Your message dated Sun, 15 Aug 2021 13:09:54 +0200
with message-id <f7aeaebc114f42836a530d9b0e7afb2d2ddcf29a.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987169: RFS: newlib/3.3.0-1.1 [NMU] -- C library and
math library for embedded systems
has caused the Debian Bug report #987169,
regarding RFS: newlib/3.3.0-1.1 [NMU] -- C library and math library for
embedded systems
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
987169: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for Newlib:
* Package name : newlib
Version : 3.3.0-1.1
Upstream Author : Red Hat and others
* URL : https://sourceware.org/newlib/
* License : various
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/newlib
Section : devel
It builds those binary packages:
newlib-source - C library and math library for embedded systems (source)
libnewlib-arm-none-eabi - C library and math library compiled for bare metal
using Cortex A/R/M
libnewlib-doc - C library and math library intended for use on embedded
systems (doc)
libnewlib-dev - C library and math library intended for use on embedded
systems
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/newlib/
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/newlib/newlib_3.3.0-1.1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
newlib (3.3.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add newlib-source binary package to aid building for new targets.
(Closes: #912271)
This change wouldn't normally be appropriate for an NMU, but the
maintainer, Agustin Henze, hasn't been responsive to my attempts for
contact, and is also on the LowThresholdNmu list and keeps the package
in the Debian group on Salsa for collaborative maintenance:
https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu
I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in good
faith that these changes would be welcome and that the LowThresholdNmu
criterion are met by addressing a bug with important severity. My
interest in this bug, to introduce a newlib-source binary package, is
to unblock my progress on gcc-sh-elf, which is otherwise almost ready.
That package will bootstrap a toolchain by building GCC and Newlib
simultaneously in a combined build tree, which in my opinion is best
practice for embedded toolchains going forward.
The changelog is set to unstable in anticipation that I won't manage to
clear NEW before Bullseye is released. If anyone would be so kind to
sponsor me sooner, I could change that to experimental.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:38:58 +0000 John Scott <jsc...@posteo.net> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> On Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:38:56 +0000 John Scott <jsc...@posteo.net>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:52 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > > I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in
> > > > good faith that these changes would be welcome and that the
> > > > LowThresholdNmu criterion are met by addressing a bug with
> > > > important severity. My interest in this bug, to introduce a
> > > > newlib-source binary package, is to unblock my progress on
> > > > gcc-sh-elf, which is otherwise almost ready.
> > > Probably still a good idea to CC them or file a bug in the BTS to
> > > document your intentions, as adding a binary package is not a usual
> > > change, even if the NMU criterias are fulfilled.
> > Okay, I made some noise on the bug report today and Cc'ed the debian-
> > toolchain mailing list on it. I'm not touching the moreinfo tag yet
> > to give them time to respond.
>
> It's been about two weeks and I've garnered some interest from others,
> so I'm removing the moreinfo tag.
Ok.
Uploaded to DELAYED/15. Please send a nmudiff to newlibs BTS if not done
already.
--
Cheers,
tobi
--- End Message ---
