Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Found this, seems to be solvable. But next time I'll do test builds > on several architectures before upload. In the past I've found it easier to upload protobuf to experimental first when testing FTBFS fixes, or just new upstream releases. There's always the

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

Hi, On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:05 PM, lumin wrote: > It is now present in unstable. However the buildd status seems bad. Yes, seen that. :( > ppc64el due to segfault during python2 test. Do you know any reason why it may happen? > kfreebsd-* had never compiled protobuf

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 20:39 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >  Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff > in some hours if you don't mind. It is now present in unstable. However the buildd status seems bad. ppc64el due to segfault during python2 test. kfreebsd-*

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 20:39 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > >  Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff > in some hours if you don't mind. I see it in the NEW queue, thank you!

Bug#844608: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#844608: Looking for sponsor for protobuf NMU

Hi, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, lumin wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:37 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> I don't think it was a bad upload, because I used DoM to build and >> test it. > > Thank you for confirmation. I checked the package at DoM and > it is