, Nathan Owens wrote: when I do blhc --build and I was wondering how to get the CPPFLAG. I tried overriding auto build and do make CFLAGS+=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) and same with CPPFLAGS but it still ^^ CPPFLAGS ...well, he did write and same with CPPFLAGS :) Or maybe you meant something else (see below). Nathan, I believe that what Andrey may have meant is that there are some upstream packages that simply pay no attention to the CPPFLAGS environment variable - just as there are some that do not pay any attention to CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, either. In this case, if it turns out that your package is one of those, you basically have two options: - patch the package's build system so that it honors CPPFLAGS - do what Andrey said: in the debian/rules file, add the contents of CPPFLAGS to the CFLAGS variable that the package supposedly already honors In both cases, write to the upstream authors and ask them to honor CPPFLAGS, too. But, as somebody else wrote, we'll need to see a build log and a copy of your debian/rules file before that. Actually, it might be good to see upstream's build files (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt, etc), too, just to make sure that they do (or don't) pay attention to CPPFLAGS at all. G'luck, Peter I have attached the two files. the config.mk file contains the flags. I did make a patch for config.mk and got it down to the CPPFLAGS(3), CFLAGS(3), and LDFLAGS(3) warning. I also have attached the build log. I also have tried putting the CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS/LDFLAGS in the rules file with the buildflags as well and still no change dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev libgnutls-dev libsoup2.4-dev libjson0-dev libglib2.0-dev (= 2.36) W: Unmet build-dependency in source dpkg-buildpackage: source package dwb dpkg-buildpackage: source version 20130503hg-2 dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Nathan Owens ndow...@gmx.us dpkg-source --before-build dwb-20130503hg dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev libgnutls-dev libsoup2.4-dev libjson0-dev libglib2.0-dev (= 2.36) dpkg-buildpackage: warning: build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.) dpkg-buildpackage: warning: this is currently a non-fatal warning with -S, but will probably become fatal in the future fakeroot debian/rules clean make: pkg-config: Command not found dh clean dh_testdir dh_auto_clean dh_clean dpkg-source -b dwb-20130503hg dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building dwb using existing ./dwb_20130503hg.orig.tar.bz2 dpkg-source: info: building dwb in dwb_20130503hg-2.debian.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building dwb in dwb_20130503hg-2.dsc dpkg-genchanges -S ../dwb_20130503hg-2_source.changes dpkg-genchanges: not including original source code in upload dpkg-source --after-build dwb-20130503hg dpkg-buildpackage: binary and diff upload (original source NOT included) I: using fakeroot in build. I: Current time: Thu May 16 20:50:34 CDT 2013 I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1368755434 I: Building the build Environment I: extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/base.tgz] I: creating local configuration I: copying local configuration I: mounting /proc filesystem I: mounting /run/shm filesystem I: mounting /dev/pts filesystem I: policy-rc.d already exists I: Obtaining the cached apt archive contents I: Installing the build-deps - Attempting to satisfy build-dependencies - Creating pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy package Package: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy Version: 0.invalid.0 Architecture: amd64 Maintainer: Debian Pbuilder Team pbuilder-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Description: Dummy package to satisfy dependencies with aptitude - created by pbuilder This package was created automatically by pbuilder to satisfy the build-dependencies of the package being currently built. Depends: debhelper (= 9), libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev, libgnutls-dev, libsoup2.4-dev, libjson0-dev, m4, libglib2.0-dev (= 2.36) dpkg-deb: building package `pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy' in `/tmp/satisfydepends-aptitude/pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy.deb'. Selecting previously unselected package pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy. (Reading database ... 11208 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy (from .../pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy.deb) ... dpkg: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you requested: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on debhelper (= 9); however: Package debhelper is not installed. pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev; however: Package libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev is not installed. pbuilder-satisfydepends
CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS
I get W-dpkg-buildflags-missing|CPPFLAGS 25 (of 25), CFLAGS 25 (of 25), LDFLAGS 25 (of 25) missing| when I do blhc --build and I was wondering how to get the CPPFLAG. I tried overriding auto build and do make CFLAGS+=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS) and same with CPPFLAGS but it still doesn't work. I tried also just setting CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS in debian/rules but it gives no results -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51915333.9050...@gmx.us
