Re: debian/watch file for the ledgersmb package

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:21 PM Robert James Clay wrote:  On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:  >> And I think using upstream http release page is much simpler for you. > I'm inclined to agree and will look at using that site instead.   In testing w

Re: debian/watch file for the ledgersmb package

using at least downloaded files but still failed due to the apparently bad downloaded archive.     > And I think using upstream http release page is much simpler for you.     I'm inclined to agree and will look at using that site instead.        Thanks!     Robe

debian/watch file for the ledgersmb package

better to try using that?   Robert James Clay, j...@rocasa.us, rjc...@gmail.com [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ledgersmb [2] https://sources.debian.org/src/ledgersmb/1.5.21+ds-1/debian/watch/ [3] https://download.ledgersmb.org/f/Releases/  

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Mattia! On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 01:16:20 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > > Hi Tobias! > > > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08

Re: syncterm/1.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]

On Monday, February 01, 2016 08:49:10 AM Fernando Toledo wrote: > > Hi all! > > I upload a new version of SyncTerm package. > > feel free for comments/reviews! > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm Glad to see that you were able to update the package! Jame j...@rocasa.us

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Tobias! On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay <j...@rocasa.us> > wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream?

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:32:49 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > To upload a non-free package, and get it built by the autobuilders you > need 'XS-Autobuild: yes' and according to DevRef § 5.10.5 also to mail > som

Re: Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

On Saturday, January 09, 2016 09:44:59 AM Jakub Wilk wrote: > The person doing whitelisting will probably want to look at the package, > so I'd only send e-mail after the package has been uploaded and > ACCEPTed. That makes sense; thanks for the clarification! RJ Clay

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

On Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:13:50 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:40:43AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hwb" > > uploaded, Thanks! > as a full source+binary upload, since I don't see the

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. As a result of the review of my multimail package by Tobias, I have completed some updates to the package and have uplo

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. Thanks! > > - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically > generated. T

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Fernando! On Monday, January 04, 2016 02:56:45 PM Fernando Toledo wrote: > > El 03/01/16 a las 11:44, Robert James Clay escribió: > >I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, > > "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if not sponsoring

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Sunday, November 29, 2015 02:25:05 AM Robert James Clay wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if not sponsoring. It can be downloaded as

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

an/control to 3.9.6, no changes necessary. * Changes to debian/copyright: - Update copyright end year for Robert James Clay to 2016. - Set the License short name for the 'build/*' stanza to 'Redistributable'. Also; I am now a Debian Maintainer and I would appreciate having DM upload p

Bug#807995: postnews sponsorship

uld greatly appreciate it. (Note also that I am now a Debian Maintainer.) Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us

Bug#807995: RFS: postnews/0.6.1-1

On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 12:53:06 AM Robert James Clay wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "postnews". > > * Package name: postnews > Version :

Bug#807995: RFS: postnews/0.6.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "postnews". * Package name: postnews Version : 0.6.1-1 Upstream Author : Michael Waschbüsch * URL :

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

uired. - Change the Maintainer entry to be 'Robert James Clay <j...@rocasa.us'. - Add Vcs* entries for the 'collab-maint' repository at anonscm.debian.org. * Add initial version of debian/patches/Makefile.patch. * Rewrite debian/rules to be used for dh. Also; I am now a Debian Maintainer

Bug#789615: RFS: ttylog/0.26-1

Paul, On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 02:25:02 AM Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Robert James Clay wrote: Thing is; I'm not sure who added it for me (though I certainly thank them!). I had asked a previous sponsor of the package earlier this month about doing so

Bug#789615: RFS: ttylog/0.26-1

Control: unblock 731086 by -1 On Monday, June 22, 2015 01:32:37 PM Robert James Clay wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ttylog Package name: ttylog I may not need an actual sponsor for this package

Bug#789615: RFS: ttylog/0.26-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ttylog Package name: ttylog Version : 0.26-1 Upstream Author : Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us * URL : http://ttylog.sourceforge.net * License : GPL-2

Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

-prototype and libjs-libjs-scriptaculous libraries. * Only include the overrides for the 'custom' empty directories in the ledgersmb.lintian-overrides. Note also that I am submitting my request to become a Debian Maintainer. Regards, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

Found and fixed another issue. Rebuilt and re-uploaded to the mentors site. The dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.46-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

the dsc file for it can be again be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.46-1.dsc -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us rjc...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

Vincent, On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 04:54:31 AM Robert J. Clay wrote: On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Vincent Cheng vch...@debian.org wrote: I suggest one of three different options (preferably options 2 or 3, whichever is most appropriate): 2) pre-depend on a sufficiently recent

Bug#773378: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.46-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ledgersmb * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.46-1 Upstream Author : Chris Travers ch...@metatrontech.com * URL : http://www.ledgersmb.org * License

Bug#691711: [Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion] New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.23-1

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 15:58 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Robert James Clay wrote: A new version of the LedgerSMB package, v1.3.23-1, is now available and has been uploaded to the Mentors site pending a sponsor. Raphael; if you're able to take a look

Bug#691711: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.23-1

, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1351459084.21665.13.camel@svrpc

