Section : web
I'll have a look at this request.
--
Neil Williams
=
https://linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpjLPfBZ3mVi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/buildcross.html
The correct list for these enquiries is the debian-embedded list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpgzI0dLmukZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk+extra3/gtk+extra3_3.0.0-0.1.dsc
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpl0r5r34q5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
at xf86-input-tslib, just have a look at
the Ubuntu patches and see what needs to be done with those - I meant
to do that before all this real life stuff came up.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms
to sponsoring once the current
illness is under control. Pressure to return is likely to be
counter-productive.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpqm2KMYiyUe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is not non-free, so package the game and a few new levels
and invite people to contribute new levels that are under the same
licence as the game itself.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
, tough - press on
without them, their loss. Those who wanted the levels to be non-free
appear unwilling to do the work to maintain the package itself so who
cares? The game is free, let it be free and those who sought to
constrain it be damned.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
/projects/roxterm/files/.
It should probably be uploaded to mentors.debian.net for sponsoring -
many sponsors require the use of that site, not SF.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpxhqKw3Kp8y.pgp
to be Architecture: all.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp54PkNKQE8k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
How does this compare with existing tools for this purpose?
It builds these binary packages:
ah - converts hex to decimal.
Same here.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpnczlm1qcdB.pgp
Description
and the binary package with the same name. The name of the executable
is harder to change (but can be done).
Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling the
ITP to use the changed package name.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:19:07 +0100
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Make sure you document this change in the ITP - including retitling the
ITP to use the changed package name.
Just saw, you've already done that. #534242 - thanks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpdW4s9IYzqI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
regards,
Joe Doe Maintainer
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp8jA9Lgxr85.pgp
Description: PGP signature
later and you have no way of enforcing the
licence. The package cannot be sponsored in that condition.
Is there no copyright information in the package at all? (I haven't
looked.)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
as a result and you'll need to see what
other effects re-running the autotools may cause. (autoreconf -f).
You'll almost certainly have a bloated .diff.gz.
What patch system are you proposing to use to implement this change to
configure.in ?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org
patch system can offer enhancements managing a problem
like this one.
It's more about how this is going to pan out in the future. Are you
intending to maintain pmidi for the foreseeable future or is this a QA
upload?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
On Fri, 15 May 2009 22:32:30 +0200
Francesco Namuri france...@namuri.it wrote:
Il giorno ven, 15/05/2009 alle 17.37 +0100, Neil Williams ha scritto:
It's more about how this is going to pan out in the future. Are you
intending to maintain pmidi for the foreseeable future or is this a
QA
that...
Then why should I trust that you can do a good enough job as a
maintainer to consider sponsoring you? How can I be sure that you'll be
able to fix bugs in the package if you refuse to read the manpages for
the commands used in the package?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org
/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/gpe-expenses.mo
But how and where do I run the dh_install command with cdbs?
With a debian/$package.install file, CDBS runs dh_install for that
package automatically.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e
paths in your own files.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpn685t6RY1M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
check the contents of
debian/$package
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpqY4dUV8ica.pgp
Description: PGP signature
dh_install where to put the file. Take a look at the source
code of any package that uses CDBS and has a desktop file. gpe-expenses
is one.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpr1PMscHcNh.pgp
Description: PGP
description is necessary too.
I'm not saying it will be sponsored if these are provided but it does
make it less likely that the RFS will be ignored for a second time.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms
what is happening and that Debian *does*
care about this.
Yes. I think running licensecheck for mentors uploads would be great.
'lintian -C mentors' could do that.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
and for a quick overview of not just what files are in the package but
what kind of files they are and what they may contain. (I use deb-gview
for that role.)
As long as the binaries are never put into any apt repository, it's
probably better to retain the uploaded binaries.
--
Neil Williams
to the above, I may sponsor it - one step I
would encourage for this kind of package is cross-building support but
I'll provide details of whatever changes might be needed to achieve
that as part of the review.
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lang
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
are still non-native packages because they can (and
do) work on other distributions. The fact that they were not originally
available on anything other than Debian is irrelevant.
Native packages are a special case and should not be abused.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
as the packaging
itself is concerned.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpSD5mOXTGyN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
with a .dsc and .changes, lintian check results and the
rest make it easier for people on this list to give you a complete
review of the package.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpTxkzO1QIn1.pgp
for me to push much further, I don't have time
for that much testing.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpwLft5OmfuO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
about the limit of what the page can achieve.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpChRl2plRaP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
update
it. If it puts some people off, so be it. It's not up to me to create a
single document that is all things to all maintainers/sponsors (even if
such a document was even conceivable).
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e
for
inclusion in main
17. I can't guarantee how quickly your upload will be made
That last one is probably very common to all sponsors, just as an
expression of the reality of typical sponsor / DD workload.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http
.
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsors
If anyone else has a similar page, let me know and I'll add it.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpuqCQ1VPCa9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
? The devscripts package does not
contain it!
I fear debian/copyright needs to mention all this. Are there other
opinions on that from mentors?
$ licensecheck -r .
(from the devscripts package)
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e
and your RFS needs
to persuade sponsors to put the upload higher in their personal
priority list(s).
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpjdghze2CkU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:08:33 +0200
Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote:
* Neil Williams [090426 13:50 +0100]
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:19:15 +0200
Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote:
* Elimar Riesebieter [090417 19:04 +0200]
Dear mentors,
I am looking
difficult
for over-committed sponsors who are trying to help you.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgp3OGqEwuwr7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:29:11 -0300
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
Dear Neil,
On Apr 26 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
You're a tad lucky that you got a response at all, most such pings
are silently ignored. Yes, that is pointing at you Rogério Brito,
regarding ttf2pt1 (QA upload
can.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpMZm4AhzGSR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpTN7mM2nnyR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to work
out if something that is not directly hardware-specific is actually the
problem but is just being hidden on more common hardware. e.g. this
could be a race condition but as you didn't provide the bug number,
no-one can help with that specific problem.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpC4lFwKCM0l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of ongoing
case-by-case discussion.
Other packages that are justifiably native include debhelper and the
like.
I'm not particularly interested in fsprotect per-se, but I don't see
that it cannot be deemed native by those who know more about the kinds
of things it needs to do.
--
Neil Williams
lines are:
foobar (1.5.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
-- Vasja Pupkin v...@g.net Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:09:16 -0700
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpGue4rZwkyh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is careful to throw away old chroots and puts the fresh ones
in a directory that uses the PID of the current process. That looks
like a static chroot which should be deleted.
Test the package with 'make distcheck'
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
could have found that the package built inside the chroot would
actually behave differently to the one built outside. Not good.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpS2KwyVrnT5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
Od: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org
You need to work out which library (libfoo.so) contains the undefined
references and ensure that the objects are linked against them.
I've tried. Is there some good
-a' and so the
entries are added in chronological order.
- Is it better to end the sentence by a final point or not ?
Personal taste.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpAgOD5ixWKK.pgp
Description: PGP
a false copyright statement!
There is no way I'm going through my packages to separate out all the
Copyright statements on a per file basis and I think it's wrong to
declare that not doing such would be a false copyright claim on this
list.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org
, they tell what is
expected
for new packages.
Absolutely.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpYB5A5rChJb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
but it does need to be
complete and understandable by ftpmaster.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpIxsmBN7Bqe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
#519840 crashs on rotated screen on first mouse press)
Severity: serious
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpHisz4xzxli.pgp
Description: PGP signature
you! mentors.debian.net looks down from here.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/mentors.debian.net
Sun Apr 12 13:41:46 BST 2009
I'll try and start the review later.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:42:54 +0100
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:43:08 +0800
Wen-Yen Chuang ca...@calno.com wrote:
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xf86-input-tslib/xf86-input
? I use cdbs.
\r
CDBS handles GCONF properly but this line is executed long before CDBS
gets any chance to use the debhelper gconf support - it looks like
upstream as it is still being called by make.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
there.
In the solution using patch, if upstream programmer agree the patch, a new
version of package will have to be released !
It would be good to get these changes upstream, I don't see why a new
version of the package is a problem. In the meantime, work on the
patches in the Debian package.
--
Neil
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:47:37 +0200
Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:29:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:09:06 +0200
Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
If the perl scripts are package specific
this data - some use their own config scripts.
The problem is that those rarely support situations like
cross-building. pkgconfig isn't perfect (see the recent thread on
spurious dependencies from Gtk) but it is a lot more portable than
bespoke hacks.
--
Neil Williams
=
http
it right from the start instead of wasting time with someone else's
mistakes.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpsYmjnqyzRT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on those machines - replied
off-list.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgprDcoioCc6T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/international/l10n/
http://www.uk.debian.org/international/l10n/po/
http://www.uk.debian.org/international/l10n/po/it
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/categories/3-i18n
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
just set out their
preferences for debian/copyright.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgplsgV7DQEUv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this one.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgppLQIoJNcrC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
:
+If hal is not available, the following defaults may be sufficient:
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgp2zpBVgNw5F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:22:13 +0800
Wen-Yen Chuang ca...@calno.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
That bit is fine, I think the changes to the manpage need a tweak or
two.
Done. :-)
Uploaded.
OK, so from comments to #517131, we're expecting
is the key - along with a few pings to this
list once in a while.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpSimiou6kan.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to do now? anything else? are the packages ready be uploaded by an
sponsor?
Not by me.
David Garcia Garzon
CLAM Team.
A Dimecres 24 Desembre 2008 16:02:42, Neil Williams va escriure:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:16:15 +0100
David García Garzón dgar...@iua.upf.edu wrote:
- Could you
to
return to that nightmare.
Personally, I have no desire to have any of my Debian or upstream code
on win32 and I would probably not have time to fix any cygwin bugs in
my packages. It just isn't important enough.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
a directory
within the source itself. Then your wrapper applies the patches BEFORE
calling dpkg-buildpackage (so that you can patch debian/rules).
Take a look at the source code of emdebian-buildsupport, especially
emsource and the Emdebian::Tools module in libemdebian-tools-perl.
