Sorry, copy'n paste mistake.
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.0-1.dsc
Current version is
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.1-1.dsc
--
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.17.1-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
S
A Debian user hinted that the painting was totally screwed in
experimental ( Qt 4.8 ).
That's fixed in the new package:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.1-1.dsc
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Well, still true.
Btw. the ITP i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.17.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pac
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
>
> * Package name: qastools
>Version : 0.16.2-1
>Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
> * URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
> * License : GPL-3
>Section : sound
>
> I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.2-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pa
> The naming scheme then would look like this:
>
> qastools-common - QasTools common files
> qasconfig - ALSA configuration browser
> qashctl - High level Control Interface ALSA mixer
> qasmixer - ALSA mixer for the desktop
Rebuilt and uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/qastools
dget -
>> It builds those binary packages:
>>
>> qastools-common - QasTools: Common files
>> qastools-qasconfig - QasTools: ALSA configuration browser
>> qastools-qashctl - QasTools: High level Control Interface ALSA mixer
>> qastools-qasmixer - QasTools: ALSA mixer for the desktop
>
> I understand
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
The current multipackage version is now uploaded to mentors.
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.1-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License
>>> A few comments about your man pages:
>>>
>>> - Your .TH line is "wrong" (you shouldn't use the command name and
>>> section number a second time after the date); have a look at
>>> /usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example.
>>>
>>> - qasconfig and qashctl don't take an
>>> So? It's difficult for me to get your point when you're asking questions
>>> without making any statement. I'd be grateful if you could clarify.
>>
>> Depending on the answers, my statements would be different. In general,
>> I see to 'primary' reasons for a package split in a package with kind
> A few comments about your man pages:
>
> - Your .TH line is "wrong" (you shouldn't use the command name and
> section number a second time after the date); have a look at
> /usr/share/man/man7/man-pages.7.gz for a better example.
>
> - qasconfig and qashctl don't take any options; p
Am 13.12.2011 20:22, schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht wrote:
>> Sebastian H. wrote:
>>>> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>>>> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>
>>> I haven't looked into the details, but I don't think you need to patch
>>> your CMakelists.txt at all. Simply use debian/${package}.install files
>>> to tell debhelper which files belong to which binary package (see
>>> dh_install(1)).
>>
>> That's looks even easier.
>> But together with the ma
> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answe
>>> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
>>> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
>>> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
>>> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
>>
>> The short answer is, it mak
Hi Benoît
> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be
> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an
> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them
> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something.
The short answer is, it makes
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qastools".
* Package name: qastools
Version : 0.16.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qastools
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer-l10n".
* Package name: qasmixer-l10n
Version : 0.15.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.15-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pack
> 1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
> without having to change/revalidate the (fat) qasmixer package.
>
> 2. The l10n package can be used for all architectures.
> This should save some precious bytes on the package servers.
It is possible to
>>> In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate
>>> package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning:
>>>
>>> W: qasmixer-l10n: desktop-command-not-in-package
>>> usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop qasmixer
>> [..]
>>> qasmixer-l10n installs a
Am 01.11.2011 15:52, schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:34 +0100, Sebastian H. wrote:
>>> 1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
>>> without having to change/re
Am 01.11.2011 16:05, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl:
> Hi!
>
> Am 01.11.2011 15:34, schrieb Sebastian H.:
>
>>> Why? Why not install the desktop file with the localized strings in
>>> with the proper package?
>> 1. It allows to add new translations or up
Am 01.11.2011 15:46, schrieb Teus Benschop:
> On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 15:34 +0100, Sebastian H. wrote:
>> 1. It allows to add new translations or update existing ones
>> without having to change/revalidate the (fat) qasmixer package.
>>
>> 2. The l10n package can be
>> In the progress of separating localizations for QasMixer into a separate
>> package qasmixer-l10n I've stumbled over the following linitan warning:
>>
>> W: qasmixer-l10n: desktop-command-not-in-package
>> usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop qasmixer
> [..]
>> qasmixer-l10n installs a new ve
= "$1" ]; then
dpkg-divert --package qasmixer-l10n --remove --rename \
--divert /usr/share/qasmixer/qasmixer.desktop.no_l10n \
/usr/share/applications/qasmixer.desktop
fi
Should I just ignore the warning or is there a better (standard?)
approach fo
Hello Kilian
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:16:24PM +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasconfig".
