On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:22:34PM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:37:27 +0500
> Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> > > Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just
> > > an executable and I
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 16:37:27 +0500
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> > Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just
> > an executable and I'm building a shared library.
> This is even more important problem. Are yo
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> Is it permitted by the Debian Policy to have a personalized makefile inside
> debian
> directory and call it from rules file? Or I should patch the upstream's
> makefile completly?
There's also a third way: as de
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> Well my problem is that upstream's software is intended to build just
> an executable and I'm building a shared library.
This is even more important problem. Are you sure you can do it properly?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descript
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:43:26 +
Mo Zhou wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> If you think writting a new makefile is better than patching the
> upstream build system, please go ahead. However, having to write a
> makefiles by oneself often signifies problematic upstream.
>
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 15:40:17 +05
Hi Jose,
If you think writting a new makefile is better than patching the
upstream build system, please go ahead. However, having to write a
makefiles by oneself often signifies problematic upstream.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> Is it permitt
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:35:52AM +0100, Jose G. López wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> Is it permitted by the Debian Policy to have a personalized makefile inside
> debian
> directory and call it from rules file? Or I should patch the upstream's
> makefile completly?
>
> I'm packaging fathom[0][1]
Dear mentors,
Is it permitted by the Debian Policy to have a personalized makefile inside
debian
directory and call it from rules file? Or I should patch the upstream's
makefile completly?
I'm packaging fathom[0][1] and can't find an answer.
Thanks and sorry if the answer is obvious.
Regards,
8 matches
Mail list logo