O:html2text
I have created a package fixing the build error relating to hardening support http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/html2text/html2text_1.3.2a-16.1.dsc I am not sure if I really want to adopt this package, but this fixes some issues and cleaning of the package and of course the issue I mentioned above. I can't upload it, since I am not a DM but if anybody wants to check it out and upload it, then you are free to do so. This package was once labeled as RFH, so I intended to help, but it seems to be up for adoption at the moment -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518d5ff8.5050...@gmx.us
Sponsorship
Is there a way I can find out who my previous sponsor for my package 'dwb' is? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51730ef6.1030...@gmx.us
RFS: dwb/20130409hg-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwb * Package name: dwb Version : 20130409hg-4 Upstream Author : Stefan Boltepor...@gmx.net * URL : http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/ * License : GPL-3 Section : web It builds those binary packages: dwb - lightweight WebKit browser To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130409hg-4.dsc This package is an update, it has already been put into the repo once by a sponsor, though I don't remember who it was. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51700363.5070...@gmx.us
Bug#705698: RFS: dwb/20130409hg-4
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwb * Package name: dwb Version : 20130409hg-4 Upstream Author : Stefan Boltepor...@gmx.net * URL : http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/ * License : GPL-3 Section : web It builds those binary packages: dwb - lightweight WebKit browser To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130409hg-4.dsc This package is an update, it has already been put into the repo once by a sponsor, though I don't remember who it was. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51702def.60...@gmx.us
newlisp
If the source build-depends depend on the arch how will I tell it to use certain libraries I tried doing like if [ $ARCH == i386]; then Build-Depends: fi but cowbuilder says dpkg-source+(not+field-colon-value) error -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5170700e.9040...@gmail.com
Bug#705185: RFS: dwb/20130409hg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwb * Package name: dwb Version : 20130409hg-1 Upstream Author : Nathan Owensndowens @ gmx.us * URL : http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/ * License : GPL Section : web It builds those binary packages: dwb - lightweight webkit browser To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_20130409hg-1.dsc I am the maintainer of dwb, I have updated it to a newer version. It was previously sponsored, though I don't remember who, but was wondering if this version could be uploaded. I understand that testing is froze and am requesting it to be included in sid/unstable, naturally. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51661c41.7020...@gmx.us
Re: Help with patching PackageKit for *BSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It looks like it is missing a package that provides prctl.h On 10/01/2012 05:05 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hi! I don't think this is the right place to request this help, but I don't know a better one at time... (RFH seems to be too big) The problem is the following: PackageKit (Debian package src:packagekit) recently became Linux-specific by accident, and I need someone who knows *BSD/portable-programming better than I do to make it compile on *BSD again. The problem is this code: http://gitorious.org/packagekit/packagekit/blobs/master/lib/packagekit-glib2/pk-spawn-polkit-agent.c On *BSD I get: pk-spawn-polkit-agent.c:24:23: fatal error: sys/prctl.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[5]: *** [libpackagekit_glib2_la-pk-spawn-polkit-agent.lo] Error 1 But I don't know how to solve this otherwise. Hints and patches welcome! this is really the only issue which blocks PK on kFreeBSD at time. Many thanks for any help! Regards, Matthias -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQahf3AAoJEHzljSty6h46ixkP/0cM165XcA75pkJZKmIhgwJq VGSfXmEBuQOfE+aEjGWDB9E8oQaQAzfyaxRU+4IiKWPf5NwdRr8pztnY4zDBYth4 7IMbSw2EdzQk+sTy415MBTLcp6IX0pA5ItXa1Xm2OwgFg+5v53L5RY3tP365diE8 GaBSjRJ1xpe1JKz9KHk5ezP3EOto8bHonza2Q4ygA+1QI9U7LBHBFZFeoQ5JrO/C NwDmOk7jZ2pjRWeQXvmDRUALJMHD+xjrvopYxmdHJFk/leTiXQK8wzfGngU0doLJ d1oxZupf1TCJgjGcsFvNSGbu86cwEVytPrnbWVbfIE5EFP30C4MYzGQEPZk/XB9e KrJSSt2KGL3C4w/SupAibhFxUC20kCO8FGwXvBZsCqAgT4EFSNLxi1z7RiPfNM+B pbrUyzECyFyRa11Ke6d9IpvGakY3TVmUbXuxNnzv72cr5BPtzTTxQ98xjgY9Fa9t nwMnbQndGHTGKS8nHudiOxE9lIZHDqUTSGRrZUn58j8kBpefi4Xpp7T2lrqKrR7H SH/eO6qTzbgcjlG+a/bCC+GH6k48igho5BJELIpHfwOVdQoWiX4gM+LZM9vIev+x FMJCFNXWerT5ooCSVaFZN1U2KFvsZ/IeHtu+oIiHIdz/T9cSnxSAOrg9jdq90qRG Bwft1kkbGkU7ZE0HHoU/ =NJMH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/506a17fe.9000...@gmx.us
Re: Advice on a new package
On 08/29/2012 02:07 PM, Juhani Numminen wrote: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/games/fortuner Take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening. If it was me I would use the one that states: DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk CFLAGS += -Wextra Also the package would be put into unstable, but won't go in to testing until after the freeze unless it is approved to bypass the blockage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503e6c1e.6090...@gmx.us
Bug#666243: RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent parser generators for C
On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1 include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: The current version appears to be at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc Lintian says: P: peg source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7 W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/leg W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/peg blhc confirms that there's a problem with LDFLAGS: LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o peg-new peg.o tree.o compile.o LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,relro): cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -o leg-new leg.o tree.o compile.o The examples directory could act as a test suite. Please run it at build time. In my opinion, the long description is a bit too… long. I would remove at least the citation, maybe something more, but I'm not sure what. You might want to ask debian-l10n-english@ for an advice. Please merge changelog entries for 0.1.7-1, 0.1.8-1 and 0.1.9-1 into one. It would be probably better not to compress examples. Compression makes playing with them a bit harder, whereas the space savings are minute. Upstream makefile strips the binaries unconditionally. However, for Debian, binaries should be not stripped if the package was built with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip. Please forward manpage_fixes.patch upstream. I always feel uneasy about “Forwarded: not-needed” patches. I believe parts of makefile_configuration.patch could be forwarded upstream, and the rest of the logic could be moved to debian/rules: all : peg leg + cp -a peg.1 leg.1 Wouldn't it be better to make leg manpage a symlink to peg one, instead of shipping two identical files? You could ask upstream to include the symlink directly in their tarball. -ROOT = +ROOT = $(DESTDIR) This could be forwarded upstream. -PREFIX = /usr/local +PREFIX = /usr Could be overridden in debian/rules. $(BINDIR)/% : % + mkdir -p $(BINDIR) cp -p $ $@ strip $@ Could be forwarded upstream. %.peg-c : %.peg compile.c - ./peg -o $@ $ + #./peg -o $@ $ leg.o : leg.c leg.c : leg.leg compile.c - ./leg -o $@ $ + #./leg -o $@ $ Hmm, why? -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120716152417.ga...@jwilk.net
Bug#670589: RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP
On 04/27/2012 07:27 AM, David Bremner wrote: David Bremnerbrem...@debian.org writes: Nathan Owensndow...@gmx.us writes: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.4.0-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : lisp I hope you put more care into the packaging than you did into filling out this template. OK, I admit that sounds a little harsh. But the questions are there for a reason, and without them filled in, the message is pretty much content free. So please think about the time of your many readers as well. Cheers, David. Sorry I didn't even notice that the details wasn't filled in. I was worring about a issue that arised and it sliped my mind. Here is the filled out version: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.4.0-4 Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller l...@nuevatec.com * URL : http://newlisp.org * License : GPL-3 Section : lisp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9b435d.9040...@gmx.us
Bug#670589: RFS: newlisp/10.4.0-4 ITP
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package newlisp * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.4.0-4 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : lisp It builds those binary packages: newlisp- general-purpose scripting language To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/newlisp Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlisp/newlisp_10.4.0-4.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://newlisp.org Changes since the last upload: newlisp (10.4.0-4) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed hyphen-used-as-minus-sign error and missing patch descriptions Regards, Nathan Owens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f9a00c7.3090...@gmx.us
Re: A Review Mentor team
On 03/15/2012 12:50 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/13/2012 06:18 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: I would also love to see a Review Mentor team, something that could work along and with the NM process, whose task would be to do just what the name suggests: reivew packages, help find a sponsor Oh, *that* is very interesting. And that gives me another idea. You know, I've been reading -mentors for quite some time, because when I was needing sponsorship, I was frustrated as well. Now that I've done few sponsoring, I don't read -mentors too much because there's too much traffic. But for sure, I'd be happy to do few sponsoring for the type of package on my *area of interest* (eg: hosting and servers). But since there's too much traffic and I have a limited time, I don't read much -mentors, and I must have skipped few interesting packages. Now, what I'd be very glad to have would be that Debexpo knows about tags, and that someone needing sponsoring would tag his package once it's uploaded to Debexpo. A sponsor would, on his side, select what type of tags he is interested in. For me for example, I'd be selecting server type of software, so I'd for example select system::server. Then I would receive on my mail all request for sponsoring server related RFS only, saving me the loss of time browsing -mentors which is flooded with X-Window / GUI software that I care less about. Having all this would mean that the following change occurs: 1/ Debexpo would allow sponsoree to edit tags on their software 2/ Debexpo would allow sponsors to register for tags they are interested in, and send RFS depending on matches with 1/ The added benefits would be that: - new software would immediately tagged, and tagging could be reviewed and discussed with sponsors - sponsors wont get flooded with packages they don't care about - sponsors will not miss software they do care about Of course, this is only an idea that I'm throwing, and I'm not raising hand for the implementation, but at the same time, the ones who have worked on tags and debexpo could be in a better position to do it. Thoughts anyone? Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I quite understand that this is off-topic for -vote, but since this is where it started, I'm sending it as a reply to Gergely post anyway. If you follow-up, *PLEASE REMOVE* debian-v...@lists.debian.org (I've set the Reply-To: header, but who knows what broken mailer/habit people have...). Also, I'm adding -mentors to the list, and Enrico (sorry, I can't remember what is the list name on alioth for the tag stuff, feel free to forward this message there...). If I could vote, I would vote yes for this idea. It would probably make adding new software to Debian faster/easier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f627e7e.5050...@gmx.us
RFS: dwb
I filled a formal RFS template for dwb and this is a follow-up in case it didn't get noticed. dwb is a lightweight browser that also supports vi-like key shortcuts. The package is at http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb or use dput http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_2011.10.29-4.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2ae4af.5000...@gmx.us
RFS: dwb
I thought I would give it a try again, I don't know if my origional message were seen or not. I have packaged dwb, which allows a person to click links by using key shortcuts similar to vi or vim. It uses the webkit as the rendering engine. URL: http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/ License:GPL-3 Download link for dget is: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_2011.10.29-4.dsc
RFS: dwb
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwb. * Package name: dwb Version : 2011.10.29-2 Upstream Author : Stefan Bolte por...@gmx.net * URL : http://bitbucket.org/portix/dwb * License : GPL-3 Section : net This would close bug #656145 requesting for this package. It is a webkit browser that can use hints like vi keys to follow a weblink It builds those binary packages: dwb - lightweight webkit browser To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/dwb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dwb/dwb_2011.10.29-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Nathan Owens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f164d59.3010...@gmx.us
RFS: Code Browser
I sent my request for a sponsor for code browser, I was just wanting to resend in case it didn't get noticed. Also this package is also a Requested Package, bug #651911 A little description of this package is: A folding text editor, designed to structure any text, especially programming languages. Syntax is supported and supports adding more syntax support for other languages. Here is the link for the package http://mentors.debian.net/package/code-browser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4efd0f16.1040...@gmx.us
RFS: Tunapie
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie. * Package name: tunapie Version : 2.1.18-2 Upstream Author : James M Stone * URL : http://tunapie.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: tunapie- Lists audio and video streams from Shoutcast and Icecast To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tunapie Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/tunapie_2.1.18-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ef73bf0.1050...@gmx.us
RFS: Code Browser
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package code-browser. * Package name: code-browser Version : 3.23-2 Upstream Author : Marc Kerbiquet * URL : tibleiz.net/code-browser * License : GPL-2 Section : editors It builds those binary packages: code-browser - Folding text editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/code-browser Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/code-browser/code-browser_3.23-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Nathan Owens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ef78325.7020...@gmx.us
RFS: tunapie
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tunapie. * Package name: tunapie Version : 2.1.18-2 Upstream Author : James M Stone * URL : http://tunapie.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: tunapie- Lists audio and video streams from Shoutcast and Icecast To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tunapie Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tunapie/tunapie_2.1.18-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ef0c396.1050...@gmx.us
