Hi Feri,
Please CC me on reply.
>> I think I understand the rest, although I don't know whether the
>> autopkgtest regression blocks migration indefinitely. That would be
>> unfortunate, because unstable pcs needs unstable pacemaker, so they
>> deadlock...
>
> I think you will need to ask the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:07 AM Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Thanks, Paul, it makes sense indeed and I agree it's reasonable to do,
> but how/why is this an excuse? Is there any problem with that?
No idea, you would have to ask the release team about this.
> That gives 404 to me.
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:06 PM wrote:
>
>> Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
>> build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
>
> Looking at the code, I think it means that
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:06 PM wrote:
> Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
> build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
Looking at the code, I think it means that the migration scripts are
Hi,
Could somebody please explain me the meaning of the "Checking
build-dependency (indep) on amd64" migration excuse as seen on
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pacemaker?
I think I understand the rest, although I don't know whether the
autopkgtest regression blocks migration
5 matches
Mail list logo
