On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:04 PM Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> It's great to hear from you :)
tbh, I'm a bit surprised at a lot of the frustration and surprise i'm
reading - I've replied whenever I've got the email and have tried to
be helpful. It's great to be asked or sent an email, I guess?
> tim
o a normal maintainer upload
> @Mateusz, as you cans see from
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927477 that the
> package owner stop responding to people more than 5 years ago.
>
> @Paul, no hurry, take your time, as we've been waiting for more than 8
> years, 😂😂
right oversight. I don't see it in NEW or the archive,
so I'm going to CC the last folks to package this, perhaps you can
deduplicate your work.
paultag
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋
Does it have to be an NMU? :)
I must have missed the request for sponsorship directly; feel free to
revamp this as a regular upload and we can push it up.
Paul
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 3:54 PM Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
>
I started replying to this mail, but I found that I really don't want
to. I'm guessing you don't want me to, either. After all, I'm just a
person. A person totally unrelated to this, who knows nothing of facts,
and will never know the facts.
So, let me treat this mailing list like my blog, once ag
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 04:29:07PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-01-15, 15:55:
> >lintian is wrong in this case, so there is no need to override it.
>
> Um, no; on the contrary, Lintian being wrong is the only legitimate reason
> to add an override.
>
> Here's how one
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:36:00PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> 2. or provide two source packages, of which main would build only
> CPU implementation while in non-free would build both/only GPU
> (depending how organized).
Yeah, that's not super great. I might consider a -src
package and
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 08:10:26PM +0430, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
>Dear Mentors ,
>
>I heard Python isn't freesoftware at pycon (yesterday). Is't true?
It is, but it wasn't always GPL compatable
https://docs.python.org/3/license.html
Cheers,
Paul
--
do not upload without a run-through
from pkg-go hackers (at the moment, myself and tianon) -- but a package
review is very very welcome!
I'm sorry, I'm a bit limited on time or this would contain a review of
the package; thanks for your contribution so far, Alexandre!
Paul
--
want
> to have best possible experience, right?
We want to provide a libre / *free* distribution to our end users.
Anything else is just tolerated / hosted. non-free is *not* Debian (the
distribution), it's simply hosted on Debian project infra.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tag
bts, go ahead with your conclusion; the worst
> case scenario is only to have to remove the packages from our Project's main
> archive later.
After reading the mail you refrence, I agree with consensus. Seems
shady. Ask upstream for clarification.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''
ve information »
| • To exploit the « Information » commercially, for example, by
| combining it with other « Information », or by including it in your own
| product or application.
\ LOOL
I'd have to think more about it.
Cheers,
T
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Prou
This is a question for the ftpteam, but here's the reason why::
Apr 29 14:22:47 processing /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes
Apr 29 14:22:47 GnuPG signature check failed on mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes
Apr 29 14:22:47 /mcron_1.0.7-1_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Apr 29 14:22:47 Removing /mcron
inaries away, it'd save us all
lots of archive space, but I can see that being overkill for a few
files.
Anyway; I'd personally do a non-dfsg repack myself, but either way
works.
Cheers,
Paul
[without any hats on other than his DD one]
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | P
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 02:17:12PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 02:19:38PM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Even considering code in the same jarfile as "linked", I don't think
> > you can link an image to code in the same way.
> I'
#x27;t "link" as it was understood when the GPL2 was written (GPL3
> might even be another story).
Even considering code in the same jarfile as "linked", I don't think
you can link an image to code in the same way.
Much love,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
or
instance, no one would claim the GPL'd GIMP program can only edit
GPL compatable images, just as in the general case, I don't think
it's a problem for a GPL'd program to render or load in non-GPL'd
assets.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul T
Sorry, I missed it. We're actually the same team, we just now have 2 WNPP
bugs. We can merge them. docker.io will be the binary name.
-T
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Hey gustavo an
Hey gustavo and Tong,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 06:20:14PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 08:36 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > In fact, I have. I've got a few tools brewing for Debian that use
> > Docker. I've got it packaged and it'll b
x27;ve got it packaged and it'll be in Debian soon.
Thanks for your interest! :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 05:07:00PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>
> Am 08.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> >On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:15:30PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> >>>>"specific to someone": Well this is an unavoidable necessity
Nov 08, 2013 at 06:03:35PM +, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> > You're free to try to get it into non-free.
> >
> >Thanks!
> > Paul
> >
> How to apply for acceptance in non-free?
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Develope
ness towards perfectly strict OSI compliance.
To be clear, not satisfying OSD 3 & 5 (DFSG 3 and 5 as well) this will
*NOT* be fit for Debian main. You're free to try to get it into
non-free.
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`.
arly know how it works with GPL.)