Bug#691711: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.23-1

On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 17:18 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/ledgersmb/ledgersmb_1.3.23-1.dsc A new

Bug#691711: [Pkg-sql-ledger-discussion] New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.23-1

On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 17:45 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 17:18 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb dget -x http

Re: Package removed from Mentors without notification

On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 14:12 -0400, Arno Töll wrote: On 27.09.2012 20:08, Robert James Clay wrote: Arno, On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote: On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote: an email when a package is removed (after a timeout of 20 weeks

Bug#672805: closed by Bart Martens ba...@debian.org (closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6)

Subject: closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 + Package hwb has been removed from mentors. Why? Now I'm going to need to upload it again.l Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Package removed from Mentors without notification

All, On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 07:33 -0400, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: email message attachment Forwarded Message From: Bart Martens ba

Bug#672805: closed by Bart Martens ba...@debian.org (closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6)

On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 09:07 -0400, Bart Martens wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:57:49AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: email message attachment Forwarded Message Subject: closing RFS: hwb/1:040412-6 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:17 + Package hwb

Re: Package removed from Mentors without notification

Arno, On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:32 -0400, Arno Töll wrote: On 27.09.2012 15:56, Robert James Clay wrote: Bart closing the hwb RFS sponsorship bug this morning because hwb had been removed from the Mentors site was the first I knew that it had been removed. I thought there was something

Bug#684106: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.21-2

Hi Bart! On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 00:30 -0400, Bart Martens wrote: Hi Robert, Have you noticed that there's a newer upstream release ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/ledger-smb/files/ Yes, I know. But as Raphaël alluded to; because I want to get an updated version into wheezy, I also

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-2

retitle 684106 RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.21-2 thanks On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Please fix all those issues and I will upload the updated package. Raphael, I think I've taken care of the issues you found (plus others I found in the course of working on that) and have

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 20:00 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: In control: This change is not documented in debian/changelog. Why did you remove those recommendations/suggestions ? That may have been the result of merge

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 20:00 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Here's my review of your package: I'll be working on these issues tomorrow. Also; my inclination now is to do a 1.3.21-2 package with any necessary changes and upload

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 03:09 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: As this is a new upstream version, a good argument (with patches, etc.) has to be prepared for the release team to have elements for their decision about allowing it in wheezy. I think a pre-approval by them would even be

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 18:20 -0400, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, On Mon, 06 Aug 2012, Robert James Clay wrote: Besides uploading the new package version to the Mentors site, I went ahead submitted a Request for Sponsor bug as well (#684106 [1]) Here's my review of your package

Bug#684106: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.21-1

templates directory in debian/rules. Regards, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344305499.22160.35.camel@svrpc

Bug#684106: New LedgerSMB Debian package, v1.3.21-1

On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:11 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http

Bug#677070: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.18-1 -- Financial accounting and ERP program

On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 08:36 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.18-1 Note that the Mentors QA item Package is not the latest upstream version[1] is incorrect, as v1.3.18 is the most recent release. The Newest version mentioned, 1.3.9990204845

Bug#677070: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.18-1 -- Financial accounting and ERP program

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:21 -0400, Bart Martens wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:03:53AM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 08:36 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: * Package name: ledgersmb Version : 1.3.18-1 Note that the Mentors QA item Package

Bug#677070: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.18-1 -- Financial accounting and ERP program

::Template::XLS.3pm from ledgersmb.manpages. * Add the removal of empty example language specifc template directories to debian/rules. -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:51:41 -0400 ledgersmb (1.3.17-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * Add a note regarding

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 09:14 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: Please inspect the source files of the program to see what they state themselfs. The mrtg-ping-probe perl script itself explicitly references the COPYRIGHT file as follows

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 20:25 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: Note also that Lintian now complains about the FSF address in the first license entry, presumably because I

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:53 -0400, Dominique Dumont wrote: On Wednesday 23 May 2012 02:25:11 Robert James Clay wrote: Ah; good point. I'll take a closer look at all of the files again. You can also use (from devscripts package): licensecheck --copyright -r . This will (try

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

Paul, On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2 not GPL-2+. Please inspect the source files of the

d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

All, One of things I decided to do as part of adopting the mrtg-ping-probe package was to rewrite debian/copyright for DEP-5. The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual source COPYRIGHT file looks to be

Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)

On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 16:47 -0400, Paul Gevers wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 14:18:52 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: The first thing I noticed when I was doing that is that while the original debian/copyright was for GPL-2+ for all files, the actual source COPYRIGHT file looks to be GPL-2

Bug#672805: RFS: hwb/1:040412-6

; urgency=low * Rewrite the debian/copyright file for DEP-5. * Bump Standards version in debian/control to 3.9.3, no changes necessary. -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Wed, 09 May 2012 16:19:21 -0400 hwb (1:040412-5) unstable; urgency=low * Change debhelper compatibility level to 7

Bug#669903: RFS: ttylog/0.1.d-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ttylog * Package name: ttylog Version : 0.1.d-2 Upstream Author : Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us, Tibor Koleszar o...@debian.org * URL : http

Bug#669167: New experimental LedgerSMB package, 1.3.15-2

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 19:28 -0400, mentors.debian.net wrote: Your upload of the package 'ledgersmb' to mentors.debian.net was successful. Others can now see it. The URL of your package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ledgersmb The respective dsc file can be found at:

Bug#669167: RFS: ledgersmb/1.3.15-1 [ITP] -- Financial accounting and ERP program

resolved. - Remove unneeded 8* series patch files resulting from an incomplete merge. Regards, Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us rjc...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#669167: LedgerSMB ITP bug

See also the ongoing discussion in the LedgerSMB ITP bug[1], # 406935. RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406935 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Package descriptions on mentors.debian.net?

All, Is it possible to correct an incomplete or bad package description for an existing package on mentors.debian.net? Jame RJ Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Package descriptions on mentors.debian.net?

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:05 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote: On 12/12/2011 10:41 AM, Robert James Clay wrote: Is it possible to correct an incomplete or bad package description for an existing package on mentors.debian.net? Those are pulled from the package, itself, Even those

Re: Package descriptions on mentors.debian.net?

Arno, On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:06 -0500, Arno Töll wrote: On 12.12.2011 17:41, Robert James Clay wrote: Is it possible to correct an incomplete or bad package description for an existing package on mentors.debian.net? the description is determined by your binary package

Re: What version of debian to develop debian packages?

Container) systems for development and testing as needed... -- Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us Rocasa LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: ttylog (updated package)

Michael, On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 14:55 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Note that since I'm not sure when the next major version (v0.2.0) will be available and it has been a while since the last update, I wanted to get this version of ttylog its debian package out so that the major

Re: RFS: ttylog (updated package)

Peter, Sorry about the delay in my reply; ISP issues, amongst other things... On Mar 28, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 03:24:48PM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.d-1 of my package ttylog. It builds

RFS: ttylog (updated package)

/t/ttylog/ ttylog_0.1.d-1.dsc I would appreciate it if someone would upload this package for me. Thanks! Kind regards Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: ubuntu keyring?

On Mar 17, 2011, at 2:18 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/13/11 15:40, Robert James Clay wrote: On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:19 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote: I have Ubuntu on my Laptop, but of course I would prefer to keep Debian as the base platform

Re: ubuntu keyring?

files. 3) Installed that package where I needed it, including to my local package repository. Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http

Re: RFS: openteacher

for that is a little different; try http:// git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/openteacher.git Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: using pristine-tar

be interested in hearing about it...) Robert James Clay j...@rocasa.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cd3b0b57-1049-4cd2-b371-f2ed523ad

Re: Adopting: maintainer change in debian/changelog

On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Daniel Stender wrote: question: if I am adopting a packet, what's the procedure for altering debian/copyright (dep5)? Since I've learned that the Maintainer: field is for the upstream developer, should I just take over the copyright for Files: debian/*?

Re: packaging help

On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:45 AM, alma...@comcast.net wrote: I am working with this tutorial to understand better the debian packaging process: http://www.debian-administration.org/article/337/ Rolling_your_own_Debian_packages_part_2 One thing I noticed about that page; the note there

Re: RFS: git-fast-export (hg/svn-to-git import)

On Mar 23, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Obey Arthur Liu wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package git-fast-export. * Package name: git-fast-export It builds these binary packages: hg-fast-export - Mercurial fast incremental exporter to Git svn-fast-export - Subversion fast incrementer

Re: Copyright if package is taken over?

debianizing the package and copyright the packaging to me, saying I origionally based the package on his package, would that conform to GPLv3 and Debian Policy? Seems to me that you should leave his entry, noting whatever years he worked on it; then add yours to it.. Robert James Clay j

RFS: ttylog (updated package)

/main/t/ttylog/ ttylog_0.1.c-1.dsc I would very much appreciate it if someone would upload this package for me. Kind regards, Robert James Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rocasa.org/ttylog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

ttylog (updated package)

/pool/main/t/ttylog/ ttylog_0.1.c-1.dsc I would very much appreciate it if someone would upload this package for me. Kind regards Robert James Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Duplicate file names? (was Re: RFS: ifstat (updated package))

On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:43 PM, The Fungi wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 07:30:41PM -0400, Robert James Clay wrote: Would I be correct in thinking that it is a bug for files of the same name to come from different packages? For data files, I don't mind so much; but I've always been leery

Duplicate file names? (was Re: RFS: ifstat (updated package))

file in Debian; it's from the ifcico package gets installed in a different directory.There is also an issue with the man page; I was thinking of doing a man page for the ifcico ifstat program (there doesn't seem to be one) but the other ifstat does install one... Robert James

Package removals: when are Documents removed:?

`fidogate' is not installed, cannot remove. Document `fidogate-readme' is not installed, cannot remove. What does the not installed indicate? Both document sets have their definitions in /usr/share/doc-base, the files referenced there are present in the install... Robert James Clay [EMAIL

RFS: hwb (Closing ITA.)

/pool/non-free/h/hwb/ hwb_1:040412-3.dsc I would very much appreciate it if someone would upload this package for me. Thanks! Robert James Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: hwb (updated package)

would upload this package for me. Kind regards Robert James Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]