Re: HELP: Fixing a debconf bug in proftpd

2017-01-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:47:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > 1. Would anybody so kind to have a look at this issue? It is our show > > stopper to get back into testing. > > From a /very quick glance/, it looks like the package is basically using > "debconf as a registry". > > Longer version: In

Re: HELP: Fixing a debconf bug in proftpd

2017-01-24 Thread Niels Thykier
Hilmar Preuße: > Hi, > > we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/ > debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/ > debconf itself. > I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in > debconf, nevertheless it does not work as

Re: HELP: Fixing a debconf bug in proftpd

2017-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 28.11.2016 21:24, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, > we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/ > debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/ > debconf itself. > I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in > debconf, nevertheless

HELP: Fixing a debconf bug in proftpd

2016-11-28 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Hi, we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/ debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/ debconf itself. I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in debconf, nevertheless it does not work as expected. 1. Would anybody