> >>Commercial software does not need to be paid software. Well, to me a
> >>similar restriction like for GPL could be very handy: having to put
> >>all of the
> >>software under any OSS-compliant license as soon as an S-FSL program
> >>is incorporated (That would also limit possible interference with other
> >>licenses).
> >>Would that be acceptible?
> >I'm not exactly sure I understand what you mean here. If you mean that
> >any program or distribution that incorporates an S-FSL licensed program
> >will need to comply with the S-FSL license terms aswell, that will not
> >work. First of all, the S-FSL is not compatible with the GPL, so you
> >can't "link" it or integrate it with anything that is GPL'd.
> >Furthermore, DFSG#9: a license must not contaminate other, unrelated
> >software.
> no just compliance with any OSS-license like f.i. GPL so that S-FSL is
> 'compatible' to other licenses; see for S-FSL v1.3.3
>
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:22:15PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> > Is it really a problem? If yes then I can add an exception for
> > distributors like Debian.
>
> Perhaps you're interesting in reading
y but actually want to retain as much
> rights as possible
> because writing, maintaining the software and supporting also casual
> users is a
> major effort.
It's a lot more effort for the distributors to review this license and
attempt to figure out how it applies in different
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:31:40PM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> The xchroot S-FSL v1.3.1 license would need some legal review. It was
> especially designed for
> distributions available free of charge like Debian. The license has been
> revised thouroughl
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:06:57AM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
> In any case, it sounds like the guidance on this ticket is that either
> solution is fineish.
Uh. The guidance is only use a Debian native package iff the software is
*ONLY* for Debian alone.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.
7;native'.
> Shouldn't it simply mean that upstream is the Debian maintainer, and
> that the packaging is included? That is the guidance I was given
> regarding one of my packages.
>
> --
> "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" - Voltaire
--
.''`.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Kevin Bortis wrote:
[snip]
> BTW: There is an upcomming Debian project which could help
> implementing a new parallel, non-official, community driven build
> infrastructure called debile (formerly know as debuild.me).
> https://alioth.debian.org/projects/
o this with 3.0 (native), without being upstream.
I'm all for allowing native packages, but newbies shouldn't be using
them to package software with an upstream.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8
-BY-SA 3.0
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e would be non-free.
From a quick glance, it doesn't appear this is an issue.Have you asked
the old maintainer why?
-T
>
> --
> ᛊᚨᚾᛁᛏᚣ᛫ᛁᛊ᛫ᚠᛟᚱ᛫ᚦᛖ᛫ᚹᛖᚨᚲ
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "uns
debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130801164319.ga3...@jwilk.net
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ouldn't find anything
> here:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Section 5.6.12 covers the epoch :)
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> --
> Felix Natter
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
close 701016
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369083201-3715-bts-paul...@debian.org
folks or so, or the xmpp
team.
Also, the jabberd2 package in the PTS[1] has Debian XMPP team on
maintainer. Are there no DDs willing to sponsor a routine upload there?
>
> Greetings,
> Willem
>
>
Cheers,
Paul
[1]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jabberd2.html
--
.&#x
5fL6pYfnP6TCjZENU3fDUY3cG43KR1N6bVsQwRQ4Q1TMcCWKSD8FS9nhsTNh
> QurI3Lxd+2brMqttku/bzh1DagvoH9kCMPseivudXXdAucw67bt/hy3kenQOmJhE
> j7vKUeAVf4IPdGzES0rU
> =jdlE
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to package-sponsorship-requests-requ...@lists.debian
I should also note a review for this package was sent off-report :)
Cheers,
T
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Sorry for the hijack of your RFS, I'm testing our new mail filter.
>> Please ign
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> Sorry for the hijack of your RFS, I'm testing our new mail filter.
> Please ignore me :)
(don't tell me what to do)
>
> --
> with kind regards,
> Arno Töll
> IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
> GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
>
--
:wq
--
To UNS
owner 674109 !
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 05:27:28PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:02:58 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> > Here are my proposals:
> >
> > sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
> >
> > suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
> > Determi
eded.
>
> I think Paul just volunteered to sponsor ;-)
Aye! While I'm not up on Ruby policy, I'd be more then happy to brush up
and sponsor it on an ongoing basis.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
>
> Get the Debian Administrator's Ha
/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/20121219134400.ga26...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com
>
I'd also love
If you get your old sponsor to ACK it with a signed mail to me, I'd be
happy to set them for them, or help them to set the permissions on their
own.
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Tomasz Muras wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I am a Debian Maintainer of a moodle package and another sm
free
to close the bug.
Thanks for your hard work, Dominik!