--
Neil
you want to add yet-another.
In my eyes blueman could be a real deal for lightweight desktops.
gpe-bluetooth is designed for that kind of environment - how does this
one differ?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpGyptKaI8sn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
prepare a proper manpage, and forward it
to upstream... but people on mentors (CC'ing) can offer you other/better
options...
Regards,
(and good look finding a sponsor)
(your attitude to manpages just lost you this sponsor).
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lintian
--
Neil Williams
than patch itself) and has ways
of resolving many patch conflicts.
Another useful tool is meld - a graphical diff viewer/editor that can
show you three way diffs - the previous unpatched, the upstream and the
one you want - containing the effect of the patch on the upstream.
--
Neil Williams
, native doesn't make any difference.
Regarding if it's good
enough to go in the archive, that's one point of requesting sponsorship,
right? :)
No. The ITP is separate - it gets to a wider audience.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
fixed anyway, i.e. where lintian provides
some help on how to fix the issue.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpIyIJjTBQLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
entry in the
changelog.
It is simple to pass the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage and then dpkg
includes all the changes since the specified -v into the .changes file
and the bugs get closed just fine.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com
page later.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpD9GZB8U6OP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. The sponsor needs
to do some of that but debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org is a useful
place to start with any debconf templates.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpglsxd3vl5y.pgp
Description
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:54:04 +1100
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
The maintainer doesn't have to worry about -v [for
‘dpkg-genchanges’] - the sponsor does that with the final build that
actually gets uploaded to Debian.
Ah okay
that for packages that I maintain or sponsor - that's it,
there's nothing more to it, nobody has to change the way they sponsor
and I'm not about to tell other sponsors how to do their work. It's me,
just me and my sponsoring requirements. End of.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
be standard practice for
anyone - they are just my requirements for sponsoring and I expect them
to be followed by maintainers who want me to sponsor their packages.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
optional. If there are bugs in
lintian then *file bugs against lintian* and reference them in the
override files *and* include or attach the override files to your RFS.
Whether you fix these problems or not, you've lost my interest because
of your attitude to lintian.
--
Neil Williams
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:06:48 +
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
lintian is not a joke and -mentors is not here to be fobbed off when
the real problem would appear to be a lazy maintainer.
Unacceptable. Write the manpages - no excuses. Write all the missing
manpages and make sure
that packages that are part of established l10n teams like GNOME
or KDE can easily use that support. The extra step is intended for
independent packages that would otherwise not be widely translated.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:37:20 +0100
Olivier Berger olivier.ber...@it-sudparis.eu wrote:
Hi.
Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 12:24 +, Neil Williams a écrit :
... I'm now going to require, for any package
using debconf that requires sponsorship, that debconf translations are
requested
primarily for the user,
they do not exist to make things easy for maintainers or sponsors.
These are not build tools for your convenience.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpaB0y5Hdtl5.pgp
Description: PGP
interest to get a translation done within 10-14
days then the maintainer and sponsor should do everything possible to
present that translation to every user in the first upload that asks
the question concerned and not make any upload until the deadline has
passed.
--
Neil Williams
of identifying what needs to change and how to get it
working.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpGujPT8HK5p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(and the source package name) is important for a small number of
fundamental libraries. There is then the inevitable pain of deciding
that libfoo1.2 simply has to go away at some point. :-)
Where would we be without libc6-dev ?
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
know some
packages in the debian tree that are already doing some similar
things, that I could have a look at, to compare, or get ideas from ?
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends
http://www.emdebian.org/
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http
libfooN-dev
when the new version of foo is uploaded. Retaining the old and new
source packages is only worthwhile if migration from old to new is
going to take a significant amount of effort on the part of a
significant number of reverse dependencies.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:04:29 +0100
Patrick Matthäi patrick.matth...@web.de wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
What if not? They stay open till someone else
tries to package it and gets rejected?
If there is no good reason
else
tries to package it and gets rejected?
If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into
an upload, there is no reason to leave the RFP open.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms
./conf/distributions
...
$ reprepro export
$ reprepro include unstable $changesfile
Simple.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpMUC4j0OzD1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this package for me.
I doubt that Vedran would be quite so pleased.
This is another upload to mentors that should be summarily removed for
blatant disregard for Policy.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:39:26 +
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
So, I've decided to make a NMU.
This package is not marked as lowNMU threshold, the bug is not
relevant to the Lenny release, the package is not orphaned, there is
no indication in the bug report that you have
/tarballs:
$ cp qof/qof-0.8.0.tar.gz ../debian/tarballs/qof_0.8.0.orig.tar.gz
$ svn-buildpackage
IIRC symlinks don't work, can't remember why.
(0.8.0 is the unreleased version, 0.7.5 was hosted at SF instead of
Alioth so 'debcheckout' doesn't get you the right version, yet.)
--
Neil Williams
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:15:36 +0100
Hámorszky Balázs balihb@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
I doubt that Vedran would be quite so pleased.
This is another upload to mentors that should be summarily removed
for blatant disregard for Policy.
than I misconceived the policy. i
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
