Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-12-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:21:57PM +0100, Federico Brega wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I've released a final version (1.9.1) with the same source code as in rc3.
> I noticed the updates in the Debian policy (4.1.1 and 4.1.2) but they do
> not affect this package.
> Finally I updated the changelog as requested and tagged the result with gbp.
I've uploaded the version in git, thank you.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-12-15 Thread Federico Brega 
Hello,

I've released a final version (1.9.1) with the same source code as in rc3.
I noticed the updates in the Debian policy (4.1.1 and 4.1.2) but they do
not affect this package.
Finally I updated the changelog as requested and tagged the result with gbp.

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-12-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:35:50PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> wRAR, because I filed the bug (866635) that ended up pushing
> cyclograph out of Testing months ago, I feel some responsibility to
> help it get back into Testing.
> 
> Is there anything else that you are waiting on in order to sponsor cyclograph?
> 
> For reference, the repo is at
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-running/cyclograph.git
I've reviewed the current version and I'm fine with sponsoring it.
Federico, please update the changelog entry date (and distribution) and
I'll upload it.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-12-12 Thread Jeremy Bicha 
wRAR, because I filed the bug (866635) that ended up pushing
cyclograph out of Testing months ago, I feel some responsibility to
help it get back into Testing.

Is there anything else that you are waiting on in order to sponsor cyclograph?

For reference, the repo is at
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-running/cyclograph.git

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Paul Wise 
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Federico Brega wrote:

> Is my proposal of adding a lintian override Ok?

lintian is only for the situation where it the lintian complaint is
not true. In this case, the problem is present so you should not
override it. If you intend to ignore this problem, just ignore the
lintian complaint, do not override it.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:46:11PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > > the package contains an html file which uses Open Layers and has the
> > option
> > > to show the Google Maps tiles. This obviously involves using the Google
> > > Maps service. The usage of this tile is explicitly described as part of
> > the
> > > Google Maps service so I think it's up to the user to use this service
> > and
> > > trust Google or not use it.
> > >
> > > I think that every user should be free to chose the service it wants, so
> > > I'd propose to override this warning. The other viable alternative I see
> > is
> > > to have a Debian patch to disable the Google Maps tiles and use only Open
> > > Street Map.
> 
> 
> Is my proposal of adding a lintian override Ok?
I don't think overriding X tags is worth it. On the other hand I don't
have an opinion whether this "privacy breach" is a problem or not. I'm
fine with keeping this as it is now unless someone has another opinion.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Federico Brega 
2017-10-13 22:14 GMT+02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :

> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> > In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new
> privacy-breach-generic:
> It was there from the beginning though:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2017/08/msg00048.html
>

My bad I haven't noticed it until now.


> > the package contains an html file which uses Open Layers and has the
> option
> > to show the Google Maps tiles. This obviously involves using the Google
> > Maps service. The usage of this tile is explicitly described as part of
> the
> > Google Maps service so I think it's up to the user to use this service
> and
> > trust Google or not use it.
> >
> > I think that every user should be free to chose the service it wants, so
> > I'd propose to override this warning. The other viable alternative I see
> is
> > to have a Debian patch to disable the Google Maps tiles and use only Open
> > Street Map.


Is my proposal of adding a lintian override Ok?
--
Federico

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin 
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:04:26PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote:
> In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new privacy-breach-generic:
It was there from the beginning though:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2017/08/msg00048.html 

> the package contains an html file which uses Open Layers and has the option
> to show the Google Maps tiles. This obviously involves using the Google
> Maps service. The usage of this tile is explicitly described as part of the
> Google Maps service so I think it's up to the user to use this service and
> trust Google or not use it.
> 
> I think that every user should be free to chose the service it wants, so
> I'd propose to override this warning. The other viable alternative I see is
> to have a Debian patch to disable the Google Maps tiles and use only Open
> Street Map.

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.1-1

2017-10-13 Thread Federico Brega 
Hello,

elyxer will be probabbly removed from Debian in the near future, so we
cannot use it anymore to generate the user manual.
In the RC3 of the package the html file is generated from a asciidoc file.

In the meantime lintian started to warn about a new privacy-breach-generic:
the package contains an html file which uses Open Layers and has the option
to show the Google Maps tiles. This obviously involves using the Google
Maps service. The usage of this tile is explicitly described as part of the
Google Maps service so I think it's up to the user to use this service and
trust Google or not use it.

I think that every user should be free to chose the service it wants, so
I'd propose to override this warning. The other viable alternative I see is
to have a Debian patch to disable the Google Maps tiles and use only Open
Street Map.
--
Federico