Paul
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Paul Tagliamonte
> wrote:
> > I'm on the way into work, but I'm interested. Someone else feel free to
> > sponsor, but ill hi
I'm on the way into work, but I'm interested. Someone else feel free to
sponsor, but ill hit this tonight ig no one does
On Nov 26, 2012 7:45 AM, "Dominik George" wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couchdb"
age to contribute.
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/pts
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 05:34:58PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 03:28:55PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > I am participating in a team-maintained package which is hosted on
> > > collab-maint.
> >
> > Which package ?
also, I do think that if you do hold a firm opinion on a subject, and you
> do care about it, then you should communicate that a bit sooner, and a bit
> more clearly. That, too is a question of respect and responsibility - towards
> a random DM as much as to the project.
>
>
t;
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/cag-kx9vsawz-aurffuze9xvm+ooja1j_admsxy3mzt+cizg...@mail.gmail.com
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;
> I suggest to not patch README but to quote what upstream wrote about this in
> debian/copyright including upstream's From and Date headers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart Martens
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subj
tags 688126 + pending
tags 675220 + pending
thanks
Howdy,
I've uploaded this to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut the
upload, or move it to 0day.
Debdiff attached.
Thanks!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R /
tags 688124 + pending
tags 685959 + pending
thanks
Hello,
I've uploaded this bug to DELAYED/4, please let me know if I should cut
the upload or move it to 0-day.
Debdiff attached.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 40
tags 688122 + pending
thanks
Uploaded to DELAYED/4, thanks!
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:57:09PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> >> I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
> >> package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
> >
> > Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?
>
> Add temporary PPA for
quot;
Yeah, mentors has this warning, where else would you suggest putting it
to make sure people, well, read it? :)
>
> --
> /*
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
> Patrick Matthäi
> GNU/Linux Debian Developer
>
> Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/
> E-Mail:
, 21 Aug 2012 11:12:47 +0800
>
> Regards,
> Tz-Huan Huang
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/c
ve, so it's going to take some time to look
over. Looks like some files are getting thrown around. I'll have to
review that in detail, but today, i've got a lot of work stuff.
Q'plah, (and thanks again),
Paul
[1]: http://jwilk.net/blog/20120710-debhelper-build-dependen
ds,
>
> Bart Martens
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120719192701.gc24...@master.debian.org
>
Che
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:09:20PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 18/07/12 15:42, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le
> > 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumar
xOLE7bwwtkAIl1t5OMgxMvwSHxFgw1t
> qH62AJh+5g3fGgCReBM+XGVSwKojnUSCYcUYDoEtRumbCNbIX/sdSR1Y5jTRyiJn
> YrMiZ5X57azs5qaapAMG
> =x6tG
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5006ac94.6090...@users.sourceforge.net
>
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50053414.5010...@blue-tc.com
>
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1341424965-sup-4...@rose.makesad.us
>
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on the same package (at least, without consent from the
release-team, which means the package is important, which means it might
likely have a sponsor, or team interested in sponsoring the package.)
+1 for usertags.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:41:03PM -0500, Nathan Handler wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udj-desktop-client"
>
> * Package name: udj-desktop-client
> Version : 0.5.0-1
> Upstream Author :
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
>> upon rough consensus and after discussing with formorer [1] I'd like
>> to to request a new list dedicated to sponsorship requests. The list
>> would be used to manage sponsorship-requests bug traffic
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:01:52AM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 21:45:10 -0400
> Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override
> > you've got in there, since you can have some probl
INADD, but here's a very partial review,
I've only had a quick second to glance at the package, but here's a
partial set of comments:
* Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override you've got
in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade, etc.
* You should also consi
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
>>> I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream
>>> tarball.
>>> This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process.
>>> Should
>>> I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I shou
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream
> tarball.
> This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
> I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should
This looks done, because the uploaded version[1] was -2, but there's
also a -3[2] in the mentors.d.n - retitile / close + refile?
-T
[1]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cvc3/news/20120304T093218Z.html
[2]: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cvc3
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all comp
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:06 AM, David Banks wrote:
> Hi Christine,
>
> On 25 March 2012 20:39, Christine Spang wrote:
>> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
>> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
>> 'mosh', which has now clear
reopen 660049 =
reopen 631139 =
thanks
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Christine Spang wrote:
> hi David,
>
> As you may have noticed from the activity on your mosh ITP, I didn't
> check the WNPP bugs list before sponsoring another package with the name
> 'mosh', which has now clearned NEW and e
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
thanks
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fbautostart"
* Package name: fbautostart
Version : 2.7182818-1
Upstream Author : Paul Tagliamonte
* URL : https://launchpad.net/fbautostart
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one
> of two things:
>
> 1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list.
