Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "downtimed":
Package name : downtimed
Version : 1.0-3
Upstream contact : Janne Snabb
URL : http://dist.epipe.com/downtimed/
License :
Your message dated Sun, 9 Sep 2018 23:44:34 +0200
with message-id <20180909214434.6rfneanhselwq...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#908435: RFS: downtimed/1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #908435,
regarding RFS: downtimed/1.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "downtimed"
Package name: downtimed
Version : 1.0-2
Upstream Author : Janne Snabb
URL :
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:24:17 +
with message-id e1x8axf-0002dq...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: downtimed/0.6-2 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #746369,
regarding RFS: downtimed/0.6-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
torsdag den 1 maj 2014 klockan 10:59 skrev Stefan Bauer detta:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com
One thing I noticed is that upstream has an Upstart job, but you are not
shipping it. Simply making a symlink from debian/downtimed.upstart to
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Cameron Norman camerontnor...@gmail.com
One thing I noticed is that upstream has an Upstart job, but you are not
shipping it. Simply making a symlink from debian/downtimed.upstart to
startup-scripts/upstart-startup.conf should do the trick.
Updated
I will modify the package and reupload soon with same version. Thank you
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Bauer
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Cameron Norman
Datum:01.05.2014 01:51 (GMT+01:00)
An: Stefan Bauer ,746...@bugs.debian.org
Betreff: Bug#746369: RFS: downtimed/0.6.2
I will modify the package and reupload soon with same version. Thank you
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Bauer
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Cameron Norman
Datum:01.05.2014 01:51 (GMT+01:00)
An: Stefan Bauer ,746...@bugs.debian.org
Betreff: Bug#746369: RFS: downtimed/0.6.2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package downtimed
* Package name: downtimed
Version : 0.6-2
Upstream Author : Janne Snabb opensou...@epipe.com
* URL : http://dist.epipe.com/downtimed/
* License
Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2012 15:28:50 +
with message-id 20120512152850.gb7...@master.debian.org
and subject line closing sponsorship-requests for packages uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #667902,
regarding RFS: downtimed/0.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means
onsdag den 25 april 2012 klockan 11:45 skrev Arno Töll detta:
Hi,
is there still anything left to come from you?
Yes, my time got consumed by other things. I need to
investigate the effects update-rc.d has when it comes
to activating runlevel switch into single mode and
back on a running
Hi,
is there still anything left to come from you?
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Arno,
söndag den 8 april 2012 klockan 14:59 skrev Arno Töll detta:
* You use dpkg-buildflags but you didn't declare a versioned
build-dependency against dpkg-dev which explicitly supports --export
*FLAGS (1.16.1 I think). My rule of thumb is to declare
build-dependencies against
Hi,
On 10.04.2012 13:15, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
I have not
used the switch --export from dpkg-buildflags. Thus version 1.15.7
is the correct level.
You are right. I wasn't looking careful enough.
and in addition insserv is never admitting the new starting links
in
owner 667902 !
tags 667902 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Mats Erik,
as promised a took a look at your package. I am willing to sponsor you
if you address these corrections:
* You use dpkg-buildflags but you didn't declare a versioned
build-dependency against dpkg-dev which explicitly supports --export
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 667902 !
Bug #667902 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: downtimed/0.5-2
Owner recorded as Arno Töll a...@debian.org.
tags 667902 +moreinfo
Bug #667902 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: downtimed/0.5-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package downtimed
Package name: downtimed
Version : 0.5-2
Upstream Author : Janne Snabb opensou...@epipe.com
URL : http://dist.epipe.com/downtimed/
License
Hi,
On 07.04.2012 12:42, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
downtimed - monitor of downtime, shutdown, and crashes
this sounds quite interesting. I'll likely have a look at this at some
point this weekend unless someone beats me on it or Sven finds time.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
Dear mentors,
pinging on my initial pledge.
torsdag den 28 april 2011 klockan 02:13 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the first update to downtimed
since it got accepted. In fact, while the package was waiting
in NEW, the upstream author brought a
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Dear mentors,
pinging on my initial pledge.
Uploaded.
Sven
--
I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart, comes a rebel fist
[ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the first update to downtimed
since it got accepted. In fact, while the package was waiting
in NEW, the upstream author brought a new release to the public.
It builds a single binary package:
downtimed - monitor of downtime, shutdown, and crashes
* [Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:10:37PM +0100] Michael Biebl:
I don't like those disable-service-via-etc-default files at all.
Oh, and it also breaks 3rd party tools which use
/etc/init.d/foo status
to find out if a service is running or not.
Because IMHO it's also wrongly implemented, at least
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
- you have a build-dep on debhelper (= 7.0.50~), which is not in the
archive. I assume this is intentional?!
The use of an override target using debhelper is functional
as of version 7.0.50~. This is clearly stated in the
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Don Armstrong wrote:
I don't like those disable-service-via-etc-default files at all.
The only reason they should be used is when the default configuration
should not start the daemon. After all, you can always achieve the
same effect by putting an exit 0;
Dear Holger and all other participants,
onsdag den 9 februari 2011 klockan 16:22 skrev Holger Levsen detta:
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
- you have a build-dep on debhelper (= 7.0.50~), which is not in the
archive. I assume this is intentional?!
Hi Mats,
do you need CC:s?
On Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
Good point. I have now chosen compatibility 8 and hence
a debhelper dependency (= 8) in the control file.
:)
I inserted Applied-Upstream stanzas in the two patches that
have gone into Upstream's Launchpad
Dear mentors,
I still maintain the viewpoint that this packaging deserves
an honest examination.
Best regards,
Mats Erik Andersson, DM
fredag den 28 januari 2011 klockan 13:33 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the package downtimed.
Package name
tisdag den 8 februari 2011 klockan 18:01 skrev Holger Levsen detta:
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/downtimed/downtimed_0.4-1.dsc
my comments:
- you have a build-dep on debhelper (= 7.0.50~), which is not
On 08.02.2011 23:07, Michael Biebl wrote:
I don't like those disable-service-via-etc-default files at all.
Oh, and it also breaks 3rd party tools which use
/etc/init.d/foo status
to find out if a service is running or not.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in
On 08.02.2011 18:01, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Mats,
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/downtimed/downtimed_0.4-1.dsc
- # Do we want to go? is strange english (says the German..)
in /etc/defaul/downtimed, I would probably
tisdag den 8 februari 2011 klockan 23:10 skrev Michael Biebl detta:
On 08.02.2011 23:07, Michael Biebl wrote:
I don't like those disable-service-via-etc-default files at all.
Oh, and it also breaks 3rd party tools which use
/etc/init.d/foo status
to find out if a service is running
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 08.02.2011 18:01, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 8. Februar 2011, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/downtimed/downtimed_0.4-1.dsc
- # Do we want to go? is strange english (says the German..)
in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor of the package downtimed.
Package name: downtimed
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : EPIPE Communications opensou...@epipe.com
URL : http://dist.epipe.com/downtimed/
License : FreeBSD
Section : admin
It
33 matches
Mail list logo
