Re: Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-16 Thread Oliver Reiche
Hi Wookey On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Wookey wrote: > I used 0~0-1 to start with. 0~ is a quite a good way of > versioning things like this that don't have versions. (that 0~ lets > you switch neatly to real versions in the future should they > appear). Adding git hashes mostly makes for

Re: Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-16 Thread Wookey
On 2023-05-16 14:46 +0200, Oliver Reiche wrote: >I'm basically aware of the build dependencies >policy and all of my binary and header-only dependencies are satisfied >from packages. However, my package additionally depends on 11 proto files >(i.e., architecture-independent

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-16 Thread Oliver Reiche
Hi Paul, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 5:07 AM Paul Wise wrote: > Generally all build dependencies should be packaged separately instead. > > https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopies > > Many thanks for that hint. I'm basically aware of the build dependencies policy and all of my binary and header-only

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 18:14 +0200, Oliver Reiche wrote: > Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have > build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the > copyright file explicity mentioning those?  Generally all build dependencies should be packaged

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Oliver Reiche
> > > I know that is is possible to create source packages consisting out of > more than 1 .orig.tar.gz. Maybe it is a better idea to split that > additional source into a new tar.gz. > > I'm not a DD, hence I can't sponsor your package anyway. Sorry! I see. That's already very helpful

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Preuße
On 15.05.2023 18:14, Oliver Reiche wrote: Hi Oliver, I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release. Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the copyright file explicity mentioning

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-15 Thread Oliver Reiche
Dear Hilmar, I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release. Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the copyright file explicity mentioning those? Many thanks! Oliver Hilmar Preuße

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-11 Thread Oliver Reiche
Dear Hilmer, If you look at that page you see a few points, which needs to be > addressed. Please fix at least the lintian errors and warnings. > > The initial upload should not go to testing, either use unstable or > experimental. > I updated the package to fix the lintian issues and moved it

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-11 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 5/11/23 15:11, Oliver Reiche wrote: Hi, The source builds the following binary packages: justbuild - Justbuild generic build system To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/justbuild/ If you look at that

Bug#1035946: RFS: justbuild/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- Justbuild generic build system

2023-05-11 Thread Oliver Reiche
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "justbuild": * Package name : justbuild Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream contact : Oliver Reiche * URL : https://github.com/just-buildsystem/justbuild * License