Bug#910018: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1

2018-10-08 Thread Marco M. F. De Santis

Il 07/10/18 13:46, Adam Borowski ha scritto:

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:

* Package name: hoteldruid
   Version : 2.2.4-1



Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release.
   * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
   * debian/control: added suggest on sensible-utils for
 hoteldruid-launcher previously included in debianutils


I'm pretty sure "hoteldruid-launcher" has never been included in either
sensible-utils nor debianutils.  Care to clarify?

Besides, both packages are >= priority:important, thus a stronger dependency
has no downsides (as hoteldruid is not something that cares about cutting
every little bit of bloat from a container it runs in).


Hello Adam, it's "hoteldruid-launcher" that checks if "sensible-browser" 
is present and eventually launches it, otherwise checks other browsers 
that may be available. Probably I had to add a comma in the changelog 
before "previously included in debianutils" as it's sensible-utils that 
used to be included in debianutils, so lintian complained that 
hoteldruid had to add a new dependency on "sensible-utils".


Best regards,
Marco



Bug#910018: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1

2018-10-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:24:52PM +0200, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> * Package name: hoteldruid
>   Version : 2.2.4-1

> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>   * New upstream release.
>   * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
>   * debian/control: added suggest on sensible-utils for
> hoteldruid-launcher previously included in debianutils

I'm pretty sure "hoteldruid-launcher" has never been included in either
sensible-utils nor debianutils.  Care to clarify?

Besides, both packages are >= priority:important, thus a stronger dependency
has no downsides (as hoteldruid is not something that cares about cutting
every little bit of bloat from a container it runs in).


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 10 people enter a bar: 1 who understands binary,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ 1 who doesn't, D who prefer to write it as hex,
⠈⠳⣄ and 1 who narrowly avoided an off-by-one error.



Bug#910018: RFS: hoteldruid/2.2.4-1

2018-10-01 Thread Marco M. F. De Santis

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid"

* Package name: hoteldruid
  Version : 2.2.4-1
  Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
  Section : web

It builds those binary packages:

  hoteldruid - web-based property management system for hotels or B

To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/hoteldruid


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hoteldruid/hoteldruid_2.2.4-1.dsc


More information about hoteldruid can be obtained from 
http://www.hoteldruid.com.


Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * debian/control: updated Standards-Version
  * debian/control: added suggest on sensible-utils for
hoteldruid-launcher previously included in debianutils

Regards,
Marco M. F. De Santis