Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

> >Is it imperative to revert it? > if you want a speedy NMU yes, if you want to wait some months no, we can let > MIA team ping the maintainer, and then take over the package. It already waited for almost year. I think we are not in a hurry. So I would rather wait for MIA. -- Accept:

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

Hi, >Okay, I can agree that compat 10 is unnecessery. But still someone >someday will have to do it. probably the maintainer, or you if MIA team orphan the package and you adopt it :) BTW maybe lets wait for compat 10 to become stable and then think about it :) >Sorry, can't locate any

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

> >I do not want to put a pressure on anyone, but if it is the only way > >to make big changes to package, let's do it. > I could understand that, but > 1) lets avoid experimental features > 2) lets try to keep changes minimal. Okay, I can agree that compat 10 is unnecessery. But still someone

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

Hi >I do not want to put a pressure on anyone, but if it is the only way >to make big changes to package, let's do it. I could understand that, but 1) lets avoid experimental features 2) lets try to keep changes minimal. I mean, a package refactor might be acceptable if the current packaging

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

> > * Bump debhelper compat level (9 -> 10), > Compat level 10 is an experimental feature. NMUs is not a place to make > experiments. > > > * Convert debian/changelog into DEP-5 format > > ITYM debian/copyright, but this is not appropriate for an NMU either. Will fix it. > > * Bump standards

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

according to db.d.o one maintainer has last action on 2011 and the other since 2014 maybe we can also start a MIA process? G. Il Giovedì 28 Aprile 2016 18:24, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-04-28, 08:18: > * Bump debhelper compat level (9

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-04-28, 08:18: * Bump debhelper compat level (9 -> 10), Compat level 10 is an experimental feature. NMUs is not a place to make experiments. * Convert debian/changelog into DEP-5 format ITYM debian/copyright, but this is not appropriate for an

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, I'm unsure about the copyright of: forkpty-* and vt.* can you please doublecheck? I'm also unsure about the versioned debhelper override, who cares? cheers, G. Il Giovedì 28 Aprile 2016 14:21, Dmitry Bogatov ha scritto:

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvtm" * Package name: dvtm Version : 0.15-0.1 Upstream Author : Marc Andre Tanner * Url : http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm *