LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
the warnings.
Ah, I wasn't
On 7/2/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source
On 6/30/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
the warnings.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Upstream has to fix that,
On 6/29/06, Lars Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm source:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
[/2]
why don't you fix these warnings? In this case, it should be _really_
Hi,
On 6/29/06, Lars Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm
On 6/29/06, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
[/2]
why don't you fix
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
the warnings.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Upstream has to fix that, you should add a
note for ftp-master so that they
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
the warnings.
[1]
$ tar tzvf qterm_0.4.0pre4.orig.tar.gz | grep ex$
-rw-r--r-- nichloas/nichloas1877 2003-04-29
Hello,
I have papared a new deb package for qterm(0.4.0pre4-1), it provide a
new upstream. It can be download from [1].
[1] https://alioth.debian.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=30987
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
[2]
Hi,
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
Hello,
I have papared a new deb package for qterm(0.4.0pre4-1), it fix a
FTBFS for g++-4.1 bug. It can be download from [1].
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm/
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't
LI Daobing wrote:
Hello,
Hi LI,
I have papared a new deb package...
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know what's the
most proper way to deal with these warnings.
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
On 3/15/06, Wolfgang Lonien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi LI,
Hi,
I think you didn't provide a manpage - that is why the .ex (example)
files are still there. According to the policy, you should provide a
manpage for your package.
I provide. the source is debian/qterm.dbk. the .ex files is not
On 3/15/06, Feifei Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did u use dh_make to debianize the source dir?
May be deleting the *ex file will solve this.
I have deleted it. but the lintian and linda also check the origin
source package, so it still give warnings.
--
LI Daobing
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:12:36PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know what's the
most proper way to deal with these warnings.
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm
re-upload, add a patch to fix the mis-spell iconname.
--
LI Daobing
On 3/15/06, LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
[2]
$ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
[/2]
If you have a manpage for qterm already, please
Hello,
qterm can't build with the newest g++, so I prepare a new debian
package 0.4.0pre3-3[1], it's lintian and linda clean. I have upload it
to mentors[2].
[1]
qterm (0.4.0pre3-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* libstdc++ allocator transition:
- debian/control: build depends on
On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:24, LI Daobing wrote:
New version(0.4.0pre3-2), fix a serious bug[1]. uploaded to mentors[2].
lintian, linda, pbuilder clean. Thanks.
Uploaded.
One minor issue: you added debian/README.Debian to the debian/docs. I'm not
very familiar with CDBS but since it
Hello,
New version(0.4.0pre3-2), fix a serious bug[1]. uploaded to mentors[2].
lintian, linda, pbuilder clean. Thanks.
[1]
qterm (0.4.0pre3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* rebuild depends on libssl-dev (= 0.9.8-1)
* configure with '--enable-arts --enable-esd'
* patches/02-openssl.dpatch:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
* debian/rules:
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please fix that.
I don't agree, at least it works.
No, it
On 9/13/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
* debian/rules:
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please
On 13-Sep-2005, LI Daobing wrote:
On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And
if you do not like roff, you can still use pod, etc.)
a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
I strongly
Re: LI Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
and many one do not write manpages[1]
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
Citing linitian warnings as an excuse not to fix bugs is certainly
strange.
*
* Steve Langasek [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:02:55 -0700]:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
* debian/rules:
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please
On 9/13/05, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Steve Langasek [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:02:55 -0700]:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
* debian/rules:
DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it
Re: LI Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
submit it at sponsors.
Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And if
you do not like roff, you
On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: LI Daobing in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
submit it at sponsors.
Why not write a manpage? There are
Hello,
I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
submit it at sponsors.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm/
[2] http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=60
Does anyone want help
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
W: qterm; The command /usr/bin/qterm
icon32x32=/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm
icon16x16=/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm listed in a menu file
does not exist.
Hi there,
It looks like /usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm and
but they are really exist, anyone know why?
$ dpkg -L qterm | grep pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm
On 8/13/05, Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
W: qterm; The
Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Changes:
qterm (0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* ABI transition
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Changes:
34 matches
Mail list logo