On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 05:32:12PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, built, signed and uploaded.
>
> thanks for following all the nitpicks/changes we requested.
Thanks!
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/dante/1.4.1+dfsg-1/piuparts
> the build was fine, the tests
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:46:24PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:33:28PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:39:07PM +, Gianfranco
control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:46:24PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:33:28PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:39:07PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > > control: owner -1 !
> > > control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > >
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:33:28PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:39:07PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > control: owner -1 !
> > control: tags -1 moreinfo
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> > changes are huge!
>
> Yes, they are... I've put off updating dante from 1.2.x to
On 04/06/2016 11:47 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> And if I read your multiarch-find-lib right, it doesn't
>> appear to even handle shebang-interpreters at the moment?
>
> Actually it handles shebang-interpreters [...]
Ok, sorry,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > So, the thing is, now it's in an arch:all package; it examines the program
> > that the user asked it to run, then chooses the
> > /usr/lib/*/dante-client/libdsocksd.so
> > file for the correct
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> So, the thing is, now it's in an arch:all package; it examines the program
> that the user asked it to run, then chooses the
> /usr/lib/*/dante-client/libdsocksd.so
> file for the correct architecture (thus the multiarch-find-lib tool), puts it
> into LD_PRELOAD, then runs
* Peter Pentchev , 2016-04-06, 17:33:
I prefer autoreconf instead of autotools-dev
Yep, that's part of the reason I updated to debhelper 10; please see
the changelog of debhelper-9.20160402 and 9.20160403 :) Still, there
are some packages and weird architectures that need
damn, I saw debian-policy in deferred/10 or whatever, I wasn't aware it got
accepted today :)
thanks!
>No, this package is still alive and well, it contains the "socksify" tool
>that preloads the Dante libraries necessary to run a network program using
>a SOCKS proxy - pretty much the main
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:39:07PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Peter,
> changes are huge!
Yes, they are... I've put off updating dante from 1.2.x to 1.4.x for
a couple of years :(
> lets see:
>
> some copyrights are missing
> #
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Peter,
changes are huge!
lets see:
some copyrights are missing
# Copyright (C) 1994 X Consortium
Radical Eye Software
Internet Software Consortium.
licensecheck * -r
reports lots of missing licenses (BSD-4 as example)
while your "other"
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: minor
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dante". This is
both a new upstream version with many bugfixes and new features
and also almost a full overhaul of the Debian packaging under
the guise of using new features of the build
12 matches
Mail list logo