Le samedi 14 août 2010 14:16:14, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
In general, a change in behavior can be handled gracefully with some
time for transitions, so that they users can adapt to that (before
that becomes the default) and with a conspicuous notice (say, in NEWS).
Hurmm. This makes
Le mardi 31 août 2010 19:17:17, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
I can come up with a scheme to upgrade fluxbox config file, but I wonder
if modification of /home/*/fluxbox/ files is acceptable when upgrading a
package?
I've seen in a more recent thread that user files are off-limit...
I guess
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Dominique Dumont domi.dum...@free.fr wrote:
Le mardi 31 août 2010 19:17:17, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
I can come up with a scheme to upgrade fluxbox config file, but I wonder
if modification of /home/*/fluxbox/ files is acceptable when upgrading a
package?
2010/8/14 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br:
Hi, Paul.
On Aug 13 2010, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I'm a co-maintainer on the Fluxbox package.
I happen to be a user of fluxbox.
Thank you :)
Oh, just one stylistic note about the way that you write things both in
your text and in your
In aanlktimikr2k5c81xxj-r2bu0jsf5myg9ewmwelni...@mail.gmail.com, Paul
Tagliamonte wrote:
fluxboxes (or is that fluxboxii)
Definitely not fluxboxii, unless it is a loan word from a language I am
entirely unfamiliar with.
It is probably fluxboxes (c.f. box - boxes) but it might also be fluxboxen
Hey Mentors,
I'm a co-maintainer on the Fluxbox package.
I have recently moved to packaging their git head, as their last
release was 2008 ( even though they have had regular development since
then ).
The stock ( un-configured ) behavior of Fluxbox was to allow
window-dragging with a
Hi, Paul.
On Aug 13 2010, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I'm a co-maintainer on the Fluxbox package.
I happen to be a user of fluxbox.
Oh, just one stylistic note about the way that you write things both in
your text and in your changelogs:
( even though they have had regular development since then
7 matches
Mail list logo