>
> 2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS
> if they
Your package also ftbfs when built twice in a row
>From my output:
| dpkg-source -b tpb-0.6.4
| dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
| dpkg-source: info: building tpb using existing ./tpb_0.6.4.orig.tar.gz
| dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory autom4te.cache
| dpk
Howdy Prach,
I took the liberty of attempting to build your package with clang
(rather then gcc) as the compiler.
The package appeard to fail in my sbuild chroot, so I double checked
(since the error was not clear it was because of clang), and found that
using clang does, in fact, cause the confi
I don't see a dsc on that page or in the description you've provided.
You should consider using mentors.debian.net.
Cheers,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16.02.2012 22:28, SchmiTTT wrote:
>> This is no April's joke in this February ...
>
> Yet it is off-topic here and your gibberish does not seem to make any
> sense to me.
>
> You could send o
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Is there already any howto ro document about it ?
>>
>>
>> About what? Pseudo-packages or mentors.debian.net?
>>
>
> I know what both are, but it is not clear to me how this pseudo-package is
> involved ?
>
> In practice, how does a r
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
actually havin
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Mike Dupont
wrote:
> We are not just talking about running here.
> people need to have the freedom to change the code, and not be tied to
> some vendor.
For Debian Main, not non-free.
> we need to have all the sources needed to be able to compile all the
> too
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Stephen M. Webb
wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 01:45 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Stephen M. Webb , 2012-01-26, 12:05:
>>
>>> since the library is a part of an MMORPG stack, and I anticipate a
>>> newer client app revision getting in to Debian long before a new
>>> server ap
On a rebuild it worked.
Something odd's going on here.
-T
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> INADD, so I can't sposor
>
> I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
>
>
>
Howdy!
INADD, so I can't sposor
I did try a test-build, and got the following result in a sid pbuilder env --
## --- ##
## confdefs.h. ##
## --- ##
/* confdefs.h */
#define PACKAGE_NAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME "skstream"
#define PACKAGE_VERSION "0.3.8"
#define PACKAG
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Savvas Radevic wrote:
>> Can someone recommend me a Debian's binary package for use as an example
>> to create mine?
>
>
> Have you tried with the checkinstall command?
That's not really a sustainable - there's no reason to resort to such
hacks, even though you d
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Emilien Klein
> wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte :
>>> perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
>>>
>>> override_dh_auto_build:
>>>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Emilien Klein wrote:
> 2011/12/13 Paul Tagliamonte :
>> perhaps something like (with dh short syntax):
>>
>> override_dh_auto_build:
>> rm -rf ./cruddy/folder
>> dh_auto_build $(FLAGS_IF_ANY)
>
> I've a
After talking with Github, it's indeed the case where this package
will be deprecated before it's of use to anyone.
I'm no longer seeking it's upload. Thanks!
Fondly,
Paul
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> Two notes:
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Emilien Klein wrote:
> 2011/12/12 Paul Tagliamonte :
>>> What is the correct way to remove an entire directory and it's
>>> contained files with a quilt patch?
>>
>> Why not do that in debian/rules ?
>
> So you would
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Emilien Klein wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I maintain the nautilus-image-manipulator package in Debian. N I M
> contains the source code for poster, which is now packaged in Debian.
> I thus want to make N I M depend on python-poster, and remove the copy
> of poster's
thub2/python-github2_0.5.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Paul Tagliamonte
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> a new version is up :-)
>
> :D
>
>>
>>
>> I moved the theme files, menu files,... to debian/debianfiles. On
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> a new version is up :-)
:D
>
>
> I moved the theme files, menu files,... to debian/debianfiles. Only one
> folder, because are not too much files for different folders.
>
ACK'd, looks great!
The README.* files can be in
license I need
> to use?
> [2] GPL-2 block. I need to add the license to the file?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards.
>
>
> [1]
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:00:55 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rodolfo kix Gar
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks a lot for your review!
Of course!
>
> On 13/11/2011 20:25, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> INADD, but here's a review,
>>
>> General note:
>> - You've got a lot of stuff
INADD, but here's a review,
General note:
- You've got a lot of stuff in ./debian/ - I would invite you to
consider creating a few directories to put files that relate to
eachother (theme related stuff, and so forth)
You're overriding a lot of stuff. Can you please explain them all?
Some of them
Howdy, folks,
I've noticed (I've not dug in to find out if it's a function of my
machine, but this seems to not be present on other packages I have, or
have reviewed) that all the files are marked +x.
You should consider wrapping the Uploaders field.
You should also consider removing the watch f
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> On 16:20 Wed 09 Nov , Marco Balmer wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:39:54PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> > I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads
>> > successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web int
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
