Hi,
itd writes:
> Hi,
>
> Kai Harries:
>> The depender will break if the dependency is not at the path where it
>> used to be at build-time (by default /nix/store/...). All software
>> deployed by nix contains the full path to its dependencies. And all
>> dependencies are available inside the ni
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> [2018-12-29 19:54] Vincent Bernat
>> > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get
>> > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion
>> > on debian-devel@.
>> >
>> > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /va
[2018-12-29 19:54] Vincent Bernat
> > Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get
> > authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion
> > on debian-devel@.
> >
> > But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /var/nix?
>
> This would break t
❦ 29 décembre 2018 18:33 +00, Dmitry Bogatov :
> Probably not. Violations of FHS is violation of policy, and to get
> authorization to policy violation is long road, starting with discussion
> on debian-devel@.
>
> But, can't we just configure Nix to store it under /var/nix?
This would break the
[2018-12-27 11:24] Kai Harries
> > [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin
> >> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
> >> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
> >> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > What is state of affair
Kai Harries writes:
> Dmitry Bogatov writes:
>
>> [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin
>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
>>> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
>>> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> What is state o
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> [2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
>> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
>> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
>
> Hi!
>
> What is state of affairs with packaging nix? I a
[2018-02-26 22:46] Andrey Rahmatullin
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
> > > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
> > > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
Hi!
What is state of affairs with packaging nix? I am interested in getting
things don
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:14:37PM +0100, Kai Harries wrote:
> > The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
> > nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
>
> My fault, GitHub doesn't like '~' in file names so I have uploaded
> the files with an '.' instead of '~'. I have uploaded a new v
> W: nix: manpage-has-errors-from-man usr/share/man/man1/nix-store.1.gz 1235:
> warning [p 13, 9.7i]: can't break line
> W: nix: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/nix-generate-patches
>
> I hope this is acceptable.
// I am not DD; did not read source.
As far as I know, lintian warnings and er
Hello,
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
> nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
My fault, GitHub doesn't like '~' in file names so I have uploaded
the files with an '.' instead of '~'. I have uploaded a new ver
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The source package you've uploaded is broken, as .dsc mentions
nix_1.11.15-2~a1.debian.tar.xz.
I don't think the package is even buildable tbh, looking at
debian/nix-docs.docs.
The version, 1.11.15-2~a1, is wrong for an initial Debian upload.
Also, the version in the RF
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nix":
* Package name: nix
Version : 1.1.15
Upstream Author : Eelco Dolstra
* URL : https://nixos.org/nix/
* License : LGPL v2.1
Section : devel
13 matches
Mail list logo