Bug#816363: marked as done (RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:00:25 + (UTC) with message-id <526910942.3624740.1459764025267.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line fgetty is now in unstable. has caused the Debian Bug report #817213, regarding RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, consol

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Hi, nobody answered to my/your concerns, so I'll upload tonight. If people complains with bug reports, please reconsider the decision and revert the change :) the patches were too old, I like decrufting some old stuff there! thanks for your nice work there, Gianfranco Il Sabato 19 Marzo

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Hi >I knew what I did, but feel free to disagree with my reasoning. > >fgetty-login.diff essentially just renames /bin/login1 to /bin/fgetty-login. are never invoked directly, so I considered installing them into /lib/fgetty. >It would eliminate need in manpage, which is barely useful. WDYT?

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Uploaded new version on mentors. > >I knew what I did, but feel free to disagree with my reasoning. > > > >fgetty-login.diff essentially just renames /bin/login1 to /bin/fgetty-login. > >are never invoked directly, so I considered installing them into /lib/fgetty. > >It would eliminate need in

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

> 1) I see you dropped patches, but they aren't applied upstream. > fgetty-login.diff > ro-dev.diff I knew what I did, but feel free to disagree with my reasoning. fgetty-login.diff essentially just renames /bin/login1 to /bin/fgetty-login. I find it confusing, when binaries are renamed. Either

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Dmitry 1) I see you dropped patches, but they aren't applied upstream. fgetty-login.diff ro-dev.diff please explain, and comment on changelog. (the cvs diff I suspect is fully applied, right?) 2) +export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS = noautodbgsym why? as

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

control: forcemerge -1 817213 On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:49:17 + Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:49:33PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > Before starting to work I tried to contact him.

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:49:33PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > Before starting to work I tried to contact him. No reply since 8th > > Feb. Would it be polite to take maintainership? > > maybe pape is willing to either orphan

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Hi, >If pape gives up the package I'll be only happy to see another package >being updated to the newer standards :) Pape was so kind in another similar issue about giving comaintenance of a package https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790125#70 so, you might consider this

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo > > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while > > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an > > email from you without the

Re: Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

[2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an > email from you without the bug number, and will be unable to follow-up > correctly. In this

Re: Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests control: tag -1 moreinfo please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an email from you without the bug number, and will be unable to follow-up correctly. In this

RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

Package: sponsorship-request Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fgetty" * Package name: fgetty Version : 0.7-0.1 Upstream Author : Felix von Leitner * Url : https://www.fefe.de/fgetty * Licenses: