Or you can point people who don't want to learn how to package things
properly
I don't care about those either -- the intended audience was those that could
use a tutorial to get a feel for the process before they make up their mind
about how to package things properly and to eventually adopt
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 00:49, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
ps. please CC me on replies as I'm not subscribed to d-mentors
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:20, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
ps. Please DON'T CC me on replies, I've had enough of this
ahahah
--
Sandro Tosi
Can you take discussions like these to d-d? Cause I think any
prospective packagers just turn away after reading threads like these.
Is it possible to keep these list for mentees to talk to sponsors
about questions problems and RFS and not use it as d-d death match
platform. Could you please
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 00:53, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
There's a tradeoff: encouraging potential new contributors (in the hope that
and do you think you're in position to take this tradeoff? I don't think so.
they'll eventually read all the docs) at the cost of initially
Sandro, in your first reply, you suggested 3 alternatives, one of which was
fix it. You seem to be quite upset despite me taking into account your
specific suggestions for improvements. I'm just curious, what more would it
take for you to consider it fixed?
I see your point about low-quality RFSs
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 22:19, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
Sandro, in your first reply, you suggested 3 alternatives, one of which was
fix it. You seem to be quite upset despite me taking into account your
specific suggestions for improvements. I'm just curious, what more would it
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:48:07PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote [edited]:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 22:19, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
re-evaluating your contributions it's a complete waste of time, so
That was the whole point: my contributions weren't good enough and I asked
what
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 00:53, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
There's a tradeoff: encouraging potential new contributors (in the hope
that
and do you think you're in position to take this tradeoff? I don't think
so.
they'll
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 00:49, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
Hi,
Those interested in packaging, but not certain about making a long-term
commitment might be interested in a practical primer for QA uploads:
http://wiki.debian.org/QAUploadsPrimer
(A QA upload is a one-off
Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain commitment,
won't read the whole policy, devref, and newmaint guide just for the
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
their long-term time-commitment; and (b) given their uncertain
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for technical-minded
debian users that (a) want to contribute to debian, but are uncertain about
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:53:32AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:01:30AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:00, Serafeim Zanikolasser...@hellug.gr wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Sandro. I've written the primer for
technical-minded
debian
Hi,
Those interested in packaging, but not certain about making a long-term
commitment might be interested in a practical primer for QA uploads:
http://wiki.debian.org/QAUploadsPrimer
(A QA upload is a one-off maintenance act of an orphaned package (as opposed to
an upload that declares one's
14 matches
Mail list logo