>>
>> * Package name: qasconfig
>>Version : 0.2.0-1
>>Upstream Author : Sebastian Holterma
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasconfig".
* Package name: qasconfig
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasconfig
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
> [...]
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qasmixer/qasmixer_0.14.0-1~bpo60+1.dsc
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Reviewed (and yes, I did see the missing QT change! ;-)), built, signed and
> u
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.14.0-1~bpo60+1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those b
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.14.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pa
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Please ignore this request as an updated version will be avilable very soon.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
--
Sebastian Holtermann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.13.0-1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds those binary pa
>> I've another question.
>> Is there a recommendation in Debian for using bzip2, gzip or xz for
>> packing source tarballs?
>
> No.
>
> Only that xz is not available in older versions of apt/dpkg/etc..
Ok. Then I'm going to use the .bz2 tarball for things coming.
(adjust watch file etc.)
Reg
Hi Kilian
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:47:35PM +0200, Sebastian H. wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the backport version 0.12.2-1~bpo60+1
>> of my package "qasmixer".
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qasmixer/qasmixer_0.12.2-1~bpo60+1.dsc
&g
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the backport version 0.12.2-1~bpo60+1
of my package "qasmixer".
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive QT4 GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL
>>> Please check if there's any more substantial edit to also needs fixing
>>> and include this fix with that.
>>>
>>> If there's long time (read: weeks) without any need to update anything
>>> else please come back and we can throw in this update as a
>>> check-if-is-still-buildable-in-unstable o
Hi Kilian
>> The upload would fix these bugs: 635233
>> ...
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Thanks for your work!
Thanks for your time :)
> As a best practice such a cosmetic update shouldn't be shipped as new
> upload.
>
> Just as a reminder: New uploads that
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-2
of my package "qasmixer".
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive Qt GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 635233
The package can be found o
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Rebuilt with the orig.tar.gz (instead of the orig.tar.bz2 that you had)
as debian/watch pulled that one in for me, signed and uploaded.
Thank you Kilian!
If you see tar.bz2 as the better alternative please bump debian/watch to
reflect
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.12.2-1
of my package "qasmixer".
It builds these binary packages:
qasmixer - ALSA sound mixer with a size adaptive QT4 GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://men
>> Got it and found the package in the NEW queue.
>> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>>
>> It shows "source" and "i386" which is fine for (my) netbook(s).
>> I wonder though, will there be an amd64 package at some point?
>
> Packages get build for all architectures after they reach the arch
Hi Kilian
The whole point for the 0.12.1 release was to make Debian
integration smoother. Since most things seem to work now I've
uploaded the tarball to the SF project page. uscan still doesn't
find it but that's probably because the SF mirrors are not
synchronized, yet.
Yes, that's to be exp
Hello Kilian
Also thanks to you for taking the time to review this package.
The new package source is uploaded.
looking closer at your package I find the following:
1. It's an intial upload to Debian AFAICT. Yet your debian/changelog is
cluttered with a number of entries already. For an
After switching the reportbug interface from the gtk to curses it worked.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632642
>>>
>>> But you forgot to add a '(Closes: #632642)' instruction in your
>>> debian/changelog...
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not too familiar with this bug tracking thing.
I've tried the bugreport utility from squeeze to report an ITP but it
seems to have crashed before sending. I can try it again with the sid
version tomorrow.
>>>
>>> You can also report the bug via email [2] if really reportbug doesn't
>>> work for you.
>>
>> After switching the repo
Am 04.07.2011 10:14, schrieb Benoît Knecht:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Sebastian H. wrote:
>> Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the
>> issues and prepared a new package.
>> lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore
> Great! Don't hesitate to ask if anything is unclear.
Ok, I've read through a few of the doc pages, fixed some (most?) of the
issues and prepared a new package.
lintian from squeeze now doesn't report any problems anymore.
Except for the too new standards 3.9.2 but that's because
lintian is too o
Hello Benoît
Thank you for reviewing!
I'll have a look at the issues you mentioned.
> Just a few additional comments, now that I've finished building your
> package:
>
> - lintian -I --pedantic qasmixer_0.12.0-3_amd64.changes reports:
>
> W: qasmixer source: empty-debian-diff
> I:
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qasmixer".
* Package name: qasmixer
Version : 0.12.0-3
Upstream Author : Sebastian Holtermann
* URL : http://xwmw.org/qasmixer/
* License : GPL V3
Section :
51 matches
Mail list logo
