On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:47:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > 1. Would anybody so kind to have a look at this issue? It is our show
> > stopper to get back into testing.
>
> From a /very quick glance/, it looks like the package is basically using
> "debconf as a registry".
>
> Longer version: In
Hilmar Preuße:
> Hi,
>
> we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/
> debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/
> debconf itself.
> I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in
> debconf, nevertheless it does not work as
On 28.11.2016 21:24, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
> we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/
> debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/
> debconf itself.
> I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in
> debconf, nevertheless
Hi,
we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/
debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/
debconf itself.
I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in
debconf, nevertheless it does not work as expected.
1. Would anybody
4 matches
Mail list logo