Re: Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-13 Thread Kevin Glynn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Apologies if I've screwed threading] Thanks all for your input. I have closed the bug, and if its re-opened I intend to tag as wontfix. cheers Kevin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt

Re: Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
2009/1/13 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org: On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:30:08 +0100 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote: Russ Allbery wrote: It would be nice if there were some way of telling the archive software not to include this package in the archive index on the platforms it

Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-12 Thread Kevin Glynn
This is in reference to serious bug#511184. The mozart package can only be built for 32 bit architectures, so its arch line is: Architecture: hppa i386 m68k mipsel mips powerpc sparc s390 arm armeb armel kfreebsd-i386 Its standard library (package mozart-stdlib) contains only architecture

Re: Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Kevin Glynn kevin.gl...@gmail.com writes: This is in reference to serious bug#511184. The mozart package can only be built for 32 bit architectures, so its arch line is: Architecture: hppa i386 m68k mipsel mips powerpc sparc s390 arm armeb armel kfreebsd-i386 Its standard library

Re: Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Russ Allbery wrote: It would be nice if there were some way of telling the archive software not to include this package in the archive index on the platforms it doesn't support, though. My proposal was http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/02/msg00045.html -- Julian Andres Klode - Free

Re: Arch:all package depending on package that isn't Arch:any

2009-01-12 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:30:08 +0100 Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote: Russ Allbery wrote: It would be nice if there were some way of telling the archive software not to include this package in the archive index on the platforms it doesn't support, though. My proposal was