Hi!
Am 14.01.2012 19:34, schrieb fre...@free.fr:
When the file is distributed in the source package, yes, then it needs
to be covered in debian/copyright. It does not matter whether this bit
of code is for Windows or Linux. Whether it is being distributed, that
matters. Of course, your
Hello,
I would like to know if we must include licenses that are not part of Linux
code, that come with the original tarball.
Example: a file in upstream source is named `windows_audio_codec.cpp`, the code
from this file is specific for MS Windows and the license only allows to use
the file
On 01/14/2012 06:52 PM, fre...@free.fr wrote:
I would like to know if we must include licenses that are not part of
Linux code, that come with the original tarball.
Example: a file in upstream source is named `windows_audio_codec.cpp`,
the code from this file is specific for MS Windows and the
When the file is distributed in the source package, yes, then it needs
to be covered in debian/copyright. It does not matter whether this bit
of code is for Windows or Linux. Whether it is being distributed, that
matters. Of course, your package can leave this file out. Teus.
Ok, thank you very
4 matches
Mail list logo
